See, that's what I mentioned before, PSSR is another proprietary solution, so I'm not sure what it will do as far as popularizing AI upscalers outside of the PS ecosystem. Ideally, we'd have one solution that works on every platform and looks as good as DLSS. The best hardware agnostic solution is FSR and it kinda sucks for a lot of things.With that said, consoles having it will drive it more to the mainstream normies as well, which we will all benefit from in the long run. Which was the crux of the article outside of the panty arguing off the clickbait title.
If you're talking about checkerboard rendering, it ain't AI.Sony has been doing this since 2016 with the Pro. R&C had it before 2018.
That's if Sony keeps it proprietary. They may benefit more by eventually expanding it, like XeSS, which the article spitballed since it will be running on AMD hardware.See, that's what I mentioned before, PSSR is another proprietary solution, so I'm not sure what it will do as far as popularizing AI upscalers outside of the PS ecosystem. Ideally, we'd have one solution that works on every platform and looks as good as DLSS. The best hardware agnostic solution is FSR and it kinda sucks for a lot of things.
I'm not that interested in all those upscalers if they battle it out but remain indefinitely proprietary. What I always wanted was for them to compete for a few years to really advance the method until someone comes up with one ubiquitous option that works for everything. Probably isn't happening but meh.
Probably isn't, but that's 5 options. That's a lot. PSSR for Sony. DLSS, TAA, FSR, and XeSS for PC. Xbox might also make their own or AMD will come up with their AI-based one next year. That's a crowded space.I doubt it’s difficult to implement with the SDK, so likely not a major issue
DLSS is also fake 4k (or whatever resolution you use). The big difference is that is optional and doesn't suck.PC master retards was saying those PS4 Pro games were fake 4k (CB) in 2016. The same people embraced DLSS some years after.
Is English your first language? I'm not being an asshole, I'm generally just asking.What do you mean it wasn't that serious? DLSS2 paved the way for all modern AI upscalers. Temporal and Spatial. In videogames and in video.
For all the mentioning about the Pro, the first game with temporal upscaling actually came out in 2015 already, Rainbow Six Siege. Not the first upscaler in general, but the first temporal one.
That's just incorrect.But there are no pixels being generated with CB.
The raster is rendering one group of pixels in one frame, then another set on another frame.
Is English your first language? I'm not being an asshole, I'm generally just asking.
They still championed fake 4K after shitting on it, was the point.That is not even correct to say that CB is an upscaler. It's just interpolation.
DLSS, especially DLSS2 is a very different tech from interpolating pixels with every other frame.
Not credit for AI, just saying that faking higher resolutions has been ongoing for a long time.They also shat on DLSS1. Almost as if they didn't care for low-quality solutions.
Cool, it's not an AI upscaler.
The solution that proved that AI upscalers were the future was DLSS, not checkerboard rendering that was seemingly difficult to implement and only saw the light of day in a select titles. What are we doing here exactly? Trying to discredit DLSS or trying to credit Sony with coming up with AI upscalers for games because they had it in their TVs? The AI upscaling revolution in games really took off with DLSS2. DLSS1 was trash and laughed at.
Man, winjer sounds like a grandpa right now. "It wasn't that deep" is just a zoomer slang meaning it wasn't that serious. He means what he was saying wasn't that serious lol so no need to address it. He meant nothing by it lol.What do you mean it wasn't that serious? DLSS2 paved the way for all modern AI upscalers. Temporal and Spatial. In videogames and in video.
Ok. This makes sense now.No, its not my first language.
I wasn't saying that at all.But I'm really curious to understand in what way DLSS was not that "deep" or not that "serious".
That's just incorrect.
If checkerboard rendering were just interpolation it would look like absolute ass. Sure it takes previous frame data for the missing pixels but it also uses filters/algorithms on top to do error correction.US20160005344A1 - Method and system for use in uprendering multimedia content - Google Patents
Some embodiments provide methods of increasing a resolution of multimedia content. Some of those methods comprising: identifying an uprendering matrix, wherein the uprendering matrix is dependent on a resulting resolution of resulting multimedia content having the increased resolution; and for...patents.google.com
Lol. Thanks. I was getting super confused.Man, winjer sounds like a grandpa right now. "It wasn't that deep" is just a zoomer slang meaning it wasn't that serious. He means what he was saying wasn't that serious lol so no need to address it. He meant nothing by it lol.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=It’s not that deep
Ok. This makes sense now.
I wasn't saying that at all.
when someone says "it's not that deep" they mean "don't take it (the discussion) so seriously", the phrase is basically meant as a "relax bro" type statement.No, its not my first language.
But I'm really curious to understand in what way DLSS was not that "deep" or not that "serious".
Yeah, these articles are just hit pieces / rage bait in disguise.I like how they also try to start a rumour about It being RDNA2 only (just added more CUs…) .
Now I have to ask you if you are not a native speaker. Because you just keep beating around the bush.
So I'll ask you again in what way DLSS was not that "deep" or not that "serious".
Honestly, I can't blame him with all these new expressions being thrown around. I have a 13-year old niece and half the time, I have no idea what heck she's talking about with all of their weird slangs. Hell, even people not that much younger than me confuse me. I had to google what an "insta thot" was when my younger cousin texted me about it.Lol. Thanks. I was getting super confused.
