Keep your nationality aside as its clouding your judgement.
Help me, I'm choking here.
Keep your nationality aside as its clouding your judgement.
The link shows Puppy claiming bump catch against NZ. Choke all you want.Help me, I'm choking here.
The top 5 cricketers of last century judged by Wisden were:
1. Sir Donald Bradman
2. Sir Garfield Sobers
3. Sir Jack Hobbs
4. Shane Warne
5. Sir Viv Richards
List warzzz! Sobers above Richards is a joke.
Way to miss the joke.Way to miss the point.List warzzz! Sobers above Richards is a joke.
Haddin is Poochie.
Stole this from BigFooty. LMAO.
Is he seriously the best option the team has right now?
Fixed.paine is injured, wade is ummm... dont know why... even <insert player name here> would still do a better job
Stop quoting him, I don't want to see his stupid fucking posts.
Man I'd even take Chris Hartley right now, and as a Queensland Bulls fan, I am frustrated by him on a regular basis.
Also you haven't actually defined what you need to do to make this list. You're just making shit up as you go along.
QUOTE]
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/153387.html
when this list was compiled, Tendulkar had played for longer than Warne but was not even close to the same votes.
This was by 100 people who supposedly know better than you or I.
I am not insular in my views. I just base my views on cricket as a whole, not just since 2000.
Tendulkar is good, though not a great.
And using the same criteria, SRT, Ponting, Kallis, Dravid today would still not make that top 5.
You base your opinions on bullshit. You blatantly lied about Tendulkars record to try and make him sound worse than what he is. I'm not going to argue with you anymore, you obivously have an agenda but i'm not sure what it is. You say you base your conclusions on cricket and yet the only thing you use to determine Tendulkars quality is that list of the 5 best players of all time. Every other metric you have used was either blatantly wrong, a lie or just your own personal anecdotal evidence.
Suffice to say that calling Tendulkar, one of the batsmen most commonly considered the best since Bradman to be "just a regular 50 average batsmen" or "good not great" are just ridiculous view points.
That top 5 list is not the be all end all of great players. This may be difficult for you too understand but it is possible that there have been more than 5 great players to ever play the game of cricket. Shocking i know.
Do people here not love watching Steyn bowl? So good. Where do you guys think he ranks amongst the all time greats?
Too soon to call. Definitely the best current fast bowler to watch though, unplayable at times.
Do people here not love watching Steyn bowl? So good. Where do you guys think he ranks amongst the all time greats?
Nevill would be ahead of Hartley.
steyn is a beast... arguably the top fast bowler in the past 5 years
Which haterZ? He's already among the greatest all-rounders, what more do you want? Kallis in lingerie?
could this be a draw???
could this be a draw???
That's what I said yesterday and irfan laughed off the suggestion.
Yeah, his strategy seemed pretty obvious to me. Declare the Australian win as the only possible outcome. Then if it happens, dine out on it as though you are some beacon of cricken knowledge, even if Australia only win the match with a final ball wicket on Day 5.
If it is a draw, dine out on "LOL, how did Australia manage to not win this game LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ" trollisms.
Win/win. A good troll plans ahead and covers their bases but if you step back and observe them, it's pretty easy to read the play.
Do Australia really have no wicket keeper better than Haddin?
Even if he couldn't bat he'd still have more to offer than Haddin.
Hopefully we can get another quick wicket with the new ball.