Effect said:Starcraft 2 needs I feel points on the map that can be captured and defended ala Dawn of War. The rush to the other's bases can simply boring at times. Something to draw players attentions away main bases for a while at least and that would then enable teching to higher tiers instead of simply upgrading a base. Say a Xel-Naga location is what enables a player to finally tech to air units. However if it's taken over by another player the first player loses the ability to produce anymore air units but the other person now can.
Won said:You could also just play Dawn of War then.
Effect said:Starcraft 2 needs I feel points on the map that can be captured and defended ala Dawn of War. The rush to the other's bases can simply boring at times. Something to draw players attentions away main bases for a while at least and that would then enable teching to higher tiers instead of simply upgrading a base. Say a Xel-Naga location is what enables a player to finally tech to air units. However if it's taken over by another player the first player loses the ability to produce anymore air units but the other person now can.
Effect said:No base building anymore in Dawn of War though unless I dig out DoW 1.
Effect said:Starcraft 2 needs I feel points on the map that can be captured
ChronicleX said:Xel Naga / Gold Expo says hi.
spazzfish said:Zerg players, when playing 3v3 what the heck do you try and aim for if it starts getting into late game. Mutas just get popped, broodlords are so expensive and time consuming and just about everything on the floor just gets smashed.
It doesn't help that I never see many zerg players now. They are either terran or protoss.
I've noticed if terran or protoss get large numbers or high up the tech tree, it's very hard for me as zerg to compete.
I end up just watching the mass battles going on as my units have within seconds been turned into zerg flambé.
BANELING HAWK 4 LYFE BABYWon said:I just saw Division have "names" instead of numbers now. Good change I guess.
all tier 3 units are expensive and time consuming.spazzfish said:Zerg players, when playing 3v3 what the heck do you try and aim for if it starts getting into late game. Mutas just get popped, broodlords are so expensive and time consuming and just about everything on the floor just gets smashed.
It doesn't help that I never see many zerg players now. They are either terran or protoss.
I've noticed if terran or protoss get large numbers or high up the tech tree, it's very hard for me as zerg to compete.
I end up just watching the mass battles going on as my units have within seconds been turned into zerg flambé.
I've noticed that when I get placed into a division the message says one thing, but when I go and actually look at my ladder page it says something else; I got placed into "Mothership Zed" and when I went and actually looked at it, it said "Stalker Zed." Same thing happened in 2v2 just with different units.Won said:I just saw Division have "names" instead of numbers now. Good change I guess.
spazzfish said:Zerg players, when playing 3v3 what the heck do you try and aim for if it starts getting into late game. Mutas just get popped, broodlords are so expensive and time consuming and just about everything on the floor just gets smashed.
It doesn't help that I never see many zerg players now. They are either terran or protoss.
I've noticed if terran or protoss get large numbers or high up the tech tree, it's very hard for me as zerg to compete.
I end up just watching the mass battles going on as my units have within seconds been turned into zerg flambé.
Effect said:I don't really see a reason to wish my enemy good luck. I won't dare say have fun to anyone. Reason being is their idea of fun could be building right outside my base, proxying me or rushing to get zerglings into my base within few minutes. Why wish them luck in doing that?
coamithra said:Dudes! Is this something new? I just got my ass kicked by 2 thors and an army of SCVs repairing them, and then copied that strat to great success in another game.
It's insane! You can't properly target the SCV's because the Thor is so huge, plus they heal each other as well as the Thors.
i think good luck is silly but have fun is always appropriate. that's why we live.Effect said:I don't really see a reason to wish my enemy good luck. I won't dare say have fun to anyone. Reason being is their idea of fun could be building right outside my base, proxying me or rushing to get zerglings into my base within few minutes. Why wish them luck in doing that? I'll only say GG if the game last for some time. If I or they have held off several attacks. If not then I see no reason to do any type of GG.
