PJV3
Member
Ok, seems plausible (and also like a huge cluster fuck).
So much energy and effort just to reinvent the wheel, and it probably will be not as good in the end anyway.
Ok, seems plausible (and also like a huge cluster fuck).
EU migrants will STAY in UK as Home Office cuts mean it will take 140 YEARS to deport them
Let the one's who have settled with good jobs stay, BUT! they must not be entitled to claim ANY benefits what so ever. NONE AT ALL!
No all immigrants should be kicked out ,Period ,we do not want them in our Country .
We should only allow those in who have skills we require ,and not extended families ever .And they must have no criminal record,as this free up our prisons .
I'd like to see a new Immigration Police formed from ex-service personnel to find, detain and deport all illegal immigrants from this country regardless of how long they have managed to stay here! It wont take 140 years with the correct attitude behind it!
Think again Teresa, spend money on tracing and deporting or expect to spend the money anyway on investigating more attacks against foreigners as was ''allegedly'' the case after the Referendum.
Set up a hotline, there'll be no shortage of info coming in -- try it!
Another amazing article from the express:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/69...ice-cuts-Theresa-May-Centre-European-Research
the title itself is a masterpiece
but nothing compared to the extremely not racist comments:
and finally the best of them all:
those comments sadden me. I always thought UK was above this.
Haha. You need to live here.those comments sadden me. I always thought UK was above this.
It's sick but I'm not surprised.
If there is one thing this vote has done in glad about, it's show the world how dire this country is; we're basically Little America
those comments sadden me. I always thought people was above this.
To be fair, Nazi Germany should have been a warning to us about why blaming ethnic scapegoats for a nation's ills isn't a good idea, but here we are.
We'll be a lesson to no-one because everyone thinks their right-wing fuckery is justified. The disaffected are so easily exploited by these demagogues and it's only going to get worse.
those comments sadden me. I always thought UK was above this.
Another amazing article from the express:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/69...ice-cuts-Theresa-May-Centre-European-Research
the title itself is a masterpiece
but nothing compared to the extremely not racist comments:
and finally the best of them all:
that attitude is as English as being miserable
EU funding for farmers, scientists and other projects will be replaced by the Treasury after Brexit, Chancellor Philip Hammond has said.
In a move which could cost up to £4.5bn a year, the Treasury will guarantee to back EU-funded projects signed before this year's Autumn Statement.
Sounds good on the face of it, but where does the money come from? Cuts elsewhere? Tax hikes? More money printing which devalues the pound? Suddenly that £350m a week figure doesn't sound as big anymore does it?
Oh... Oh no. Now I'm sad.Another amazing article from the express:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/69...ice-cuts-Theresa-May-Centre-European-Research
the title itself is a masterpiece
but nothing compared to the extremely not racist comments:
and finally the best of them all:
It will obviously come from all the money the forrins will be throwing at us to be able to trade with the GREAT BRITISH EMPIRE.
Their worldview is shaped by the sun and mail.I don't understand how anyone could argue with this.
Also I'm now going to fucking hunt Farmers for a living.EU funding for farmers, scientists and other projects will be replaced by the Treasury after Brexit, Chancellor Philip Hammond has said.
In a move which could cost up to £4.5bn a year, the Treasury will guarantee to back EU-funded projects signed before this year's Autumn Statement.
Sounds good on the face of it, but where does the money come from? Cuts elsewhere? Tax hikes? More money printing which devalues the pound? Suddenly that £350m a week figure doesn't sound as big anymore does it?
EU funding for farmers, scientists and other projects will be replaced by the Treasury after Brexit, Chancellor Philip Hammond has said.
In a move which could cost up to £4.5bn a year, the Treasury will guarantee to back EU-funded projects signed before this year's Autumn Statement.
Sounds good on the face of it, but where does the money come from? Cuts elsewhere? Tax hikes? More money printing which devalues the pound? Suddenly that £350m a week figure doesn't sound as big anymore does it?
