• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The 77th Annual Academy Awards

Status
Not open for further replies.

Socreges

Banned
Harry Knowles... why do people listen to him?

Greenpanda said:
And so Hollywood continues to get more irrelevant by the year.
I hate celebrity and don't care for the Academy Awards, but please substantiate this. Are you still reeling after the Bush jokes?
 

Liono

Member
Is Bogey a Mimic?

I totally whiffed it on Freeman as best supporting actor, of course he was going to get it
 

Agent Icebeezy

Welcome beautful toddler, Madison Elizabeth, to the horde!
catalina.jpg


cat2.jpg


cat3.jpg
 

Shaheed79

dabbled in the jelly
Clint Eastwood: I'm goin to Denny's for a Beer.

Some Douche Interviewer: Are you inviting me?

Clint: No.

:lol
 

FoneBone

Member
More Knowles idiocy:
Ok - Back. Calmed, a tad. I like Eastwood's MILLION DOLLAR BABY. It's a nice flick about a fairly obvious story, told better throughout any number of fantastic boxing films. It isn't near as great as the film he last won for, UNFORGIVEN. To me, AVIATOR was breathtaking cinema told by this country's greatest filmmaker, who this Academy in it's infinite blindness has continuously handed him his high hat. Like A BEAUTIFUL MIND, in a year's time MILLION DOLLAR BABY will be gathering dust in the previously seen bins, left unbought. They're good performances in a nicely directed film... But Scorsese was on an entirely different level of filmmaking.
That is, I think it's idiotic to compare Million Dollar Baby to A Beautiful Mind.
 
FoneBone said:
More Knowles idiocy:
What a moron. Although I don't like A Beautiful Mind that much, I think M$B shits all over The Aviator, and I'm the biggest Scorsese fanboy there is. The Aviator is a very good flick, I loved it, but M$B is one of the best flicks of the decade so far, if not the best, in my opinion. And well, I haven't seen a movie that tackles the same issues this one does in the same way. It's like Harry watched the first hour and left, missing the whole ending.

The worst thing about it is that Aintitcool is filled with M$B haters, most of which having probably not even seen the film.
 

Amir0x

Banned
effzee said:
who is this? and where has she been this whole time????!!!??

She was nominated for one of my personal top 3 picks of this year, Maria Full of Grace. Her name is Catalina Sandino Moreno, and she showed great promise in that movie. Besides just being sizzling hot.

sefskillz said:
*shakes fist at bogey*

nice job

Congratulations to you as well. You did excellent, as did Liono and RedDwarf.
 

Socreges

Banned
MIMIC said:
They were just now trashing her on E! for wearing the same (or similar) dress as Beyonce and Alicia Keys.
I think it's bad enough that you've got mere television shows dedicated to celebrity, but entire channels? That's depressing
 

Priz

Member
Question for those who've seen both Girlfight AND MDB: How similar are they?

I really liked Girlfight and MDB seemed like the same film to me, which is why I never got around to see it. I still really want to see Hotel Rwanda. I really liked Sideways and Maria Full of Grace.

Maybe an hour into the Oscars, when they went to commercial the balconies only seemed to be half full. I wonder if that was people just arriving late or what.

There were some good moments, and I'm glad certain things won (Eternal Sunshine, Ray, Incredibles), but I think I enjoyed IFC's broadcast of the Independent Spirit Awards yesterday more. Everyone who deserved an award received one. From the Motorcycle Diaries to Maria to Sideways (I think the only thing that didn't get an award was BADASSSSSS! which I also still need to see). Good stuff.
 

Amir0x

Banned
Priz said:
Question for those who've seen both Girlfight AND MDB: How similar are they?

I really liked Girlfight and MDB seemed like the same film to me, which is why I never got around to see it. I still really want to see Hotel Rwanda. I really liked Sideways and Maria Full of Grace.

Ok, honestly... they are almost NOTHING alike. I know that may be hard to believe, but just to ensure you a little less than half the film is actually about the boxing aspect and about a much more serious subject matter. I don't want to spoil it for you because telling you would ruin what happens, but let's just say MDB is better in every single way and is also not extremely similar besides being about two female boxers.

Also, Hotel Rwanda owns :)
 

Macam

Banned
Glad I didn't waste my time watching the awards, as they've become the equivalent of televised IGN. The joys of not having television.
 

