The Last of Us - Review Thread [Emargo up, scores in OP.]

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dragun619

Member
Damn, overwhelming # of positive/ 10 out 10 reviews. I'll see if I can still pre order the Survival Edition at Gamestop or Best Buy. Amazon doesn't seem to have it available anymore.
 

Draconian

Member
The funny thing is if Polygon fell in line, no one would be complaining. It would just be another 10/10 from a game journo.

Yes, and people here complain all the time about how bad video game journalism is. As soon as a site gives a game they're hyped about and haven't played a score that isn't a 10, they claim they're doing it for hits.
 

iNvid02

Member
sony arent charging £59.99 for this on PSN (£39.99 actually), might switch to digital as i already have some money in the wallet

hmmm
 

Zia

Member
Why would Phil Kholar review this game? Doesn't he only have a NES and SNES?

I already made a version of this joke, but it's worth repeating, not necesarilly as an insult to Phil, but as a note to urge people to read the bylines. He isn't "Polygon." He's a writer with pretty particular tastes. He's personally the last person on the staff I'd look to for impressions on a game like this. Similarly, Colin Moriarty at IGN is the last person on Earth I'd look to for impressions on anything, ever. Unless an outlet omits bylines, and has a pretty strong house voice like Edge or GamesTM, it's wrong to condemn an outlet based on one review you disagree with. Find writers you like and listen to them. I know this is really obvious, and much of the gnashing is about scores and mindshare instead of criticism, but I thought I'd throw it out there anyway.
 

DatDude

Banned
woFF37l.jpg


I doubt the score will move from here.

Considering there's 60 more reviews to (eventually) be accounted for than I wouldn't count on it
 
"But seriously, this is a game based on a monotonous game concept already for years ago was trite to breaking point. And seriously, that relationship is based mostly on the father figure uses his concern for daughter figure as an excuse to torture, cold-blooded execution and set fire to people."

Hey, that's the impression I get too!

still, that torture, cold-blooded execution and setting fire to people looks like it might be fun.
 

Vice

Member
Perhaps the game just isn't that good. I mean ND has only made one truly incredible game this generation anyway.
 

Alienous

Member
You can't increase the difficulty? The fuck?

In New Game +.

Play on Normal -> New Game +, Normal -> Hard -> New Game +, Hard -> Survivor, but if you want to change difficulties you can't keep your weapons and skills (I'm assuming, haven't played it).

Which, if you're changing difficulties, would only undermine that playthrough.
 
"But seriously, this is a game based on a monotonous game concept already for years ago was trite to breaking point. And seriously, that relationship is based mostly on the father figure uses his concern for daughter figure as an excuse to torture, cold-blooded execution and set fire to people."

Hey, that's the impression I get too!

And? What would they think of movies like The Road and Children of Men?
Violence can be used to make a point.
 

EatChildren

Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
So the game has some wave based encounters? Well fuck. Naughty Dog waves are awful.
 

PJFJosh

Member
Where is this coming from? Is it an editorial policy, or is this from Sony/ND? Can you say your site/mag?

this comes straight from Sony/ND. They were very specific about which parts of the game they wanted kept under wraps and I really hope everyone follows that. It's better for everyone if these parts aren't spoiled.
 

Drek

Member
That actually...kinda sucks.

I'd assume it's trophy protection. Can't let you take an upgraded turn into a "new" game on harder difficulty for easier trophies. Once again proving that trophies/achievements are one of the worst new things from this generation.
 

manueldelalas

Time Traveler
I was pissed at the 8.8 score with TP, with time I've learned they were absolutely right, great game but the flaws were there.

Then I saw the post reactions to the GTAIV, MGSIV, Uncharted 3, etc early 10 scores, some of them with obvious flaws. Same thing. Not saying the game will be a 7.5 in the future, but I have learned to wait a few weeks and see.
 

DatDude

Banned
cool that game got good scores.

But digging pass the hyperbole, games seems relatively standard but executioned well with some AI issues and mixed opinions on combat.

hope it turns out ok. Didn't think bioshock lived up to all the hyper/reviews. Was fun, but not the next moses.

