picardfacepalm.gifHenchmen21 said:No better, No worse than Abrahms trek really.
picardfacepalm.gifHenchmen21 said:No better, No worse than Abrahms trek really.
Henchmen21 said:No better, No worse than Abrahms trek really.
Eh. Despite Nemesis having an awesome space battle (something Star Trek 2009 lacked), overall, I thought Star Trek 2009 was the better movie. But, really, that's not saying much.Henchmen21 said:No better, No worse than Abrahms trek really.
I thought the crazy villain who blamed one of the main characters for the loss of his people/family, let it fester for a few decades, then decided to try and take it out on the galaxy at large (starting with things important to main character) seemed a bit familiar.SpoonyBard said:At least Abrahms didn't try to remake Wrath of Khan once again...
JoshuaJSlone said:I thought the crazy villain who blamed one of the main characters for the loss of his people/family, let it fester for a few decades, then decided to try and take it out on the galaxy at large (starting with things important to main character) seemed a bit familiar.
SpoonyBard said:At least Abrahms didn't try to remake Wrath of Khan once again...
DrForester said:I wouldn't say that with all the hints being droped that Khan will be in the sequel. Hope Abrahms is just trolling fans.
DrForester said:I wouldn't say that with all the hints being droped that Khan will be in the sequel. Hope Abrahms is just trolling fans.
DrForester said:time for Star Trek to die off for another half decade...
JoshuaJSlone said:And using a body of gas for aid in a surprise attack.
True enough. Always a small nebula or habitable planet within crashing distance when the need arises.JoeMartin said:This is like, every other Star Trek episode.
Stumpokapow said:So is it just me, or is "Caretaker" pretty poorly made?
Stumpokapow said:I mentioned this to DrForester earlier, but I watched "Caretaker" last night for the first time since about 2002. So I've maybe seen it 4 or 5 times including the original airing.
It sucked. Really bad. Incredibly shitty matte work and effects, weak acting (particularly from the three Maquis characters), slow to get going, and the sets don't look half as good as they remember them.
I only mention this because this wasn't what I was expecting. I don't think Voyager was a great show, but I remember highly enjoying the pilot at the time. By the same token, I've rewatched bother "Emissary" and "Encounter at Farpoint" within the last 12 months, and they both hold up much better despite also suffering from typical Trek S1 jitters.
So is it just me, or is "Caretaker" pretty poorly made?
Kai said:Ok I LOVED TNG but I never watched DS9. I don't have time to watch the whole series right now - but if I had to watch - let's say 10-25 episodes in order to get the gist of the whole series (i.e absolute best episodes that also carry along the overarching storyline the most) what should I watch?
How to get into 20 classic science fiction shows: The ultimate guideKai said:Ok I LOVED TNG but I never watched DS9. I don't have time to watch the whole series right now - but if I had to watch - let's say 10-25 episodes in order to get the gist of the whole series (i.e absolute best episodes that also carry along the overarching storyline the most) what should I watch?
Seriously. Just the last chunk of highly serial episodes would take up ~10.maharg said:I don't think you can really do DS9 up like that. You could watch the earlier episodes, which are mostly trashy (and imo incredibly boring) one-offs, or you could watch the episodes once the arc really kicked in, but you'd probably be lost if you only watched 10-25 of them.
You think didn't do just that with Nero, and that he won't bring up Kahn at some point? :lolSpoonyBard said:At least Abrahms didn't try to remake Wrath of Khan once again...
Coldsnap said:This has been bugging me, I'm watching TNG for the first time AND EFFING LOVING IT! I am curious if Captian Riker is wearing a toupee or not? My friend doesn't seem to think so, I do.
DrForester said:You mean Commander Riker? No it's not a wig (or it's a really really good one that no one ever picked up on)
what I have read would have hardly composed a moderately interesting episode somewhere in the middle of season five of TNG.
On the other hand, actor Brent Spiner who plays the major co-starring role of Lieutenant Commander Data, an android, was not as comfortable with me. He was extremely polite about it but finally after discussing ideas for the film over lunch, he leaned forward and said,
Im kind of worried that you dont know how to write my character.
Gary Whitta said:I read the Piller book and recommend it; it's a well-written, comprehensive, very frank look inside the process of writing and developing a studio franchise movie. And proof that even bad movies are made with the very best of intentions.
Gary Whitta said:I read the Piller book and recommend it; it's a well-written, comprehensive, very frank look inside the process of writing and developing a studio franchise movie. And proof that even bad movies are made with the very best of intentions.
Teh Hamburglar said:I saw the episode where Kes gives Neelix one of her lungs. Chalk that to another plot point thats never, ever brought up again.
Willy105 said:?
Wasn't that big a deal. Didn't McCoy give somebody a new liver or something while time traveling to the 80's?
Teh Hamburglar said:I saw the episode where Kes gives Neelix one of her lungs. Chalk that to another plot point thats never, ever brought up again.
Willy105 said:?
Wasn't that big a deal. Didn't McCoy give somebody a new liver or something while time traveling to the 80's?
Whaa--? They used sets from TNG in the movie?DrForester said:Watchign Star Trek VI on Blu-Ray
Can not unsee TNG sets now that someone told me about them
Engineering = Engineering
Dining Hall = Conference Room
Federation President Office = Ten Forward
Dax01 said:Whaa--? They used sets from TNG in the movie?
Gonna have to rewatch the movie sometime soon now.:lol