I love how you eloquently use that word to describe an important character that affected the outcome of the movie. Way to go. And the joker used Rachel as a means to escape, so one would assume that, you know, joker escaped.LM4sure said:Posted this in the rottenwatch thread, but probably should post here since it contains spoilers.
Saw it last night at 10:45. Still don't know how the theater got away with showing it before midnight since every other theater I checked had 12:01 showings. Oh well, I guess I won!
Anyway, the movie was pretty good. A couple of editing problems, but I think that might have been because of the dead dude. For instance, the scene when the Joker throws that cunt out the window at the party and Batman jumps out after her, they crash into a car and then the next scene takes place the next day. What the hell happened to the Joker? He just gave up looking for Harvey and left? Why didn't they show that? LAME!
I also felt that Two Face didn't get enough screen time. Probably should have saved him for the sequel. I think they were shooting for a sequel with the Joker, seeing as how he didn't die, but that's not going to happen now!
One Final comment. I am SICK of hearing on the internet, tv, etc. how Ledger was UNBELIEVABLE and will win an Oscar. Don't get me wrong. He was good, but not nearly as good as the tools in the media have made him out to be. If he was still alive, no one would say shit.
Raguel said:No, joker set up each ferry with a remote to detonate the other ferry. Whoever detonates the other ferry survives. That's why the inmate did the honorable thing and threw the detonator away, thereby saving the civilian ferry
My guess is that Joker was clearly a little too wrapped with the hostage situation to kill all those people, especially random police officers. I dunno. Someone who has their senses together will put the pieces together better than i can right. I'm still reeling from the film.crisdecuba said:This has been asked before, but I couldn't see anyone come up with a plausible answer: why did they have to blame Batman for the people Harvey killed? Why couldn't they blame the Joker or one of his thugs?
Nolan played all the cards in his hand. I mean, once you ride the batpod up a wall just to turn around with it, WHERE THE FUCK ELSE DO YOU GO FROM THERE?Lion Heart said:This movie should have been the final in the trilogy. It should have ended with Joker, there is no way the next film can be as good. But damn, fuck, win, speechless, sad, etc
Lion Heart said:This movie should have been the final in the trilogy. It should have ended with Joker, there is no way the next film can be as good. But damn, fuck, win, speechless, sad, etc
No no...he has to...otherwise some other douchebag will.Dirtbag 504 said:Totally agree.
I don't know if Nolan should even make the third one now.
shidoshi said:Not sure if this was covered yet, but I don't want to forget about it: there was nothing convenient about the situation. Joker expected one of the two groups to kill the other, so he never really set a timer.
He was much like the mob he was dealing with - small time. It was to show the audience that Batman still has a force in the town to be reckoned with, and it's gonna need a lot more than the scarecrow to take him down.Frester said:Was there a solid reason for Scarecrow's cameo? Don't get me wrong, I loved him in Batman Begins (which I rewatched Wednesday night), but he really didn't add anything to The Dark Knight. Why was he even dealing what would presumably be the hallucinogen from the first movie? It's not like he has a motive or a boss for that kind of thing anymore.
RubxQub said:No no...he has to...otherwise some other douchebag will.
Penguin said:Okay I was really think hard the first time and tried to count the second time.
Gordon says that Harvey killed 5 people.
I counted the dirty cop, Sal and his driver and maybe Dent himself. That would only make 4. Ramirez as far as I could tell only got slapped. So who am I missing?
SpeedingUptoStop said:... I'm still reeling from the film.
Gordan says 2 of them were cops.Penguin said:Okay I was really think hard the first time and tried to count the second time.
Gordon says that Harvey killed 5 people.
I counted the dirty cop, Sal and his driver and maybe Dent himself. That would only make 4. Ramirez as far as I could tell only got slapped. So who am I missing?
gketter said:Unless its in a commetary at some point we'll never know, but i'm convinced that Joker setup the ferry's bombs to blow up their own ship, and that the good civilians were going to blow themselves up.
Either that or it would blow them both.shidoshi said:Yup, I'm pretty much right there with you. That was what I was expecting the outcome to be, that the detonators where not in fact for the other boat, but their own.
Ah, I read the quote wrong.shidoshi said:Yup, I'm pretty much right there with you. That was what I was expecting the outcome to be, that the detonators where not in fact for the other boat, but their own.
el Diablo said:Saw it last night at a 3:15 showing, didn't walk out of the theater till 6 AM :lol. As great as the movie was, and it was (i never once thought during the entire movie that it drug along, the pacing was incredible), i'm really really glad i got it out of the way in a 1/2 full theater. It's going to be a f'ng madhouse trying to watch it this weekend. Not only that but there were a couple of major plot twists that could have been spoiled that would really have taken alot of the enjoyment out of the movie for me (rachel dying and harvey going two-face).
I went on media blackout about 3 months ago for this movie so hadn't seen anything except the trailers that were shown on TV so i've got a question. Am i the only one that was shocked that Harvey actually turned into two-face in this movie? Had it been leaked on the net, were there other trailers or what? I mean i know HD is Two-face but i didn't actually think he'd turn into him in this movie. Figured it was a set-up, kind of like what they did with Dr. Conners (the lizard) in the Spiderman movies.
At any rate, the ONLY problem i had with the movie was that they killed Two-face. I really hate it when these superhero movies kill villains. Now if the hero kills then fine the finality works, but not if the guy is always taken alive and always turns them in. Ras was fine being killed in Begins since he ALWAYS ends up getting revived but killing Two-face was just a poor decision. IMO the single reason why Batman trumps all other comic book heroes is he has the absolute BEST villains, killing Two-face and not throwing him in Arkham just seems off.
