Ashwin is definitely good with the bat, heck he got a century recently but that was against WI. But the respect given to him there was more than warranted, you'd have to agree. Hilfy/Pattison could have been brought much earlier.I'm not saying they shouldn't attack him. I'm never a fan of the strategy of just letting a batsmen just sit down one end. I just don't think you can expect to bowl to Ashwin like a tail ender and get him out. He looks like he has some talent with the bat.
Protecting him from what? Mother & sister abuses?prior to this series, hilfy never had a 5-for and now he has 2, well done son.
kohli to be dropped, rohit sharma on (or are they "protecting" him?)
Clarke man of the match.
Bloody politics.
Haddin will probably hold his spot on account of not having a chance to fail with the bat this match.
Why do they keep insisting on bringing in these spinners like Lyon? You don't have to have a spinner just for the sake of it. None of the spinners coming through look any good at all.
I'd rather they just bring in another fast bowler and if they need some spin just give Clarke or Hussey a go. They seem to do better anyway.
Three years back, India were in a similar situation, going 0-2 down at the SCG before hitting back at Perth. They weren't meant to lose that second Test but this time, they deserved what they got. Which makes the recovery all the more difficult. There's another week left for that. Lots of time for introspection/team changes.
The dude's got 25 wickets at 27 in his first 8 tests. The first two tests against India he has barely been needed. Sure this game he wasn't great, but I for one am prepared to let him have a go. He looks more consistent than any of the other guys they've played. Hussey is NOT a viable option, you need the variety, and Clarke can't bowl for long spells because of his back.
Did I just start the Lyon Defence Force?
Why do they keep insisting on bringing in these spinners like Lyon? You don't have to have a spinner just for the sake of it. None of the spinners coming through look any good at all.
I'd rather they just bring in another fast bowler and if they need some spin just give Clarke or Hussey a go. They seem to do better anyway.
The stats i'm looking at have him at 24 wickets in 9 tests at 30, which includes a 5/34. I'm happy to see him given a go, i just won't be too surprised when Australia end up with another spinner who struggles to average below 35-40.
.
I thought Doherty managed to get a fair bit of spin from time to time. He didn't have much success at test level, but he only got two tests. He's managed 19 at 25 this season.They have that same little over the wrist action which results in them getting little spin.
Sometimes the conditions and the pitch suit a spinner and that's not always obvious in advance. Better to have a full time spinner for those occasions. He's not complete rubbish like some previous experiments.
Yeah, he's not brilliant, but as long as you have a decent pace attack around him, I'd rather have a spinner and not need him than need him and not have him.
The problem with the spinners Australia has been bringing through is that even when the pitch favours them they still struggle.
I'd rather go with bowlers who can actually perform than to drag around dead weight in the hope that when he finally gets a pitch that suits him he can actually perform.
Again though Lyons stats aren't that bad and i don't mind if he stays around a little longer. However if he starts struggling like the others (and that looks likely imo) than he shouldn't be kept around just for the sake of having a spinner.
Edit: Also lets not get too far ahead of ourselves with the quality of Australias pace attack. Yeah it is carving up this shitty India outfit but it has had its problems in the past. A lot of Australias quicks are sturggling to average under 30 as well.
You didnt get the memo, troll!To be honest the chance of a draw was highly unprobable after yesterday, Possible sure but not very likely. Yeah the Indian team has batsmen who've done well in the past in Aus but given their recent form and the 2 wickets which fell you would have to be pretty optimistic to expect a draw.
Edit: Also lets not get too far ahead of ourselves with the quality of Australias pace attack. Yeah it is carving up this shitty India outfit but it has had its problems in the past. A lot of Australias quicks are sturggling to average under 30 as well.
To be fair, they are only really coming into form now. This is the nucleus of what will hopefully be a good lineup come the next tours of S.Africa and England.
Coincidentally against a batting team that is struggling for form. I think Australias bowling line up is getting better but i think some people are getting carried away. It wasn't that long ago that most people were saying Hilfenhaus was terrible (i don't mean on here).
Oh. Shit. Worst news.
I wonder what the reaction was in Australia was when India reached the no.1 ranking and won the WC.lol
http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-india-2011/content/current/video_audio/548452.html
Eyes on the ball Sachin, eyes on the ballll.
Indian Gentleman: "Twenty20 should be trashed, and test cricket should be promoted. IPL brings in a lot of money and test cricket is being sacrificed because of that".
Indeed good sir. Indeed.