Greenpanda said:And so Hollywood continues to get more irrelevant by the year.
Huh?
Greenpanda said:And so Hollywood continues to get more irrelevant by the year.
I hate celebrity and don't care for the Academy Awards, but please substantiate this. Are you still reeling after the Bush jokes?Greenpanda said:And so Hollywood continues to get more irrelevant by the year.
*shakes fist at bogey*Amir0x said:FINAL STANDINGS.
CONGRATULATIONS TO:
1.) BOGEY
2.) SEFSKILLZ
2.) LIONO
2.) RedDwarf
Agent Icebeezy said:
Shaheed79 said:Clint Eastwood: I'm goin to Denny's for a Beer.
Some Douche Interviewer: Are you inviting me?
Clint: No.
:lol
That is, I think it's idiotic to compare Million Dollar Baby to A Beautiful Mind.Ok - Back. Calmed, a tad. I like Eastwood's MILLION DOLLAR BABY. It's a nice flick about a fairly obvious story, told better throughout any number of fantastic boxing films. It isn't near as great as the film he last won for, UNFORGIVEN. To me, AVIATOR was breathtaking cinema told by this country's greatest filmmaker, who this Academy in it's infinite blindness has continuously handed him his high hat. Like A BEAUTIFUL MIND, in a year's time MILLION DOLLAR BABY will be gathering dust in the previously seen bins, left unbought. They're good performances in a nicely directed film... But Scorsese was on an entirely different level of filmmaking.
She wins the "best looking" award for me tonight, and I never saw her before.Meier said:They can trash her all they want, she looks amazing in it.
What a moron. Although I don't like A Beautiful Mind that much, I think M$B shits all over The Aviator, and I'm the biggest Scorsese fanboy there is. The Aviator is a very good flick, I loved it, but M$B is one of the best flicks of the decade so far, if not the best, in my opinion. And well, I haven't seen a movie that tackles the same issues this one does in the same way. It's like Harry watched the first hour and left, missing the whole ending.FoneBone said:More Knowles idiocy:
Agent Icebeezy said:
effzee said:who is this? and where has she been this whole time????!!!??
sefskillz said:*shakes fist at bogey*
nice job
I think it's bad enough that you've got mere television shows dedicated to celebrity, but entire channels? That's depressingMIMIC said:They were just now trashing her on E! for wearing the same (or similar) dress as Beyonce and Alicia Keys.
Priz said:Question for those who've seen both Girlfight AND MDB: How similar are they?
I really liked Girlfight and MDB seemed like the same film to me, which is why I never got around to see it. I still really want to see Hotel Rwanda. I really liked Sideways and Maria Full of Grace.
You keep raging against the machine.Macam said:Glad I didn't waste my time watching the awards, as they've become the equivalent of televised IGN. The joys of not having television.
FoneBone said:More Knowles idiocy:
That is, I think it's idiotic to compare Million Dollar Baby to A Beautiful Mind.
android said:Yeah but someone needs to revive the genre. And he is the best choice to do it.
Watch them beat Carrey to a Oscar. :lol
VPhys said:Actually, Marlin Wayens had quite a good acting performance in a movie whos title is on the tip of my tounge.
Never seen that. Will have to check it out.Ninja Scooter said:Requim for a Dream? Marlon is actually a pretty good actor. I think he was formally trained and everything. Its Shawn thats the worthless one. ONce you put Marlon together with Shawn, he becomes some kind of brainless, unfunny zombie.
Iceman said:explain.
At first glance I think the analogy is quite good.
Although I must admit I wasn't quite enthralled with Million Dollar Baby. (that said, I hated the Beautiful Mind after the first viewing and only later came to appreciate the story and especially the acting) Can a film be too simple and subdued? Apparently so. It's a 3 act play - limited sets, few characters, easy to follow story. Only in this play there's a huge twist in the third act that makes it a completely different play with very few strings attaching part 1 to 2. I was kind of disappointed with Haggis here (although I don't know the source material at all)
Well acted, well produced film. But the finale/second half of the movie, like in A Beautiful Mind, makes the rest of the film seem rather shallow and pointless in the end.. heck in this case it even seems like a non-sequitor. A fighter for so much of her life and then.. well, you know..It's like the film featured strokes that were too broad. Goes too far to make the point.don't you kinda want her to keep fighting?
Terrific performances, particularly by Swank but the movie .. I don't think.. will hold up over time.
In comparison, I think Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Sideways have more staying power as movies. Original, poignant, quirky and a great variety of people can associate with the characters.