I guess we could always take the £4.5bn from the £13bn we would no longer have to pay to Brussels.In 2015 the UK government paid in £13bn and EU spending on the UK was £4.5bn, meaning the UK's net contribution was estimated at about £8.5bn,
GBPUSD at 1,2959 and GBPEUR at 1.1615. Should really start ordering at Amazon UK.
I guess we could always take the £4.5bn from the £13bn we would no longer have to pay to Brussels.
I guess we could always take the £4.5bn from the £13bn we would no longer have to pay to Brussels.
I guess we could always take the £4.5bn from the £13bn we would no longer have to pay to Brussels.
I'm not assuming anything. The government have guaranteed it. Even after the guarantee it still leaves £8.5bn to spend elsewhere as a result of leaving.You are assuming that £4.5bn is going to be available and not going elsewhere as a result of exit.
Still, really saddening to see it being expressed so strongly and openly.
I'm not assuming anything. The government have guaranteed it. Even after the guarantee it still leaves £8.5bn to spend elsewhere as a result of leaving.
I'm not assuming anything. The government have guaranteed it. Even after the guarantee it still leaves £8.5bn to spend elsewhere as a result of leaving.
The amount of money that is saved depends on the size of the British economy. A 1% contraction of GDP as predicted for this year after the brexit vote is worth more than the £8.5bn. It is also quite fallacious to expect that just because a sum becomes available it will be used in a certain way. That's why many of the anti-trident sentiments don't make sense, as getting rid of Trident would only mean the army pays that into conventional armies instead. (they probably should it's much more useful)I'm not assuming anything. The government have guaranteed it. Even after the guarantee it still leaves £8.5bn to spend elsewhere as a result of leaving.
I would bet we will have access to a large degree.The 8.5bn are already done for not having access to the largest single market in the world anymore.
Where have you gathered this information from?The tax contribution of the City of London's financial services industry alone is £65bn a year. There will be an exodus if we leave the single market and lose the financial passport.
So again, where is this money coming from?
It will obviously come from all the money the forrins will be throwing at us to be able to trade with the GREAT BRITISH EMPIRE.
I would bet we will have access to a large degree.
Where have you gathered this information from?
I don't know the plans of the financial sector, but I haven't seen a single report that expects a mass exodus. Most of what I've seen indicated that parts of their operations would relocate within the EU if we lose the passport.
I would bet we will have access to a large degree
No one says the UK can't do business with the EU. The EU wants continued business. Only now the UK will have to pay for access, in addition to adhering to EU rules, like freedom of movement.I would bet we will have access to a large degree.
I don't know the plans of the financial sector, but I haven't seen a single report that expects a mass exodus. Most of what I've seen indicated that parts of their operations would relocate within the EU if we lose the passport.
Or this:HSBC said before the vote that it could move as many as 1,000 trading jobs to Paris in the event of a Leave. But because the bank already has a Paris office, it could defer any decision until right before the UK’s exit comes into effect.
https://www.ft.com/content/a3a92744-3a52-11e6-9a05-82a9b15a8ee7Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan chief executive, warned before the referendum that as many as 4,000 jobs could be shifted out of the UK.
I would bet we will have access to a large degree.
Where have you gathered this information from?
I don't know the plans of the financial sector, but I haven't seen a single report that expects a mass exodus. Most of what I've seen indicated that parts of their operations would relocate within the EU if we lose the passport.
He was being hyperbolic, but the city would loose a lot of income if it looses the passports.
Though to be fair, like a lot of things, that'd depend how the EU will fair in the coming years.
Another amazing article from the express:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/69...ice-cuts-Theresa-May-Centre-European-Research
the title itself is a masterpiece
but nothing compared to the extremely not racist comments:
and finally the best of them all:
So true. That's always hilarious considering:German car manufacturers to the rescue!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36646251German carmakers have said that the UK will have to accept the free movement of EU citizens in return for access to the single market.
She. A lot of people are going to lose their jobs and many will have to relocate. We can speculate how much the treasury will lose in income because of this but it's obvious that the hit to this industry alone will far exceed the £8.5bn net contribution we put into EU coffers.
What you guys are missing is that the treasury will pay that money up until 2020.
Brexit won't be finalised until 2019.
So they are promising to give that money for 1 year
EU funding for farmers, scientists and other projects will be replaced by the Treasury after Brexit, Chancellor Philip Hammond has said.
In a move which could cost up to £4.5bn a year, the Treasury will guarantee to back EU-funded projects signed before this year's Autumn Statement.
Sounds good on the face of it, but where does the money come from? Cuts elsewhere? Tax hikes? More money printing which devalues the pound? Suddenly that £350m a week figure doesn't sound as big anymore does it?
I did point this out. There is also the chance that we are looking to be in the EU right up to the end of the current Tory term if the process isn't actually triggered in 2017. The longer they delay the closer the next national election is going to be the greater the risk is to the tories, but at the same time, they need to time to actually figure out what to do and can't do it before 2017 and even then after we actually leave the economy might be hit as a result which will affect them in the 2020 elections if we leave in 2019.What you guys are missing is that the treasury will pay that money up until 2020.
Brexit won't be finalised until 2019.
So they are promising to give that money for 1 year
Despite the brexit blurb, we don't just default to WTO rules, there's going to be a huge amount of horse trading with the EU (as we're currently under their schedules) and the rest of the WTO to get there.
Lord David Hannay, who was one of Britains representatives when the U.K. joined the E.E.C. and who later became an ambassador to the U.N., recently wrote a piece that perfectly captures the folly of the Brexit vote. The following paragraph explains not only the tariff bind that Britain finds itself in, but more important, the lunacy of leaving an arrangement that cant be bettered in a world where a relatively small country cannot hope to make advantageous trading deals with huge economies like China and the U.S., or with large trading blocks.
"The technicalities of constructing a new U.K. tariff, for which neither [the pro-Brexit trade minister] Liam Fox nor the officials advising him have any relevant experience, will themselves be pretty daunting. Tariff rates will need to be set for thousands of tariff positions and sub-positions. Should these be higher than those set in the E.U.s Common External Tariff, in which case we will either have to cut tariffs on [other] products to compensate all our W.T.O. trading partners or suffer higher retaliatory tariffs from them? Or should the tariffs be set lower, in which case U.K. manufacturers will have to face up to more competition and less protection? Or should they be set at the same level as now, in which case one wonders what all the fuss was about in the first place?
I would bet we will have access to a large degree.
Of course things will change and people will lose their jobs. As a child I was unfortunate enough to witness over 20,000 miners lose their livelihoods in the 80's along with thousands of steelworkers, car manufacturers, shipbuilders etc etcTheir website is under maintenance so here's a cached link: https://webcache.googleusercontent....+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&lr=lang_en|lang_fr
She. A lot of people are going to lose their jobs and many will have to relocate. We can speculate how much the treasury will lose in income because of this but it's obvious that the hit to this industry alone will far exceed the £8.5bn net contribution we put into EU coffers.
Whoops sorry for the gender confusion.
I agree with you on this post; for me an exodus would however be if >50% of the banks (or their jobs) left the city, and that won't happen. At least not before a long, long while, London is too big a trading place for that to happen in the near future.
Of course things will change and people will lose their jobs. As a child I was unfortunate enough to witness over 20,000 miners lose their livelihoods in the 80's along with thousands of steelworkers, car manufacturers, shipbuilders etc etc
Things change, sometimes for the better, sometimes not. I still feel pretty confident we will remain in the single market, pay for the privilege, retain university research projects if we pay in and continue to have a amicable relationship with Europe in many other areas. Leaving wasn't the best result but we aren't about to decend into the apocalypse.
Im going to stay subbed and continue reading this very interesting thread, but somewhat cut back posting. Every time I try to be positive about the situation we find ourselves in,I'm greeted with a sea of green and feel battered and bruised for a page or two