got a mention in the new reboot too
Enterprise - the only Trek series canon in both timelines
I could throw out there my silly theory for why Enterprise actually exists in an alternate timeline and why it wouldn't exist as we know it in the JJverse.
Regarding Enterprise as a whole, I actually liked it more than Voyager (actually in general Voyager is, imo, the worst Trek show besides TAS).
Bring it on.I could throw out there my silly theory for why Enterprise actually exists in an alternate timeline and why it wouldn't exist as we know it in the JJverse.
The only bad parts of DS9 were the Dax episodes, ALL OF THEM!
The only bad parts of DS9 were the Dax episodes, ALL OF THEM!
Bring it on.
I could throw out there my silly theory for why Enterprise actually exists in an alternate timeline and why it wouldn't exist as we know it in the JJverse.
Regarding Enterprise as a whole, I actually liked it more than Voyager (actually in general Voyager is, imo, the worst Trek show besides TAS).
Yeah, DS9 was pretty heavy in the political philosophy realm.
Did it
(Scroll up a little)
Well, it could have been, but there was so much lost potential. The Cardassians were always the bad guys and Bajorans always the good guys. A couple of individual characters nonwithstanding.
Does this make sense? Basically instead of making Cardassians the Nazi-Germany and Bajorians the Jew, they should have made Cardassia Israel and Bajorians Palestinians. Blur the lines a bit and not make everything so simple. Maquis were an attemp in the right direction, but that didn't really go anywhere, and DS9 and Voyager butchered the concept in any case...
Well, it could have been, but there was so much lost potential. The Cardassians were always the bad guys and Bajorans always the good guys. A couple of individual characters nonwithstanding.
Does this make sense? Basically instead of making Cardassians the Nazi-Germany and Bajorians the Jew, they should have made Cardassia Israel and Bajorians Palestinians. Blur the lines a bit and not make everything so simple. Maquis were an attemp in the right direction, but that didn't really go anywhere, and DS9 and Voyager butchered the concept in any case...
There wasn't any lost potential. DS9 was DS9. You're criticizing it for what it wasn't trying to be.
You're saying they should've done a Palestine/Israel metaphor when that's clearly what they weren't going for.What does that even mean? I was criticizing the show for being shallow. And you are saying that the show was meant to be shallow? The whole premise of the show was to be less black and white that the main Trek shows.
You saw the same type of progression with the Cardassians.Babylon 5 did much better job in many of the things, for example The Narn started as the tokem aggressive bad guys at the start of the first season, but more we learned about them, the more complex the political situation became.
I get what you are saying, but I do think it mixed elements of both Nazi/Jews and Israel/Palestine.Well, it could have been, but there was so much lost potential. The Cardassians were always the bad guys and Bajorans always the good guys. A couple of individual characters nonwithstanding.
Does this make sense? Basically instead of making Cardassians the Nazi-Germany and Bajorians the Jew, they should have made Cardassia Israel and Bajorians Palestinians. Blur the lines a bit and not make everything so simple. Maquis were an attemp in the right direction, but that didn't really go anywhere, and DS9 and Voyager butchered the concept in any case...
One day I will watch Enterprise. Every once in a while I try and watch it, but I just can't force myself to like it. I don't like any of the characters on the show.
You're saying they should've done a Palestine/Israel metaphor when that's clearly what they weren't going for.
You saw the same type of progression with the Cardassians.
Nazi German and Jew metaphors aren't complex?It was just an example for something more complex.
And I Cardassians didn't really progress that much in comparison, after all, the Narn became one of the most trusted allies later in B5. Ok, Dukat being the main Cardassian maybe made things worse, the character got less interesting as the show progressed...
I have to get a video of this sometime but here's my funny Trek story:
When we first got our dog, my wife and I were going through DS9 as she had never seen the full series before. We would watch one or two episodes right before bedtime. My dog learned that the horns at the end of the song meant that it was time to go to bed, which means she gets let out to go run around the backyard before bed. This was reinforced just about every night for at least a month or more, and she's a Border Collie, so it really stuck. This was two years ago.
Now, when we get up to go to bed, she actually barks the beginning of the DS9 theme song, same pitch and cadence. It's fucking hilarious.
Enterprise is Star Trek with all the life and colour sucked out of it.
And a shitty Brian Adams song not even written or sung by Brian Adams.
Saying it's better than Voyager is like acknowledging that it simply exists.
Nazi German and Jew metaphors aren't complex?
Um. Yeah they did. They went from the occupiers of a world to being, going through several different governments along the way. Their fate was left uncertain, but the Cardassians at the beginning of the show are not the same as the end.occupied themselves
Well, it could have been, but there was so much lost potential. The Cardassians were always the bad guys and Bajorans always the good guys. A couple of individual characters nonwithstanding.
Does this make sense? Basically instead of making Cardassians the Nazi-Germany and Bajorians the Jew, they should have made Cardassia Israel and Bajorians Palestinians. Blur the lines a bit and not make everything so simple. Maquis were an attemp in the right direction, but that didn't really go anywhere, and DS9 and Voyager butchered the concept in any case...
Because the show always prioritized its internal universe over real-world parallels, it's impossible to pin Deep Space Nine down to a single interpretation. "The Darkness and the Light" is almost certainly recalling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but in "Duet," the occupation is likened to the Holocaust, with Kira's interrogation of a suspected war criminal recalling similar interrogations of former Nazis in the 50s and 60s. In "Past Prologue," meanwhile, the strained relationship between extreme and less-extreme resistance groups recalls the situation in Northern Ireland. From the Cardassian point of view, the occupation of Bajor has parallels with the American presence in Vietnam, especially when it comes to Ziyal's difficult situation as a mixed-race child. On the other hand, Cardassian attitudes toward the Bajoran's have the hint of colonialism about them, and most particularly of Apartheid, and I think there's an argument to be made that Dukat's fraught relationship with the Bajorans is reminiscent of the slave-owner, who hates his slaves because he sees hatred in their eyes and knows that he deserves it, and punishes them for his depravity. The Vedek who kills herself in "Rocks and Shoals" to protest the Dominion's occupation of Bajor is probably a reference to the self-immolating monks in Tibet, and the notion of 'comfort women' for the Cardassian occupiers, which is introduced in "Wrongs Darker Than Death or Night," as well as the Bajorans' disdain for them, is probably derived from similar attitudes during Nazi occupation of European countries, and in fact that entire episode has undertones of Vichy France. And then there are episodes, like "Cardassians," which tell stories that could never have occurred have on Earth, but are entirely organic to the show's setting.
The result of Deep Space Nine's broad spectrum of political references is not merely to strengthen the show's fictional setting, but to render it universal and extend its relevance, so that a show written in the early to mid-nineties still has something important to say about the present-day political landscape, in spite of the upheavals it has undergone over the last decade. In fact, in some cases, Deep Space Nine is even prescient. "The issue is not if there are Founders on Cardassia," Worf darkly pronounces when Gowron uses that excuse as a justification for declaring war in "The Way of the Warrior," and then goes on to explain that the Klingon empire is simply eager for conquest. Is it truly possible that this episode was written in 1995? Well, of course it is, because 9/11 isn't the root cause of the current political climate, nor did it erase everything that came before it. The questions that plague us today--how to balance security with a respect for human rights, how to protect ourselves against a virtually unstoppable form of warfare without losing our civil liberties, how to respect other cultures without losing sight of the values central to ours--were just as prevalent, in slightly different forms, ten and fifteen years ago. That's easier to notice on Deep Space Nine, which never ripped its storylines from newspaper headlines.
As BorkBork's link shows, DS9 had no problem handling complex themes, and was great at showing them.Generally no, the situation was relatively simple.
Damar was a pretty good cipher for everything you're wanting.Well, as far as we know, and I remember, only some millions of Cardassians died when their home world was attacked. They lost their military strenght, but I don't think there was proof that their civilisation went through any larger changes. Compared to Narn, which I chose as comparison, they had it rather easy.
If there were strong Cardassian characters that could show us what the Cardassians were going through it would have helped, but that didn't really happen. The character arc of Dukat was quite weak towards the end. There was a point where the character could have started to redeem itself, but instead he goes evil and insane. Bah.