Oh, one last thing. Saw the Terminator: Salvation trailer before DK. F*CKING HYPED![]()
el Diablo said:On the topic of that ferry scene, part of me wanted Deebo to stand up and grab the detonator and say, "that's my detonator punk!". Man in any other movie it would have been perfect.
RubxQub said:Ah, I read the quote wrong.
It's quite possible, but we have no reason to think it was rigged one way or the other.
Frester said:Also, this could just be me seeing something that wasn't there, but I thought he didn't die, and Gordon and Batman were trying to cover up what really happened since they didn't want Gotham to see their new knight-in-shining-armor DA go bad. Hence why Batman takes the blame.
Indeed, what's more important to people, a fellow human being in distress or a movie? I guess people just stop caring when they're convinced the situation is "handled"...ahoyle77 said:Ah....you were in my theater! I was on my way home and told my buddy that I had a bad joke, but that we could honestly tell people it was so good it sent people in to seizures. I followed that up by saying, "I am going straight to hell". He looked at me and said, "no, the guy that shushed is going straight to hell!"
Frester said:Also, this could just be me seeing something that wasn't there, but I thought he didn't die, and Gordon and Batman were trying to cover up what really happened since they didn't want Gotham to see their new knight-in-shining-armor DA go bad. Hence why Batman takes the blame.
I had a wife....can you believe that? ME? A WIFE?Xdrive05 said:You wanna know how I got these scars?
Xdrive05 said:You wanna know how I got these scars?
TheSonicRetard said:Also, the only villain I could possibly see being in Batman 3 would be The Mad Hatter. The TV shows made him less insane, but he was originally one of the darkest villains ever.
LM4sure said:One Final comment. I am SICK of hearing on the internet, tv, etc. how Ledger was UNBELIEVABLE and will win an Oscar. Don't get me wrong. He was good, but not nearly as good as the tools in the media have made him out to be. If he was still alive, no one would say shit.
Darko said:Exactly and I will not watch unless it is helmed by the Nolan Brothers + Gouyer.
Amen.Zeliard said:Such bullshit. I fucking hate posts like this. If Heath gets nominated and/or wins the Oscar, it will be fully merited. The performance was astonishing and he completely buried himself in the role. Compare Heath's Joker to any one of his other performances. Hardly seems like the same actor. He's virtually unrecognizable.
If you want to get into the technicalities of it, his dialogue delivery and comedic timing were hilariously perfect (the guy was able to get huge laughs out of simple one-word utterances), his physical acting was impeccable (i.e. the nurse's outfit, which I'm still laughing at), he filled the character with various ticks and idiosyncrasies that made him unique and stand out from pretty much every villain we've seen, his screen presence was enormous and his impact was felt throughout the film even though he had little screen time overall. He managed to convey both pure sadism but also a twisted morality that sort of made sense. It was a darkly humorous, complex and brilliant performance.
The problem now is that after Heath is nominated, we'll be hearing idiots whining about people "worshipping the dead" and such, when people are simply worshipping a great performance. Heath's Joker would have dominated the film and dominated discussion about the film with or without his death. If you can't see that, you're blind.
Frester said:There was a very brief clip in the trailers where Dent is riding in a car holding a pistol, and you can see that part of his face has been burned.
Also, this could just be me seeing something that wasn't there, but I thought he didn't die, and Gordon and Batman were trying to cover up what really happened since they didn't want Gotham to see their new knight-in-shining-armor DA go bad. Hence why Batman takes the blame.
el Diablo said:Lots of good villains to choose from, the difficult part is bringing them to the screen in a realistic manner. IE: Penguin, Bane, Mr. Freeze.
Personally i'd like to see the last one go in the direction of the No Man's Land arc. Would be pretty much imposible though since no other heroes have been introduced.
Really, I don't think Goyer had much to do at all with this script. He 'laid out the template' but then, quite clearly, the Nolans flipped the script. They made a totally different film from BB. the way I see it, Goyer was just their to hold their hands during BB. With TDK, the Nolans stood out on their own.jett said:David Goyer is fail. Next one should be a Jonathan and Chris Nolan sexclusive.
MiamiWesker said:Thats what I got out of that scene. Never once did Harvey dying enter my mind until gaf started talking about it. No one in my party last night thought Two-Face died either.
SpeedingUptoStop said:Amen.
Zeliard said:Such bullshit. I fucking hate posts like this. If Heath gets nominated and/or wins the Oscar, it will be fully merited. The performance was astonishing and he completely buried himself in the role. Compare Heath's Joker to any one of his other performances. Hardly seems like the same actor. He's virtually unrecognizable.
If you want to get into the technicalities of it, his dialogue delivery and comedic timing were hilariously perfect (the guy was able to get huge laughs out of simple one-word utterances), his physical acting was impeccable (i.e. the nurse's outfit, which I'm still laughing at), he filled the character with various ticks and idiosyncrasies that made him unique and stand out from pretty much every villain we've seen, his screen presence was enormous and his impact was felt throughout the film even though he had little screen time overall. He managed to convey both pure sadism but also a twisted morality that sort of made sense. It was a darkly humorous, complex and brilliant performance.
The problem now is that after Heath is nominated, we'll be hearing idiots whining about people "worshipping the dead" and such, when people are simply worshipping a great performance. Heath's Joker would have dominated the film and dominated discussion about the film with or without his death. If you can't see that, you're blind.
SpeedingUptoStop said:Really, I don't think Goyer had much to do at all with this script. He 'laid out the template' but then, quite clearly, the Nolans flipped the script. They made a totally different film from BB. the way I see it, Goyer was just their to hold their hands during BB. With TDK, the Nolans stood out on their own.
MiamiWesker said:This.
Seriously, how can you watch that performance and not think Oscar worthy. That was some of the best acting I have ever seen because he was not there, there was no actor, just the Joker.