• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The games industry ‘will only have room for one non-Nintendo console next gen’, it’s claimed

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
You obviously are a Nintendo hater but the answer is: Mario kart 9, Mario Odyssey 2, new smash Bros, etc. why upgrade from PS4 to PS5?

Come one man!


Monkey King GIF by NVIDIA GeForce

88A93C333CEA930F797B5B7B507018723F15AF89

giphy.gif

giphy-downsized-large.gif

giphy.gif

CXQ1MoE.gif

i8BfRga.gif

rRQ9QeA.gif




Every one of these games (except for one) came out within the last year.
 
Last edited:

Woopah

Member
Which console are they referring?

If it's the Switch 2 then that's a Ninth Gen console, it won't be competing with PS6.
it's competition will only be the PS6 if it doesn't overtake the PS5 before the PS6 releases.
And if it does, the PS5 will be it's competition.
That's how it works... right.
It will compete against both, like how Switch was competiting against PS4 and now competes against PS5.
Come one man!


Monkey King GIF by NVIDIA GeForce

88A93C333CEA930F797B5B7B507018723F15AF89

giphy.gif

giphy-downsized-large.gif

giphy.gif

CXQ1MoE.gif

i8BfRga.gif

rRQ9QeA.gif




Every one of these games (except for one) came out within the last year.
That's his point, people will upgrade to Switch 2 for exclusive games like they upgraded to PS5 for exclusive games.
 
The Nintendo rebound and success story post-Wii U and 3DS is amazing. They're the only hardware manufacturer that is confident in what it's, knows where they're heading, doesn't relying on a AAA and microtransaction bubble, and skirts around all the industry drama and politics.

Nintendo is probably the safest of the three when it comes to future viability.
I actually disagree with this, mainly due to what you posted. It wasn't even a decade ago with the complete bomb of the Wii U, where they were EASILY doing the worst. Even when you look at their history, their highs are very high but their lows are low. GameCube was another massive failure. They really don't have a middle ground, they crush or fail big time. To their credit though, if they do something wrong they rebound very very well.
 
Last edited:

powder

Member
The Last Ninja 4 as launch title. 20 million sold day 1. ❤️
Nice. Honestly all they have to do is a complete official remaster/remake of the Half Life games and/or announce Half Life 3 launching exclusively on the Steam console OR just tell people they can play everything in their Steam libraries on their fuckin OLED tv’s and they’ll sell several million. I’m not even a PC user or a huge Half Life fan but I can clearly see the value of the built-in user base on Steam making Valve a serious contender in the future console landscape if they do it right.
 
Last edited:

Fess

Member
Nice. Honestly all they have to do is a complete official remaster/remake of the Half Life games and/or announce Half Life 3 launching exclusively on the Steam console OR just tell people they can play everything in their Steam libraries on their fuckin OLED tv’s and they’ll sell several million. I’m not even a PC user or a huge Half Life fan but I can clearly see the value of the built-in user base on Steam making Valve a serious contender in the future console landscape if they do it right.
Yeah I’m just reacting on ”System 3”, was a legendary dev on the Commodore 64.

Half-Life 3 would be bigger, releasing it as an exclusive on a new Valve ”console” could probably change the whole industry. Is there a more powerful release among enthusiast gamers? Maybe GTA6 but otherwise I don’t know
 

powder

Member
We have a final Xbox console & handheld rumored to be revealed. If it’s a hybrid then we’re in for a show.
Considering the lousy sales trajectory of the current Xbox consoles, how impactful will yet another Xbox actually be long term? I think this is the argument. We’re only 4 years into the current gen and I don’t think there’s an appetite for next gen quite yet. Realistically we’ve probably got another 3 years left, at least in the PS5 life cycle.
 

HeWhoWalks

Gold Member
I'm not laughing. After the Activision buyout, anything is possible with Microsoft. Buying Steam is definitely a longshot, but it's not impossible if Microsoft throws enough money at it.
I laugh because I don’t see Gabe selling to them. They tried that shit with Nintendo and got that gif.

Of course, strange things happen, but I don’t see this as one of them.
 
Last edited:

powder

Member
I laugh because I don’t see Gabe selling to them. They tried that shit with Nintendo and got that gif.

Of course, strange things happen, but I don’t see this as one of them.
If anything, Valve/Steam would make more sense under Sony as it would give them a solid competitor to Gamepass.
 
Last edited:
Considering the lousy sales trajectory of the current Xbox consoles, how impactful will yet another Xbox actually be long term? I think this is the argument. We’re only 4 years into the current gen and I don’t think there’s an appetite for next gen quite yet. Realistically we’ve probably got another 3 years left, at least in the PS5 life cycle.
Not in terms of sales. But if a hybrid is reveled with good advertising it can shakeup the industry.
A 700+ hybrid backed by msft & 3rd parties would start a new gen and redefine it as competitors would be facing a device that plays their titles. No one will be left behind as msft/3rd parties will be catering to ps/pc/nin but the rift will be is ps6 going to be worth it if Sony does not have steam/epic as day1 options . This forces Sony to choose between casual (400 usd and lower) or enthusiasts (700 min) with core gamers knowing ps mult titles are day1 pc and so around the corner.

In short, msft would be unveiling the final console. One that no longer has barriers for console/pc/mobile titles. This console will exist to break the mold before the army of steam machines 2.0 and other pc handhelds make another push.
 

Humdinger

Gold Member
We've had 3 consoles for as long as I've been a console gamer, 25 years, and no doubt before that. We know that we will have 3 consoles next gen, too. Five, if you count handhelds separately, and even more if you count PC hybrids (e.g., the one potentially coming from Valve or the handheld versions). Not saying all will be successful. Some, like Xbox, may bring up the rear like the out-of-shape guy wheezing his way through a 10K. But they will be there, plugging away.
 
Last edited:

powder

Member
Not in terms of sales. But if a hybrid is reveled with good advertising it can shakeup the industry.
A 700+ hybrid backed by msft & 3rd parties would start a new gen and redefine it as competitors would be facing a device that plays their titles. No one will be left behind as msft/3rd parties will be catering to ps/pc/nin but the rift will be is ps6 going to be worth it if Sony does not have steam/epic as day1 options . This forces Sony to choose between casual (400 usd and lower) or enthusiasts (700 min) with core gamers knowing ps mult titles are day1 pc and so around the corner.

In short, msft would be unveiling the final console. One that no longer has barriers for console/pc/mobile titles. This console will exist to break the mold before the army of steam machines 2.0 and other pc handhelds make another push.
I think Sony will price the next console below 700usd - I think setting the Pro at that price this gen was to test the spending appetite waters for the next console but I don’t think the base PS6 will be 700usd out the gate. Could be 5-600 which is steep but still within the realm of reality even for casual consumers.
 
Last edited:

Scrawnton

Member
I actually disagree with this, mainly due to what you posted. It wasn't even a decade ago with the complete bomb of the Wii U, where they were EASILY doing the worst. Even when you look at their history, their highs are very high but their lows are low. GameCube was another massive failure. They really don't have a middle ground, they crush or fail big time. To their credit though, if they do something wrong they rebound very very well.
That was back when Nintendo was "lost" and unsure about their brand. Are they casual? Are they hardcore? Do they stick with traditional game mechanics are try for gimmicks? Nintendo answered all of those questions with Switch and now they know who they are and what everyone wants. They'd have to purposely go out of their way and try to tank their brand again like they did with Wii U.

On a hardware level Sony is just as good as ever, but no one can deny Sony lost their identity with software and we will see the ramifications of they're GAAS initiatives play out over the next couple of years. Their new leader just came out complaining about their lack of IP and brands: that is not the sentiment of a confident leader. Sony WILL be okay, but they messed up and they're going to pay for it financially for a bit.
 

powder

Member
Dude’s gotta realize by this point he’s on the wrong team when it comes to actual games and the authorship of IP. Sure his bloated salary and stock options make his job worthwhile in material terms, but every time he gets in front of the camera and acts prideful about gaming and Microsoft’s role in it you can feel how dead he is inside. Spiritually cucked individual.
 

phant0m

Member
If MS is smart then Xbox becomes an OS instead of specific hardware. XboxOS should be a stripped down version of Windows that takes out all the non-gaming related shit. No Microsoft365 ads, no OneDrive and other nonsense. The UI should be fully operable by a controller, and it should be able to run Steam and other 3rd party launchers, with a Home Screen that integrates them all
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Not in terms of sales. But if a hybrid is reveled with good advertising it can shakeup the industry.
A 700+ hybrid backed by msft & 3rd parties would start a new gen and redefine it as competitors would be facing a device that plays their titles. No one will be left behind as msft/3rd parties will be catering to ps/pc/nin but the rift will be is ps6 going to be worth it if Sony does not have steam/epic as day1 options . This forces Sony to choose between casual (400 usd and lower) or enthusiasts (700 min) with core gamers knowing ps mult titles are day1 pc and so around the corner.

In short, msft would be unveiling the final console. One that no longer has barriers for console/pc/mobile titles. This console will exist to break the mold before the army of steam machines 2.0 and other pc handhelds make another push.

But MS would literally lose 100s of millions of dollars per year on this device since people would just buy games, micro-transactions, etc from the Steam store. So what does MS get out of this?
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Waste of money if you ask me. Unless it's for a Nintendo console, which is an even bigger waste of money, but anyone who wants to play their games doesn't have a choice.

How is it a waste of money? If people wanted to play video games, what should they do then?
 
But MS would literally lose 100s of millions of dollars per year on this device since people would just buy games, micro-transactions, etc from the Steam store. So what does MS get out of this?
Not if it’s oem for manufacturing costs as the consumer will pay the full amount. They are simply releasing a pc that has Xbox is as part of it and split the store fees. Msft has around 800m mau; their goals are figuring out how to bring it together for themselves. If all msft games can sync between buyers then a steam copy and Xbox copy are the same. Mtx will eventually default to an Xbox store or a msft construction store for msft properties. Their cloud play was to get 100% of mtx revenue. The msft goal will be remaking the store to utilize all msft properties via payment/mtx costs across pc/console/mobile. Therefore it would not matter if you are playing on ps6 or pc as msft mtx will be handled by a msrp they will set and possibly undercut. Example all your mtx purchases have keys msft simply discounts it 30% off vs ps or steam ecosystem.

note we also do not know gp owners growth and the percentage of xbots who are mainly gp users. Nor if msft releases are profitable when released (aka gp covers its development cost of Xbox/pc games).
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Not if it’s oem for manufacturing costs as the consumer will pay the full amount. They are simply releasing a pc that has Xbox is as part of it and split the store fees. Msft has around 800m mau; their goals are figuring out how to bring it together for themselves. If all msft games can sync between buyers then a steam copy and Xbox copy are the same. Mtx will eventually default to an Xbox store or a msft construction store for msft properties. Their cloud play was to get 100% of mtx revenue. The msft goal will be remaking the store to utilize all msft properties via payment/mtx costs across pc/console/mobile. Therefore it would not matter if you are playing on ps6 or pc as msft mtx will be handled by a msrp they will set and possibly undercut. Example all your mtx purchases have keys msft simply discounts it 30% off vs ps or steam ecosystem.

note we also do not know gp owners growth and the percentage of xbots who are mainly gp users. Nor if msft releases are profitable when released (aka gp covers its development cost of Xbox/pc games).

Hold on........the 100s of millions I'm talking about is if they allow the Steam store to be on this "OEM" Xbox hybrid console.
 
That was back when Nintendo was "lost" and unsure about their brand. Are they casual? Are they hardcore? Do they stick with traditional game mechanics are try for gimmicks? Nintendo answered all of those questions with Switch and now they know who they are and what everyone wants. They'd have to purposely go out of their way and try to tank their brand again like they did with Wii U.

