agreed.forgive me for drawing a blank though... what do you mean by GG?
GamerGate.
agreed.forgive me for drawing a blank though... what do you mean by GG?
Avatar whatever. Shepard has plenty of terrible aspects that will be a part of the story no matter what dialogue you choose.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1031314Seen this article
"Mass Effect 4 Story, Gameplay, Special Features Leak Through Survey?"
http://www.hardcoregamer.com/2015/0...-special-features-leak-through-survey/145078/
It could be fake or real. If real it contains plot spoilers. If fake someone has a lot of time on their hands.
Edit: Just finished reading it. Lots of information there
indeed. i'm curious about it though so I should do some reading on my own.But discussing Mass Effect is so much better than toxic stuff!GamerGate.
the thread wasn't gonna be derailed because of 2 people's discussion. but you're right, we shouldn't go off the rails anyway.Please don't derail the thread.
good point. I never thought of that before.Oh, I'm not saying that Shepard doesn't have really weird/dumb aspects of character that exist separate from the player; just that the dichotomy between Shepard(the character) and Shepard(receptacle for the player's opinions) is really vague(and sorta jarring as a result).
I'm not really getting the fuss about battlefront, probably because i'm not much of a star wars fan. but i hear that game won't even have a campaign, so as games it probably won't be much like Me4 because obviously ME is a very story driven game.I'm getting teary-eyed knowing that Mass Effect will be a single player 30fps improvement on the magnificent spectacle in the Battlefront media. E3, 6 weeks.
6 weeks? Isn't mid-June 8 weeks away?I'm getting teary-eyed knowing that Mass Effect will be a single player 30fps improvement on the magnificent spectacle in the Battlefront media. E3, 6 weeks.
It's just a little off, but yeah. That's probably what he meant.6 weeks? Isn't mid-June 8 weeks away?
I've been interested in playing the trilogy, but the price point plus all the DLC bothered me. How much do I miss out in terms of DLC if I just buy the Trilogy package? Any DLC in particular that I should buy separately?
shit, i didn't even know those were missing aside from citadel since it was released later. if the remaster is real it better not fucking leave anything out.Shadow Broker, Leviathan, From Ashes, Citadel
shit, i didn't even know those were missing aside from citadel since it was released later. if the remaster is real it better not fucking leave anything out.
you have got to be fucking kidding me.Better prepare for the worst.
you have got to be fucking kidding me.
when Me2 released for Ps3 it came with all the dlc up till that point. you really think they'll release the trilogy and then make all the dlc separate?
fuck that shit if it is the case.
What film?
There are zero remasters that don't include all existing DLCBetter prepare for the worst.
There are zero remasters that don't include all existing DLC
Don't say that. A certain someone here started throwing shade at me for pointing it out.There are 0 remasters by EA too.
Don't say that. A certain someone here started throwing shade at me for pointing it out.
but this shouldn't be an expectation in question. because of the way the market has shaped remasters or vice versa, it is a ripoff to release a remaster of a game with a lot of existing dlc, and not include it in the package.I don't have any inside knowledge but it wouldn't surprise me. If you prepare for the worst, you'll either get what you expect, or be pleasantly surprised.
I didn't even know arad was involved.The shit one produced by Avi Arad.
I missed it. what was ea's remastered game?Don't say that. A certain someone here started throwing shade at me for pointing it out.
Can I still post in this thread if my hopes and dreams are nearly gone?
what is it about that post that you don't like?Can I still post in this thread if my hopes and dreams are nearly gone?
From the survey thread:what is it about that post that you don't like?
This talk of "APEX" gamebux and Inquisition-style "strike teams" make me very, very nervous. And I'm disappointed that it will be set in a different galaxy.
I'm honestly not sure why I expected otherwise, though. BioWare's mantra is throwing out the baby with the bathwater. If something doesn't work quite right, they have an alarming tendency to axe it completely.
No. That would be the ultimate insult if EA tried to pull that shit.Meh, I'm just saying it's hard to be disappointed in a remaster if you prepare for the worst.
No. That would be the ultimate insult if EA tried to pull that shit.
If EA seriously tried that crap, not only would I not buy the trilogy I wouldn't even buy ME4. I'm serious.
However I don't think anyone would be upset if they didn't include Bring Down the Sky since they supposedly lost all the original files for that.
Of course, it's a moot point anyway since EA doesn't do remasters and never will. Right Pantheon?
No. That would be the ultimate insult if EA tried to pull that shit.
If EA seriously tried that crap, not only would I not buy the trilogy I wouldn't even buy ME4. I'm serious.
However I don't think anyone would be upset if they didn't include Bring Down the Sky since they supposedly lost all the original files for that.
Of course, it's a moot point anyway since EA doesn't do remasters and never will. Right Pantheon?
Wasn't that Pinnacle Station?
You seriously wouldnt be bothered if EA decided to sell the ME DLC separately?I just beat the trilogy in 4K, I can't say I'd be bothered. Unless they have a deluxe version with all the DLC at like $80 USD.
You seriously wouldnt be bothered if EA decided to sell the ME DLC separately?
That would be the ultimate "fuck you" to the fans.
