The major difference between these two situations is right there in the URL. THREE YEARS. In the latest episode they were just getting around to retracing his steps and getting security cam footage. That would be what, day 2 of the investigation? He hasn't been in there that long.
I think the point is that it's not a cakewalk. This kid was beaten daily by other inmates
and the guards, and regularly thrown in solitary for refusing to confess to a crime he didn't commit - stealing a bookbag. It was so traumatic he offed himself when he left. And that's real life. Naz hasn't had it nearly as bad, I'd think adopting a fake tough guy persona will serve him well in the short term.
You don't need to beat him until you're pulled off by another inmate. The fact that there COULD be consequences for not participating is what's so unrealistic. In this ridiculous universe where rikers is run by an inmate, yes it makes sense to beat the guy up some.
Again, reading the story above, the real life guards are just as bad as the inmates.
But it's just stupid. 10 minutes earlier he was quibbling over his fee, now he's suicidally dedicated to proving he's not a loser?
There was a part in between where he realized he was impotent, got humiliated at his pharmacy (again), got humiliated as a volunteer at a school, got humiliated at a bar, and then got a rush of adrenaline/success chatting up and harassing a few witnesses. Yes, it was insanely stupid for him to go that far, and I think the episode tried to paint a picture of a man who threw himself into this thing because it's the only thing he's good at. If it didn't resonate, I can understand, but at least I think that's what they were trying to do.
There's no setup for why she's like that. She's in the show for a few minutes before this episode, and appears to be a cautious and pragmatic DA. Now she's having the coroner rehearse statements and drawing wild conclusions from 10 seconds of video?
Conviction rates are how big city prosecutors move up in the world. They don't care about seeking truth, that's the police's job. If they find themselves with a weak case, they will more than likely push for a plea rather than just throw it out.
The silence of the cop in that scene, and the map thing prior, is such an obvious telegraph that he thinks Naz didn't do it.
This scene I felt he was just establishing that Nas was where he said he was. Totally circumstantial to the crime itself. The video of Nas picking her up is far more damning.
Forget the father joining the complaint then. Either the two guys can file charges, get the car back, then drop them and all's good in the world. Or, they file and have to wait until the case is decided which would easily be 6+ months, in which case it's far too late to help them if that's their main source of income. I don't buy it as a source of drama. It either makes 100% sense to do or 0%, depending on facts that we don't know.
The fact remains if Nas is charged by either party and indicted on the charge, that's now public knowledge. Now he's an opportunistic cab thief high on illegal drugs prowling for women to abduct. They save their business, and damn him to life in prison.