Ganzlinger
Member
This Garrus is one of the best cosplays ever.
I dunno, I spoke with Jessica in depth a few times. (Really cool community manager and all-around nifty person.) I chatted her up about the endings once and she seemed genuinely disappointed with them as well. I got the impression she really just could not say it outright to the community at-large, for obvious reasons.
We touched on IT and it was basically her asking me if I believed it because she had been following the vids and found if pretty fascinating. I said I didn't, and I personally hoped it wouldn't prove true, because I liked the foundations behind two of the ending choices enough and wanted to see more of them, and also because I was terrified the IT ending would legitimately just be Shepard waking up, and I thought that would be awful. She seemed fairly intrigued by my answer, and we continued discussing it. But she did say outright that she wasn't especially privy to what Mike Gamble and his team were doing for Extended Cut, and she was kind of torn on which way she would prefer things to go.
I suppose the broad baseline of her dialogs with me were built upon professional decisions to entertain certain ending discussion elements with the community, but having gotten to know her a bit, I don't really think she was playing everyone like a fiddle or anything. She was probably just as unsure of what she wanted EC to do as a bunch of other forumites.
The foundation of Destroy is you use the crucible to destroy the reapers. There are issues with the convenient/easy nature of it all but being able to nuke them isn't inherently bad (execution of it aside).
other than killing EDI and the Geth....
what exactly do you mean by this part?I dunno, I spoke with Jessica in depth a few times. (Really cool community manager and all-around nifty person.) I chatted her up about the endings once and she seemed genuinely disappointed with them as well. I got the impression she really just could not say it outright to the community at-large, for obvious reasons.
We touched on IT and it was basically her asking me if I believed it because she had been following the vids and found if pretty fascinating. I said I didn't, and I personally hoped it wouldn't prove true, because I liked the foundations behind two of the ending choices enough and wanted to see more of them, and also because I was terrified the IT ending would legitimately just be Shepard waking up, and I thought that would be awful. She seemed fairly intrigued by my answer, and we continued discussing it. But she did say outright that she wasn't especially privy to what Mike Gamble and his team were doing for Extended Cut, and she was kind of torn on which way she would prefer things to go.
I suppose the broad baseline of her dialogs with me were built upon professional decisions to entertain certain ending discussion elements with the community, but having gotten to know her a bit, I don't really think she was playing everyone like a fiddle or anything. She was probably just as unsure of what she wanted EC to do as a bunch of other forumites.
in the process of being indoctrinated, and fully succumbed if you choose anything but destroy.Indoctrination Theory.
As in, Shepard was indoctrinated by the Reapers.
other than killing EDI and the Geth....
What's unclear? She was saying that she didn't know what the Extended Cut would be, given that it hadn't come out at the time of the conversation.what exactly do you mean by this part?
think of the amazing aliens in another galaxy
I hope they actually make them alien looking. Not just variations of humans in order to make them "sexable".
You know that the chances we get another "Turian" is higher than another "Hanar".
I'm expecting we'll get both.
Because.
Well.
We did last time.
Destroy is the only canon ending I can support. It was my ending as well.
Also this thread is pretty dead now in the Community ;_;
Destroy is the only canon ending I can support. It was my ending as well.
Also this thread is pretty dead now in the Community ;_;
So, you expect this game to have as many new alien races as when ME1 released?
What is it? Turians, Asaris, Salarians, Krogans, Quarians, Batarians, Volus, Hanars, Elcors? I suppose Geths too if you count them. 10 races.
Sure it's a new galaxy and everything, so it would make sense, but will they make so many new races, when, I assume, they're going to remodel all the original races, plus the ones introduced in ME2 again? That's a hell of a job.
other than killing EDI and the Geth....
Right, and? Knowing you had to make a sacrifice was a good thing.
Destroy killing the Geth makes some sense as they have integrated Reaper code, but how would it kill EDI other than Space Magic?
Destroy killing the Geth makes some sense as they have integrated Reaper code, but how would it kill EDI other than Space Magic?
EDI is also part reaper tech based off of Sovereign's remains.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1041253
I guess this means no Mass Effect Trilogy remaster, bummer.
EDI is also part reaper tech based off of Sovereign's remains.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1041253
I guess this means no Mass Effect Trilogy remaster, bummer.
The top of the image is cut off. It says FY16 Announced games console/PC. Since a Trilogy remaster is not officially announced it would not be on the list.
People have forgotten this tweet.
Sjosz has already said that he has no knowledge of the state of any remaster, if it actually exists, in this thread. Also, this was an actual financial presentation, i.e. something that matters.
While it's entirely possible that they're keeping a title under wraps, the fact that they revealed the new Need For Speed and didn't mention a Mass Effect Remaster has swung me back to the "It's not going to happen (at least any time soon)" camp.
This is for investors. This is for the people who really matter.
that's what was unclear to me and you cleared it up. =]What's unclear? She was saying that she didn't know what the Extended Cut would be, given that it hadn't come out at the time of the conversation.
It's perfectly clear to me.
How are you coming to this conclusion?EDI is also part reaper tech based off of Sovereign's remains.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1041253
I guess this means no Mass Effect Trilogy remaster, bummer.
How are you coming to this conclusion?
And again, I ask the question....why would this be sent out via Twitter?Sjosz has already said that he has no knowledge of the state of any remaster, if it actually exists, in this thread. Also, this was an actual financial presentation, i.e. something that matters.
