word? cool.
for the record I'm a Batman fan, probably buy all of the books Batman is in. I was just having fun, but if you feel some kind of way, I'll just have to remember not to discuss comics with you in the future. But since I'm curious and you do like pulling up old shit, why don't you bring up the last time I "pulled this shit" and we will handle it right there.
but we're not done. I can't complain about how they wrote bruce, and also how the set up the entire premise? Why can't I? Its valid criticism. Because you object?
What does capitalism have to do with anything? The invisible hand metaphor, sir. Do I have to explain the negative connotations and satirical points that follow along with it? I can. if you really need me to. Did I really forget anything when all I have to do if my memory is unclear is hit up comic wikias and google?
Oh I did it all so I could be like Slayven. You ever come at me wrong like this again, you better do it in PM.
Because the only person you've embarrassed is yourself.
Why can't you complain about how they set up the premise as a rebuttal to me? Because it's god damned irrelevant. The argument was never "No Man's Land is a great story" it was that Bruce didn't want Clark flying in to try and fix everything and whether that was the right call on his part or just Bruce being an asshole. You want to talk about how good of poor the premise was to force that situation? Cool. Do that. We can have that discussion. Don't do it as a rebuttal to a completely unrelated point.
And clearly you didn't remember or bother to search the wiki since you were comparing Gotham to Katrina and talking about evacuations when that wasn't an option once the boarders were closed. If you really wanted a real life comparison and you actually remembered the storyline you have the Haiti earthquake sitting right there (which still wouldn't be accurate, mind, since American relief workers weren't forbidden to enter Haiti). So don't try to front like you did.
As for capitalism, see my first paragraph. What the he'll does it have to do with what was being discussed? Where did the invisible hand of the free market enter into Bruce Wayne'a decision making when he told Clark to not try and fix Gotham. Explain it to me, if you can. Explain it like I'm 5.
No, you didn't bother to try to argue a single point in my rebuttal to you. Took the time to directly respond to your post and argue my point with you, despite my better judgement from previous experience, and instead of showing me the same courtesy you sum up my post as "too much" and go off on an unrelated, irrelevant tangent and now you want to get heated that I called you on that bullshit.
That's why I'm accusing you of intellectual dishonesty and bandwagon jumping. And if I got the latter part wrong, then I apologize to you, because that was rude of me. But the former? Maybe you do it unintentionally, but from my perspective it is absolutely true.