Flying_Phoenix said:So in short, Severin wasn't doing shit and Zukerberg fucked him over purposely knowing that Severin would rage quit from the project?
OrangeGrayBlue said:I don't really see the sexism. Erica Albright is the most badass character in the entire film. "You called me a bitch... on the internet."
Truthfully the film made me feel dirty to be a guy, if anything.
Dipindots said:Finally got around to watching this over the weekend.
I loved it, easily my 2nd favorite movie this year.
Korey said:Legal question:
The Winklevoss twins only had a case against Zuckerberg because he agreed to work for them and then stole their idea right?
If Zuckerberg never agreed to work with the twins, but copied the idea anyway after hearing it, would they still have a case against him?
Yaweee said:I don't think it was to force a rage quit. It was more writing him out of the company in any meaningful fashion with full knowledge that they'd determine a price tag later through a lawsuit.
In actuality, he wasn't really the sole financial contributor early on. Zuckerberg's parents had to take out loans to support it when Severin failed to get investors.
Flying_Phoenix said:So the film adaptation isn't fully accurate?
RSTEIN said:Saw this. Amazing. My jaw was on the floor with the soundtrack. I just couldn't believe how daring the soundtrack was... like holy fuck that was quite the experiment that could have really backfired.
The story is good but lots of it made up which detracted from my enjoyment a bit.
Beaulieu said::lol are you for real ?
Flying_Phoenix said:So the film adaptation isn't fully accurate?
Flying_Phoenix said:From reading some of the facts in this thread, Zuckerberg seems less and less like an asshole, and more so of a typical nerd who grabbed an opportunity and ran with it.
Expendable. said:just looked, joined 5/8/2006 while I was still in my senior year of HS but when I got my college e-mail for that fall.
Buckethead said:Yeah wasn't this originally like 3 hours?
I wanna see the Finchery final cut.
Flying_Phoenix said:No, meant as a joke (I even commented that the film itself was aware that it over-exaggerated and changed information in my review from the "Movies you have seen recently" thread), but I do wonder how accurate the film is.
Flying_Phoenix said:This is what confuses me. I don't really see him as stealing the project, but more so taking their idea and expanding it far further. I mean their original idea was just a simple styled myspace for the elite, while Zuckerberg took it much further.
I mean don't get me wrong he did wrong, but I'm not sure if it was complete theft.
Maybe somebody can fill me in here.
Predicting Best Picture winners is like trying to predict which member of Duran Duran will die first. It's useless, and who the fuck cares anyway?Solo said:I didn't say it wasn't deserving of a nomination. It is and it will probably get one with 10 nominees. I was just saying that there a contingent of people who are already awarding it Best Picture. When its only early October and Ive already seen 4-5 better movies (Ghost Writer, Toy Story 3, etc.), I have to call foul on the claims that this is a shoe-in for BP. Not to mention that Aronofsky, the Coens and Boyle all have absolutely dynamite-looking films still to come, and there are always darkhorses that pop up. TSN will definitely get a nom, and Inception has pretty darn good chances too, but I don't think either will be your winner.
OrangeGrayBlue said:How was the soundtrack all that? I liked the soundtrack... but I didn't see any sort of daring experiment that could have backfired.
I always thought that scoring movies was a natural progression for his stuff.deadbeef said:Trent Reznor makes great atmospheric music. To be honest I'm surprised it took this long for him to take on a project like this. I know he did a little bit of work for Lost Highway, but it was nothing like this.
Hopefully he can keep doing this kind of stuff, because he did a great job with it.
julls said:I always thought that scoring movies was a natural progression for his stuff.
The shotas "In Motion" started was just crazy. That whole sequence was one of my favourites in the whole movie.in slow motion down the aisle of the bus with all the girls (hardly spoilerish but you never know...)
Veidt said:Seeing this sometime this week. I haven't been hyped for a film this much, since Inception...
And yes, I was only messing about with that whole ranting thing I had going on a few pages back.
The soundtrack is..dare I say...
Social Network for OST of the year. Even beats Inception.
For real man.Spire said:"In Motion" could win best soundtrack of the year by itself.
I wanted to see if I could sneak one past you guys. :'(Solo said:Juice sinking to DP levels of self promotion?
It uses a section of the Ghosts track, but the piano bit at the end is new. Dunno if that counts - not sure what the rules are :lolCajoleJuice said:Is The Social Network even eligible for Original Score? Since at least that one track I posted is off an existing album.
I started that page hahahaha.shagg_187 said:
Gigglepoo said:I'm still not sure why this was made into a movie. It was entertaining enough, but there didn't seem to be much of a point. Neither the destination nor the journey were particularly impactful. Zuckerberg didn't evolve as a character at all and it's hard to get invested in the financial windfall of people you don't know, especially when everyone is going to end up rich. All of the pieces were fine (acting, pacing, music, etc), but I guess I wanted more than that. This was a good movie from a great director.
Seems I'm in the minority, though.
nib95 said:What an absolutely brilliant film! David Fincher somehow managed to transport me in to this gripping, complex and exclusive world, yet not once make me feel alienated. Loved it! Copious amounts of cyber flexing on offer mind!
Anyone else think Zuckerberg may have been responsible for the chicken story leak and the Parker party sting? If he was sly enough to rob the Winklevoss's out of their initial idea in the way he did, and his best friend of almost his entire share of the co-founded project, I think he's cunning and greedy enough to pull off any potentially profitable or power garnering stint!
Flying_Phoenix said:Zukerberg's character barely even changed. At the start of the movie he was a snidy, assertive, cheeky, smartass nerd, and at the end of the movie he is a snidy, assertive, cheeky, smartass BILLIONAIRE nerd.
nib95 said:Anyone else think Zuckerberg may have been responsible for the chicken story leak and the Parker party sting? If he was sly enough to rob the Winklevoss's out of their initial idea in the way he did, and his best friend of almost his entire share of the co-founded project, I think he's cunning and greedy enough to pull off any potentially profitable or power garnering stint!
McBacon said:Fixed.
WascallyWabbit said:It's totally possble, but I honestly don't think that he did in the way you mean, if he did do it, he was just lashing out because ultimately he was just a kid who reacted to any slight by taking revenge too far.
In the case of Eduardo he was just a little jealous of him getting punched. But I don't see how or why he would have done that to Parker, in Zuckerberg's mind, Parker was THE guy to take facebook to the next level
Discotheque said:Top 3 of the year right now:
1. The Social Network
2. The Ghost Writer
3. Scott Pilgrim
really really need to see Never Let Me Go. I heard it was fantastic. Don't really care about Boyle's lame ass film either, so the only potential threat to my list right now is Never Let Me Go and True Grit. Oh shit and probably Black Swan too, though I'm more hyped for the soundtrack than the actual film itself.
Discotheque said:It's a terrible movie. The reason why I was kinda skeptical of Fincher's next project, but it looks like he's got it locked for this one. Don't think he'll ever top Zodiac though, it's his masterpiece.