Foreign Jackass said:I beg to differ, with reasons expressed multiple times in other threads. Movies like Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Sideways are much "colder" movies, and will be forgotten in ten years, especially Sideways. ESotSM will be reminded as another of Kauffman's narratic structure experimentations, which, even though I LOVED the movie, are getting a little gimmicky.
Iceman said:explain.
At first glance I think the analogy is quite good.
Although I must admit I wasn't quite enthralled with Million Dollar Baby. (that said, I hated the Beautiful Mind after the first viewing and only later came to appreciate the story and especially the acting) Can a film be too simple and subdued? Apparently so. It's a 3 act play - limited sets, few characters, easy to follow story. Only in this play there's a huge twist in the third act that makes it a completely different play with very few strings attaching part 1 to 2. I was kind of disappointed with Haggis here (although I don't know the source material at all)
Well acted, well produced film. But the finale/second half of the movie, like in A Beautiful Mind, makes the rest of the film seem rather shallow and pointless in the end.. heck in this case it even seems like a non-sequitor. A fighter for so much of her life and then.. well, you know..It's like the film featured strokes that were too broad. Goes too far to make the point.don't you kinda want her to keep fighting?
Terrific performances, particularly by Swank but the movie .. I don't think.. will hold up over time.
In comparison, I think Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Sideways have more staying power as movies. Original, poignant, quirky and a great variety of people can associate with the characters.
Prospero said:I haven't heard the score for Finding Neverland, but it's hard to believe that John Williams wasn't robbed.
JC10001 said:I felt that Foxx's portrail of Ray was a little too over the top at times and that the film itself was too cliched.
It would be arguable, but it would also be arguable that the structure juggling does everything it could to alienate the viewer and put him in the 'jigsaw puzzle solving' situation, which is DEFINITELY not the best position to be involved dramatically, in my opinion. I loved the movie, but I don't remember crying in it, even though it was sad as hell, and I cry a lot at movies (not in tripe like Patch Adams or violin-riddled flicks, but intelligent tear-jerkers like M$B).Amir0x said:I disagree about what you said for Eternal Sunshine. Especially since it's arguable that it's not "cold" at all.
The fact that it's endorsed by the guy whose life is played in it is not a warranty of it being truthful. Ray supposedly had way more drug problems than what was expressed in the movie, and was supposedly sometimes a lot worst human being than how he is portrayed in the movie. Tell me, would you really want someone to portray all your mistakes and bad sides on the silver screen? I think you'd be the worst person to judge.DarienA said:Are you the person that said this before in another thread? How can a biography endorsed as true and worked on in cooperation with the person it's about be over the top and cliched, if that is what really happened?
SteveMeister said:John Williams has 5 Oscars, and has been nominated 43 times. He's also won two Emmys, 3 Golden Globes, and 18 Grammys. I'm sure he's not TOO upset![]()
One of those other things was the fact that Nash had homosexual tendencies. It would have been interesting to see the movie tackle that part of his life, but A Beautiful Mind was way too stereotypical and well, Ron Howard-ish for it.Dan said:Yeah, please, A Beautiful Mind had the full support of the Nashes but that film is full of innaccuracies right down to the false claim that they live in Princeton, not to mention the fact that it skips one of his marriages and a whole hell of a lot of other things.
Dan said:Yeah, please, A Beautiful Mind had the full support of the Nashes but that film is full of innaccuracies right down to the false claim that they live in Princeton, not to mention the fact that it skips one of his marriages and a whole hell of a lot of other things.
Foreign Jackass said:The fact that it's endorsed by the guy whose life is played in it is not a warranty of it being truthful. Ray supposedly had way more drug problems than what was expressed in the movie, and was supposedly sometimes a lot worst human being than how he is portrayed in the movie. Tell me, would you really want someone to portray all your mistakes and bad sides on the silver screen? I think you'd be the worst person to judge.
DarienA said:That doesn't really speak to the crux of what I asked the other poster... the complaint that it's cliche... well the shit did happen to Ray so I find it hard to make that particular complaint about the movie...
Yeah.. Well.. I dunno. Foxx was incredible. The only thing that's really sad is the fact that most movies nominated were bio-pics. I'm sure glad that M$B won. Fiction is the reason why we're doing movies. Biopics are only masquerading as truth, and therefore get some unconditional love from plenty of stupid people who think that because it's posing as being a real life story, it's somehow filled with more truth than fiction, and therefore more deserving in some ways.Hotarubi said:I'm not sure if cliché would be the appropriate word... Foxx did a good job, but to me, it felt like an impersonation more than an embodiment of of the person. Don Cheadle probably should've gotten the award, but that isn't how the Oscars work.