Read it again. It's for reconstructing a higher resolution image from two lower resolution images based on applying an algorithm detecting the shift in pixels from one frame to the next.That is an interlacing technique for video. So what?
Google has a ton of patents for video compression, deinterlacing, etc.
when someone says "it's not that deep" they mean "don't take it (the discussion) so seriously", the phrase is basically meant as a "relax bro" type statement.
It wasn't that deep and Playstation absolutely has a ton of visual data to train the AI.
Don't worry I wasn't insulting Nvidia....
Like your typical nVidia jump on their top cards. Though much, much cheaper than the nVidia tax.It's 67% increase in Compute units and 45% increase in rendering (rasterization) in real games. Those guys are paid to write stuff?
100% my kids walk around saying the weirdest shit.Honestly, I can't blame him with all these new expressions being thrown around. I have a 13-year old niece and half the time, I have no idea what heck she's talking about with all of their weird slangs. Hell, even people not that much younger than me confuse me. I had to google what an "insta thot" was when my younger cousin texted me about it.
i'm not missing any context. You're the one who's being confrontational for no reason due to a misunderstanding. His statement isn't about DLSS at all, it's about you becoming weirdly aggressive.You are missing the context. This is what he said in response to me talking about Nvidia and DLSS.
He was clearly and specifically referring to DLSS. Not to the conversation itself.
Read it again. It's for reconstructing a higher resolution image from two lower resolution images based on applying an algorithm detecting the shift in pixels from one frame to the next.
"coalescing pixels from each of the reference image and the shifted images creating an uprendered image having a higher resolution than the reference image."
That's what checkerboard rendering does.
It seems like that jump to 4K is just too much. 1440P is just such a perfect sweet spot and has been since 2011/2012. Considering DLSS is often pushing better visuals than native images it's a perfect compromiseNvidia proved that years ago..
CB in PS4 Pro don’t use interpolation lolIt's neither. It's interpolation. Something that has been done for decades. Even in videogames.
It's just interlacing one set of pixels in one frame, then another set of pixels in another frame. It's not that difficult to understand.
You can try to insult as much as you want, but the fact remains you don't understand the tech.
i'm not missing any context. You're the one who's being confrontational for no reason due to a misunderstanding. His statement isn't about DLSS at all, it's about you becoming weirdly aggressive.
Ok. That was an interesting googling.Honestly, I can't blame him with all these new expressions being thrown around. I have a 13-year old niece and half the time, I have no idea what heck she's talking about with all of their weird slangs. Hell, even people not that much younger than me confuse me. I had to google what an "insta thot" was when my younger cousin texted me about it.
CB in PS4 Pro don’t use interpolation lol
It's a coincidence. "It's not that deep" is an expression. It just so happens that DLSS means Deep Learning Super Sampling. The "Deep" are completely unrelated lol.Then he is the one that can't speak proper English. The subject in his sentence does not match the context.
I starting to absolutely love this thread.It's a coincidence. "It's not that deep" is an expression. It just so happens that DLSS means Deep Learning Super Sampling. The "Deep" are completely unrelated lol.
It's like if I told you Iceman isn't that cool and you went, "but he can freeze things down to -273 C. How is that not cool?"
It's a coincidence. "It's not that deep" is an expression. It just so happens that DLSS means Deep Learning Super Sampling. The "Deep" are completely unrelated lol.
It's like if I told you Iceman isn't that cool and you went, "but he can freeze things down to -273 C. How is that not cool?"
The subject of the discussion we were having, was DLSS. If one of the interlocutors requires to change the subject, then it has to be named, it can't be referred as "it". Otherwise, other interlocutors will continue to understand the subject remains the same. This is basic grammar, in any language.
In this case, he should have named the "discussion" or the "article" as not being that deep.
TOPS is the new TFLOPS. How big is your NPU?Its the beginning of a new war that's coming to the console space
Yeah, but it was kind of funny that you thought he meant that DLSS isn't that deep when it's called deep learning lol.The subject of the discussion we were having, was DLSS. If one of the interlocutors requires to change the subject, then it has to be named, it can't be referred as "it". Otherwise, other interlocutors will continue to understand the subject remains the same. This is basic grammar, in any language.
In this case, he should have named the "discussion" or the "article" as not being that deep.
Yeah, but it was kind of funny that you thought he meant that DLSS isn't that deep when it's called deep learning lol.
Anyway, you learned a new expression (please, don't start using it. I hate it).
Well, we are talking about consoles.>Been going on on PC for 4-5 years
>The PS5 Pro which has yet to be released proves AI upscaling is the future
Yeah, sounds like an IGN article, alright.
Also:
The funny part is that a non-native speaker knows better English than you.
Then you pretend it's the other person's fault.
Does the method really matter? At least Sony's version was expanded to increase perceived visual clarity comparable to a native resolution.It's neither. It's interpolation. Something that has been done for decades. Even in videogames.
It's just interlacing one set of pixels in one frame, then another set of pixels in another frame. It's not that difficult to understand.
You can try to insult as much as you want, but the fact remains you don't understand the tech.
Does the method really matter? At least Sony's version was expanded to increase perceived visual clarity comparable to a native resolution.
broThe funny part is that a non-native speaker knows better English than you.
Then you pretend it's the other person's fault.
But I know that expression. It doesn't take a native speaker to know it.
What it doesn't make sense is his grammar structure.