That was a joke yes.
Not-blood related incest is boring, Yabuki knows this rest assured.
Yabuki is a master of his craft.
That was a joke yes.
Not-blood related incest is boring, Yabuki knows this rest assured.
That was a joke yes.
Not-blood related incest is boring, Yabuki knows this rest assured.
Uh, that's our argument. The problem with revisionism is replacing the original, trying to make it obsolete. That's what Lucas does. That's what SHAFT does.Really, the only problem with what Lucas did is attempting to make the original cuts inaccessible, a stance that I will not defend. But nothing more.
The version of Nisemonogatari on Blu-ray is not the same Nisemonogatari that aired on television. It's also a direct to video re-edit, maybe you could class it as an OVA?
I thought that was a satire.This is where I link you to Jex's essay, right?
Unfortunately library computers don't have the link bookmarked, so someone else will have to supply it
something something burden of proofAlmost as much of a pain in the ass as actually engaging people that you disagree with.
Ideally, both versions should be released. I'd think with modern technology there would be a cost efficient and reasonable way to store both versions on the same disc.But as I just said (and Mandoric said earlier) it isn't meant to be misleading. The idea that the Blu-Ray version will be a different product from what aired on TV is implicit from the start. Is Shaft supposed to not do anything and/or release both versions? Why should they have to do that? Who demands that? This isn't replacing a beloved movie that's been around for 20 years, this is the first permanent release of a television show that aired on TV six months ago with the implicit understanding that the content on this permanent release was going to differ from the broadcast version in various ways. It's stupid that this is even an issue in the first place, and I'm not sure why duckroll felt the need to turn it into one or heck, why I even bothered to seriously respond to something that was so silly to begin with.
It's not like it'd be unreasonable. Two episodes per Blu-ray doesn't even come close to filling up a BD-25 -- a single layer Blu-ray. Usually they take up about 10-13GB of the disc, not sure of the specifics for Nisemono. They could add the TV versions of those two episodes with ease and not sacrifice a bit of quality or add any costs at all to manufacturing.But as I just said (and Mandoric said earlier) it isn't meant to be misleading. The idea that the Blu-Ray version will be a different product from what aired on TV is implicit from the start. Is Shaft supposed to not do anything and/or release both versions? Why should they have to do that? Who demands that?
Doesn't matter. Any revisionism should be frowned upon.This isn't replacing a beloved movie that's been around for 20 years
Well, it's an issue for people who take anime/film/etc seriously.It's stupid that this is even an issue in the first place, and I'm not sure why duckroll felt the need to turn it into one or heck, why I even bothered to seriously respond to something that was so silly to begin with.
Ideally, both versions should be released. I'd think with modern technology there would be a cost efficient and reasonable way to store both versions on the same disc.
For 2-ep-per-disc releases, I've long said that I think they should include the broadcast versions on the discs as well. It's not like there isn't space.
I admit if this were released in English I would SO use this for my characters, Giga Girl in particular.
It's not like it'd be unreasonable. Two episodes per Blu-ray doesn't even come close to filling up a BD-25 -- a single layer Blu-ray. Usually they take up about 10-13GB of the disc, not sure of the specifics for Nisemono. They could add the TV versions of those two episodes with ease and not sacrifice a bit of quality or add any costs at all to manufacturing.
Doesn't matter. Any revisionism should be frowned upon.
Well, it's an issue for people who take anime/film/etc seriously.
As far as I know this isn't standard practice anywhere, nor is there actually a market for such a thing.
It sounds like you have straw man issues.Outrageous. It sounds like you have entitlement issues, just like gamers who don't want to pay a dollar per-week per-game for multiplayer.
I'm pretty sure Branduil was joking/sarcastic.It sounds like you have straw man issues.
Yes, I know. That's why I said it.I'm pretty sure Branduil was joking/sarcastic.
It's actually not uncommon for anime in Japan to include both the original and a vastly improved version when it is the case. Lots of releases specifically have the regular episode and the "director's cut" episode in these cases. Heck, for certain shows they do it even when there aren't any animation changes, but rather just the way credits on the episode are presented. For example if an episode on TV had to cut the opening or ending due to a lack of time, and the credits are instead overlaid on actual episode footage. If the episode on DVD has a clean version with the opening and editing animations restored into the episode, they sometimes also include the original broadcast version on the disc.
It seems to me that you simply do not care at all for this topic, and hence you don't really bother to notice these things. That's not an insult, but in the context of this discussion it frames you as someone who is not understanding of the opposite view point, due to your lack of interest in it, and at the same time you want to argue against it anyway. Just an observation.
Then I was wrong. I am interested in specific examples though, for curiosity's sake. (Enron don't you dare.)
No, and I stand by this. Anybody who takes anime/film/etc seriously, actually seriously, also has concern for archival, preservation, and such. It's very relevant.Oh stuff it. This is not an issue for people who take anime/film/etc "seriously", this is an issue for people who are specifically annoyed by this type of thing. How "serious" they are about their hobby is irrelevant.
Think of it this way, imagine if the Louvre decided the Mona Lisa was outdated and they painted over it with their own take. People would be outraged regardless of the legality of doing so.
Maybe if you took more than just infantile mediums seriously you would realize that the world is overstuffed with too much art and most of it really doesn't matter one bit.No, and I stand by this. Anybody who takes anime/film/etc seriously, actually seriously, also has concern for archival, preservation, and such. It's very relevant.