Starcraft 2 needs I feel points on the map that can be captured and defended ala Dawn of War. The rush to the other's bases can simply boring at times. Something to draw players attentions away main bases for a while at least and that would then enable teching to higher tiers instead of simply upgrading a base. Say a Xel-Naga location is what enables a player to finally tech to air units. However if it's taken over by another player the first player loses the ability to produce anymore air units but the other person now can.
Kinyou said:Well then how about a simple thx? If you don't respond to someone who wishes you good luck... It's kinda like someone gives you his hand to shake and you simply ignore it.
Yeah that's the one. Works wonders against zerg too, and I didn't even do any fancy proxying or perfect timing stuff-COOLIO- said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP3egyvH-DU
it's all fun and games until your transitioning scvs are caught by a stalker though.
the thoritary build remedies that problem somewhat.
Won said:Company of Heroes it is then.
Effect said:Why even that though? "Good luck", "have fun", or "good game" are all shallow gestures to begin with. I doubt anyone really means them anyway.
mescalineeyes said:anyone up for 2on2? EU or US, I don't care.
MisterAnderson said:I'll 2on2, I'm US
v1nc3vega @ gmail dot com
if the games werent good or fun we wouldnt playEffect said:Why even that though? "Good luck", "have fun", or "good game" are all shallow gestures to begin with. I doubt anyone really means them anyway.
Effect said:Why even that though? "Good luck", "have fun", or "good game" are all shallow gestures to begin with. I doubt anyone really means them anyway.
mescalineeyes said:My poor little (2.5 yo) macbook pro actually managed to produce playable frame-rates in a 3on3, on medium settings no less. Way to go, Blizzard! :lol
Sorry for your loss but I hope this means that they're gonna fix the damn issue!ElectricBlue187 said:argghh i missed the tiny window to publish maps and now the server is down until further notice aaaaarrrrghhhhghh
eye-roll to the nth degreeEffect said:I don't really see a reason to wish my enemy good luck. I won't dare say have fun to anyone. Reason being is their idea of fun could be building right outside my base, proxying me or rushing to get zerglings into my base within few minutes. Why wish them luck in doing that? I'll only say GG if the game last for some time. If I or they have held off several attacks. If not then I see no reason to do any type of GG.
shagg_187 said:I stopped saying GLHF after a 10+ games of no one responding. I always end up saying "GLHF!" and 20 seconds later "Or not..."
Some people think they are too pro to respond, sheesh! I also make it a fun fun setting adding more than just GLHF, usually commenting on the game or commenting on the rushes, etc etc. I don't like facing players who think they are everything and have a serious gameface.
fixed
Ashhong said:Blizzards mac client still sucks balls. i cant even load a game if i have firefox open, because apparently sc2 needs all of my resources. im on a 13" mbp, which should at least be able to open the map.
Effect said:Why even that though? "Good luck", "have fun", or "good game" are all shallow gestures to begin with. I doubt anyone really means them anyway.
-COOLIO- said:great video on why bnet sucks from husky:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-r_uCaFxg8&playnext_from=TL&videos=geLQYTF0kaU&feature=sub
everything is so true
aznpxdd said:I used to say GL, HF in the lobby before the game started in SC1. But yeah, I don't care enough that I'm gonna "type all" - GL HF once the game starts. People are too big of drama queens, who the fuck cares if someone says GG or not?
the spiel on the xbox live guy making battle.net for controllers was embarrassing. awesome kittens, though.-COOLIO- said:great video on why bnet sucks from husky:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-r_uCaFxg8&playnext_from=TL&videos=geLQYTF0kaU&feature=sub
everything is so true
-COOLIO- said:great video on why bnet sucks from husky:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-r_uCaFxg8&playnext_from=TL&videos=geLQYTF0kaU&feature=sub
everything is so true
they should do that for chatroomsFoxSpirit said:Please sign here. Already over 250.000 signees. Thanks
http://www.**************.com/LANSC2/petition.html
Seems that online petition site is blacklisted. Ugh >.<
So check here:
http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=25172038288&sid=5000