Iceman

Member
FoneBone said:
More Knowles idiocy:
That is, I think it's idiotic to compare Million Dollar Baby to A Beautiful Mind.

explain.

At first glance I think the analogy is quite good.

Although I must admit I wasn't quite enthralled with Million Dollar Baby. (that said, I hated the Beautiful Mind after the first viewing and only later came to appreciate the story and especially the acting) Can a film be too simple and subdued? Apparently so. It's a 3 act play - limited sets, few characters, easy to follow story. Only in this play there's a huge twist in the third act that makes it a completely different play with very few strings attaching part 1 to 2. I was kind of disappointed with Haggis here (although I don't know the source material at all)

Well acted, well produced film. But the finale/second half of the movie, like in A Beautiful Mind, makes the rest of the film seem rather shallow and pointless in the end.. heck in this case it even seems like a non-sequitor. A fighter for so much of her life and then.. well, you know..
don't you kinda want her to keep fighting?
It's like the film featured strokes that were too broad. Goes too far to make the point.

Terrific performances, particularly by Swank but the movie .. I don't think.. will hold up over time.

In comparison, I think Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Sideways have more staying power as movies. Original, poignant, quirky and a great variety of people can associate with the characters.
 

VPhys

Member
android said:
Yeah but someone needs to revive the genre. And he is the best choice to do it.

Watch them beat Carrey to a Oscar. :lol

Actually, Marlin Wayens had quite a good acting performance in a movie whos title is on the tip of my tounge.
 
VPhys said:
Actually, Marlin Wayens had quite a good acting performance in a movie whos title is on the tip of my tounge.

Requim for a Dream? Marlon is actually a pretty good actor. I think he was formally trained and everything. Its Shawn thats the worthless one. ONce you put Marlon together with Shawn, he becomes some kind of brainless, unfunny zombie.
 

android

Theoretical Magician
Ninja Scooter said:
Requim for a Dream? Marlon is actually a pretty good actor. I think he was formally trained and everything. Its Shawn thats the worthless one. ONce you put Marlon together with Shawn, he becomes some kind of brainless, unfunny zombie.
Never seen that. Will have to check it out.
 
Iceman said:
explain.

At first glance I think the analogy is quite good.

Although I must admit I wasn't quite enthralled with Million Dollar Baby. (that said, I hated the Beautiful Mind after the first viewing and only later came to appreciate the story and especially the acting) Can a film be too simple and subdued? Apparently so. It's a 3 act play - limited sets, few characters, easy to follow story. Only in this play there's a huge twist in the third act that makes it a completely different play with very few strings attaching part 1 to 2. I was kind of disappointed with Haggis here (although I don't know the source material at all)

Well acted, well produced film. But the finale/second half of the movie, like in A Beautiful Mind, makes the rest of the film seem rather shallow and pointless in the end.. heck in this case it even seems like a non-sequitor. A fighter for so much of her life and then.. well, you know..
don't you kinda want her to keep fighting?
It's like the film featured strokes that were too broad. Goes too far to make the point.

Terrific performances, particularly by Swank but the movie .. I don't think.. will hold up over time.

In comparison, I think Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Sideways have more staying power as movies. Original, poignant, quirky and a great variety of people can associate with the characters.

I beg to differ, with reasons expressed multiple times in other threads. Movies like Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Sideways are much "colder" movies, and will be forgotten in ten years, especially Sideways. ESotSM will be reminded as another of Kauffman's narratic structure experimentations, which, even though I LOVED the movie, are getting a little gimmicky.
 

Amir0x

Banned
Foreign Jackass said:
I beg to differ, with reasons expressed multiple times in other threads. Movies like Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Sideways are much "colder" movies, and will be forgotten in ten years, especially Sideways. ESotSM will be reminded as another of Kauffman's narratic structure experimentations, which, even though I LOVED the movie, are getting a little gimmicky.

I disagree about what you said for Eternal Sunshine. Especially since it's arguable that it's not "cold" at all.
 

drohne

hyperbolically metafictive
haha. some of my friends were watching the oscars in the other room (i'm terribly averse to awards shows), and i thought i heard the terminator theme, but couldn't think of why they'd be playing it. why were they playing it?
 

ManaByte

Gold Member
Iceman said:
explain.

