• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Stern: 'Girls' star Lena Dunham 'is a little fat girl who looks like Jonah Hill...'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Keri

Member
Buncha haters.
She got the job because of Apatow and on the strength of her earlier work. Most of the people she's recruited were friends.

Yeah, the nepotism angle sounds absolutely ridiculous.

The only person on that poster I've ever heard of is Brian Williams. I doubt being the daughter of a playwright or general "artist" has much sway when it comes to making TV.
 

GusBus

Member
I've watched the show from the beginning, and for the most part, enjoyed it for what it is. However, I don't delude myself into thinking it's some kind of intense social commentary, or remotely reflective of "real life". As well, I agree that the lack of diverse characters does not do the show any favors. Lena Dunham is not that attractive (sry, higher standards brah) but she has occasional insights and she does add something to the mix.
The writing is solid, the characters are (mostly) entertaining, and it's better than 90% of what else is on TV. Therefore, I will be watching. Haters can hate, but HBO will still make bank.
 
enhanced-buzz-26285-1334683665-8.jpg

I knew about Brian Williams' daughter. Didn't know the rest. Very interesting.
 
Hey, if you have connections, use them. I don't see anything wrong with that.

Exactly. I think nepotism is an issue more so when it comes to choosing people you don't feel are right for a part out of peer pressure or expectation. If you have the opportunity to create a show it's inevitable that you'll seek to include people that you already have a comfortable working relationship with.

Nepotism is only an issue to those that aren't benefiting from it. I include myself in this category.
 
The difference is Entourage actually thought its characters were likable, decent human beings. Girls is well aware its characters aren't.

Definitely didn't get the same vibe you did watching it. The tone of the show seems like it absolutely thinks its characters are likable, decent human beings
 
I like the show, but that's the truth. It's a show about entitled girls played by entitled girls. Maybe that helps the show work (and helps the characters be particularly unbearable).

No, that poster is just wrong. Does anyone really think being the daughter of a New York painter in any way was responsible for Dunham getting a movie into Sundance and then getting a meeting with Judd Apatow? Or that being the daughter of a drummer or a playwright or a news reporter is what got them cast in a comedy? Those things might have helped them get their names to casting people, but they certainly weren't hired solely because of it. The whole industry runs on connections and networking, and showbiz people do often tend to come from showbiz families, but that's no more "nepotism" than Joss Whedon or Shawn Ryan or hell, Apatow casting their friends in all their projects. Girls isn't exceptional in that regard.

And to go from there to saying the actresses themselves are entitled is just an unjustified personal attack. What, should only actors with absolutely no familial or friendly connections to the industry get cast now? That's taking the privilege argument too far.
 

maharg

idspispopd
Singling out Girls for nepotism is just plain silly. If you don't think the show is good, just say so. Its existence has no more to do with nepotism than any other show's.
 
Definitely didn't get the same vibe you did watching it. The tone of the show seems like it absolutely thinks its characters are likable, decent human beings

In the pilot Hannah argues with her parents about not paying her own cell phone bill, calls herself the "voice of a generation" to explain why her parents should keep supporting her, and steals tip money her parents leave for the hotel maid.
 
I'm no big fan of Girls, but I think Lena Dunham is a better role model for girls than glamor mags or other superthin models. Flaunt your flaws.
 

Riggs

Banned
I'm no big fan of Girls, but I think Lena Dunham is a better role model for girls than glamor mags or other superthin models. Flaunt your flaws.

True I would rather have my daughter watching and admiring this girl then a ..... "girl" like Kim Kardashian. I will say that much.
 

DjRoomba

Banned
Is girls supposed to be a comedy? Serious q
Howard Stern is the man who speaks the truth and Lena herself agrees with this. Wheres the controversy?
 
In the pilot Hannah argues with her parents about not paying her own cell phone bill, calls herself the "voice of a generation" to explain why her parents should keep supporting her, and steals tip money her parents leave for the hotel maid.

I did remember this when you brought it up, but it seemed more like an exception than indicative of what her character was by the end of the season. Characters are often a bit different in pilots than what.they end up being so I chalked it up to that as well, but you are right, I did get that vibe exactly from that dinner scene, just didn't maintain it through the season and it ended up feeling like a mix of Friends and Sex in the City.
 

Tashi

343i Lead Esports Producer
I think the show Girls is awesome
I think Howard Stern is awesome
Can't we all just get along.

Howard should interview her on the show. It would be amazing.
 
True I would rather have my daughter watching and admiring this girl then a ..... "girl" like Kim Kardashian. I will say that much.

Personal preferences aside, if you can put that aside, would you not want you daughter to work the system to her advantage, as many males before her have?

He is a really ugly dude who lucked out on his career. I've never seen Girls.


Stern worked very hard in his career to get that Sirius contract. Was some luck involved along the way? of course there was, but Howard Stern isn't the example of, "luck got me here," that you're trying to push.

As long as its not will Smith's family, nepotism is perfectly fine.

Jaden has acquitted himself twice in Happyness and Karate Kid.
 

gdt

Member
I think the show Girls is awesome
I think Howard Stern is awesome
Can't we all just get along.

Howard should interview her on the show. It would be amazing.

