exarkun said:Did anyone else find it weird that a semi orange haired accountant found out who batman was? I know it used for the sake of the movie so the Joker had an excuse to go to the hospitals, but I was arguing in the car that it could be a foreshadowing for the Riddler. Though they couldn't really use such an ordinary looking man to play the part I guess.
It would be perfect if his name was Nashton or whatever, but anyone else think about that?
agreedScullibundo said:The Riddler can fuck right off after we got the Joker.
Broadbandito said:for sure. The first thought about the two films after seeing this is how completely different both films felt. And to me i think that is a good thing.
Scullibundo said:Seriously though, Zombie Rachel or Alfred on strike should be the next villain.
:lol :lolScullibundo said:The Dark Knight is second only to Michael Bay's treatment for it: http://my.spill.com/profiles/blog/show?id=947994:BlogPost:355506
:lol :lol :lol
Whoever wrote that is GENIUS
suaveric said:For new criminals, you could have the Penguin as a new mob boss. Catwoman could be floating around as a super-thief contracted out by the mob (and she's a love interest for Batman). You could also throw in the Riddler as something more serious. He would be in the vein of the Unabomber or the Zodiac, where he would commit crimes and then taunt the police and Batman with notes.
Ninja Scooter said:dude, Joker killed like the fucking commissioner of police, blew up the goddamn police station and leveled a fucking hospital...a little fat deformed man or a dude in a suit with question marks all over it just can't live up to that without coming off as lame.
the problem would be that they would have to tone it down significantly, and i don't see how you can do that as a follow up to DK. How would it even be possible? I guess i'll have to trust in Nolan.
suaveric said:there would be no question marks on the Riddler, it would be a much more serious take on the character. maybe question makrs on his notes to the police. and the Penguin would also be something much more tame, nothing like Burton's version.
but I agree that Nolan can't up and ante any more. the next movie would have to be smaller in scope.
Dude, Gordon returned like 28 hours after his 'death'. The city was in chaos, the police department was in chaos, etc.me so Grant said:-Gordon's fake death. WTF. Big eye roll moment. One, it makes almost zero sense and is full of plot holes if you give it any thought (like, say, he's "shot" in pure day light but there's no body? but his family buys it? what?) Two, it cheapens the other "real" deaths. Rachel's dead... but maybe its a fake, we don't know what to trust at his point!
As stated before, there was a little hint that Dent might not be completely safe. Secondly, knowing they were taken would have removed the entire sense of victory that came with nabbing the Joker. It works so much better in going from that brief moment of elation to finding out that Joker was once again a step ahead, that two of our main characters are in mortal danger. Showing gloved hands take them would have in no way created mystery. Who else would we believe was responsible? What would Gordon possible have to gain by bluffing the Joker? There was no information he needed. Joker was the target. Why would he rush back from home to do it? The plot was at the end of the road until the abductions came to light.-This is minor, but we should've visually seen somebody abduct Harvey and Rachel. Just a quick shot of a gloved hand over their mouth or something. Gordon walks in and tells the Joker that Harvey didn't get home last night, but my first instinct was that Gordon was bluffing (AFTER ALL, he bluffed his death). Until we saw Dent and Rachel tied up, it seemed like a ruse. You can still keep the mystery of where they are, and who abducted them a mystery, but this is a visual medium - SHOW me Dent didn't make it home last night.
mugwhump said:Lulz awesome wowsome movie
Did anyone else think the thing with the cellphones was silly though? That didn't seem remotely possible to me >_>
MechaX said:The truck flip got some pretty big "Oohs."
The Batpod 180 got some applause.
This, and the kids pretending to blow up the cars are the only things that ticked me off about the film.PacoDG said:I fucking hate Christian Bale's stupid deep voice while in the Batman outfit.
Fixed2BeBroken said:things that got applause or major "OOOHS!/AHHHS!" in my theater....
-pencil/magic trick
-Batman appearing in the joker questioning room and slamming his head into the table
-the truck flip
shiwasu said:Just saw it this afternoon/night. I've got some questions.
-What was the point of the Scarecrow
-How did the Joker really get his scars
-Why was Harvey Dent known as Two-Face?
It's irrelevant. Mystery is good.shiwasu said:-How did the Joker really get his scars
SpeedingUptoStop said:Yea, I really can't see how you'd be confused by that. that's 100% pure film language there. No "Here's Harvey Dent, guys! he's right here in this warehouse!" until it's absolutely necessary.
And do you guys really think the Joker mixed up the addresses? I think not. I'm fairly certain he made the Batman choice (saving his white knight so he can live a normal life) as opposed to the Bruce Wayne choice (saving his love for selfish reasons). Unfortunately, neither worked out.
Fixed2BeBroken said:things that got applause or major "OOOHS!/AHHHS!" in my theater....
-pencil/magic trick
-Batman appearing in the joker questioning room and slamming his head into the table
-the truck flip
-"Debo" throwing out the bomb trigger
Exactly. Let's but the kibosh on this crap right now. He was messed up but he was still perfectly recognizable as Harvey Dent, if there was the slightest chance anyone might see him again it would entirely destroy the symbol they turned him into.Dan said:Two-Face is dead. Harvey Dent lives on in the spirit of Gotham.
[and anyone suggesting otherwise, Two-Face somehow being alive after that ending would be the dumbest fucking thing ever]
Shig said:Exactly. Let's but the kibosh on this crap right now. He was messed up but he was still perfectly recognizable as Harvey Dent, if there was the slightest chance anyone might see him again it would entirely destroy the symbol they turned him into.
As far as the switching addresses thing, I'm still not sure if that's what happened. Batman didn't seem surprised, if he was expecting to find Rachel he would have ran right back out the door upon realizing it was Harvey. (Didn't he have a couple of cops flanking him as he busted the door open, too?) I think the theory that he put what was best for Gotham over what was best for himself might have some merit.
Did they say it was that specific address when they returned?Archaix said:Gordon went to the location opposite Batman, and ended up at 250 52nd Street (They return to the location later, with Harvey stating that's where his family died)
Shig said:Did they say it was that specific address when they returned?
If they went to both locations, why was Gordon's team not caught in the explosion at his point? Perhaps Batman told Gordon the opposite location to minimize casualties; If they had teams at both places, not only would Rachel or Dent die, their rescuers probably would have as well.
You should really read the things you reply to.Nazgul_Hunter said:Batman didn't tell Gordon the address, they heard it through the speakers. Gordon just asks "where are you going?" and Batman says "Rachel"
Dan said:As stated before, there was a little hint that Dent might not be completely safe. Secondly, knowing they were taken would have removed the entire sense of victory that came with nabbing the Joker. It works so much better in going from that brief moment of elation to finding out that Joker was once again a step ahead, that two of our main characters are in mortal danger. Showing gloved hands take them would have in no way created mystery. Who else would we believe was responsible? What would Gordon possible have to gain by bluffing the Joker? There was no information he needed. Joker was the target. Why would he rush back from home to do it? The plot was at the end of the road until the abductions came to light.
I didn't say it was the absolute tops in terms of Pop Culture or Cebreberal Subtext, but it sure as hell is one of the most fantastic mixtures of the two.me so Grant said:Its great. Loved TDK.
But its not exactly the brainiest thing around. For comics movies, maybe yes.
Although I think I'll probably have to wait a few days before GAF is ready to actually talk about the movie's highs and lows.
Hitokage said:It's clear that Heath Ledger got raptured to actor heaven.
Anyway, interesting addition to my Dark Knight experience... during the social experiment scene with the two ferries a woman in the theater had a medical emergency and was promptly carried down the steps to the entrance by the people accompanying her, while some people shouted "If she's seizing she needs to be on the ground!", then an offer to call 911 was made and taken up, and not before long...
People started shushing.
Snaku said:Could be entirely possible that Gordon pulled a Gordon and faked Harvey's death, and just hid him away somewhere.
Enter the Riddler; to solve the mystery behind Harvey Dent, and clear the Batman's name.
Your special.Rapping Granny said:I hated two face, very fucking annoying character, yeah we know your spouse got killed, move on fuck. I hated him throught the entire movie.