anotheriori said:
Kindevu bodied by Mochi.. doesn't know that match.
I see this sentiment repeated all the time and it really puzzles me. When you are watching matches at this high of a level, it's pretty much guaranteed that the guys playing have been at it since SF2: The World Warriors, and excelled at many if not all of the games in between that and SSF4. These guys know everything there is to know about every character in the game.
Kindevu played vanilla SF4 to death, so he knows how Dhalsim works in the game. He is playing Cammy at a level above 95% of the SF population, so he obviously knows how
she works in the game. So to hear the excuse (or reasoning or whatever) that "he doesn't know the matchup" after a loss, doesn't ring true to me at all.
A week or two after the game is out, and everyone is still figuring out nuances to their character and others? Sure, a little ignorance might cost you a couple matches. But console SF4 is going on 2 years old now, Cammy and Dhalsim were both there, and I'd bet just about anything that Kindevu did not start playing Cammy a week ago. From the way Kindevu was playing I'd say he is
quite familiar with the match, and simply got outplayed by Mochi.
The same thing was said when Justin lost to Gamerbee at EVO. "Oh, he is just unfamiliar with Adon, doesn't know the match". I read this as someone who doesn't really know what they're watching and is oversimplifying things grossly, and in the process denigrating the skills and knowledge of both Justin/Gamerbee, or Kindevu/Mochi or whoever. The EVO match came down to the last round of the 3rd set, and Gamerbee BARELY edged out a victory. So if Justin wins, that whole "lost cause he doesn't know the matchup" sentiment is nonexistent, but since he did lose it gets trotted out and repeated ad nauseum. Why is it not likely that they DO know the matchup, and Mochi & Gamerbee simply played better than their opponents?
It's almost as if saying "He got outplayed" is somehow a slap in the face to a player who lost or might be viewed as "hating" on the loser or "dickriding" the winner, so instead of that we have this weird PC-sounding cliche to cling to so that no feelings are potentially hurt. It really comes off to me as an excuse, especially since these players are the world's best and to believe that they lack basic knowledge of a certain matchup is asinine at best. Which is why when I heard Ryan Hart say the exact same thing after he lost to Luffy I was really surprised. It's usually the viewers who parrot this and not the players. He literally said he didn't know how to fight Rose and that he didn't lose because he was outplayed or anything like that, just lost due to ignorance. It reeks of excuse-making and bullshit imo, whether a player says it or a viewer.
And I don't mean to single you out about it since I see this repeated all the time. I just happened to be reading the thread and saw your post minutes after seeing the same thing said in a stream chat, so I decided to write a novel about it. Sorry for the novel.