Shes in NY....it will happen sooner or later. Especially now that she knows who she is and is interested.
 

vidcons

Banned
Is girls supposed to be a comedy? Serious q
Howard Stern is the man who speaks the truth and Lena herself agrees with this. Wheres the controversy?

he said something and she said that he has pretty much spent his entire life looking at glammed up celebs and pornstars to the point where he is flabbergasted at anything less that a product of The Industry. she didn't agree with him, she removed any impact from stern's comment by reminding everyone that the guy is a weirdy.

and yeah, it's a comedy. it's a comedy where you're supposed to be laughing at what they're saying, whether it is with them or at them is another thing. if you can laugh at david brent then you can probably laugh at the dirty talk.

i wonder if lots of 'internet people' hate the show because of how hard the first few episodes ripped on the nice guy persona.
 

Pyronite

Member
So... Crispin Glover wrote a rebuttal to that poster. Yes, that Crispin Glover.

It starts:
This is so much bullshit. I debated whether or not to reblog this, because I don’t really want to give it any more notes or attention. But I don’t think people understand what a hot load of misogyny this mock poster is blowing. There is no doubt that privilege gets us everything in life. But there is also no way that HBO is going to give someone a TV show based solely on who their parents are. The channel that does that is E!, ok? It makes me so angry that everyone wants to reduce the hard work and creativity and risks that went into this show to nepotism.

http://crispin-glover.tumblr.com/post/21278674697/newsweek-nepotism-this-is-so-much-bullshit

EDIT: A little more digging and I'm not sure that this is actually Crispin Glover. DOH.
 

Takuan

Member
I don't think she looks anything like Jonah Hill, but she's absolutely a little fat girl who doesn't mind being nude. It takes strength to do that, especially as a woman.
 

Clipjoint

Member
Is this back peddling?

I don't think it's back peddling. When he said it, he had only seen the first two episodes of the show. He probably watched the rest of the first season and changed his mind. This is coming from a guy who loved Sex and the City, he loves girly television.
 

akira28

Member
I think Lena is attractive :(

I'd smang it repeatedly, probably show up for Thanksgiving, maybe even date if she asked. She kind of looks like the other girls sitting on that bench with her though. They all have slight differences, but you know...it's all sort of I don't even know. I don't want to say boring or uninteresting, but it's like they all look alike.
 

Keri

Member
Crispin Glover said:
It’s very hard to get an opportunity to portray women as less than glamorous and sexy. It’s very hard to get an opportunity to show female friendships as revolving around more than just dicks. And it’s very hard to find a woman on television with a totally average body. And Girls has all three of these things and that makes me so excited. You know what? I am not a glamorous and sexy person. I spend more of my life fucking it up than I do getting it right. And I am an asshole. I am such an asshole. And it feels so good to see someone completely embrace that. Men have Louis CK and Larry David and I love those guys too, but Lena Dunham touches on a life that I actually live.

Goddamn. Crispin Glover makes a good point. If this show is comparable to Louie than I will definitely watch it.

Why is watching an overweight middle-aged man fumble through sexual situations and life A-OK, but watching an overweight young woman do the same is horrible?
 

jon bones

hot hot hanuman-on-man action
ibshUBkfNIKb7A.gif


Back to discussing Howard, you know ... the important part of this thread.

terrible radio host with awful fans?

i've never even seen the show Girls but chances are it's much better than whatever stern's doing these days
 

Jado

Banned
The show definitely is problematic in its presentation of diversity, and Apatow's responses to that criticism (which I hadn't seen before) are also problematic. But Lena Dunham's responses have been, I think, worthy of being given the chance for the show to change. I think, at the very least, she does care and whatever she does next will be better. She obviously comes from privilege, but I think she's more aware of it than most people in her position.

I also don't think she believes for one second that she's speaking for a generation, though.

Lena Dunham's character, who she uses as a mouthpiece, has said precisely that she's speaking for a generation of people like her, and later implied it in interviews with the language she uses to describe her show. She's aware but, like many white persons, doesn't correlate it with her whiteness and well-connected upbringing.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2012/04/lena-dunham-girls-race.html#ixzz2HtbhmxrC

In a live chat hosted by HBO last Monday, she called the all-white casting “a complete accident.”

That's how naive and blind she is, and that's why I loathe junk like Girls. The nonchalant, casual attitude of people like her who "don't notice" minorities (or the complete lack of). The utter lack of black and hispanics people in depicting Prospect Heights (70%+ of the pop.!) doesn't register mentally in her life of privilege. It may just be a show, but Dunham panders to the self-obsessed, passively racist person in NY: the kind who interacts with minorities as little as possible (otherwise it's inconvenient), says he "has a black friend" and therefore can't possibly be racist when behaving in a racist manner, and who quietly becomes upset if ethnic minorities move into her upper-class (white) neighborhood in any significant numbers.

Pandering with token black and Hispanic characters in the show is a million times worse than the cast being entirely white. That's why we're gonna end up with a hack like Donald Glover in the show even though he's awful in everything.

The people who want diversity on the show don't want pandering with token stereotypes. Why is that the most common rebuttal? That's the erroneous conclusion from those who hastily misunderstand the desire of minority groups to be fairly represented on television and film. Over half of the city's population is black and hispanic! I would love it if a season of the show took place in Harlem with no black people anywhere in sight (or Washington Heights with no Dominicans!), to illustrate as painfully as possible why some of us are so sick of this shit.

But you're right, the show will likely go down the path I described with one-off token characters. If the show made a real effort to introduce permanent minority characters that weren't one-dimensional, the show would probably lose the interest of its insular, self-absorbed white audience.

I like the show, but that's the truth. It's a show about entitled girls played by entitled girls. Maybe that helps the show work (and helps the characters be particularly unbearable).

I heard it from a coworker but didn't know the specifics until that image. An average show from an average writer with lots of nepotism and big-name backing to make sure it's "critically acclaimed" and succeeds no matter what.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom