What you don't like BronsonLee?Looks like alt-right won't be a problem, since Slayven is a mod. That's one thing good about this list.
What you don't like BronsonLee?Looks like alt-right won't be a problem, since Slayven is a mod. That's one thing good about this list.
SameYikes
Definitely staying on GAF. Loved this site forever.
That's not what open borders means. You're being disingenuous if you think we are just gonna tear down all the security checkpoints we have and not check baggage coming in on flights and stuff.
I never said that you were using alt-right ideas. Just that functionally your scare mongering about terrorism is no different from what those groups do.
Admins:
Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX
Moderators:
Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone
Admins:
Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX
Moderators:
Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone
The mod list doesn't really inspire me.
The admin list though, holy shit, a bunch of people who were too arrogant for NeoGAF. Count me out.
Admins:
Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX
Moderators:
Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone
They let Zhuge be admin just to bring in users? Mods are the one that said he was threatening and being abrasive
So who's the owner of this new site? Basically who is the new Evilore that will profit from NeoGafs demise?Admins:
Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX
Moderators:
Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone
Yep.Come on, there were unspoken rules in the political threads. Things that were not to be said. Mention open borders is an issue for security, or Hillary is a crook and it was immediate racist! Nazi! I read so many posts from people that said if you voted third party, or didn't vote at all that you were JUST AS BAD AS A WHITE SUPREMACIST. It's total horseshit. There was no room for discussion and to the notion "well, come prepared to back up all your words" is fine if you are given a few posts to do that. Most people make a comment or thought and if it's asked about would then reply and have a discussion. In those threads, you could one-line ALL COPS ARE FUCKS all day and all you would get is posters saying, "TRUTH!" but if you said, I voted Johnson because Hillary does NOT have the country's best interests then you had better have had 1000 words and 10 links to support your claim in the same post.
Most people on this site (that remain) are not GGers, racists, homophobes or Islamophobes. Most on here believe in having the right to live the life you want if it doesn't cause harm to others. But, a lot of people disagree on the finer points. These are the areas for discussion that will hopefully be allowed to occur. Two opposite minded people need to be able to talk candidly, even if one view might not be so hot. This is how minds can be changed, how people can become aware of things they might not have considered before. Expecting people to already be "on board" with the left leaning stances shuts out those who are open to have an honest discussion about them.
So who's the owner of this new site? Basically who is the new Evilore that will profit from NeoGafs demise?
So who's the owner of this new site? Basically who is the new Evilore that will profit from NeoGafs demise?
So who's the owner of this new site? Basically who is the new Evilore that will profit from NeoGafs demise?
No one because no one will profit from it.
I wish them the best of luck, will prob try to register my self there once its live. But jeez... you don't start off a new forum from scratch and have that many staffers. Sure you need to prep, but every single post is going to be vetted 10x more than one would hope. Ugn...
They will all kill each other after a few months, and they will all think they are better than each other, it wont last, ill stick to this place till the end. I know where my loyalties are. Fucking idiots!
Looks like a favoritism site which is your best expected. Happened here with mods too
Yep.
I was banned for two months for mentioning -- in response to a post suggesting all Trump voters endorse sexual assault -- that the husband of his opponent was also accused of rape/sexual harassment by several women, and that voters who care about that issue faced an awful choice on election day.
It would be nice if non-hateful views of various perspectives could be presented without resulting in a ban.
Admins:
Cerium
Emily Rogers
Methuselah
Nibel
Shinobi602
Sirpopopop
Sweet Nicole
ZhugeEX
Moderators:
Ana
Brazil
BronsonLee
Cheesemeister
Durante
Hecht
Kagari
kristoffer
kswiston
Kyonashi
Matt
MaverickHunterAsh
MiraculousSwidge
Morrigan
RASCAL
Rowlf
Royalan
Imran (ShockingAlberto)
Slayven
Spider
Steve
Supernorn
Sylverstone
So... where does the revenue go? Purely into server maintenance? What about the excess and maintenance time and burning these hours?
People in power usually doesn't go so well anywhere imoWhat do you think of GAF's current mods?
You keep saying you know what I mean and you don't. I'll give this one last go and then we can agree to disagree. Secure borders, first off, means more than one thing. To those on the far left, it is a catch phrase for saying the right wants to stop immigration. To people who don't live and breath the political rhetoric, it can mean something else.
Our ports, for one. Completely unsecured and my main concern when it comes to security. I have zero issues with people coming here to make a better life for themselves. I even think if you can get in and not get caught and start a life here you should get to stay. I also feel our country, since 9/11, has done fuck all to make sure we are checking shipping that is coming in from across the globe. I traveled for work for many years and those dumb airline rules do jack squat tbh. Drugs flow in from the north and south, and someone could easily get something in on one of those routes and take out a power plant or city. I am hawkish to the 9th degree on keeping ALL people on American soil safe from a terrorist attack, It's way up my priority list as I love a lot of people who live here.
So, again, as you can see from our back and forth, the conversation was misunderstood and unfruitful. This is what I am talking about in not allowing discussions about politics to grow. Someone always takes something out of context, or feels they know what the poster "really meant" and comes at them with a wall of text that has nothing but "you're wrong" in it.
Anyway, I wish you well, have a good night. Perhaps we can talk more in the future. I'm tired.
So... where does the revenue go? Purely into server maintenance? What about the excess and maintenance time and burning these hours?
I'm saying there will be no profit from such a site because they'll soon start cannibalizing their community like they did here. I predict a disaster of epic proportions
Hey to be fair he's been here since 2005.how about we let the site launch before we start posting all the hot takes about how it's obviously guaranteed to fail according to noted forums poster Sephiroth
I'm saying there will be no profit from such a site because they'll soon start cannibalizing their community like they did here. I predict a disaster of epic proportions, I'm almost tempted to visit it just for the lols.
Given that this is a new beginning that's supposed everything GAF wasn't transparency about the direction and basis would be a good thing. In any case it can't be wrong to ask.A bit premature to even have answers like that, the place might just burn money and die. Though why does that matter? Have you asked these questions and got answers about the forum you post on now?
Your "loyalties?" This is a place to hang out and discuss things with other people.
Given that this is a new beginning that's supposed everything GAF wasn't transparency about the direction and basis would be a good thing. In any case it can't be wrong to ask.
Given that this is a new beginning that's supposed everything GAF wasn't transparency about the direction and basis would be a good thing. In any case it can't be wrong to ask.
Exactly. Its pretty ironic.obviously these past people who have posted forever preach about being here for the community and people and make gaf the best gaming board on all the internet and a safe haven, but one little hiccup, they all abandon everyone, they can piss right off, will be amazing without them.
Whos going to reign in Slayven when he starts banning anyone who says a few lines of dialogue in Black Panther are a bit hammy?
I agree, and if they would divulge that information that amount of transparency would be amazing. I just think it's asking way too much for wanting those specifics when their chief concern is just getting the site operational. It's also a weird complaint coming from a user here since I don't think Evilore has ever disclosed any of this site's finances. I could be mistaken though.
"cannibalizing" the community lol
they made shitty bigots and racists feel unwelcome because, well, they should
Bill Clinton was not running for office. That is a big giant distinction and you were simply shitting on a candidate for something they didn't do in order to create some sort of equivalence which doesn't exist.
You keep saying you know what I mean and you don't. I'll give this one last go and then we can agree to disagree. Secure borders, first off, means more than one thing. To those on the far left, it is a catch phrase for saying the right wants to stop immigration. To people who don't live and breath the political rhetoric, it can mean something else.
Our ports, for one. Completely unsecured and my main concern when it comes to security. I have zero issues with people coming here to make a better life for themselves. I even think if you can get in and not get caught and start a life here you should get to stay. I also feel our country, since 9/11, has done fuck all to make sure we are checking shipping that is coming in from across the globe. I traveled for work for many years and those dumb airline rules do jack squat tbh. Drugs flow in from the north and south, and someone could easily get something in on one of those routes and take out a power plant or city. I am hawkish to the 9th degree on keeping ALL people on American soil safe from a terrorist attack, It's way up my priority list as I love a lot of people who live here.
So, again, as you can see from our back and forth, the conversation was misunderstood and unfruitful. This is what I am talking about in not allowing discussions about politics to grow. Someone always takes something out of context, or feels they know what the poster "really meant" and comes at them with a wall of text that has nothing but "you're wrong" in it.
Anyway, I wish you well, have a good night. Perhaps we can talk more in the future. I'm tired.
Who's going to reign on Slayven? Have you seen the other names, they're going to join the banning spree not prevent it.
Come on, there were unspoken rules in the political threads. Things that were not to be said. Mention open borders is an issue for security, or Hillary is a crook and it was immediate racist! Nazi! I read so many posts from people that said if you voted third party, or didn't vote at all that you were JUST AS BAD AS A WHITE SUPREMACIST. It's total horseshit. There was no room for discussion and to the notion "well, come prepared to back up all your words" is fine if you are given a few posts to do that. Most people make a comment or thought and if it's asked about would then reply and have a discussion. In those threads, you could one-line ALL COPS ARE FUCKS all day and all you would get is posters saying, "TRUTH!" but if you said, I voted Johnson because Hillary does NOT have the country's best interests then you had better have had 1000 words and 10 links to support your claim in the same post.
Most people on this site (that remain) are not GGers, racists, homophobes or Islamophobes. Most on here believe in having the right to live the life you want if it doesn't cause harm to others. But, a lot of people disagree on the finer points. These are the areas for discussion that will hopefully be allowed to occur. Two opposite minded people need to be able to talk candidly, even if one view might not be so hot. This is how minds can be changed, how people can become aware of things they might not have considered before. Expecting people to already be "on board" with the left leaning stances shuts out those who are open to have an honest discussion about them.
That's what I'm wondering. It's still early but safer than sorry. We know GAF is headed by EviLore and I'm assuming the revenue and maintenance is paid by him I think, but what about this new forum? There are multiple admins and I'm guessing it's supposed to be equal, will the revenue still be centralized and how will funding the site go about?
Those are questions for later on but I hope this gets sorted for them! Ad revenue also depends on how visited your site is I believe.
Who's going to reign in Slayven when he starts banning anyone who says a few lines of dialogue in Black Panther are a bit hammy?
Make GAF great again!Your "loyalties?" This is a place to hang out and discuss things with other people.
Anyone remember how gaf used to have hot girl threads? I swung by the IGN boards and they still have those. Its weird, like they havent evolved yet or something.Yikes
Definitely staying on GAF. Loved this site forever.
This is the first I've posted since last week, well before all this mess. It's been depressing to watch. I was invested in this place more than I realized.Definitely not an equivalence in the slightest.
An while it was bill who was accused, Hillary did try to smear one of accusers, which was gross.
Again, not equivalent, but all 3 characters dirty on that issue
fwiw: cerium is currently funding the whole thing, that's subject to change
:jnc