On a hardware level Sony is just as good as ever, but no one can deny Sony lost their identity with software and we will see the ramifications of they're GAAS initiatives play out over the next couple of years. Their new leader just came out complaining about their lack of IP and brands: that is not the sentiment of a confident leader. Sony WILL be okay, but they messed up and they're going to pay for it financially for a bit.
One would think but it's Nintendo. It sounds like switch 2 is gonna be most of the same but look at their history, it traditionally isn't them. They also have to worry about more competitors in their space if the handheld now. They're always gonna get destroyed when it comes to power by the other guys. They might need to reinvent themselves again, but that could be longer term.

I also disagree about software. I'm just one dude but I'm MUCH more disappointed by their output then Sony. People can bag on Sony for their GaaS output, but that also produced helldivers which sold a shit ton and people seem to love 🤷‍♂️. The new Zelda games, while good, are a far cry of OoT, TP and wind waker. 3D Mario's in the same situation. Good but the quality isn't there. They also take forever for these games. ToTK used the same entire map and assets and took over 6 years. They didn't even release a new Mario Kart for the switch!!

Idk, I liked my switch overall and don't hate the system or games by any stretch. But it's also the least played system I've owned from Nintendo my entire life
 

Scrawnton

Member
One would think but it's Nintendo. It sounds like switch 2 is gonna be most of the same but look at their history, it traditionally isn't them. They also have to worry about more competitors in their space if the handheld now. They're always gonna get destroyed when it comes to power by the other guys. They might need to reinvent themselves again, but that could be longer term.

I also disagree about software. I'm just one dude but I'm MUCH more disappointed by their output then Sony. People can bag on Sony for their GaaS output, but that also produced helldivers which sold a shit ton and people seem to love 🤷‍♂️. The new Zelda games, while good, are a far cry of OoT, TP and wind waker. 3D Mario's in the same situation. Good but the quality isn't there. They also take forever for these games. ToTK used the same entire map and assets and took over 6 years. They didn't even release a new Mario Kart for the switch!!

Idk, I liked my switch overall and don't hate the system or games by any stretch. But it's also the least played system I've owned from Nintendo my entire life
I can respect your opinion about disliking the software, but in a topic about the security and longevity about their business, you can't argue with the data, and the data shows Nintendo's software outsold Sony's first party software at an astounding rate this past gen, and it wasn't even close.
 
Hold on........the 100s of millions I'm talking about is if they allow the Steam store to be on this "OEM" Xbox hybrid console.
Was a bit confused by that but msft can negotiate a split in revenue as this would be a pc where the big gainers are platform holders and publishers.

Also I would believe msft has data as to what games are most played in their ecosystem. Steam would not be an issue but valve ftp games might be competitive. The future for msft is being the biggest publisher, getting more subscribers, mtx gains and hiding their assets.

Michael patcher (yes him) made a good point about msft needing to find a way to profit off their 800m vs Sony 120 mau. An example used was battlenet coins/tokens used to pay for avowed.
My point is if msft can make mtx items out of thin air ( feds ability to print) then one store wins if they can legally tie it to a prime store.
 

Drell

Member
Neither does Xbox. They found out the hard way after buying Activision and saw the bottom of the warchest.
They still gain tons of money thanks to office, windows and all their other very lucrative activities where they have a monopoly in some of them and so an endless flow of cash coming to them to try whatever they want with xbox.
Sega, back then had the arcades as a secondary revenue source but that was all, it didn't allow them to screw up indefinitely like ms.
 
They still gain tons of money thanks to office, windows and all their other very lucrative activities where they have a monopoly in some of them and so an endless flow of cash coming to them to try whatever they want with xbox.
Sega, back then had the arcades as a secondary revenue source but that was all, it didn't allow them to screw up indefinitely like ms.
You are entirely missing the point. Microsoft has endless money, Xbox does not. There was a warchest, true, and it was indeed vast. But Xbox still managed to spent it all. Xbox now is being extracted for whatever value it has left to get some money back, after which it would be discarded and MS gaming would be what remains. The warchest WAS real. But it is gone now.
 

