jamesinclair
Banned
NYPD in full intimidation mode
I feel like the topic post is missing something... Like what are the evidence against this?
Seems so one sided that my mind feels like something is missing.
Did the jury see something that we didn't see?
Yeah, they saw that black lives don't matter.I feel like the topic post is missing something... Like what are the evidence against this?
Seems so one sided that my mind feels like something is missing.
Did the jury see something that we didn't see?
I feel like the topic post is missing something... Like what are the evidence against this?
Seems so one sided that my mind feels like something is missing.
Did the jury see something that we didn't see?
NYPD really can't intimidate despite that. Just busses and their bikes. We can/will walk right by it.NYPD in full intimidation mode
It should send a chill down the spine of any ethnic minority, that people who are supposed to be 'protecting and serving' think this way.
I feel like the topic post is missing something... Like what are the evidence against this?
Seems so one sided that my mind feels like something is missing.
Did the jury see something that we didn't see?
Did the jury see something that we didn't see?
Did the jury see something that we didn't see?
That's the part I don't find surprising. There's a reason why most NYC folk often forget Staten Island is there.In Staten Island?? The only boro to vote McCain? Oh, I have a few ideas.
Looks like a hog pen was established
Goddamnit, does the NYPD want to look evil?NYPD in full intimidation mode
yeah i get the video is straightforward which makes this all really confusing.
Summary of what was said?
Personally speaking there's nothing wrong with any of those pictures. The minute they park army vehicles then I'll change my mind.Goddamnit, does the NYPD want to look evil?
This one hit me harder than most others because of the video of the incident and just watching a man die for no reason at all. I want to type more, but there's nothing more for me to say.
I feel like the topic post is missing something... Like what are the evidence against this?
Seems so one sided that my mind feels like something is missing.
Did the jury see something that we didn't see?
Personally speaking there's nothing wrong with any of those pictures. The minute they park army vehicles then I'll change my mind.
CNN is claiming they didn't indict because they were asked to indict if it was done with malicious intent.
Who the fuck cares whether it was malicious.
Not it doesn't, to me it doesn't. It sends a message of maintain order to me simply because they are just buses and bikes and barricades. I've seen more than enough protests in this city to know that NYPD at the very least handles protest very well.You dont see anything wrong with completely surrounding peaceful protestors?
Thats intimidation.
Nothing wrong with being prepared - two blocks away, out of sight. Parking a convoy of jail buses within view of the protest? That sends a fuck you we're coming for you message.
In what way exactly?malicious intent should be in the title or the post. Things make slightly more sense.
I can't really blame the cops for mobilizing after seeing what happened with the absence of police in Ferguson on that first night.
I saw that shit before you edited it.
Thanks for being part of the problem.
I saw that shit before you edited it.
Thanks for being part of the problem.
malicious intent should be in the title or the post. Things make slightly more sense.
The problem is that I personally know more people who agree with these decisions and side with the cops than I know who don't. If I see one more 'that thug got what he deserved' Facebook post, I'm going to go insane.
Civil disobedience is totally warranted here, but it will never be seen as anything but a fringe movement and will be sharply criticized by the vast majority of the population. Still needs to happen, though.
But in this case they had a whole crowd watching. I believe that this was not intended was a honest mistake. However it's still a mistake. They had every right to hold him, but not right to use a choke hold. Literally. Choke-holds are banned in the state. And their ignorance of him pleading for air makes it even worse. This was an accident - but an accident that could've been easily prevented if the police would've worked as intended.There is a perverse incentive for cops to have their victims die rather than be seriously injured. This not only prevents them from living to testify (allowing the cop to give the one sided and unchallenged "I feared for my life, they lunged for my gun, they were resisting arrest, etc"), but it creates a much higher legal burden in terms of them facing any consequences.
Some shit about not provoking police officers.what did he write?
Video of the take down and death of Eric Garner:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1ka4oKu1jo
No way you can excuse the NYPD actions here.
I saw that shit before you edited it.
Thanks for being part of the problem.
Of course you can't
By all means, share
Via pm if necessary
Guess I should be thankful that I'm a relatively thin black guy of average height. Better keep my glasses on at all times too. Whatever it takes to look less threatening to the cops so they don't feel the need to put me in an illegal chokehold that they won't have to worry about suffering any repercussions over.
malicious intent should be in the title or the post. Things make slightly more sense.
Was actually going to add more but then got distracted. No, I'm not part of the problem. Wasn't this guy arrested on the same charges many times before? I'm not condoning his death, and feel it was an accident.
It sill comes down to, DON'T BREAK THE LAW. Go ahead and flame this all you want. It's the truth. You don't break the law or argue with those in authority, you don't get in trouble.
Share what? That the cops saw what happened in Ferguson with the fires and don't want to let it happen again possibly?