Sooner
Member
DFC believes it’s too early to know which of Xbox and PlayStation will drop off next gen
In other words, they know less than we do.
DFC believes it’s too early to know which of Xbox and PlayStation will drop off next gen
You obviously are a Nintendo hater but the answer is: Mario kart 9, Mario Odyssey 2, new smash Bros, etc. why upgrade from PS4 to PS5?
It will compete against both, like how Switch was competiting against PS4 and now competes against PS5.Which console are they referring?
If it's the Switch 2 then that's a Ninth Gen console, it won't be competing with PS6.
it's competition will only be the PS6 if it doesn't overtake the PS5 before the PS6 releases.
And if it does, the PS5 will be it's competition.
That's how it works... right.
That's his point, people will upgrade to Switch 2 for exclusive games like they upgraded to PS5 for exclusive games.Come one man!
Every one of these games (except for one) came out within the last year.
That's his point, people will upgrade to Switch 2 for exclusive games like they upgraded to PS5 for exclusive games.
Market research firm DFC Intelligence...
I actually disagree with this, mainly due to what you posted. It wasn't even a decade ago with the complete bomb of the Wii U, where they were EASILY doing the worst. Even when you look at their history, their highs are very high but their lows are low. GameCube was another massive failure. They really don't have a middle ground, they crush or fail big time. To their credit though, if they do something wrong they rebound very very well.The Nintendo rebound and success story post-Wii U and 3DS is amazing. They're the only hardware manufacturer that is confident in what it's, knows where they're heading, doesn't relying on a AAA and microtransaction bubble, and skirts around all the industry drama and politics.
Nintendo is probably the safest of the three when it comes to future viability.
Consoles are not really needed anymore tbh.
Nice. Honestly all they have to do is a complete official remaster/remake of the Half Life games and/or announce Half Life 3 launching exclusively on the Steam console OR just tell people they can play everything in their Steam libraries on their fuckin OLED tv’s and they’ll sell several million. I’m not even a PC user or a huge Half Life fan but I can clearly see the value of the built-in user base on Steam making Valve a serious contender in the future console landscape if they do it right.The Last Ninja 4 as launch title. 20 million sold day 1.
Yeah I’m just reacting on ”System 3”, was a legendary dev on the Commodore 64.Nice. Honestly all they have to do is a complete official remaster/remake of the Half Life games and/or announce Half Life 3 launching exclusively on the Steam console OR just tell people they can play everything in their Steam libraries on their fuckin OLED tv’s and they’ll sell several million. I’m not even a PC user or a huge Half Life fan but I can clearly see the value of the built-in user base on Steam making Valve a serious contender in the future console landscape if they do it right.
They can't, they lack the hw manufacturing prowess.Valve could change the dynamic if they come out witha resonably priced home console that plays all pc games
If advertised right; it can kill the industry.@HeisenbergFX4
That new Microsoft console in time for gta6, that side loads steam allowing you to play Playstation games as well.
Manufacturing prowess? Everything is made in fucking China!They can't, they lack the hw manufacturing prowess.
We have a final Xbox console & handheld rumored to be revealed. If it’s a hybrid then we’re in for a show.Weird article.
I mean right now Sony and Nintendo are the dominant consoles and go after different markets and each do well in their respective areas but Xbox is clearly the odd man out. Why are they even remotely suggesting Microsoft is still in this race?
Considering the lousy sales trajectory of the current Xbox consoles, how impactful will yet another Xbox actually be long term? I think this is the argument. We’re only 4 years into the current gen and I don’t think there’s an appetite for next gen quite yet. Realistically we’ve probably got another 3 years left, at least in the PS5 life cycle.We have a final Xbox console & handheld rumored to be revealed. If it’s a hybrid then we’re in for a show.
I laugh because I don’t see Gabe selling to them. They tried that shit with Nintendo and got that gif.I'm not laughing. After the Activision buyout, anything is possible with Microsoft. Buying Steam is definitely a longshot, but it's not impossible if Microsoft throws enough money at it.
I know it was a rhetorical question, my point was the primary reason to upgrade any console is the new games.Come one man!
Every one of these games (except for one) came out within the last year.
If anything, Valve/Steam would make more sense under Sony as it would give them a solid competitor to Gamepass.I laugh because I don’t see Gabe selling to them. They tried that shit with Nintendo and got that gif.
Of course, strange things happen, but I don’t see this as one of them.
Not in terms of sales. But if a hybrid is reveled with good advertising it can shakeup the industry.Considering the lousy sales trajectory of the current Xbox consoles, how impactful will yet another Xbox actually be long term? I think this is the argument. We’re only 4 years into the current gen and I don’t think there’s an appetite for next gen quite yet. Realistically we’ve probably got another 3 years left, at least in the PS5 life cycle.
Consoles are not really needed anymore tbh.
I think Sony will price the next console below 700usd - I think setting the Pro at that price this gen was to test the spending appetite waters for the next console but I don’t think the base PS6 will be 700usd out the gate. Could be 5-600 which is steep but still within the realm of reality even for casual consumers.Not in terms of sales. But if a hybrid is reveled with good advertising it can shakeup the industry.
A 700+ hybrid backed by msft & 3rd parties would start a new gen and redefine it as competitors would be facing a device that plays their titles. No one will be left behind as msft/3rd parties will be catering to ps/pc/nin but the rift will be is ps6 going to be worth it if Sony does not have steam/epic as day1 options . This forces Sony to choose between casual (400 usd and lower) or enthusiasts (700 min) with core gamers knowing ps mult titles are day1 pc and so around the corner.
In short, msft would be unveiling the final console. One that no longer has barriers for console/pc/mobile titles. This console will exist to break the mold before the army of steam machines 2.0 and other pc handhelds make another push.
That was back when Nintendo was "lost" and unsure about their brand. Are they casual? Are they hardcore? Do they stick with traditional game mechanics are try for gimmicks? Nintendo answered all of those questions with Switch and now they know who they are and what everyone wants. They'd have to purposely go out of their way and try to tank their brand again like they did with Wii U.I actually disagree with this, mainly due to what you posted. It wasn't even a decade ago with the complete bomb of the Wii U, where they were EASILY doing the worst. Even when you look at their history, their highs are very high but their lows are low. GameCube was another massive failure. They really don't have a middle ground, they crush or fail big time. To their credit though, if they do something wrong they rebound very very well.
Dude’s gotta realize by this point he’s on the wrong team when it comes to actual games and the authorship of IP. Sure his bloated salary and stock options make his job worthwhile in material terms, but every time he gets in front of the camera and acts prideful about gaming and Microsoft’s role in it you can feel how dead he is inside. Spiritually cucked individual.
Not in terms of sales. But if a hybrid is reveled with good advertising it can shakeup the industry.
A 700+ hybrid backed by msft & 3rd parties would start a new gen and redefine it as competitors would be facing a device that plays their titles. No one will be left behind as msft/3rd parties will be catering to ps/pc/nin but the rift will be is ps6 going to be worth it if Sony does not have steam/epic as day1 options . This forces Sony to choose between casual (400 usd and lower) or enthusiasts (700 min) with core gamers knowing ps mult titles are day1 pc and so around the corner.
In short, msft would be unveiling the final console. One that no longer has barriers for console/pc/mobile titles. This console will exist to break the mold before the army of steam machines 2.0 and other pc handhelds make another push.
Waste of money if you ask me. Unless it's for a Nintendo console, which is an even bigger waste of money, but anyone who wants to play their games doesn't have a choice.
Not if it’s oem for manufacturing costs as the consumer will pay the full amount. They are simply releasing a pc that has Xbox is as part of it and split the store fees. Msft has around 800m mau; their goals are figuring out how to bring it together for themselves. If all msft games can sync between buyers then a steam copy and Xbox copy are the same. Mtx will eventually default to an Xbox store or a msft construction store for msft properties. Their cloud play was to get 100% of mtx revenue. The msft goal will be remaking the store to utilize all msft properties via payment/mtx costs across pc/console/mobile. Therefore it would not matter if you are playing on ps6 or pc as msft mtx will be handled by a msrp they will set and possibly undercut. Example all your mtx purchases have keys msft simply discounts it 30% off vs ps or steam ecosystem.But MS would literally lose 100s of millions of dollars per year on this device since people would just buy games, micro-transactions, etc from the Steam store. So what does MS get out of this?
Not if it’s oem for manufacturing costs as the consumer will pay the full amount. They are simply releasing a pc that has Xbox is as part of it and split the store fees. Msft has around 800m mau; their goals are figuring out how to bring it together for themselves. If all msft games can sync between buyers then a steam copy and Xbox copy are the same. Mtx will eventually default to an Xbox store or a msft construction store for msft properties. Their cloud play was to get 100% of mtx revenue. The msft goal will be remaking the store to utilize all msft properties via payment/mtx costs across pc/console/mobile. Therefore it would not matter if you are playing on ps6 or pc as msft mtx will be handled by a msrp they will set and possibly undercut. Example all your mtx purchases have keys msft simply discounts it 30% off vs ps or steam ecosystem.
note we also do not know gp owners growth and the percentage of xbots who are mainly gp users. Nor if msft releases are profitable when released (aka gp covers its development cost of Xbox/pc games).
One would think but it's Nintendo. It sounds like switch 2 is gonna be most of the same but look at their history, it traditionally isn't them. They also have to worry about more competitors in their space if the handheld now. They're always gonna get destroyed when it comes to power by the other guys. They might need to reinvent themselves again, but that could be longer term.That was back when Nintendo was "lost" and unsure about their brand. Are they casual? Are they hardcore? Do they stick with traditional game mechanics are try for gimmicks? Nintendo answered all of those questions with Switch and now they know who they are and what everyone wants. They'd have to purposely go out of their way and try to tank their brand again like they did with Wii U.