Maybe if you took more than just infantile mediums seriously you would realize that the world is overstuffed with too much art and most of it really doesn't matter one bit.
Aw yeah.
Thought this was a nice contrast asit gave some visual credence to Omatsuri succeeding as the story went on.
sogood
lolMaybe if you took more than just infantile mediums
It is.^
It is a crime that this movie is not available on blu-ray.
It is.
Yes...Wait, it is?
I didn't say it's wrong for different people to care about different things. My point was that that is an inexhaustible amount of artistic work out there of varying aptitudes and most of it isn't worth paying mind to from anyone but special interest groups. Not all art has significant artistic merit. Your twisting and turning in the wind to put on a show that suggests otherwise couldn't feel more disingenuous when the most recently released anime was this guy here:So basically you're saying that because you do not care about this, in your opinion it does not matter and hence no one else should care because it is a waste of time as long as it is of no important to you blahblahblah? That's a really rude way of expressing your incorrect opinion. Different people care about different things, and some people take certain things more seriously than others. It is not wrong.
Her panties are blacked out a few seconds later beneath her skirt. Woe is artistic license if the Blu-Ray release doesn't let viewers partake in the television aired masterpiece of lazy censorship that primarily serves as an advertisement simply to sell home release copies.
To anyone? Unless you are saying you care about everything released. Most of it is of suspect quality, or can often appeal to specialized interest groups. I don't know why this is contentious, but most of you seem set on misinterpreting or misquoting me to create some sort of huff.to whom...?
Yes...
I didn't say it's wrong for different people to care about different things. My point was that that is an inexhaustible amount of artistic work out there of varying aptitudes and most of it isn't worth paying mind to from anyone but special interest groups. Not all art has significant artistic merit. Your twisting and turning in the wind to put on a show that suggests otherwise couldn't feel more disingenuous when the most recently released anime was this guy here:
Her panties are blacked out a few seconds later beneath her skirt. Woe is artistic license if the Blu-Ray release doesn't let viewers partake in the television aired masterpiece of lazy censorship that primarily serves as an advertisement simply to sell home release copies.
To anyone? Unless you are saying you care about everything released. Most of it is of suspect quality, or can often appeal to specialized interest groups. I don't know why this is contentious, but most of you seem set on misinterpreting or misquoting me to create some sort of huff.
I've alluded to some of them, though most of them kind of go without saying.Have you ever taken time to explain the demerits of Bakemonogatari, as you see them?
Lack of artistic merit does not mean it lacks the right to continue to exist. Quality has nothing to do with it. I don't care just about the preservation and archival of things I like.I didn't say it's wrong for different people to care about different things. My point was that that is an inexhaustible amount of artistic work out there of varying aptitudes and most of it isn't worth paying mind to from anyone but special interest groups. Not all art has significant artistic merit. Your twisting and turning in the wind to put on a show that suggests otherwise couldn't feel more disingenuous when the most recently released anime was this guy here:
To anyone? Unless you are saying you care about everything released. Most of it is of suspect quality, or can often appeal to specialized interest groups. I don't know why this is contentious, but most of you seem set on misinterpreting or misquoting me to create some sort of huff.
Her panties are blacked out a few seconds later beneath her skirt. Woe is artistic license if the Blu-Ray release doesn't let viewers partake in the television aired masterpiece of lazy censorship that primarily serves as an advertisement simply to sell home release copies.
Kono Naka ni Hitori, Imouto ga Iru!Danceinmyblood, what show is that from? Its relevant to my interests.
Advertisements are works of art too.
Kono Naka ni Hitori, Imouto ga Iru!
I'll drop the argument stuff. It's not getting me anywhere and I just look like a dunce anyways.
It was the same kind of disregard for others feelings/opinions that got me banned before. I would be careful taking that route.
Lol. I don't think that's exactly what got you banned! You just need to think a bit sometimes before posting something!
David Fincher is just some Nike shoe salesman, man.Many of prolific directors working on movies today started their careers shooting commercials!
One Piece Movie 6
It's nice to be wrong. Instead I was given this fantastic adventure film that reveled in comedy but knew well enough to reel it in when the time came, a story that grew progressively darker, and a fabulous villain in Baron Omatsuri.Even with the bare minimum of knowledge of the franchise going in, it was more than enough as this felt so wonderfully self-contained. While I'm certain more familiarity with the characters may have enhanced the experience, not once did I feel as if I was missing out with what was presented to me and that's commendable.His motivations were rather obvious early on but he did this wonderful job in this role, especially when he nearly broke Luffy down with his speech about him now being alone after he lost his friends.
I suppose there's one caveat in that last statement and that's in regards to Luffy's characterization. I really enjoyed him in the second half of the movie but he seemed so much the caricature in the first. So much so I was left wondering if he was normally portrayed as such or if it was sort of lampooning his regular role.
Thought this was a nice contrastas it gave some visual credence to Omatsuri succeeding as the story went on.
It is.
Having now seen the show, I can assure you that that is Luffy's normal characterization - if anything, he's normally even more exaggerated (and annoying).
I can't even imagine that.
Luffy's a really, really annoying protagonist.I can't even imagine that.
sure you can
just watch Strong World (movie 10)
The eccentric style of One Piece really works well with fluid animation and colourful but detailed settings
its a damned shame that the TV adaptation is such a low budget affair
Danceinmyblood, what show is that from? Its relevant to my interests.
Man neogaf mobile really sucks.
Anyway, thats pretty cute but possibly a little disturbing.
Cool tech though!