At first glance I think the analogy is quite good.

Although I must admit I wasn't quite enthralled with Million Dollar Baby. (that said, I hated the Beautiful Mind after the first viewing and only later came to appreciate the story and especially the acting) Can a film be too simple and subdued? Apparently so. It's a 3 act play - limited sets, few characters, easy to follow story. Only in this play there's a huge twist in the third act that makes it a completely different play with very few strings attaching part 1 to 2. I was kind of disappointed with Haggis here (although I don't know the source material at all)

Well acted, well produced film. But the finale/second half of the movie, like in A Beautiful Mind, makes the rest of the film seem rather shallow and pointless in the end.. heck in this case it even seems like a non-sequitor. A fighter for so much of her life and then.. well, you know..
don't you kinda want her to keep fighting?
It's like the film featured strokes that were too broad. Goes too far to make the point.

Terrific performances, particularly by Swank but the movie .. I don't think.. will hold up over time.

In comparison, I think Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Sideways have more staying power as movies. Original, poignant, quirky and a great variety of people can associate with the characters.

Of all the movies nominated for Best Picture, I think Ray was the most enjoyable of the bunch (despite the ending). Aviator dragged too much in the third act. MDB was too depressing and could've been cut a bit shorter. Finding Neverland was pretty good. And I honestly didn't think Sideways was in the same league as the others.
 

Iceman

Member
I could personally only compare M$B to the movies I've seen and I still haven't seen Ray, Aviator or Finding Neverland or Hotel Rwanda.

(I'm going to watch Finding Neverland first, then Rwanda, then Aviator then Ray.. but it might take me a couple of months to get them all in.)
 

Baron Aloha

A Shining Example
I just wanted to chime in and say that I thought both Leonardo DiCaprio and Martin Scorsese were robbed. I thought The Aviator was an amazing film and DiCaprio turned in his best performance since The Basketball Diaries. Say what you want about DiCaprio but the man can act. Unfortunately they could not overcome the Ray/Million Dollar Baby hype trains. I actually think that DiCaprio and Don Cheadle both turned in better performances than Foxx. I felt that Foxx's portrail of Ray was a little too over the top at times and that the film itself was too cliched. And once again, Clint Eastwood walks away with an Oscar that he didn't deserve (if Mystic River is the most overrated movie in the past decade then MDB is the second most overrated).
 

Prospero

Member
I didn't bother to watch the Oscars last night (except for Chris Rock's not-funny opening monologue), but I'm relatively happy with how things turned out, given the choices.

Given the choice between MDB and The Aviator sweeping, I'd rather see MDB sweep, because it's a small, actor-driven film for which the director had complete creative control (the sort of film that Martin Scorsese used to make, but hasn't made in a long time). So in a way, you can say that the Academy voted for the kind of film that Scorsese does well--they just didn't vote for Scorsese. (Though if either MDB or The Aviator had been replaced with Hotel Rwanda in the list of Best Picture nominees, I'd've been fine with that.)

Hurrah for Sideways winning Best Adapted Screenplay. Double hurrah for Charlie Kaufman's screenplay for Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (which had rich, three-dimensional characterization, despite the postmodern tricks) beating out John Logan's screenplay for The Aviator (which was conventional and linear, but had characters that were made out of cardboard for the most part).

I haven't heard the score for Finding Neverland, but it's hard to believe that John Williams wasn't robbed. (Then again, the Academy failed to nominate the score for Sideways, which is one of the best I heard in the past year--jazz ensembles don't fare well in that category, though.)
 

SteveMeister

Hang out with Steve.
Prospero said:
I haven't heard the score for Finding Neverland, but it's hard to believe that John Williams wasn't robbed.

John Williams has 5 Oscars, and has been nominated 43 times. He's also won two Emmys, 3 Golden Globes, and 18 Grammys. I'm sure he's not TOO upset :)
 

DarienA

The black man everyone at Activision can agree on
JC10001 said:
I felt that Foxx's portrail of Ray was a little too over the top at times and that the film itself was too cliched.

Are you the person that said this before in another thread? How can a biography endorsed as true and worked on in cooperation with the person its about be over the top and cliched, if that is what really happened?
 