On a hardware level Sony is just as good as ever, but no one can deny Sony lost their identity with software and we will see the ramifications of they're GAAS initiatives play out over the next couple of years. Their new leader just came out complaining about their lack of IP and brands: that is not the sentiment of a confident leader. Sony WILL be okay, but they messed up and they're going to pay for it financially for a bit.
I can respect your opinion about disliking the software, but in a topic about the security and longevity about their business, you can't argue with the data, and the data shows Nintendo's software outsold Sony's first party software at an astounding rate this past gen, and it wasn't even close.One would think but it's Nintendo. It sounds like switch 2 is gonna be most of the same but look at their history, it traditionally isn't them. They also have to worry about more competitors in their space if the handheld now. They're always gonna get destroyed when it comes to power by the other guys. They might need to reinvent themselves again, but that could be longer term.
I also disagree about software. I'm just one dude but I'm MUCH more disappointed by their output then Sony. People can bag on Sony for their GaaS output, but that also produced helldivers which sold a shit ton and people seem to love . The new Zelda games, while good, are a far cry of OoT, TP and wind waker. 3D Mario's in the same situation. Good but the quality isn't there. They also take forever for these games. ToTK used the same entire map and assets and took over 6 years. They didn't even release a new Mario Kart for the switch!!
Idk, I liked my switch overall and don't hate the system or games by any stretch. But it's also the least played system I've owned from Nintendo my entire life
Was a bit confused by that but msft can negotiate a split in revenue as this would be a pc where the big gainers are platform holders and publishers.Hold on........the 100s of millions I'm talking about is if they allow the Steam store to be on this "OEM" Xbox hybrid console.
They still gain tons of money thanks to office, windows and all their other very lucrative activities where they have a monopoly in some of them and so an endless flow of cash coming to them to try whatever they want with xbox.Neither does Xbox. They found out the hard way after buying Activision and saw the bottom of the warchest.
You are entirely missing the point. Microsoft has endless money, Xbox does not. There was a warchest, true, and it was indeed vast. But Xbox still managed to spent it all. Xbox now is being extracted for whatever value it has left to get some money back, after which it would be discarded and MS gaming would be what remains. The warchest WAS real. But it is gone now.They still gain tons of money thanks to office, windows and all their other very lucrative activities where they have a monopoly in some of them and so an endless flow of cash coming to them to try whatever they want with xbox.
Sega, back then had the arcades as a secondary revenue source but that was all, it didn't allow them to screw up indefinitely like ms.
It depends if Valve would be willing to sacrifice Half-Life 3 (financial gains) just to make a statement. As much as Valve is making moves to secure a Windowless future, all the money at the moment comes from Windows. Then there is the fact they would be seen as crawling back with their tail between their legs if this Linux console initiative fails a second time.Yeah I’m just reacting on ”System 3”, was a legendary dev on the Commodore 64.
Half-Life 3 would be bigger, releasing it as an exclusive on a new Valve ”console” could probably change the whole industry. Is there a more powerful release among enthusiast gamers? Maybe GTA6 but otherwise I don’t know
Consoles are not really needed anymore tbh.
Maybe in an alternative universe
Do you have directions to said universe? if SEGA's still making consoles its a better place.
Competition from who? Closest they had to competition in the handheld space was the PSP and the DS still outsold it almost 2:1.One would think but it's Nintendo. It sounds like switch 2 is gonna be most of the same but look at their history, it traditionally isn't them. They also have to worry about more competitors in their space if the handheld now. They're always gonna get destroyed when it comes to power by the other guys. They might need to reinvent themselves again, but that could be longer term.
I also disagree about software. I'm just one dude but I'm MUCH more disappointed by their output then Sony. People can bag on Sony for their GaaS output, but that also produced helldivers which sold a shit ton and people seem to love . The new Zelda games, while good, are a far cry of OoT, TP and wind waker. 3D Mario's in the same situation. Good but the quality isn't there. They also take forever for these games. ToTK used the same entire map and assets and took over 6 years. They didn't even release a new Mario Kart for the switch!!
Idk, I liked my switch overall and don't hate the system or games by any stretch. But it's also the least played system I've owned from Nintendo my entire life
Euro countries are literally taking his words seriously and change their opinion about xbox.
I was deep into console gaming when Steam happened, so might be wrong here, but didn’t Valve force people to use Steam with the Half-Life 2 release and that was basically how it all took off?It depends if Valve would be willing to sacrifice Half-Life 3 (financial gains) just to make a statement. As much as Valve is making moves to secure a Windowless future, all the money at the moment comes from Windows. Then there is the fact they would be seen as crawling back with their tail between their legs if this Linux console initiative fails a second time.
The tempting move might be to give it HL3 away "free with a Valve console" much like they gave Alex away with the headset. Obviously HL3 would be a bigger powerplay, but of course sell it for other platforms as well.
I was deep into console gaming when Steam happened, so might be wrong here, but didn’t Valve force people to use Steam with the Half-Life 2 release and that was basically how it all took off?
I definitely think it could be done again. SteamOS required