dinazimmerman
Incurious Bastard
Link: http://www.newser.com/story/207459/study-women-let-handsome-men-off-easier.html(NEWSER) Males wooing women can get away with acting a little creepy if they're good-looking, but the homely ones are out of luck, suggests a new study out of Eastern Kentucky University. To gauge their perceptions of men, researchers showed 170 female college students two male faces with similar featuresone considered attractive, the other not so muchalongside two scenarios. In what the study in Gender Issues describes as a "low violation" scenario, the male asks to borrow a pen; in the "high violation" or "disconcerting" scenario, he suggests she try modeling and asks to take her photo. The women were then asked a series of questions, including whether they would comply; most said yes to the pen and no to the photo, regardless of how attractive the man was. But they also ranked each man as to how friendly, ambitious, mean, rude, and creepy (and more) he was. In the low-violation case, both men's personalities were perceived to be similar.
But in the modeling scenario, "the perceptions of the facially attractive male's personality were significantly less negative ... than the perceptions of (the) facially unattractive male's personality." As researcher Jeremy Gibson puts it, "The unattractive male is tolerated up to a point; his unattractiveness is OK until he misbehaves." The researchers call it a "double" devil effect, Science Daily reports: The bad behavior and the unattractiveness combine, and the negative perception is magnified. This has real-world implications, says researcher Jonathan Gore. "A man who stands trial has already shown himself to have violated social norms in one way or another. If he is also unattractive, the magnified devil effect ... could influence how negatively jurors view him and, as a result, the degree to which they believe him guilty of the crime." (Need help in the looks department? Tilt your head.)
Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150527092608.htmWomen tolerate an unattractive man up to a point, but beware if he misbehaves. Then they'll easily shun him. So say Jeremy Gibson and Jonathan Gore of the Eastern Kentucky University in the US, after finding that a woman's view of a man is influenced by how handsome and law-abiding he is. Their study in Springer's journal Gender Issues has significance for those using dating sites or doing jury duty.
Discovering how someone can make a positive first impression is an important field of study because of its role in forming relationships. It is often based on physical appearance and whether someone sticks to social norms or not. Such impressions are made in a flash, but are not always correct. In what is called the "halo effect," people warm up to others with positive characteristics, such as handsomeness. The "devil effect" or "negative halo effect" comes into play when people assume that others possess so-called "bad" characteristics, based on traits such as unattractiveness..
Gibson and Gore tested if and how levels of attractiveness and conforming to social norms combine to influence 170 college women's perceptions of men. Two male faces -- one attractive, the other not -- bearing similar features were paired in two written scenarios. In the one, the man committed a major social no-no, in the other not.
The researchers found that whether a man transgressed a social norm was a much greater put-off than whether he was unattractive. Normally women do not feel differently towards a homely man who toes the line. If that same ugly duckling, however, transgresses the boundaries of right or wrong, a magnified or "double" devil effect comes into play. He is then viewed in an extremely negative light, much more so than would have been the case if he were handsome.
"The unattractive male is tolerated up to a point; his unattractiveness is OK until he misbehaves," says Gibson.
The halo and devil effect often comes into play when people view others' profiles on online dating sites. Based on their results, Gibson and Gore believe that unattractive men who provide unusual or alarming information in their profiles may not receive a second glance from women. This will not be the case for an Adonis posting the same information, or unattractive ones who do not violate these norms. In the judicial system, unattractive defendants are also known to receive more severe penalties than more attractive ones, even if they committed the same crime.
"A man who stands trial has already shown himself to have violated social norms in one way or another. If he is also unattractive, the magnified devil effect may result in a larger fine or sentence, as it could influence how negatively jurors view him and, as a result, the degree to which they believe him guilty of the crime," explains Gore.
Journal Reference:
Jeremy L. Gibson, Jonathan S. Gore. Youre OK Until You Misbehave: How Norm Violations Magnify the Attractiveness Devil Effect. Gender Issues, 2015; DOI: 10.1007/s12147-015-9142-5
Limitations of the experiment:
Future experiments examining the devil effect should seek to address limitations with the present experiment. Demographics for the current experiment were exclusively college age females enrolled in a state university. This convenience sample offers perspective for only one gender, as well as one race (Caucasian), in regards to the devil effect and only applies to the one specific population. In addition to sampling limitations, female sexual orientation could influence results by not creating the intended levels of attraction to the males. The present experiment did not inquire as to participant sexuality. Additional experiments in this area should attempt to recreate the devil effect with different demographics and populations, while accounting for sexuality. Examination of online dating profiles for the devil effect would also constitute a beneficial contribution to the literature.
Additional limitations of the present experiment include the testing method. The experiment was conducted using typed scenarios paired with pictures of male faces. It is possible that these materials do not accurately recreate the scenarios described and also may not reflect true attraction levels through the use of the photograph. Continued research on the devil effect should seek to improve the construct validity by possibly conducting an experiment with live male confederates to manipulate attractiveness.
Further research on the topic of devil effect should expand external validity and test different levels of norm violation. External validity can be expanded by testing male perspective of males violating social norms. Norm violation scenarios must be adjusted to fit the spectrum from the male perspective. Supplementary research can begin testing the halo/devil effect from the male perception of females violating social norms. Results from these experiments would contribute to a larger understanding of how the devil effect influences perceptions in this context. Additionally, testing different levels of norm violation can help to establish effects that may have been negated by the use of two polar scenarios. Selecting a scenario that reflects a moderate intensity violation of norms may draw more of a halo/devil effect. This additional research, in conjunction with the present experiment, may provide an empirical base from which the devil effect may be more fully explored.