I really dont think its possible to undervalue third party exclusives or over value 3rd party in current market. Sales of frabchises and reception of PS3 and 360 strongly indicate for the majority of console purchasers price point, perception of better version of big franchises (COD, BF, AC, etc) and trending online community all matter more than 1st party exclusives now.Not quite. This is an interesting development, but I think people atm are undervaluing the role of 1st party exclusives and over-valuing the role of 3rd-party multiplats. I know when I got my PS1, I got it for the exclusives. Same for PS2. Same for PS3.
I personally buy consoles for unique, exclusive games to those consoles. 1st parties absolutely differentiate consoles...just not as much as in the past. The people showing concerns that Sony (and MS) are relying too much on 3rd parties to set the agenda for their systems...and aren't masking that behind uncalled-for game/studio/console bashing...aren't in the wrong. I also happen to be one of those people. If folks really want the top multiplats, they could go PC.
This isn't directed towards anyone in particular, but I'll just say: alright, there are some trolls who are gonna go hard to paint the PS4's line-up this year as terrible, taking prominent delays like this into account. We can shut that down without marginalizing the importance of 1st party content for the platforms, because they are important and delays like this hurt almost as much as they help.
This isnt to say 1st party doesnt matter but it seems to trail those others for general demand now. Most purchasers wont have a PC nor will they buy both consoles so for the average consumer everything is excusive to an extent and its about the feeling theyre getting better versions of games and more value for their investment that matters. Those factors are cleary what have hurt MS so far despite having decent excusives so far.
As a result id argue while not ideal (and obviously bad for the minority buying more for 1st party excusives) the delay of titles like The Order wont hurt Sony much so long as in general there are enough games and they retain the perception of better price and better versions of big multi-platform titles.
Seperately im surprised people react to Sony delaying games now - its clearly their general ethos going back to PS3 to delay rather than push games out if they still have rough edges. This should surprise no-one. EA as an example go the other way every time and the results speak for themselves so TBH id rather the delay than push out unfinished or unpolished titles.
I mean it sucks in simple terms - obviously if they could have hit their original target then that would be better but a delay vs rushing is the lesser of two evils id argue.