eot
Banned
This thread
But also yeah, no shir Sherlock
Did you read any of the replies?
This thread
But also yeah, no shir Sherlock
Channing Tatum follows you on twitter, liked all of your photos on instagram, Friended you on Facebook, sends you his dick pics on Snapchat, and you've been flattered by it. But whenever I did it, you reported me to the police. WTF hypocrite!
But something can be controversial in one community, but not in another.That's actually not necessary. All that needs to be done is to establish that the issue is controversial, not that these specific people said X in that thread and Y in another.
If I say something is so obvious and clear that no study needs to be done on it, and someone else posts a thread that shows lots of people disagree with my conclusion and that there is much debate about the topic, then that shows rather clearly that it is not so obvious and clear.
At least, not to everyone. Perhaps I am the shining diamond who sees things clearly and everyone else are stupid.
But something can be controversial in one community, but not in another.
For instance: That other thread would obviously be controversial. It invited it. It was an opinion piece, essentially, so that was a community of differently minded people.
Since this is an actual study, and it's "scientific," it's more likely the naysayers won't show up here to defend their point, so what we have here is an echo-chamber community of like-minded people who will say this is obvious, which it is to all of us.
Men will also put up with a lot of shit for attractive women.
Men will also put up with a lot of shit for attractive women.
Oh, certainly. I'm not saying this study wasn't necessary, but it is something that is obvious to me as it is to you.That may be true. At the very least, it's good to have this study in case I ever find myself surrounded by the people in that other thread, so I can provide evidence for my position.
Lol, haven't salty motherfuckers been saying this on GAF for years? Everyone like "no, creepy is creepy." Evidently nottt
Also Breaking: Men let prettier women off easier.
Just Breaking: Water is wet.
Personally, I'll be the naysayer here that everyone wants: They were shown pictures, and answered questions based entirely on pictures. Most of them still said they'd give the pen and say no to 'modeling' no matter how attractive the man was. Their inner personal opinon changed.
I think the study is flawed because interaction, body language, vocal tone, etc all can factor in. I've been creeped out by hot guys before.
It's much clearer than your phrasing, but you're mostly correct.Well, the word attractive already explains most of it: if you find someone attractive, it means you are, well, attracted to them. You might even have some brief lewd thoughts about them when you first see them. So when that person acts in a way that could be interpreted as a sexual advance, they are "responding" to an "invitation" that only exists in the back of your mind and trick you into not viewing as gravely as you would were them unattractive.
Personally, I'll be the naysayer here that everyone wants: They were shown pictures, and answered questions based entirely on pictures. Most of them still said they'd give the pen and say no to 'modeling' no matter how attractive the man was. Their inner personal opinon changed.
I think the study is flawed because interaction, body language, vocal tone, etc all can factor in.
Thank you Fiction.So while their perceptions of the different men's personality's changed biased on looks, their actual behavior didn't.
They needed a study to figure this out?
Good looking people no matter the gender will always have it easier than those who are less so.
Also Breaking: Men let prettier women off easier.
Just Breaking: Water is wet.
Personally, I'll be the naysayer here that everyone wants: They were shown pictures, and answered questions based entirely on pictures. Most of them still said they'd give the pen and say no to 'modeling' no matter how attractive the man was. Their inner personal opinon changed.
I think the study is flawed because interaction, body language, vocal tone, etc all can factor in. I've been creeped out by hot guys before.
I think its just people like to pretend and portray themselves as having higher standards and being less shallow than they are in practice.I would state that the clear reason this is relevant -- even though it should be obvious -- is this old, controversial observation: men who are unattractive are accused of sexual harassment in situations where attractive men would be received more warmly.
Basically, this:
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/sexual-harassment/2751966
Is not just funny, but also apparently has some truth to it, according to this study. You can claim this is obvious, but this topic has been quite controversial in the past, including on GAF.
In other breaking news, scientific studies have shown that ice cream tastes good, people like good television shows over bad shows, and playing with a puppy makes you happy.
Men will also put up with a lot of shit for attractive women.
Yup, understand that, which why I keep saying 'personally'. I am not smart like most of the people here, just expressing my experiences and such.
Good looking people no matter the gender will always have it easier than those who are less so.
what a fucking surprise
I've seen good looking people get away with so much shit
It's why I tend to not trust good looking people, because I know they're used to being served on a golden platter and being treated with more respect than they deserve.
Men AND women.
Yup, understand that, which why I keep saying 'personally'. I am not smart like most of the people here, just expressing my experiences and such.
Again, the study seems to indicate that the responses to the men were (or would have been) the same. It also deals with photos and not actual interactions, which could easily change the responses.I think its just people like to pretend and portray themselves as having higher standards and being less shallow than they are in practice.
I mean who wants to admit they let someone talk dirty to them simply because they were hot but got offended when a more homely person did the same?
The women were then asked a series of questions, including whether they would comply; most said yes to the pen and no to the photo, regardless of how attractive the man was.
Males wooing women can get away with acting a little creepy if they're good-looking, but the homely ones are out of luck
I think the study is flawed because interaction, body language, vocal tone, etc all can factor in. I've been creeped out by hot guys before.
My thoughts on this are that the examples you posited are so out of line that they might have passed any sort of "creepiness vs hotness" threshold where no amount of hotness would have saved them.Creeped out as in I've had a hot guy give off more of a 'murderer' vibe than 'lets have sex' vibe. Or had a hot guy shout something on street. It happens occasionally.
Just because someone who's hot yells 'Hey, nice tits!' doesn't mean I'm going to automatically fall into his arms, you know? Hot guys can be assholes/creepy too.
Personal experience again, but it seems to me that the more traditionally attractive men are actually more likely to be jerks, because they think they can get away with it.
I am not smart like most of the people here