I’m probably the only one, but I just love this controller. Only missing L and R-buttonsheres your controller, bro
I’m probably the only one, but I just love this controller. Only missing L and R-buttonsheres your controller, bro
Yes. Once PS1 and Saturn were revealed there was no reason for anyone else to buy a Jaguar. Which led to it being discontinued the year after PS1 released in North America.The Jaguar came out before the PS1 though
That was common sentiment at the time, they realy messed up on that.Then...nothing.
The controller gets a lot of crap but I thought it was fairly comfortable and forward thinking. Yes, it looks like an old cordless phone with the buttons but the idea was that you put overlays on the controller and it basically turns it into a keyboard or gives you an incredible amount of options. For instance, you slap this on while playing DOOM and you have instant access to all of your weapons.
Sure it's not needed for every game and the controller does look like silly if you don't have overlays but otherwise, kinda brilliant.
If Atari had a bit more money to support fixing some HW bugs before they finalised the HW and then to produce enough models, it might have had a better chance.
Yes. Once PS1 and Saturn were revealed there was no reason for anyone else to buy a Jaguar. Which led to it being discontinued the year after PS1 released in North America.
Wasn't the Jaguar hardware flawed, broken, bugged and bottlenecked and never fixed? Causing grief for developers?
Amiga CD32, anyone actually own one? It was utter crap, even with the AGA chip set. The only redeeming feature was the additional buttons on the joy pad. But the game experience was pretty much the same as an A1200. Sega CD, Turbo CD were better CD experiences.
I'd like to see an example of the Jaguar running circles around the competition for a 2D game from CD-ROM and see how it compares. Is there any such game I can go check out?.
I’m probably the only one, but I just love this controller. Only missing L and R-buttons
I’m probably the only one, but I just love this controller. Only missing L and R-buttons
I’m probably the only one, but I just love this controller. Only missing L and R-buttons
The Jaguar controller is much better than it’s reputation. It’s comfortable to hold, features some good ergonomics, the d-pad and buttons are smooth and responsive. I think most critics have never held one and just can’t get past the keypad.
Atari’s plan should have been to concentrate on quality software, then retire the Jag after ‘96 and survive as a software publisher.
I was an Atari ST user back in the day and bought a Jaguar at launch. I originally had a 1040STf, then upgraded to a 1040STE. I almost jumped on the Falcon bandwagon back in like 1995, when C-Lab was manufacturing the Falcon, as my local Atari computer dealer had them in stock. (one of the last Atari computer dealers left in the US). Falcon's were still spendy. A C-Lab Falcon with 4MB of RAM and an internal 20 MB HD was like $1299. A fully decked out Falcon with 14 MB RAM and 80 MB internal HD was like $1799. I did mess around with Falcon's at my local Atari Computer User Group meetings, but nothing beyond that. My better judgment kicked in and I joined the Wintel computer kids, as the days of Commodore and Atari were over.Just some random thoughts for this amazing, epic, never ending diatribe we are all witnessing. It's really impressive.
Okay, how many people in this thread actually owned an ST or god forbid a Falcon? How many have actually touched a Falcon?
ClickBOOM's Amiga port of Quake required a lot of extra juice, 68020 was the minimum spec but required an upgraded graphics board. It really required 68060 and tons of ram. Where the falcon's DSP and FPU's enough to match an Amiga on steroids?
Also anyone else really want to get a Jaguar now, just for fun?
Truth time, I have a soft spot for the 32X and it's untapped potential. I had more enjoyment out of that than the Jaguar. But I'm first to admit that potential was not great.
Atari released a 6 face button version of their controller, that's amazing.
Wasn't the Jaguar hardware flawed, broken, bugged and bottlenecked and never fixed? Causing grief for developers?
Amiga CD32, anyone actually own one? It was utter crap, even with the AGA chip set. The only redeeming feature was the additional buttons on the joy pad. But the game experience was pretty much the same as an A1200. Sega CD, Turbo CD were better CD experiences. I doubt that would have ever have changed if the system actually lived. There was no saving that trash, it was quickly exposed for the fraud it was after die hard Amiga lovers got suckered into buying one. AGA, limited ram, CD bandwidth, it was going nowhere.
VDP2 is for backgrounds, why are we still debating this? Every source you check, it's very clear what it does. Let's not move the goal posts.
I'd like to see an example of the Jaguar running circles around the competition for a 2D game from CD-ROM and see how it compares. Is there any such game I can go check out?.
I was an Atari ST user back in the day and bought a Jaguar at launch. I originally had a 1040STf, then upgraded to a 1040STE. I almost jumped on the Falcon bandwagon back in like 1995, when C-Lab was manufacturing the Falcon, as my local Atari computer dealer had them in stock. (one of the last Atari computer dealers left in the US). Falcon's were still spendy. A C-Lab Falcon with 4MB of RAM and an internal 20 MB HD was like $1299. A fully decked out Falcon with 14 MB RAM and 80 MB internal HD was like $1799. I did mess around with Falcon's at my local Atari Computer User Group meetings, but nothing beyond that. My better judgment kicked in and I joined the Wintel computer kids, as the days of Commodore and Atari were over.
