The state of NeoGAF

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's not what open borders means. You're being disingenuous if you think we are just gonna tear down all the security checkpoints we have and not check baggage coming in on flights and stuff.

I never said that you were using alt-right ideas. Just that functionally your scare mongering about terrorism is no different from what those groups do.

You keep saying you know what I mean and you don't. I'll give this one last go and then we can agree to disagree. Secure borders, first off, means more than one thing. To those on the far left, it is a catch phrase for saying the right wants to stop immigration. To people who don't live and breath the political rhetoric, it can mean something else.

Our ports, for one. Completely unsecured and my main concern when it comes to security. I have zero issues with people coming here to make a better life for themselves. I even think if you can get in and not get caught and start a life here you should get to stay. I also feel our country, since 9/11, has done fuck all to make sure we are checking shipping that is coming in from across the globe. I traveled for work for many years and those dumb airline rules do jack squat tbh. Drugs flow in from the north and south, and someone could easily get something in on one of those routes and take out a power plant or city. I am hawkish to the 9th degree on keeping ALL people on American soil safe from a terrorist attack, It's way up my priority list as I love a lot of people who live here.

So, again, as you can see from our back and forth, the conversation was misunderstood and unfruitful. This is what I am talking about in not allowing discussions about politics to grow. Someone always takes something out of context, or feels they know what the poster "really meant" and comes at them with a wall of text that has nothing but "you're wrong" in it.

Anyway, I wish you well, have a good night. Perhaps we can talk more in the future. I'm tired.
 
Admins:

Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX

Moderators:

Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone

why does it have to be a "new GAF" like, I mean... just start ur own forum? Why does it have to be over GAF's dead body?
Oax4dzl.gif


anyway, that list seems... messy? But good luck, y'all.
 
Admins:

Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX

Moderators:

Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone

They will all kill each other after a few months, and they will all think they are better than each other, it wont last, ill stick to this place till the end. I know where my loyalties are. Fucking idiots!
 
Admins:

Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX

Moderators:

Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone


Some of the worst moral crusaders here are gone? Looks like I'm back then, thank God there was a forum to take them.
 
They let Zhuge be admin just to bring in users? Mods are the one that said he was threatening and being abrasive

Yeah, I have all sorts of issues with some of the bans handed out on GAF over the years and I don't intend to stay here but his name as an admin is one of the huge red flags.
 
Admins:

Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX

Moderators:

Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone
So who's the owner of this new site? Basically who is the new Evilore that will profit from NeoGafs demise?
 
Come on, there were unspoken rules in the political threads. Things that were not to be said. Mention open borders is an issue for security, or Hillary is a crook and it was immediate racist! Nazi! I read so many posts from people that said if you voted third party, or didn't vote at all that you were JUST AS BAD AS A WHITE SUPREMACIST. It's total horseshit. There was no room for discussion and to the notion "well, come prepared to back up all your words" is fine if you are given a few posts to do that. Most people make a comment or thought and if it's asked about would then reply and have a discussion. In those threads, you could one-line ALL COPS ARE FUCKS all day and all you would get is posters saying, "TRUTH!" but if you said, I voted Johnson because Hillary does NOT have the country's best interests then you had better have had 1000 words and 10 links to support your claim in the same post.

Most people on this site (that remain) are not GGers, racists, homophobes or Islamophobes. Most on here believe in having the right to live the life you want if it doesn't cause harm to others. But, a lot of people disagree on the finer points. These are the areas for discussion that will hopefully be allowed to occur. Two opposite minded people need to be able to talk candidly, even if one view might not be so hot. This is how minds can be changed, how people can become aware of things they might not have considered before. Expecting people to already be "on board" with the left leaning stances shuts out those who are open to have an honest discussion about them.
Yep.

I was banned for two months for mentioning -- in response to a post suggesting all Trump voters endorse sexual assault -- that the husband of his opponent was also accused of rape/sexual harassment by several women, and that voters who care about that issue faced an awful choice on election day.

It would be nice if non-hateful views of various perspectives could be presented without resulting in a ban.
 
No one because no one will profit from it.

So... where does the revenue go? Purely into server maintenance? What about the excess and maintenance time and burning these hours?
 
I wish them the best of luck, will prob try to register my self there once its live. But jeez... you don't start off a new forum from scratch and have that many staffers. Sure you need to prep, but every single post is going to be vetted 10x more than one would hope. Ugn...

While potentially a problem, the large list is probably to show people that there's a large buy-in for the new site, and so potential users see at least one or two people they trust.
 
They will all kill each other after a few months, and they will all think they are better than each other, it wont last, ill stick to this place till the end. I know where my loyalties are. Fucking idiots!

Your "loyalties?" This is a place to hang out and discuss things with other people.
 
Im really happy to hear the changes and refocusing coming to Off Topic and the community. I think a restructuring and change back to the old days where it was more lighthearted and fun is absolutely needed. Looking forward to see what happens!
 
Yep.

I was banned for two months for mentioning -- in response to a post suggesting all Trump voters endorse sexual assault -- that the husband of his opponent was also accused of rape/sexual harassment by several women, and that voters who care about that issue faced an awful choice on election day.

It would be nice if non-hateful views of various perspectives could be presented without resulting in a ban.

Bill Clinton was not running for office. That is a big giant distinction and you were simply shitting on a candidate for something they didn't do in order to create some sort of equivalence which doesn't exist.
 
I am glad to see the OT Communities have returned!

It doesn't seem like they are showing up in my list of Subscribed Threads though....is anyone else having that issue?
 
Admins:

Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX

Moderators:

Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone

The only name I recognize out of that whole list is kswiston and you have to think he is a big loss to this community. His contributions to the BO threads were pretty significant.
 
So... where does the revenue go? Purely into server maintenance? What about the excess and maintenance time and burning these hours?


I'm saying there will be no profit from such a site because they'll soon start cannibalizing their community like they did here. I predict a disaster of epic proportions, I'm almost tempted to visit it just for the lols.
 
You keep saying you know what I mean and you don't. I'll give this one last go and then we can agree to disagree. Secure borders, first off, means more than one thing. To those on the far left, it is a catch phrase for saying the right wants to stop immigration. To people who don't live and breath the political rhetoric, it can mean something else.

Our ports, for one. Completely unsecured and my main concern when it comes to security. I have zero issues with people coming here to make a better life for themselves. I even think if you can get in and not get caught and start a life here you should get to stay. I also feel our country, since 9/11, has done fuck all to make sure we are checking shipping that is coming in from across the globe. I traveled for work for many years and those dumb airline rules do jack squat tbh. Drugs flow in from the north and south, and someone could easily get something in on one of those routes and take out a power plant or city. I am hawkish to the 9th degree on keeping ALL people on American soil safe from a terrorist attack, It's way up my priority list as I love a lot of people who live here.

So, again, as you can see from our back and forth, the conversation was misunderstood and unfruitful. This is what I am talking about in not allowing discussions about politics to grow. Someone always takes something out of context, or feels they know what the poster "really meant" and comes at them with a wall of text that has nothing but "you're wrong" in it.

Anyway, I wish you well, have a good night. Perhaps we can talk more in the future. I'm tired.


I agree with you. As a first generation immigrant, here are my two cents. The conversation about securing borders always get shut down because it leads to STOPPING immigration or racism which I don’t understand. Securing borders is the job of a nation, do people want open borders? If you don’t want open borders then you have to follow the immigration laws. People are making immigration laws as pick and chose as it fits your narrative.

If you allow all illegals to enter, then how about us the legal immigrants and our struggles to enter! Our family had to wait years to come to America and I had to wait years before I was reunited with BOTH mother and father. So if you’re allowing all illegals then make it open border so anyone from any country can come anytime as they please. So that it will be fair.

When I talk like this, they say well we can have some immigration after we take care of the struggling illegals already in America. That’s fine, let’s make them all legal! But what happens after that ? as long as there is any form of an immigration law, there will always be someone who breaks and enter illegally so 100% illegal immigration problems will exist as long as there are immigration laws. What will we do to those future illegals? Oh make them legal again ? Then why have any laws, open border is the only solution to never have illegals. As a nation, it can’t happen because all personals need to be accounted for...

I mean people will make sure their houses are safe and secure but don’t bat an eye for National security because they’re not directly impacted right away .... better solution is better immigrant laws. (Getting too long lol)
 
So... where does the revenue go? Purely into server maintenance? What about the excess and maintenance time and burning these hours?

A bit premature to even have answers like that, the place might just burn money and die. Though why does that matter? Have you asked these questions and got answers about the forum you post on now?
 
I'm saying there will be no profit from such a site because they'll soon start cannibalizing their community like they did here. I predict a disaster of epic proportions

how about we let the site launch before we start posting all the hot takes about how it's obviously guaranteed to fail according to noted forums poster Sephiroth
 
I'm saying there will be no profit from such a site because they'll soon start cannibalizing their community like they did here. I predict a disaster of epic proportions, I'm almost tempted to visit it just for the lols.

"cannibalizing" the community lol

they made shitty bigots and racists feel unwelcome because, well, they should
 
A bit premature to even have answers like that, the place might just burn money and die. Though why does that matter? Have you asked these questions and got answers about the forum you post on now?
Given that this is a new beginning that's supposed everything GAF wasn't transparency about the direction and basis would be a good thing. In any case it can't be wrong to ask.
 
Your "loyalties?" This is a place to hang out and discuss things with other people.

obviously these past people who have posted forever preach about being here for the community and people and make gaf the best gaming board on all the internet and a safe haven, but one little hiccup, they all abandon everyone, they can piss right off, will be amazing without them.
 
Given that this is a new beginning that's supposed everything GAF wasn't transparency about the direction and basis would be a good thing. In any case it can't be wrong to ask.

Transparency would go a long way to show everyone the new site is going to be different.
 
Given that this is a new beginning that's supposed everything GAF wasn't transparency about the direction and basis would be a good thing. In any case it can't be wrong to ask.

I agree, and if they would divulge that information that amount of transparency would be amazing. I just think it's asking way too much for wanting those specifics when their chief concern is just getting the site operational. It's also a weird complaint coming from a user here since I don't think Evilore has ever disclosed any of this site's finances. I could be mistaken though.
 
obviously these past people who have posted forever preach about being here for the community and people and make gaf the best gaming board on all the internet and a safe haven, but one little hiccup, they all abandon everyone, they can piss right off, will be amazing without them.
Exactly. It’s pretty ironic.
 
I agree, and if they would divulge that information that amount of transparency would be amazing. I just think it's asking way too much for wanting those specifics when their chief concern is just getting the site operational. It's also a weird complaint coming from a user here since I don't think Evilore has ever disclosed any of this site's finances. I could be mistaken though.

That's what I'm wondering. It's still early but safer than sorry. We know GAF is headed by EviLore and I'm assuming the revenue and maintenance is paid by him I think, but what about this new forum? There are multiple admins and I'm guessing it's supposed to be equal, will the revenue still be centralized and how will funding the site go about?

Those are questions for later on but I hope this gets sorted for them! Ad revenue also depends on how visited your site is I believe.
 
"cannibalizing" the community lol

they made shitty bigots and racists feel unwelcome because, well, they should

im mean, i dont think myself as racist or bigot, god knows how much i have argued with my mom about her way of seeing gay marriage and stuff, and no, that gaf didn't care for opinions, they just wanted to lynch people, i still remember people practically getting boners when ben affleck grope thing came out, something that happened like 15 years ago, that wasn't ok, but people here were like "he's done" and so fucking happy about it.

and it keeps happen time and time again, like if a famous person being shitty, made them better people just because they called him a'piece of shit"

it always creeped me out
 
Bill Clinton was not running for office. That is a big giant distinction and you were simply shitting on a candidate for something they didn't do in order to create some sort of equivalence which doesn't exist.

Definitely not an equivalence in the slightest.

An while it was bill who was accused, Hillary did try to smear one of accusers, which was gross.

Again, not equivalent, but all 3 characters dirty on that issue
 
You keep saying you know what I mean and you don't. I'll give this one last go and then we can agree to disagree. Secure borders, first off, means more than one thing. To those on the far left, it is a catch phrase for saying the right wants to stop immigration. To people who don't live and breath the political rhetoric, it can mean something else.

