http://www.formula1blog.com/f1-news/horner-f1-should-abort-v6-engines-go-back-to-v8s/F1blogdotcom said:There is no gold medal for fielding a green engine but there is a radically increased cost in doing so. It is a cost so steep that the series is now standing over the chalk outline to two corpses who have been IDd as Marussia and Caterham.
In many ways the demand from Renault and Mercedes to use hybrid engines was not really a case of could so much as it is should. Should F1 go down this road and what, if any, impact would it have on the series? F1 marched off with its usual pragmatism shunning prudence as a back-seat afterthought.
In the end, the pragmatism seemed to miss the obvious resultslack of sound, lack of visceral excitement, lift and coast, massive cost increases and ultimately the demise of the grids smaller teams. Wow, nobody saw that coming!
Perhaps that didnt matter to Mercedes as they waded into the F1 sandbox with all the ham-fisted bravado of Robert ZDar only to quickly become the odd-looking antagonist to F1s protagonistthe rest of the grid. Mercedes had a plan on the boil from 2009 and their commitment to F1 was based upon F1 changing its very nature to something more fitting to the German carmakers plan.
You have to hand it to them, they really pulled a doozy on F1. They seemingly would only enter and commit long-term to F1 if the series changed its very DNA to something closer to their business model. Renault, like the middle child, yelped me too, me too and off to the eco-drawing board the series went.
The FIA were rubber-stamping the concept all along with, apparently, little regards to the cost impact to the series and this is the very organization that was advocating cost-caps and cost reduction. The duality of their position is astonishing unless, of course, the commercial arm of the sport forced their hand.
Much has been made over the disproportionate distribution of prize money for the small teams but that is a red herring argument as it was the system for 2013 and things seemed stable. It wasnt until 2014 when the small teams had to increase their operating costs by $30 million in order to buy an engine.
Yeah, not understanding why a company would want to advertise to future consumers only confirms that old people shouldn't be in charge of anything.
Yeah, pretty much. There were all sorts of rumours about Sauber's future this time last year.Everything looked stable financially in 2013? That's just absolute nonsense. This is nothing more than the perfect way for people who never liked the engines in the first place to have a valid reason for not liking them except that the noise is terrible.
Yeah, pretty much. There were all sorts of rumours about Sauber's future this time last year.
In regards to the alcohol discussion, in my opinion if they ban alcohol sponsorships they also should ban telecom provider sponsorships. Texting/Calling while driving is fucking irresponsible.
Pretty much. I still don't see how advertising in a sport like this could have an influence like that on the viewers or fans (especially if you think about the viewers that Bernie has in mind). Which is why the general tobacco ban never made sense to me either. Do adults really go out and start smoking or switch to a specific brand to support their team?
The smoking ban is more complicated I think. It has to do with F1 being an international sport, and in many countries tobacco advertising is heavily limited or outright banned. So you can't really take on sponsors when you can't promise them the level of marketing they would like.
That obviously makes sense now, but was this the case during the time of the ban in the then biggest markets for F1? I really don't remember it anymore, since it's been so long.
How incredibly dumb, ignorant and/or uninformed!
Without the engine change, neither Mercedes, nor Renault would still be there, and Honda wouldn´t have returned. Just imagine F1 with all teams on Cosworths trying to compete with Ferrari...
If the guy thinks the "system seemed stable in 2013" he needs to inform himself.
The problem wasn't moving to the V6T Hybrid, it was not putting in place a spending and purchase price cap and bending to the will of Mercedes who threatened to leave if they weren't allowed to spend as much as they pleased. Mercedes added a massive upwards spending pressure and that has led to massively inflated engine costs (3-4x higher than the V8 as you well know) and now massive financial issues in the middle of the grid. As I said before, I love that Lewis is at a team that has delivered a WDC winning car, but the cost to the sport is too high, F1 with £30m engines is not sustainable and Mercedes are the root cause of that high cost, whether you want to admit or not. In trying to ensure success this season and next, Mercedes adopted a beggar-thy-neighbour R&D policy and now the sport is going to end up with 14/16 cars on the grid after Sauber or FI (or both) fold.
On F1s entertainment factor:
Entertainment is what people want to see. If you asked me tonight to go to the ballet and said its fantastic, I would say, its not for me.
I just cant understand the reason why they have these girls dancing on their toes. Why dont they get taller girls? It would be so much easier.
Who is the human?
Hilariously cretinous.Bernie, I hate you. But you just made me alol.
http://www1.skysports.com/f1/news/1...less-for-f1-to-a-chase-a-new-younger-audience
@CaterhamF1: We are delighted to announce that we will be racing in Abu Dhabi next week thanks to the support of the fans. THANK YOU #RefuelCaterhamF1
How I wish it was Marussia and not Caterham. Is Kobayashi at least confirmed?
Can you imagine if Caterham gives the spot to a rookie and when he's being lapped he crashes against Nico or Lewis?
Oh boy...
Can you imagine if Caterham gives the spot to a rookie and when he's being lapped he crashes against Nico or Lewis?
Oh boy...
Looks like very basic early season spec with gills for extra cooling. Sounds like the engine didn't blow up and everything worked so good start so far!
Just imagine F1 with all teams on Cosworths trying to compete with Ferrari...
Bernie, I hate you. But you just made me alol.
http://www1.skysports.com/f1/news/1...less-for-f1-to-a-chase-a-new-younger-audience
The sainz Jr part has already been rubbished so my hunch is the whole article is bollocks.warms the cockles, but it's missing the powered by Honda decal and an orange livery
McLaren going all Spanish?
Omnicorse says Telefonica will be the new title sponsor and the driver line up will be Alonso & Sainz Jr, if confirmed McLaren are dead to me, not even Honda returning can keep me watching this F1 muck.
Insiders say the new Honda engine is already close to producing a similar level of performance to the Mercedes turbo hybrid V6 which has dominated Formula 1 this season.
But the Japanese company may need to find considerably more performance ahead of the new season if it is to be competitive, as Mercedes are said to have made significant steps forward with their power unit for 2015.
Even under rules restricting development, sources say Mercedes have improved their engine enough to translate into a performance gain of about a second a lap for next season.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/30060635