I still have a 65XE w/XF-551 disk drive and 1040STE (w/4MB RAM, SC1224 monitor, 60 MB Supra HD) set up in my computer room. I have a pretty large Atari 8-bit and ST boxed game and software collection. I also still have two Jags (for Jag-Link Doom and Battlesphere), Jag CD, two Pro-Controllers and a complete retail Jag/Jag CD collection, along with a bunch of home brews. I also have an Atari 2600/5200/7800/XEGS and a Lynx and all kinds of Atari swag and junk.. Lol
Here is my Jag and STE:
Oh ya, I have a bunch of C64/Atari flippy-floppy releases. Epyx and Datasoft did it a lot. SSI even had a few Atari/Apple II flippy-floppy releases.I know people joke about the Jaguar and how it looks like a toilet bowl, but I really do like the look of the console. The 6 button pad, two of them! nice.
The ST is a thing of beauty, but I think the XEGS or whatever is even better looking and a neat set-up to continue the 8 bit line.
Out of curiosity - your Atari 8 bit games, do a lot of the originals contain the C64 version on the front and the Atari on the back? Such an odd early 80's thing.
Actually never, but i am glad you are saying the same thing in regards to Quake - A 020 wouldn't really cut it and its basically a 060 game (or a very fast 040 iteration)Just some random thoughts for this amazing, epic, never ending diatribe we are all witnessing. It's really impressive.
Okay, how many people in this thread actually owned an ST or god forbid a Falcon? How many have actually touched a Falcon?
ClickBOOM's Amiga port of Quake required a lot of extra juice, 68020 was the minimum spec but required an upgraded graphics board. It really required 68060 and tons of ram. Where the falcon's DSP and FPU's enough to match an Amiga on steroids?
Some saving grace: It can run standard CD's just fine. Meaning people have created compilation disks with patches to make then CD32 native (Earok), which is honestly kind of impressive. That alone makes the CD32 go from rather useless to a pretty darn good machine in terms of replayability.Amiga CD32, anyone actually own one? It was utter crap, even with the AGA chip set. The only redeeming feature was the additional buttons on the joy pad. But the game experience was pretty much the same as an A1200. Sega CD, Turbo CD were better CD experiences. I doubt that would have ever have changed if the system actually lived. There was no saving that trash, it was quickly exposed for the fraud it was after die hard Amiga lovers got suckered into buying one. AGA, limited ram, CD bandwidth, it was going nowhere.
Far as i can tell you are the one saying the Falcon could run Quake. I mean, i can literally screenshot that exact statement. You will say its out of context or ignore that ive conceded that you weren't saying that Quake 2 could be a direct port, but everything else is just the way it is.Strange how someone is claiming I made an argument they themselves made.
Obviously, what the Jag needed was more quality software. T2K, AvP, Iron Soldier and Doom were great showpieces, NBA Jam TE, Brutal Sports Football and Sensible Soccer were great sports games, and Super Burnout really showed off how good racing games could be if drawn in that “super scaler” style. Atari really needed Mortal Kombat and Street Fighter. But then you’d run into problems with the original joypad. Maybe they should have shipped the pro controller at the start?
Ah, well. The truth is that Jaguar only had that small window of 1993-96 to shine, after which the main Gen-5 consoles would arrive and take over. Atari’s plan should have been to concentrate on quality software, then retire the Jag after ‘96 and survive as a software publisher. Too bad the Tramiel Family was in charge.
That seemed to be the management's intention in early 1996, as they were planning to create games for PlayStation, Saturn, and PC, while gradually winding down on the Jaguar (although they had a next-generation Jaguar 2 system in development).
The Jaguar controller is much better than it’s reputation. It’s comfortable to hold, features some good ergonomics, the d-pad and buttons are smooth and responsive. I think most critics have never held one and just can’t get past the keypad.
I agree with both of you The Jaguar controller was quite comfortable. People who have only seen it in pictures and never used it think it's some awfully bulky monstrosity. In fact, it's ergonomically designed, and the bottom side is contoured so that your fingers curl around slightly as you cradle it, much like modern PlayStation/Xbox controllers. If you can visualize a PlayStation controller, and imagine that there was a numeric keypad in between the two handles, then you might have a better idea of what a Jaguar controller is like.
The only real drawback to the original controller was the relatively low number of readily accessible buttons
AtJ has some nice games, too bad its emulation is worse than basically most other consoles. And despite the differences in hardware, Jaguar and Atari's fate is very similar to that of Dreamcast and Sega's, right to the point of having a dediacted fanbase and homebrew developers.
Atari's too?You can play Sega games made this year