Gonna go in with low expectations for this (and almost blind. only read a few reviews and seen no previews/gameplay yet), so hopefully that makes me enjoy this more!

What's your definition of standard? :/
 
Yeah...I guess that was a pretty bad post in retrospect!

I guess my main complaint wasn't towards Polygon was a (albeit a probably misplaced) worry of potential outside influence from a bad review and the fact that they're just incredibly misleading about their reviews and review criteria. I mean, I've read a good majority of the reviews and outside of the inconsistent AI, the things Polygon docked the game on were things that other reviewers raved about. To each his own but I don't think I would put someone in charge of a review who doesn't like or questions the genre. It would be like putting me in charge of reviewing a Pokemon game.

I'll disappear now!
TyYXHHa.gif
 

brandnew

Member
My problem with the Polygon review is not that the score stands out, it's how Kollar used the "shaky aiming" and AI companions being invisible to enemies to justify it. He even mentioned how the aiming helped with immersion and the invisibility being good for a stealth-focused game. It's like he is saying the aiming is relatively good considering the story and characters, but it's objectively bad compared to something like Uncharted, so it's a negative.

Polygon takes so much pride in their organic review scores, but all of the actual written reviews and opinions seem anything but organic. It's like they have a checklist of what a game needs to do and they never stray from it regardless of the story/experience the game is trying to convey. Their obsession with Bioshock Infinite's violence is another example of this.

That being said, in a world without inflated review scores 7.5 is still a "good" score. But even with Kollar's weak complaints it doesn't seem to match the written words. Wonder if this is a result of numerical scoring being pretty dumb in general or Polygon needing dem clicks.
 

Principate

Saint Titanfall
TBF the difference between Gamespot's 8 and Polygon's 7.5 is only 0.5, you can't only mention and talk about polygon in regards to scores. It's not alone in it's low score. Who knows if this will turn out like another TP.
 
I just wish we could have a serious conversation about Polygon and the nature of reviews without either the idiots blasting them or the over-sarcastic people making jokes about 'conspiricy meetings'. If you think politics and console jockeying doesn't ever happen in game sites, you are lying to yourself. What is this review from Polygon? I don't know and it doesn't matter, it just looks bad.

Polygon didn't do itself any favors with creating a self fellating documentary before they had even begun working. A doc that had heavy funding from Microsoft itself. If you ever wanted to establish credibility out of the gate than that was the worst move possible. It looks really bad. So when they have numerous articles after the criticized XBONE reveal that were far more positive than most sites and aritcles including some that seem to defend the practices being presented than you are going to be called a mouthpiece for a console maker and not a serious site. It looks bad.

Of course when this review comes up you get the same. It fucking looks bad and it's thier own fault. We resently got a small inside comment about recent vocal GAF members and possible attachment to PR, marketing and social media firms. Well, that's what Polygon ends up looking like when this happens. It's not even fair to them or the reviewer, but that's what you get.
 
Kudos to not linking to the Polygon review. I see Resident Evil Revelations and The Last of Us are in the same league to them...well, at least by that reviewers opinion.
 

Papercuts

fired zero bullets in the orphanage.
In New Game +.

Play on Normal -> New Game +, Normal -> Hard -> New Game +, Hard -> Survivor, but if you want to change difficulties you can't keep your weapons and skills (I'm assuming, haven't played it).

Which, if you're changing difficulties, would only undermine that playthrough.

You can change it on the fly, it locks to what it finishes on apparently. Which makes it sound like you can play it on Easy, go up to Hard at the end, be locked to Hard and be unable to move it down.

Stupid if true.
 

antitrop

Member
Nah, they will find plenty of flaws and agree that it's not worth 10/10 but maybe 8/10 or 9/10

Sure, that would be reasonable. But there will still be people saying it's one of the worst games of the year, or of the gen, or that they've ever played. There always is. :)
 

WilyRook

Member
Well shit, I can't wait to play this. Nothing like having all this excitement around a new release right during E3, too. Playing through it should be the perfect chaser to watching all e3 livestream stuff.
 

sTeLioSco

Banned
great reviews.

polygon getting schizophrenic and trying to shit on a ps exclusive was funny also.

nothing stops playstation....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom