ShadowKingpin
Member
If you don't have enough for full frame and generally shoot portraits, I'd stick with the 60D over the 7D. Most of the improvements in the 7D are the metal construction, improved AF for shooting action and the drive speed. Most of those improvements would benefit you more if you shot sports or high speed photography in a demanding environment. The high ISO isn't improved much and the only thing the 7D has over the 60D when it comes to portraits is a 100% coverage viewfinder in my opinion.
I also shoot portraits for work and I've had about 2 years experience with the 60D and 7 months with the 7D. If you're a portrait guy like me, I'd go with the 60D and invest the extra savings on lighting equipment for portraiture.
Thank you so much for the feedback! I had a feeling that was the way to go since the only real difference were the AF points, the viewfinder coverage, the drive speed and the weather-proofed body. I don't shoot sports, but every once in a while, I will take pictures of dogs at the dog park, but I was able to get crystal-clear images with the 60D, so I'm all good. I am going on a backpacking trip around Europe and other areas soon and running a blog for it, so just portraits and travel photography for me (Street photography included).
I got my Canon 50 mm 1.8 Monday after Amazon screwed up and my shipment got delay from Friday. This thing is amazing for its value. And don't even get me started on the video capabilities of this thing. I cannot wait to put it to the test.
Good thing I'm flying to Bruges tomorrow! Gonna have plenty of time to get used to this new lens.
Hopefully I can show some usable shots when I come back.
Here is something I did with my 50mm 1.8 earlier this year: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_nkEQ5mfXI