I don't think anyone that has given a $30 game hasn't also already given a bunch of bundle or sale games
I don't know, man. I'm just brainstorming here. My point was that the "megagiver" thing seems like it's meant to identify the folks who go above and beyond for the community, but the way the selection criteria are set up now makes it kind of meaningless.
The problem is that there's no easy way I can think of to hardcode "value". I mean, personally, I'd say a giveaway for some well-regarded game that's normally fairly expensive (regardless of whether or not it's on sale at the time) should count for more than some bundle spares when determining whether or not somebody's a "megagiver", but there doesn't seem to be an easy way for a program to determine that. Manually flagging people as megagivers would work, but that would require someone to make the call, and I suspect Stump wouldn't want that headache.
Just one of those problems that doesn't seem to have an easy solution.