While it's entirely possible that they're keeping a title under wraps, the fact that they revealed the new Need For Speed and didn't mention a Mass Effect Remaster has swung me back to the "It's not going to happen (at least any time soon)" camp.
This is for investors. This is for the people who really matter.
He's not tweeting as a representative of the company. I think a lot of these tweets are people just talking about their jobs. I don't think they're trying to send coded messages to fans.And again, I ask the question....why would this be sent out via Twitter?
It makes NO SENSE to Tweet your boss a question when you could just call or email him directly. I seriously have a hard time believing tweeting Aaryn is the best way to ask him a question.
To me it seems more like a vague hint that it is coming.
But whatever, I have to admit that I am less excited about it coming than I was several months ago. Playing new games like Bloodborne has my attention.
At this point I am firmly in the camp that we will know for sure at E3, unless they decide to not show anything Mass Effect related. However, if they talk about ME4 and there is no mention then yes I will fully accept that it's not coming.
If I were a boss tweeting me about something like that would be seen as unprofessional and create unnecessary work. Granted, I seriously doubt discipline would result.He's not tweeting as a representative of the company. I think a lot of these tweets are people just talking about their jobs. I don't think they're trying to send coded messages to fans.
I agree with you that E3 would be the final nail in the coffin.
While I am pessimistic about it now, I also wouldn't be super shocked if it's announced.
If it's not talked about at all, I will assume that it's not going to happen, and will continue to believe that unless it's ever officially announced regardless of rumors or what have you.
If I were a boss tweeting me about something like that would be seen as unprofessional and create unnecessary work. Granted, I seriously doubt discipline would result.
But whatever. As of right now, the only trilogy that has higher demand attached to it would be the Uncharted trilogy, where even one of the top dogs has mentioned that is highly requested.
But as more and more new games come out there will be less interest in revisiting old titles for me anyway.
I think it exist. Now is the perfect time while people still have new console thirst and the consoles don't have a ton of games or a COD "dominator game" that sucks the air from everything else. It's a business decision and I think if the timing works, before ME4, the decision is easy.I still firmly believe it exists and it will be out this year. For all we know the list published are just for new titles and not remasters or just games with a set release date. I could eat my words at E3 so we have to wait and see.
Not really. We haven't learned anything from the tweets other than the devs are having fun at the latest build milestone meetings. They build hype and establish a relationship with fans over our common affinity for #space.Honestly, I've been wondering for a long time why people at Bioware have been allowed to be tweeting about ME4, because it does seem to just be creating headaches.
For you maybe, but it sucked.
that's what was unclear to me and you cleared it up. =]
so she wasn't in the know during the production of EC
Some people probably think that sacrificing AIs to destroy Reapers once and for all(which is what we were intending to do since the first game) isn't that bad of a "deal".
Especially considering Geths were the bad guys for a good portion of the trilogy(other than Legion and the "good" Geths that we never saw until the last Rannoch missions), so only EDI really feels like a loss.
Some people probably think that sacrificing AIs to destroy Reapers once and for all(which is what we were intending to do since the first game) isn't that bad of a "deal".
Especially considering Geths were the bad guys for a good portion of the trilogy(other than Legion and the "good" Geths that we never saw until the last Rannoch missions), so only EDI really feels like a loss.
I hope the jetpacks' are more than "on rails" ladders. I want to be able to accidentally shoot myself into space. I want gravity to effect them somehow.I'll leave the multiplayer speculation to the rest of the gang, as I'm not into that side of the series.
Jetpacks are a whole bunch of "hell yes"; this could be really, really awesome if done right. BioWare showed off verticality in Inquisition's regions, so my guess is that there'll be multiple levels involved in the planetary maps in ME4, and jetpacks will be the new ladders.
Good point. Narrative would probably suffer, so I doubt that they chose that route.I don't anticipate the Tempest being more than maybe XYZ, which would still be a pretty cool upgrade were it to come to pass. Probably not, though.
Very stoked it's still probably "just" a human protagonist. After Inquisition, I've serious reservations about how chock full of stuff ME4's leak reads to be like. If it's as bloated as DAI, the core narrative could potentially suffer. I'm in this for the story and the characters, and I want to love it as I have with the first three games. I worried that writing the script to accommodate multiple playable species would dilute the game's potential, and, well, selfishly humans are my favorite race anyway, so this feels like a personal victory.
It will have weapons for sure. Probably those are the things that we find from the remnants. Maybe we can upgrade the Mako to a Hammerhead.Something I've wondered for a while: will the new Mako be equipped with weapons? All the concept stuff was devoid of guns. I'd rather it didn't come back only to be a glorified horse, but it'll be nice to have it regardless. So long as banter can fire off while inside the thing. If... er, wait a minute, Mass Effect banter historically doesn't operate the same as Dragon Age. Nevermind, strike my last.
The leak suggested that Bioware were only looking to bring two previous species back to squad. Probably Asari and Krogan.I've also been speculating what the other five squadmates will be. Taking the leak at face value, we know there's a krogan named Drack and a biotic named Cora. We don't know Cora's species, and of course, we don't know the first thing about the remaining five. I hope there's some newness to the lineup. It's reasonable that many fans will argue over which trilogy races should get represented, but I'd like two of 'em to be Andromedan in descent, so to speak. I could do without an asari, or even a turian, but they're staples, and that's a minority opinion. Still, my ideal lineup would be, like, a couple of humans, the krogan, a couple of Andromedans, and then... I don't know, maybe a salarian and a drell or somethin'.