Uh huh...Garak begins as the best alien character of the show, but towards the end he seems to lose his edge. Maybe the showrunners told the actor to tone down the "camp" acting, and the actor lost interest in the show? I recall reading something about this...
I get what you are saying, but I do think it mixed elements of both Nazi/Jews and Israel/Palestine..
However, I think Gul Dukat was the evil one really. I mean hell, you had Kira training Damar and Garak. There was Kira's "father" (the Cadassian one, forget his name, the guy who is dying and confesses everything to her) as well, who spoke out against the standard regime.
It's easy to accept Dukat as the face of the Cardassians as they seem to want to portray him as such, but there's a lot more depth there than you get at first glance.
You also have Sisko who isn't exactly a Star Trek moral character. He's very emotional and capable of 'evil' things, using the same consequentialist rationalization that the Cardassians do. Same with the Bajoran terrorists/freedom fighters.
Dukat may have been the worst of his people, but it seemed to me that he always had the support of Cardassian goverment. The "good" Cardassians were always a small minority.
Sisko on the other hand... He was not an elite Starfleet officer like Enterprise crew, but murdering an Romulan ambassador was still something I'd rather have seen Odo made instead. It would have been pretty interesting episode, and less melodrama in the log entries, I reckon. Or maybe Dax, would have given her a bit more depth.
Damar was a pretty good cipher for everything you're wanting.
Oh fuck, a Lwaxana episode
Those are both terrible ideas, and anyway Odo has some shadows from the occupation.
I thought Lwaxana worked well on DS9. Her and Odo's relationship was a lot more believable than Odo and Kira.
Damar's story parallels Cardassias evolution from a valuable ally to a necessary burden. It was quite marvelous what they did with his character. You keep talking about Dukat and Garak, but Damar is just as good as both of them. Damar, it could be argued, is the best character in all of Star Trek.Well, not that much really... he was a soldier interested in winning the war. His biggest problem seemed to be having to play second fiddle to the Breen. He didn't seem to have moral conflights with the situation, if I remember correctly.
Odo's main driving force was his sense of justice. Having him kill someone would have been more interesting character study than what we got with Sisko, if done right.
Oh fuck, a Lwaxana episode
The best freaking commercial EVER featuring OG Kirk.
http://movies.yahoo.com/video/star-trek-video-game-spot-213028647.html
Well, not that much really... he was a soldier interested in winning the war. His biggest problem seemed to be having to play second fiddle to the Breen. He didn't seem to have moral conflights with the situation, if I remember correctly.
Generally no, the situation was relatively simple. And we have seen every aspect of it before...
Well, as far as we know, and I remember, only some millions of Cardassians died when their home world was attacked. They lost their military strenght, but I don't think there was proof that their civilisation went through any larger changes. Compared to Narn, which I chose as comparison, they had it rather easy.
Wasn't it revealed that once upon a time the military didn't have such a stranglehold on Cardassian life (and that is what they were going back to after the invasion)?
You're remembering this completely wrong.
Damar was pretty complex and clearly grew over the show, he absolutely had moral struggles with what was going on and it was central to his character for the last season, especially the last story arc where he led the rebellion against the founders.
He was a soldier who was BASICALLY a toadie, and became a patriot, and that led him to both his lowest moments (Ziyal) and his highest ones (Martyr for Cardassia).
Hmm, I remember him being against the Dominion and especially a certain Vorta quite early, already when he was Dukat's lieutenant. But he didn't do anything until the last minute, when he absolutely had to in order to save what was left of Cardassian empire. I think it was quite clear that Weyoun was pushing too hard, and it was just a matter of time when he'd change sides. Don't get me wrong, it's still a solid character, but lacking depth and charisma to be truly special.
How would killing a Romulan senator and thus being responsible for millions of Romulan deaths would've fit within Odo's sense of justice? You're not making any sense here. In the Pale Moonlight was perfect as is. There's no pondering "it would've been better if..."
That was my point, how could Odo justify what he'd have to do? The episode was hardly perfect, we would have been far better off with less melodrama than what Mr. Brooks gave us. Maybe it wasn't as bad as Shatner reading the US constitution in Omega Glory, but what is?