$60 with all DLC is the minimum standard. 1080p/60fps.
There is no excuse for anything less.
If MS can charge $60 for Halo MCC for four games.
I own it all in 1080p/60fps, what do I care? Releasing a full trilogy with all the content would be nice, but inconsequential as to whether or not they include the DLC. I've never appreciated re-buying old games.
That's the thing. Everyone missed it.I missed it. what was ea's remastered game?
The "never will" isn't something I'd take any guess on, but you are right on the rest.Of course, it's a moot point anyway since EA doesn't do remasters and never will. Right Pantheon?
alright. I definitely understand your concern now.From the survey thread:
whether or not you care, that move by ea would be a ripoff.I own it all in 1080p/60fps, what do I care? Releasing a full trilogy with all the content would be nice, but inconsequential as to whether or not they include the DLC. I've never appreciated re-buying old games.
so enlighten us..?That's the thing. Everyone missed it.
alright. I definitely understand your concern now.
whether or not you care, that move by ea would be a ripoff.
so enlighten us..?
why does the number of platforms matter? tomb raider launched on 3 platforms and a year later, had remastered versions for the new consoles. that's what we're talking about here.I guess? It's playable on 3 platforms already. What happens now with the trilogy doesn't really matter anymore.
so enlighten us..?
why does the number of platforms matter? tomb raider launched on 3 platforms and a year later, had remastered versions for the new consoles. that's what we're talking about here.
oh okay. I was confused because I thought someone brought up a remastered game that ea did indeed commit to when they said "pointed it out"Not to be confusing, I was just confirming diaspora's note on EA and remasters.
i can't speak for hardcore dragon age fans, but I think generally ME is bigger than dragon age. there was also never ever any talk of a da remaster but I think bioware did at least mention that they were exploring the possibility of remastering ME.Right, that's what I'm saying, it doesn't matter if they do or don't make or include the DLC which I think is unlikely anyway- we didn't see a remaster of DA1 and 2 after all.
oh okay. I was confused because I thought someone brought up a remastered game that ea did indeed commit to when they said "pointed it out"
i can't speak for hardcore dragon age fans, but I think generally ME is bigger than dragon age. there was also never ever any talk of a da remaster but I think bioware did at least mention that they were exploring the possibility of remastering ME.
and as far as remastered games go, yes man, it does matter if they make it without including the dlc for reasons I and others have already stated.
I figure almost everyone has played it in 1080p60 at this point anyway. These games can run on toasters.
edit: Honestly, they shouldn't even bother unless they plan on remaking these games in Frostbite or something.
DA 1 and 2 were disappointments commercially iirc. I think there was even some implication in the press that DAI was a last chance reboot that put a lot of weight on upping the production values and appeal to fans of BioWare's Mass Effect successes.
You figure way wrong. PC sales are way less of the franchise's sales than consoles. Many have not come remotely close to playing in 1080p60.
No. Hell no. While I cannot provide you definitive numbers, I'm pretty sure the 360 was the best selling platform for all ME games so that means majority of people playing the games at 30, and only 30, not 60fps. Me3 on 360 outsold the Ps3 version 4 to 1 at launch.There really isn't much, or anything, showing that this is going to happen in the first place. I just can't see EA even bothering short of releasing 1080p versions of the game digitally with the DLC separately if that. I figure almost everyone has played it in 1080p60 at this point anyway. These games can run on toasters.
At first I was on board with this, but at this point I think a remaster of the same games (on like the same engine & shit) would be fine just simply considering the fact that playing them on playstation for me entailed playing with so many performance issues, and playing them without the full, triple, game-to-game experience.edit: Honestly, they shouldn't even bother unless they plan on remaking these games in Frostbite or something.
DA 1 and 2 were disappointments commercially iirc. I think there was even some implication in the press that DAI was a last chance reboot that put a lot of weight on upping the production values and appeal to fans of BioWare's Mass Effect successes.
You figure way wrong. PC sales are way less of the franchise's sales than consoles. Many have not come remotely close to playing in 1080p60.
What do you define as MASSIVE?Incorrect.
Dragon Age: Origins was the best-selling Bioware game for a long time, besting both Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 2 in sales.
I don't recall reading if Mass Effect 3 finally bested it, but it was a MASSIVE seller.
Dragon Age 2, however, was a crushing disappointment. It initially sold better than Origins, but sales quickly fell off a cliff so hard that retailers refused to stock an Ultimate Edition.
It's actually why despite the fact that Mass Effect gets all the praise, Dragon Age is probably Bioware's must lucrative and important franchise.
You clearly have no clue how the industry works....There really isn't much, or anything, showing that this is going to happen in the first place. I just can't see EA even bothering short of releasing 1080p versions of the game digitally with the DLC separately if that. I figure almost everyone has played it in 1080p60 at this point anyway. These games can run on toasters.
edit: Honestly, they shouldn't even bother unless they plan on remaking these games in Frostbite or something.
ea was disappointed with selling arguably close to a million copies of the game on the first day?What do you define as MASSIVE?
From what I recall is that EA was disappointed in the sales of the game, but were pleased with the revenue from the multiplayer micros.