I've never played an AssCreed game and despite all the "hate" the series gets, I'm highly interested and looking forward to playing the whole franchise from start to finish. Shrugs
They're not really bad games, at least not compared to other open world games. I mean the combat is pretty shallow and the mission design isn't great, but the same applies to most other AAA open world games.
The big problem is that there are just so damn many of them, and after 2, they don't really change enough from game to game. I mean sure, they're each set in new locations, and they add new weapons and tools each time, but it really just feels like more of the same, and the new additions at best make an easy game easier, but more often feel entirely pointless (did anyone actually make use of the bombs in Revelation, despite there being an entire crafting system around them?).
I was enjoying playing through one game a year for a while, as a low investment open world checklist game. I found the games relaxing to just be in the world in, when I didn't have the energy to really invest in a game. But even then, I felt the fatigue (and the half-assed conclusion to the story in 3 didn't help). I can't imagine trying to play through the series back to back. Don't do that to yourself.
If you do want to play the games, I'd stick with the first 3 (1, 2, and Brotherhood). 1 is kind of rough, and there's a ton of pointless filler, but I like that it shows the promise for what the series could have been if it went down a different path. 2 was a solid game in that it turn the series into Renaissance-era GTA with parkuor, but I enjoyed it, and Ezio is a great main character. Brotherhood was more of the same from 2, but I enjoyed it well enough, and it added a gang management system that I enjoyed.
Revelations offered a satisfying conclusion to Ezio's storyline, but all in all it felt like a filler episode, and literally nothing happened in the present day story line. That was the game where he fatigue really set in.
AC3 just didn't do anything for me. The cities were bland, and the wilderness areas were not fun to explore. Plus the story was terrible, but it was the conclusion to the main present day story in the series up to that point (just youtube if if you played the first few games and want to know how it ends, but it's a really bad ending).
From there on, there is basically nothing connecting game to game except that they all have assassins and templars and you kill dudes. All of the games from 4 on are completely self-contained, so there is no reason to play them all. I guess play 4 if you like boats. I kind of want to play Syndicate when it gets cheap, just because it's been a while, but I have no intention of playing through the rest of the games I missed (4 and on).
Don't know why people are celebrating a major franchise collapsing like it's some kind of win or will result in more or different games getting developed to take its place. Strange take on things some people have.
Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't want the series to die off. I do want the sales to dip enough for Ubisoft to maybe take a couple years off, and re-evaluate the series, so they can make a new one with a little more innovation.