Shining Sunshine
Banned
What was better?
Wow did you really need to ask when there was Destiny, Far Cry 4, Wolfenstein, Alien Isolation (sorta shooter)?
What was better?
Jeff:"Video games aren't movies. Chasing after movies is a really weak goal... that games can be so much more. Games are so much more."
stopitsalreadydead.jpg
Going by the impressions thread, most that played it found it not to be "bad". I guess we will just have to wait and see how the public responds after they get their hands on it.Yeah, hopefully this bad game gets a sequel.
Where did you get that idea?
Did people really expect a "cinematic" game that is only 5-6 (half being cutscenes) hours long to do well?
Especially when (MAJOR SPOILERS)The last boss is the same as the first encounter and it ends with a QTE.
A pretty game does not compensate for poor gameplay and story, and developers thinking they can make games that are "movie-esque" is also a big fallacy. You can never bring a true cinematic experience in video games, games are more than just storytelling, it's interactive and as a result relies on various mechanics that movies do not bring to the table.
I'm also baffled how the devs could play the game and think this would be good, or at the very least a 8/10 (which I assume devs strive for that or higher) when it comes to reviews.
The whole champagne scene is the cherry on top, yes I'm sure you are glad you are done, but if I played this game and saw it for what it is, I don't think I would be celebrating, I'd be a nervous wreck personally.
Also after 5 years, this is what they come out with? All this money sunk into what amounted to a bad game; there is some serious mismanagement going on at the top if this is what the final product came out to be.
Everyone feels so bad at those kotaku pizza stories. But in reality it seems like everyone really likes the idea of game companies failing and closing, no second chances. Just goodbye.Poor RAD
stopitsalreadydead.jpg
I expected all these bad reviews, why were people getting so hype and defensive over this game?
You've just proven his point. Are making up your mind based on what other people "say"?
I'm going in for this game basically because I like the setting, I like the visual, it's different than other games already out, and I want to support a new IP. These reasons alone make it MY decision, not someone else's. It's not like I'm throwing away $60, I'm still playing a very solid game.
Also, nowadays you have to be careful what you read on forums and such, astro-turfing is very real. There's millions of dollars at play here, video games are not for kids anymore.
More like: People who wait to hear impressions about a game before spending $60 of their hard earned money on it.In this thread: People who let others determine what game is good or bad before playing it themselves.
Ugh you goddam internet warriors. Your games arent being attacked its just another genre. Quit with the ignorance... Yikes.I, for one, just want to say that it's so refreshing to see this game get the mediocre scores it deserves.
It's a great day for us gamers who want, well, games--not short, interactive movies with small bits of mediocre gameplay strewn throughout.
worked for mgs4
In this thread: People who let others determine what game is good or bad before playing it themselves.
I'm playing for 5 hours, and I don't understand the review, this game is gorgeous, the scenario is for now good, sounds are very good. Why?!
stopitsalreadydead.jpg
Nobody asks people to buy every game. But every gamer has a special interest in some games for whatever reasons. If a game interests me for some reason (in the case of The Order the art and iconography) I don't care about other people's opinion. I buy the game, I play the game and I decide afterwards if it was a good move on my part.
I'm 40, I game since I was a teenager, I don't need the opinion of a 25 years old game journo who know less than me, to tell me what games are good or not. I have a brain, I have personal tastes, I have a huge personal gaming experience. I can decide for myself, I have all the tools to decide for myself. And if I'm wrong (and it happens from time to time) then so be it. I don't pretend I'm Superman but I rather be wrong on my terms than blindly follow the advice of a game journos or some random gamers on the internet.
With the examples already in this thread, why do you still doubt it?
The majority of Telltale games is not interactive and yet many people really like them, me included. Games have the advantage over movies in that the form they take isn't nearly as limited.
Ever seen a 6 hour+ interactive brand new movie go for $25? Thought not...
worked for mgs4
Meanwhile the same reviewers are happy with CoD's 4 hours campaign and tired multiplayer just because it has Kevin Spacey.
This is another reason why no one should listen to journalists.
Wow KazHiraiCeo got suspended on twitter.
Ugh you goddam internet warriors. Your games arent being attacked its just another genre. Quit with the ignorance... Yikes.
So embarassing.
yes I am making my decisions based on other's impressions, it's a very common thing to do. I would have gotten this game if it reviewed well, the setting didn't really interest me and the game looked bland as hell, I would have LOVED for me to be wrong and for it to be a fantastic game.
I, for one, just want to say that it's so refreshing to see this game get the mediocre scores it deserves.
It's a great day for us gamers who want, well, games--not short, interactive movies with small bits of mediocre gameplay strewn throughout.
Hmm, looks like he's just getting started.
Wait for real?
Wow Sony is not happy with the negativity this game is getting if true.
Is there a big difference between american and european reviews? Or are they all more or less the same?
Embarrassing.
Wow KazHiraiCeo got suspended on twitter.
the Order 1446
Open World
Co op
Multiplayer
Fetch Quest
Can switch to first person shooter on the fly
Micro Transactions
Most content cut for day 1 DLC incentives
Leveling and Crafting system
Full Screen
Day 1 10GB patch
Still wont work
Metacritic score 88
stopitsalreadydead.jpg
the Order 1446
Open World
Co op
Multiplayer
Fetch Quest
Can switch to first person shooter on the fly
Micro Transactions
Most content cut for day 1 DLC incentives
Leveling and Crafting system
Full Screen
Day 1 10GB patch
Still wont work
Metacritic score 88
Unfortunately, the director did indeed say that. And I completely agree with you about ND. They know they are a game company, they have a pedigree of making very fun games, and they've gained an enormous amount of talent balancing story presentation and gameplay elements, enough that they seemelessly blend together in most games. In ND games, playing the game is experiencing the story in a lot of cases. They always put the gameplay and the story they are telling on an equal playing field, because to them, it's the same thing.
It seems to me like The Order forgot that their customers are going to want to enjoy playing The Order as much as they are going to want to experience it. And it seems like in a lot of reviews, the critic praises the story but calls the gameplay utterly boring, a huge problem in something that is, at the end of the day, a videogame.
It isn't another genre, though. It's a third-person shooter. A very short, linear, story-driven, QTE-filled third-person shooter.