Sorcerer

Member
Yeah I’m just reacting on ”System 3”, was a legendary dev on the Commodore 64.

Half-Life 3 would be bigger, releasing it as an exclusive on a new Valve ”console” could probably change the whole industry. Is there a more powerful release among enthusiast gamers? Maybe GTA6 but otherwise I don’t know
It depends if Valve would be willing to sacrifice Half-Life 3 (financial gains) just to make a statement. As much as Valve is making moves to secure a Windowless future, all the money at the moment comes from Windows. Then there is the fact they would be seen as crawling back with their tail between their legs if this Linux console initiative fails a second time.
The tempting move might be to give it HL3 away "free with a Valve console" much like they gave Alex away with the headset. Obviously HL3 would be a bigger powerplay, but of course sell it for other platforms as well.
 
Last edited:
One would think but it's Nintendo. It sounds like switch 2 is gonna be most of the same but look at their history, it traditionally isn't them. They also have to worry about more competitors in their space if the handheld now. They're always gonna get destroyed when it comes to power by the other guys. They might need to reinvent themselves again, but that could be longer term.

I also disagree about software. I'm just one dude but I'm MUCH more disappointed by their output then Sony. People can bag on Sony for their GaaS output, but that also produced helldivers which sold a shit ton and people seem to love 🤷‍♂️. The new Zelda games, while good, are a far cry of OoT, TP and wind waker. 3D Mario's in the same situation. Good but the quality isn't there. They also take forever for these games. ToTK used the same entire map and assets and took over 6 years. They didn't even release a new Mario Kart for the switch!!

Idk, I liked my switch overall and don't hate the system or games by any stretch. But it's also the least played system I've owned from Nintendo my entire life
Competition from who? Closest they had to competition in the handheld space was the PSP and the DS still outsold it almost 2:1.

BOTW, TOTK, and Odyssey all sold a shit ton (20-33 million each) and people very much love.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
"DFC believes it’s too early to know which of Xbox and PlayStation will drop off next gen, stating that price points, launch dates, and other basic features such as portability, will factor."

It would take some masterful leadership at Microsoft to be able to pull that off. Problem is Microsoft doesn't have masterful leadership.
 
Last edited:

SHA

Member
There is a video I've watched recently about a guy who used to be a playstation fanboy and his girlfriend bought him an Xbox and it went viral. Euro countries are literally taking his words seriously and change their opinion about xbox.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
Euro countries are literally taking his words seriously and change their opinion about xbox.

Sounds anecdotal unless there is a shift in sales that can be referenced.

Edit: I found the video. Hope you are not serious here.
 
Last edited:

Fess

Member
It depends if Valve would be willing to sacrifice Half-Life 3 (financial gains) just to make a statement. As much as Valve is making moves to secure a Windowless future, all the money at the moment comes from Windows. Then there is the fact they would be seen as crawling back with their tail between their legs if this Linux console initiative fails a second time.
The tempting move might be to give it HL3 away "free with a Valve console" much like they gave Alex away with the headset. Obviously HL3 would be a bigger powerplay, but of course sell it for other platforms as well.
I was deep into console gaming when Steam happened, so might be wrong here, but didn’t Valve force people to use Steam with the Half-Life 2 release and that was basically how it all took off?
I definitely think it could be done again. SteamOS required 💥
 

grvg

Member
With any luck, that "only non Nintendo console" will be a steam machine.

I was deep into console gaming when Steam happened, so might be wrong here, but didn’t Valve force people to use Steam with the Half-Life 2 release and that was basically how it all took off?
I definitely think it could be done again. SteamOS required 💥

That's exactly what happened. Counter strik , too, iirc. I was mad at the time, but fast forward 20 years and the only reason I still buy games at all is steam.


That would be a dream come true. Segas new console debits with phantasy star online 3.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom