honestly don't see the point. It is still in 4:3 and the apparently high def versions are on netflix.
You'll still get noticeably better picture and audio quality through the actual blurays than you will with the Netflix version.
honestly don't see the point. It is still in 4:3 and the apparently high def versions are on netflix.
You'll still get noticeably better picture and audio quality through the actual blurays than you will with the Netflix version.
honestly don't see the point. It is still in 4:3 and the apparently high def versions are on netflix.
Yep. Not to mention they might get pulled off Netflix at some point with a month's worth of notice at best. Always going to be good to have a hard copy/backup, even if you end up ripping everything.
You can always buy it later, it is not going anywhere. It is Star Trek, it will be available forever and ever.
Yep, but given that it's eternally popular it's not like prices are likely to ever drop to something ridiculously low either.
I think the fannon is that he was part of the first colony to Alpha Centauri after the events of First Contact.
Nice. It was neat to run across Mike Ehrmantraut early in DS9, since my first time through the series I didn't recognize him from anything.Lmao a young tuco in that ds9 episode where nog loses a leg.
He's a crazy meth head in this too.
Looks like Voyager is going to start airing on BBC America on the 1st. Don't really have a source other than online TV guides. Why not DS9? Even Enterprise would have been better in IMO.
That's interesting. AFAIK, TNG has been the only show on BBC America. Or was TOS on there as well? In any case, I suppose the "episodic starship adventures" gig is the way they wish to go. Serialized shows don't always fare so hot in syndication. Voyager is usually quite easy to hop into on a whim. DS9 and the back half of ENT, not so much.
Who's the best minor/sub character?
Obviously some series like tng from my recollcation doesn't have many as every episode is more of less standalone.
I think the most obvious answer would be Q
However dn9 has so many great characters.
Brunt gets my vote.
Who's the best minor/sub character?
Obviously some series like tng from my recollcation doesn't have many as every episode is more of less standalone.
I think the most obvious answer would be Q
However dn9 has so many great characters.
Brunt gets my vote.
Nurse Chapel (TOS); Guinan (TNG); Gowron (TNG); Vash (TNG/DS9); Morn (DS9); Kasidy Yates (DS9)... Lwaxanahahahahah no no I can't even pretend
NogWho's the best minor/sub character?
Obviously some series like tng from my recollcation doesn't have many as every episode is more of less standalone.
I think the most obvious answer would be Q
However dn9 has so many great characters.
Brunt gets my vote.
That was Rick Berman's mandate. They compromised and got the big ending arc, but only if the rest of the season was episodic.
I can't remember if B5 was syndicated or if it was on one of those mini-networks that existed in the 90s, but it's just another one of those "coincidences" that leads me to at least consider JMS's claims of plagiarism. lolIn a lot of ways DS9 was too early for its own good. They were trying to graft serialized storytelling onto the TNG episode format, which operated via first-run syndication. They'd have had a much easier time crafting the show they wanted had they released it 10 years later.
I think that it's something of a chicken or egg situation, because when I think about the highly serialized series of today, even the ones I really like, many episodes don't stand out. The series might be great, but you end up with episodes like the tail end of DS9, where there's a lot of table-setting, plot threads get brought up too soon and get put into stasis, where episodes of anticipation leads to a "that was it?" sense of disappointment. To a certain point I think if you're going for a highly serialized show you're basically acepting that hour to hour it's probably not going to be as good as an episodic show.I can't remember if B5 was syndicated or if it was on one of those mini-networks that existed in the 90s, but it's just another one of those "coincidences" that leads me to at least consider JMS's claims of plagiarism. lol
But on serialization, the counter argument is that most people's memorable DS9 episodes are standalone episodes, so... maybe Berman was right?
Watched The Omega Glory recently...the use of the US Flag and constitution which is almost word for word to ours was bad but in a hilarious way, that's two planets they've found which are almost exact parallels to earth at one point or another lol
Pretty sure there are more than two.
They even had to make up some bullshit in-universe "theory of parallel planet development" to explain why all these planets were exactly like Earth.
And that's not even counting all the times a person from Earth landed somewhere and managed to completely change the planet to be like Earth of X time period. I can think of the nazi planet and the gangster planet right off the top of my head.
Who's the best minor/sub character?
You're comparing 60s golden age scifi writing to 2010s modern writing though...I gotta say the backlash the new ST movies have received for things like Khans blood, the teleporter at warp or between planets etc seems kinda ridiculous after watching TOS, seems like they find the craziest things on a weekly basis that the stuff in the ST movies seem kinda tame. I know they've stumbled into immortality at least a couple times already.
Yeah, SG1 handled the whole Goa'uld threat thing fairly well. Even the secret Russian program and conspiracy stuff worked well as background arcs that appeared spread throughout the seasons. If the new show is really just going to be a yearly anthology series like the Ryan Murphy shows though, then it's clear that it's probably going to just tell a tightly packed serialized story.I think that it's something of a chicken or egg situation, because when I think about the highly serialized series of today, even the ones I really like, many episodes don't stand out. The series might be great, but you end up with episodes like the tail end of DS9, where there's a lot of table-setting, plot threads get brought up too soon and get put into stasis, where episodes of anticipation leads to a "that was it?" sense of disappointment. To a certain point I think if you're going for a highly serialized show you're basically acepting that hour to hour it's probably not going to be as good as an episodic show.
Personally I'd really love shows to find a balance better in the middle. Early Stargate SG1 to me is a great example of how you can move the overarching story along with episodes scattered around the season and keep that sense of context and momentum when when the majority of episodes are standalone.
If the new show is really just going to be a yearly anthology series like the Ryan Murphy shows though, then it's clear that it's probably going to just tell a tightly packed serialized story.
Watched The Omega Glory recently...the use of the US Flag and constitution which is almost word for word to ours was bad but in a hilarious way, that's two planets they've found which are almost exact parallels to earth at one point or another lol
It wes one of the draft pilot scripts, too.
I don'the know if it got butchered like This Way To Eden, but the story would have been FAR more plausible if if was some Earth colony where the superpowers had rival ideological systems and evolved seperately. TOS named dropped the Mars colony all the time... surely they weren't all successes?
Okay, it's still stupid, but at least it's not some fucking planet in the middle of nowhere that no one had EVER heard of. It's up there with the Irish in Space episode of TNG, except, I suppose Captain Tracey is a lot better than the episode.
You're comparing 60s golden age scifi writing to 2010s modern writing though...
Yeah, I've since been convinced that 6 is a perfect number for serialized stories, based on watching lots of British and Australian shows. You can do your 5-act structure with a little wiggle room for extra development and other plot threads.Yeah, it seems likely. At least with a anthology series you have a much narrower focus to devote your attention.
But it seems like with a lot of Netflix-style shows I've been feeling personally burned. The fewer episodes, the more my expectations rise. What's weird is that despite the trend towards shorter 8 or 10 or 13 episode seasons, I've become increasingly tired or bloat. Jessica Jones or Stranger Things all could have lost dead weight episodes and been better, and they're so short as it is. I hope that's not a problem with new Trek.
By the 80s, when Roddenbery was taken off the series and all his golden age writers/producers retired/were let go/etc, most of that type of writing was gone. Sure the movies are supposed to be "TOS" movies, whatever that meant, but even the original Star Trek movies weren't as "silly" as the original television show. Hell, one of them had the balls to kill off a main character (even if temporarily).But the complaint is that it's not "Star Trek" yet it totally is,
Yeah, I've since been convinced that 6 is a perfect number for serialized stories, based on watching lots of British and Australian shows. You can do your 5-act structure with a little wiggle room for extra development and other plot threads.
By the 80s, when Roddenbery was taken off the series and all his golden age writers/producers retired/were let go/etc, most of that type of writing was gone. Sure the movies are supposed to be "TOS" movies, whatever that meant, but even the original Star Trek movies weren't as "silly" as the original television show. Hell, one of them had the balls to kill off a main character (even if temporarily).
That is true and I'll be honest that I didn't become a fan until ST 2009, I had watched a couple of the TNG/TOS movies but I didn't really get hooked until the reboot and then I started with TNG/DS9 before jumping into TOS so I thought TOS was going to be a lot more grounded like TNG (and even then TNG still had some crazy stuff all the time) and that that's where the complaints were coming from but from what I've seen of TOS ii's just pure campy sci-fi fun and I have seen all the TOS movies already and they are very different from the show, they took themselves more serious and the use of Uhura, scott, and sulu in the show compared to the movies was a surprise, I thought they were going to be main characters in the show.
I can see why people didn't like STID though, after having watched Space Seed, there was so much they could have done but they just turned it into super bad guy in space. Kinda sucks to think about even though I still enjoy the movie.
I'm going through all the Trek VR experiences I can find. Most seem to work fine on a standard monitor.
TOS Bridge
https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B6EKoBBhpPy0YTNSNmw5UFYxSGc&export=download
Consitution Class Experience
http://www.mediafire.com/download/ubo03wss8rcaba9/Constitution_Class_Experience_v1.05.zip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ld62Dyb3PUk
Enterprise D Bridge & Misc
https://www.reddit.com/r/stage9/comments/5dga5t/stage_9_v004_nonvr_release/
Voyager Bridge
https://2e8993918fedc837630126e87e2a94bdb162b1e8.googledrive.com/host/0B-PPb1vAvJRCX1l2LUtEQV9wODA/