DrForester
Kills Photobucket
T'pol's actress's was terrible.
I think I like the Enterprise crew better and I actually like Captain Jonathan Archer.
Really? I've always thought they were kind of awkward, like a kit bash.
That said, I don't think there's any one starship design that totally works. Even my beloved Enterprise refit/A has some awkward angles to it, although I think the Galaxy and Ambassador classes are among the least photogenic.
Oh, since people on GAF might find this amusing, flashback to my art school days--the E made out of cardboard for my freshman space research class. Made the engineering hull a bit too big, but that's because I had to stick some dowels in to support the thing later on (I think I stole my roommate's mug as a counterweight too.) Still was a blast to make, since I suck at sculpture, and I was kind of amazed my measurements translated into something that's recognizable.
T'pol's actress's was terrible.
I've not seen any evidence for *why*. I thought she did a pretty good job of playing a Vulcan.
T'pol's actress's was terrible.
She was fine, but it's always hard to take these characters seriously when all they're allowed to wear is skintight lycra..
Enterprise would have been cool if they had interesting characters. They were more bland than Voyagers. I dont even remember the pilots name he was so forgettable.
The E as in the Enterprise, not the Enterprise-E. insert Scotty "Relics" quote here.The E?
That doesnt look like the E to me, more like the first Enterprise or the A.
The E as in the Enterprise, not the Enterprise-E. insert Scotty "Relics" quote here.
I think underused characters like Travis are one reason for why more open script submissions are a good thing. Sometimes the writers don't want to or don't know how to write a character, and they need some outside input.
I've not seen any evidence for *why*. I thought she did a pretty good job of playing a Vulcan.
Catching up on Enterprise on Netflix. I'm probably alone on this but I loved the Xindi and the whole Xindi story arc.
Me too. Playing an emotionless creature is the opposite of acting. Anyone could have done it. But they tried to give her some depth by giving her some emotion due to the angel dust addiction she picked up.
The E as in the Enterprise, not the Enterprise-E. insert Scotty "Relics" quote here.
I think underused characters like Travis are one reason for why more open script submissions are a good thing. Sometimes the writers don't want to or don't know how to write a character, and they need some outside input.
That's just it, Vulcans aren't emotionless. They suppress them but they are still there. Characters like Spock, Sarek, and even Tuvok conveyed that. They didn't give a deadpan delivery of their lines. T'pol sounded like a bland, hollow character reading off cue cards. Heck, even Vorak on Voyager wasn't that bad.
It was super terrible because the original pitch for the character was that he was the one on the crew that was the most experienced space traveler, having lived on a slow-ass cargo ship all his life.
Would have been nice for him to give some insight to the crew on how to handle things over a long haul through the expanse with no resupply, but nope.
Archer arguably being a worse captain than Janeway didn't help matters. Janeway had mood swings, but Archer was just incompetent.
"How dare they be offended that my dog pissed on their sacred trees!"
I honestly can't think of any god-awful actors in any of the series.
lol. I read the post before the quote and I thought you were talking about me.Dax. She couldn't act her way out of a nutsac.
Archer arguably being a worse captain than Janeway didn't help matters. Janeway had mood swings, but Archer was just incompetent.
"How dare they be offended that my dog pissed on their sacred trees!"
Well, at least he never murdered one of his own crew members in cold blood.
Okay, I don't remember that. What episode was this?Archer arguably being a worse captain than Janeway didn't help matters. Janeway had mood swings, but Archer was just incompetent.
"How dare they be offended that my dog pissed on their sacred trees!"
Again I think that was the writers coming up with a character they couldn't deliver. A being that's lived for hundreds of years doesn't have as much in the way of low-hanging fodder for story and characterization if they're already supposed to be so wise.Dax. She couldn't act her way out of a nutsac.
Again I think that was the writers coming up with a character they couldn't deliver. A being that's lived for hundreds of years doesn't have as much in the way of low-hanging fodder for story and characterization if they're already supposed to be so wise.
Holy 1998 MIDI Batman. What crap production value.I started playing Star Trek Online again after getting back into the series after the Best of Both Worlds experience and the upcoming movie.
I gotta say, the theme song to the game is pretty damn good.
Again I think that was the writers coming up with a character they couldn't deliver. A being that's lived for hundreds of years doesn't have as much in the way of low-hanging fodder for story and characterization if they're already supposed to be so wise.
Given she's playing a Vulcan, these two thoughts just don't compute.she's so stiff and wooden. Super bad casting in that area.
Given she's playing a Vulcan, these two thoughts just don't compute.
Again, I've only seen her in Enterprise but I'd have judged her performance of the character to be one of the better in Trek-dom.
Well if you want to partially justify it in-universe they were total dicks until Surak came back and whipped them into shape in time for TOS.Leonard Nimoy, Mark Lenard, Kirsty Alley, hell even Kim Cattrall all managed to perform vulcans without being "stiff and wooden". I think they were maybe going for something kind of awkward with T'Pol's character that never really worked but I think in the end the criticism is valid.
Romulan: "What happened to your eyes?"
La forge: "I was born this way.."
Romulan: "..and they let you live?! no wonder your species is so weak, they waste time and resources on defective children"
Just saw the new movie. It's really Star Trekky. I like!
Doesn't "really Star Trekky" generally mean "Slow and meandering but with a thoughtful moral applicable to modern society"?
No, it means improbable, cheesy, and entertaining.
On season 3 of DS9. I'm digging the characters a great deal more than TNG. While Sisko is no where near the level of Picard the supporting characters are far deeper than the ones on the Enterprise. I genuinely couldn't care less about Deanna, Crusher, Riker etc. The interaction between Odo and Quark is probably my favorite part of the show.
On season 3 of DS9. I'm digging the characters a great deal more than TNG. While Sisko is no where near the level of Picard the supporting characters are far deeper than the ones on the Enterprise. I genuinely couldn't care less about Deanna, Crusher, Riker etc. The interaction between Odo and Quark is probably my favorite part of the show.
Definitely Voyager. It had two better written and acted contemporaries and was just a glorified Lost in Space.I would have a hard time trying to write down which shot is more arse, Voyager or Enterprise. I tend to dislike VOY a bit less because it still had some of that old Trek feeling, while ENT is just one gigantic missed opportunity
I liked the DS9 ending. The only issue for me was the terrible transition from the war ending to the prophets ending. And that stupid flashback scene for everyone.After watching BSG and running through all the Star Trek eps I have a new respect for DS9. Bad ending aside, it pushed the more alien aspects of Trek and provided a dynamic where there could be conflict between characters, but they were still on the same sides. I think it's a good thing Berman and co. reined in Moore though.
And Quark/Odo is probably my favorite single pairing in the series as well.
Including the flashback that doesn't make sense for Word since they didn't want to pay Terry for showing up in the finale?I liked the DS9 ending. The only issue for me was the terrible transition from the war ending to the prophets ending. And that stupid flashback scene for everyone.
As far as the actual finale, the book of Kosst or whatever it was called is nothing less than the worst plot point modern Trek has tried to use as an arc. The book and its powers never made any sense and the Pah Wraiths only ever worked for one or two episodes (like the evil Keiko one.)
Even in war, life still goes on, and that episode is one of the best in all of Trek.My isse with the end of DS9 is that until the final run, the war was unevenly handled--one ep it's the most important thing ever, the next they're doing a horrible and slightly racist baseball episode.
Hence why I'm happy there was someone stopping him during DS9's run. The guys a great writer but some of his ideas are terribad.It was just Moore's practice run for BSG.
Even in war, life still goes on, and that episode is one of the best in all of Trek.
Hence why I'm happy there was someone stopping him during DS9's run. The guys a great writer but some of his ideas are terribad.
...
Oh, surprised Dax didn't link this: (warning mobile link):
http://mobile.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/05/15/new_star_trek_tv_show_what_the_world_needs.html