Our ports, for one. Completely unsecured and my main concern when it comes to security. I have zero issues with people coming here to make a better life for themselves. I even think if you can get in and not get caught and start a life here you should get to stay. I also feel our country, since 9/11, has done fuck all to make sure we are checking shipping that is coming in from across the globe. I traveled for work for many years and those dumb airline rules do jack squat tbh. Drugs flow in from the north and south, and someone could easily get something in on one of those routes and take out a power plant or city. I am hawkish to the 9th degree on keeping ALL people on American soil safe from a terrorist attack, It's way up my priority list as I love a lot of people who live here.

So, again, as you can see from our back and forth, the conversation was misunderstood and unfruitful. This is what I am talking about in not allowing discussions about politics to grow. Someone always takes something out of context, or feels they know what the poster "really meant" and comes at them with a wall of text that has nothing but "you're wrong" in it.

Anyway, I wish you well, have a good night. Perhaps we can talk more in the future. I'm tired.

There isn't a real conversation to be had because your concerns are literally a phantom menace. Statistically, if you really cared about Americans being safe from terrorism you would be more concerned about disarming Americans because they are the ones committing acts of terrorism in America.

Good night.
 
Who's going to reign on Slayven? Have you seen the other names, they're going to join the banning spree not prevent it.

Oh, ok. Thanks for letting me know.

I’ll miss Kagari. Her insider tips that the next Final Fantasy game would have characters really made me feel like I was in the know.
 
Come on, there were unspoken rules in the political threads. Things that were not to be said. Mention open borders is an issue for security, or Hillary is a crook and it was immediate racist! Nazi! I read so many posts from people that said if you voted third party, or didn't vote at all that you were JUST AS BAD AS A WHITE SUPREMACIST. It's total horseshit. There was no room for discussion and to the notion "well, come prepared to back up all your words" is fine if you are given a few posts to do that. Most people make a comment or thought and if it's asked about would then reply and have a discussion. In those threads, you could one-line ALL COPS ARE FUCKS all day and all you would get is posters saying, "TRUTH!" but if you said, I voted Johnson because Hillary does NOT have the country's best interests then you had better have had 1000 words and 10 links to support your claim in the same post.

Most people on this site (that remain) are not GGers, racists, homophobes or Islamophobes. Most on here believe in having the right to live the life you want if it doesn't cause harm to others. But, a lot of people disagree on the finer points. These are the areas for discussion that will hopefully be allowed to occur. Two opposite minded people need to be able to talk candidly, even if one view might not be so hot. This is how minds can be changed, how people can become aware of things they might not have considered before. Expecting people to already be "on board" with the left leaning stances shuts out those who are open to have an honest discussion about them.

Have to quote this and say thank you. As someone who leans more right than left, I was never allowed to post in any semi-political thread. If I said anything negative about Hilary, I was indeed called a racist piece of shit. I probably still have the PMs I got saying I want all homosexuals to die and that I'm a racist. All because I said I disagreed with certain aspects of Hilary's campaign.

The future of GAF is unknown, and that's OK for now. The forum that a bunch of users are migrating to is also in an unknown future. Opinions on the Evilore situation aside, there's no reason both forums can't coexist. There are a bunch of other forums that are very similar to GAF already, and they were thriving alongside GAF. Reset will likely do the same.
 
That's what I'm wondering. It's still early but safer than sorry. We know GAF is headed by EviLore and I'm assuming the revenue and maintenance is paid by him I think, but what about this new forum? There are multiple admins and I'm guessing it's supposed to be equal, will the revenue still be centralized and how will funding the site go about?

Those are questions for later on but I hope this gets sorted for them! Ad revenue also depends on how visited your site is I believe.

fwiw: cerium is currently funding the whole thing, that's subject to change

Who's going to reign in Slayven when he starts banning anyone who says a few lines of dialogue in Black Panther are a bit hammy?

:jnc
 
Definitely not an equivalence in the slightest.

An while it was bill who was accused, Hillary did try to smear one of accusers, which was gross.

Again, not equivalent, but all 3 characters dirty on that issue
This is the first I've posted since last week, well before all this mess. It's been depressing to watch. I was invested in this place more than I realized.

Anyway, thanks for the laugh, Goose. Even when the forum is imploding we'll still make time to argue points vis a vis the 2016 election.
 
fwiw: cerium is currently funding the whole thing, that's subject to change



:jnc

Alright that's good to know. I hope they have a plan on how to generate traffic for ad revenues if they're planning to support the site without using their own personal funds!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom