As we've seen this season, a good engine don't mean shit if your chassis is a crock.
As I've barely paid attention to F1 this year, who does this pertain to?
As we've seen this season, a good engine don't mean shit if your chassis is a crock.
As I've barely paid attention to F1 this year, who does this pertain to?
As I've barely paid attention to F1 this year, who does this pertain to?
Also this:
has a team ever won every race in a season before?
Sportscar365 ‏@sportscar365 2m2 minutes ago
We've just been informed that Fernando Alonso will be making an appearance at today's #6HBahrain as a private visitor. @alo_oficial @FIAWEC
C'mon Fred, just do it, F1 and Le Mans next year!
Webber trying to rope him in -
It's crazy how small Alonso looks.Webber trying to rope him in -
No double points next season, woot! Season will have to find silliness elsewhere.It will find plenty of silliness.
I know everyone wants to see Alonso join the WEC just for the Webber bromance, but he belongs in F1.
https://i.imgur.com/c7NJRa2h.jpg[/MG]
Bourdais did F1 and Le Mans in 2008 and 2009, so hopefully Alonso would also be able contract-wise to do the same.
Also, Radio Le Mans guys are hyping up WEC in the context of F1 drivers, "some good things will happen in the near future".[/QUOTE]
Could you imagine Webber, Button, and Alonso driving the same car in a WEC customer team? Woah.
Or better yet; Alonso, Hamilton, and Vettel :p
A voice from the real world
Here is a message I have received. I have edited out a small section that I consider to be libellous. However, I think that the rest of the information should be made public.
I am a former (as of yesterday) employee with Caterham F1.
It is dismaying to see the amount of publicity surrounding the success of the crowdfunding on the same day that there entire workforce was made redundant while owed seven weeks salary. The cynic in me would suggest that the two are not unrelated and the good news has served as a convenient opportunity to bury the bad news. If this is the case then it seems to have worked as there hasnt been a peep anywhere (unlike Marussia the week before who owed their employees only one week of salary).
The employees have been made redundant from 1MRT (a company still owned by Mr Fernandes). This should be more widely known and Mr Fernandes should be encouraged to do the honourable thing and fund the owed salaries instead of hiding behind 1MRTs orchestrated lack of funds.
The present situation is the inevitable (and foreseeable) consequence of the manner in which Mr Fernandes sold Caterham F1. It isnt good enough to claim that there were no other buyers. In that event the proper thing to do would have been to wind up the company gracefully while ensuring that employees and suppliers were fairly dealt with. Undeniably this would have been the more expensive course of action for Mr Fernandes.
It is not right that Mr Fernandes should be allowed to profit from evading his responsibilities and suffer no adverse publicity.
I should add that I am hearing that there are legal actions being prepared elsewhere for massive damages against the former owners of the team and, I have even heard the suggestion that the Administrator may also be the subject of law suits.
A sorry mess.
It looks like Ferrari finally sucked the will to shave out of Alonso.Webber trying to rope him in -
It looks like Ferrari finally sucked the will to shave out of Alonso.
Caterham F1 Team ‏@CaterhamF1 now9 seconds ago
We are pleased to announce that @kamui_kobayashi will race for the Team in the season finale in Abu Dhabi next week #F1 #RefuelCaterhamF1
Now, who's going to buy second seat? Let the bidding begin!
I am still yet to see someone say the opposite. Yet, we all know full well the opposite is going to become reality.
I always forget how much of a dick Senna was.
Calling him a dick is probably putting it mildly.
I always forget how much of a dick Senna was.
Calling him a dick is probably putting it mildly.
So Caterham actually managed to get the funds (well for 1 driver at least)? I'm surprised.
What if their Prost/Senna-like rivalry is taken to its logical conclusion and they end up taking each other out?
Or even more controversial, what if Nico does what he did at Spa, smashes into Lewis, forcing a DNF, but is able to nurse his car home to a podium? If the former happens. Lewis will taint his championship, like Schumacher did at Adelaide in 94, but if the latter happens, Rosberg will be even more disliked than he already is.
I am still yet to see someone say the opposite. Yet, we all know full well the opposite is going to become reality.
Bernie said that his suggestions was the last 3 races. Which I kinda agree with him. This will push teams to keep fighting until the end of the year for positions rather than completely shift development to the next year.
He also said that "they" chose to do it for the last race, I'm assuming the teams? And maybe that's why they're keeping quiet about the whole thing?
Toto has already admitted in interviews that the strategy group (that he is a part of) made the wrong decision to vote in double points.
I'm still shocked the teams voted for double points. F1 is like a Panda.
Alan Baldwin ‏@alanbaldwinf1 7h7 hours ago
So @kamui_kobayashi will be one of the @CaterhamF1 drivers in Abu Dhabi. Second driver in due course. http://bit.ly/11gY7Di
Karun Chandhok ‏@karunchandhok 5h5 hours ago
@alanbaldwinf1 - heard the new GP2 champion is in pole positon....
Because Abu Dhabi paid extra for that privilege (LOL) so everyone had sudden change of heart?
But the question is why they didn't accept a 3 races double point and changed it to 1 only? That means there should be a rationale behind changing and approving Bernie's suggestion..
But the question is why they didn't accept a 3 races double point and changed it to 1 only? That means there should be a rationale behind changing and approving Bernie's suggestion..
Yes, I believe that is pretty much exactly how it transpired.I think that misrepresents what actually went down in that debate. The teams didn't want double points for -anything- at all. Bernie was pushing hard for double points towards the end of the season for his own reasons. While it probably can't be proven, Abu Dhabi wanting to have more of a spotlight on their race could be a big factor in that. In the end the choice was "double points for the last 3 races" or "double points for the last race". I don't think Bernie was willing to compromise with "no double points at all it's stupid go home" even though that was the right choice. So both sides ended up with the option that made no one happy. That's how I saw it.