Amir0x said:
I disagree about what you said for Eternal Sunshine. Especially since it's arguable that it's not "cold" at all.
It would be arguable, but it would also be arguable that the structure juggling does everything it could to alienate the viewer and put him in the 'jigsaw puzzle solving' situation, which is DEFINITELY not the best position to be involved dramatically, in my opinion. I loved the movie, but I don't remember crying in it, even though it was sad as hell, and I cry a lot at movies (not in tripe like Patch Adams or violin-riddled flicks, but intelligent tear-jerkers like M$B).

I think Kauffman will run out of narrative juggling linked ideas soon enough, and maybe we'll see some intelligent classical storytelling from him. You know, classical storytelling has been here for CENTURIES, it's not like nobody tried to jerk it around in the past, it's just the most effective storytelling there is.
 
DarienA said:
Are you the person that said this before in another thread? How can a biography endorsed as true and worked on in cooperation with the person it's about be over the top and cliched, if that is what really happened?
The fact that it's endorsed by the guy whose life is played in it is not a warranty of it being truthful. Ray supposedly had way more drug problems than what was expressed in the movie, and was supposedly sometimes a lot worst human being than how he is portrayed in the movie. Tell me, would you really want someone to portray all your mistakes and bad sides on the silver screen? I think you'd be the worst person to judge.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Yeah, please, A Beautiful Mind had the full support of the Nashes but that film is full of innaccuracies right down to the false claim that they live in Princeton, not to mention the fact that it skips one of his marriages and a whole hell of a lot of other things.
 

Prospero

Member
SteveMeister said:
John Williams has 5 Oscars, and has been nominated 43 times. He's also won two Emmys, 3 Golden Globes, and 18 Grammys. I'm sure he's not TOO upset :)

Yeah, I know--he probably slept well last night anyway. I still think that's one of the best and most unconventional scores he's ever done, though.
 
Dan said:
Yeah, please, A Beautiful Mind had the full support of the Nashes but that film is full of innaccuracies right down to the false claim that they live in Princeton, not to mention the fact that it skips one of his marriages and a whole hell of a lot of other things.
One of those other things was the fact that Nash had homosexual tendencies. It would have been interesting to see the movie tackle that part of his life, but A Beautiful Mind was way too stereotypical and well, Ron Howard-ish for it.
 

Prospero

Member
Dan said:
Yeah, please, A Beautiful Mind had the full support of the Nashes but that film is full of innaccuracies right down to the false claim that they live in Princeton, not to mention the fact that it skips one of his marriages and a whole hell of a lot of other things.

Like his bisexuality.
EDIT: like FJ said.
 

DarienA

The black man everyone at Activision can agree on
Foreign Jackass said:
The fact that it's endorsed by the guy whose life is played in it is not a warranty of it being truthful. Ray supposedly had way more drug problems than what was expressed in the movie, and was supposedly sometimes a lot worst human being than how he is portrayed in the movie. Tell me, would you really want someone to portray all your mistakes and bad sides on the silver screen? I think you'd be the worst person to judge.

That doesn't really speak to the crux of what I asked the other poster... the complaint that it's cliche... well the shit did happen to Ray so I find it hard to make that particular complaint about the movie...

That's like me bitching about Jo Jo Dancer being too over the top and cliche... except that crazy ass Richard Pyror really did lose it....
 

Cosmic Bus

pristine morning snow
DarienA said:
That doesn't really speak to the crux of what I asked the other poster... the complaint that it's cliche... well the shit did happen to Ray so I find it hard to make that particular complaint about the movie...

I'm not sure if cliché would be the appropriate word... Foxx did a good job, but to me, it felt like an impersonation more than an embodiment of of the person. Don Cheadle probably should've gotten the award, but that isn't how the Oscars work.
 
Hotarubi said:
I'm not sure if cliché would be the appropriate word... Foxx did a good job, but to me, it felt like an impersonation more than an embodiment of of the person. Don Cheadle probably should've gotten the award, but that isn't how the Oscars work.
Yeah.. Well.. I dunno. Foxx was incredible. The only thing that's really sad is the fact that most movies nominated were bio-pics. I'm sure glad that M$B won. Fiction is the reason why we're doing movies. Biopics are only masquerading as truth, and therefore get some unconditional love from plenty of stupid people who think that because it's posing as being a real life story, it's somehow filled with more truth than fiction, and therefore more deserving in some ways.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom