Their official response, which can be read in full below, has been shared via the Assassin's Creed Twitter account half an hour ago:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Would the example of Assassin's Creed Freedom Cry work better for you then?Wakanda isnt a real place my G.
Black Panther is a literal fictional character.....Yasuke isnt.
Was he a Samurai I dont know.
Did he exist and interact in some way with other historical figures presented in the game, yes.....how? we dont know.....fuck it we will fill in the blanks with fiction....after all this is Assassins Creed, do people actually think the Order of Templars is real?
It's a fucking game. They should sod off!Seems like just a pathetic attempt at damage control, while telling Japanese gamers to sod off.
![]()
Will they adress copy pasting stuff and selling it as collectors item?
You sound way note racist here than those upset.Say it loud, He is white so it's acceptable right
Ac was never historical. The SETTING was, its why the discovery mode was used in schools. Did people really believe Cleopatra helped Aya to kill some people with masks.
If thats the case go off when the discovery mode for Shadows is out since that is marketed as an educational tool. The actual game is marketed as an entertainment product.It seems that some people still don't get it: Ubisoft isn't doing historical fantasy based on real history with this game, they're doing historical fantasy based on literal fanfiction with an avalanche of other crap, and that's the problem.
And don't forget that Ubisoft was able to help with the Notre-Dame reconstruction but now they're not even able to properly design and model some basic room with tatami mat and common shrines/temples?
C'mon, the agenda couldn't be more clear.
And this irks people why?
Will they adress copy pasting stuff and selling it as collectors item?
How come Ubisoft and its defenders are pulling this argument only now that Lockley's bullshit has been uncovered?If thats the case go off when the discovery mode for Shadows is out since that is marketed as an educational tool. The actual game is marketed as an entertainment product.
Would the example of Assassin's Creed Freedom Cry work better for you then?
A game where the protagonist is freeing black people from slavery except this time the protagonist isnt black but asian.
Would that be cause enough for an uproar "my g" or since it's a work of fiction as you say we should let it slide cuz it ain't "real"?
Because they did it to push an agenda, that's all.
Didn't the guy edit Wikipedia pages so he could cite them in his book and also then cite his book on other Wikipedia pages or so? Like an ouroboros of bullshit citations? Or was this another guy?
It doesn't poison the well, it just points to an current social issue that you do not want to address.
As if normalizing violence against Asians is the new normal that we must all accept.
For decades male Asians have been underrepresented in western media, or worst portrayed in very insulting ways.
And this game continues to do this. But since now Asians are now considered as "white adjacent", it's ok to be racist against them.
You are being very racist against a group, while pretending that other people are the racist, for pointing out the normalization of racism and violence against Asians.
It's actually a dope standalone AC.Also loved the CG trailer for that one alot.Id play the fuck out of that too.
<----Didnt play Freedom Cry.
What agenda is that?
Will they adress copy pasting stuff and selling it as collectors item?
We had Hippocrates on the boat with the heir of Leonidas sailing the Aegean sea. I guess people who actually played ac games understands reality and fiction better than those looking from the outside. Also, real life doesnt have enemy camps every mile or so of landmass.How come Ubisoft and its defenders are pulling this argument only now that Lockley's bullshit has been uncovered?
The defense for Yasuke killing off people in town left and right while doning a full combat armor was completely different just a few weeks ago.
There's only one reason but it's the most important unfortunately : Ass Creed sells.There's no reason why they couldn't make a normal-ass Japanese Samurai (or a female Samurai, I think they were called Onna Bushi(?)
Apparently Japan started an investigation on Thomas Lockley , the guy "consulting" Ubisoft about Yasuke, whom he said was "legendary samurai". He had also claimed that black slaves were popular in feudal Japan.
Japan said people could demand compensation over the fake assumptions of black slavery in Japan and Nihon University erased Thomas Lockley's work and resume. He has pretty much vanished since.
I think that's the main reason Japan is so angry.
.
And don't forget that Ubisoft was able to help with the Notre-Dame reconstruction but now they're not even able to properly design and model some basic room with tatami mat and common shrines/temples?
C'mon, the agenda couldn't be more clear.
That stuff is based on ancient legends and myths, this crap is based on historical fanfiction passed for real history written in current day by some absolute clown.We had Hippocrates on the boat with the heir of Leonidas sailing the Aegean sea. I guess people who actually played ac games understands reality and fiction better than those looking from the outside. Also, real life doesnt have enemy camps every mile or so of landmass.
I'll have you know that i went to the island of Lesbos and IT IS populated by level 45 dykes irl.Origins is the last one to be historically accurate. The discovery tours in Odyssey and Valhalla are bullshit.
Odyssey's success ruined the historical aspect of the series.
winjer, my man. I know you're an intelligent poster, so why are we talking about 21st-century American issues in a thread about a game featuring an African dude? "Normalizes violence against Asians?" This is akin to saying GTA normalizes criminal behavior or that video games promote violence.
You’re hella reaching using this game to speak about American issues. If it were a game where you’re black dude murdering Chinese-American people in San Francisco’s chinatown, you’d have a point, but we’re so far from that that I have a hard time understanding how the comic you posted reached that point.
Make no mistake, Nobunaga is still the big dog and Yasuke serves him in this game. You’re not some big shot black guy who arrives in Japan with his crew to murder the locals.
The issues with this game are the historical revisionism, the poorly researched historical "facts", and the seemingly stolen logos because Ubisoft didn’t do their due diligence. American race relation problems aren’t on the checklist my man.
I'm not following you here.What agenda did they have when Odyssey and Valhalla had more in common with LOTR than with Greece and England?
Origins is the last one to be historically accurate. The discovery tours in Odyssey and Valhalla are bullshit.
Odyssey's success ruined the historical aspect of the series.
A lot of the story is developing in Japanese media sites so it's not really translated. Some say "National politicians" prompted the investigation and some sources say "Japanese officials" I guess it's the same thing, but translated differently.Who exactly is ‘Japan’ in this narrative?
Assassins Creed - “The Holy Land” modern day Israel - Character: Altaïr Ibn-La’Ahad ( Arabic )I don't really understand the backlash.
If this was a historical game, then sure I'd kind of understand. However, it's assassin's creed, a sci-fi fantasy action game. It's not meant to be historically accurate and never has been.
That is precisely why being offended nowdays is a marvelous tool to get ahead.Sounds like a big reach. If one is looking to be offended, everything is offensive.
They are selling it as part of collectors editionIt's concept art using matte painting...
I don't see any problems...
That's completely normal.
This game and it's choice of characters is a political one. Ubisoft has not hidden this matter.
So whatever you may think, this game is directly connected to modern XXI century US politics.
I doubt any of us is Asian or Black. I'm latino, so I'm probably half way in the racist ladder.
Still, this does not mean neither of us can be prevented of speaking of current social issues.
And one of the major issues we have currently, is racism and violence against Asians.
Watch that essay I posted about the portrayal of how Asian men are constantly being discriminated against, in western media.
This is an issue that goes back many decades, and unfortunately, Ubisoft decided to continue to continue this trend.
Assassins Creed - “The Holy Land” modern day Israel - Character: Altaïr Ibn-La’Ahad ( Arabic )
Assassins Creed II - Location: Florence, Italy - Character: Ezio Auditore ( Italian )
Assassins Creed III - Location: Boston, New York, American Colonial Frontier - Character: Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway) ( American )
Assassins Creed IV Black Flag - Location: The Caribbean - Time Period: The Golden Age of Piracy (18th Century) - Character: Edward Kenway ( British )
Assassins Creed Unity - Location: Paris, France - Character: Arno Dorian ( French )
Assassins Creed Origins - Location: Egypt - Character: Bayek of Siwa ( Egyptian )
Assassin Creed Odyssey - Location: Greece - Character: Kassandra/Alexios ( Greeks )
Assassins Creed Valhalla - Location: Norway/England - Character: Eivor (Scandinavian )
U see, every other AC game has a main character that depicted the time period and ethinic location of the game, now lets see what is happening to AC Shadows.
Assassin Creed Shadows- Location: Sengoku Japan - Character: Some African dude.
and ppl still dont know why the backlash.
Ubisoft is French. Maybe Europeans just don't care to be sensitive about whatever new political issue the US is facing right now? I know I don't.This game and it's choice of characters is a political one. Ubisoft has not hidden this matter.
So whatever you may think, this game is directly connected to modern XXI century US politics.
yeah yeah, should've been two asians.what does Ubisoft going with a black samurai as the protagonist have to do with violence against Asians in the U.S?
How exactly is this connected to modern 21st century politics in the U.S.?
As far as I know, there are TWO main characters in AC Shadows. One is clearly of Asian ethnicity.
Ubisoft is French. Maybe Europeans just don't care to be sensitive about whatever new political issue the US is facing right now? I know I don't.
Assassins Creed - “The Holy Land” modern day Israel - Character: Altaïr Ibn-La’Ahad ( Arabic )
Assassins Creed II - Location: Florence, Italy - Character: Ezio Auditore ( Italian )
Assassins Creed III - Location: Boston, New York, American Colonial Frontier - Character: Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway) ( American )
Assassins Creed IV Black Flag - Location: The Caribbean - Time Period: The Golden Age of Piracy (18th Century) - Character: Edward Kenway ( British )
Assassins Creed Unity - Location: Paris, France - Character: Arno Dorian ( French )
Assassins Creed Origins - Location: Egypt - Character: Bayek of Siwa ( Egyptian )
Assassin Creed Odyssey - Location: Greece - Character: Kassandra/Alexios ( Greeks )
Assassins Creed Valhalla - Location: Norway/England - Character: Eivor (Scandinavian )
U see, every other AC game has a main character that depicted the time period and ethinic location of the game, now lets see what is happening to AC Shadows.
Assassin Creed Shadows- Location: Sengoku Japan - Character: Some African dude.
and ppl still dont know why the backlash.