I'm fairly certain she is....Thinking on it, are we sure she's not actually Thatcher's horcrux or something?
I'm fairly certain she is....Thinking on it, are we sure she's not actually Thatcher's horcrux or something?
The other was the watering down of plans to reduce the harm junk food for kids in advertising etc. It's kinda funny since she has diabetes. Corporate puppet over all else eh. Suppose she has no soul anyway.
Seen a few 'make people on benefits do it' tweets already.
Theresa May tells BBC foreign doctors will be allowed to stay "until further numbers [of home-grown doctors] are trained". Doc-exit in 2025?
https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/783195009550024704
It must feel nice and comfy to be foreign doctor in UK now.
Theresa May tells BBC foreign doctors will be allowed to stay "until further numbers [of home-grown doctors] are trained". Doc-exit in 2025?
https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/783195009550024704
It must feel nice and comfy to be a foreign doctor in UK now.
https://www.rte.ie/news/2016/1004/821270-brexit-belfast/
A legal bid to try to stop the UK's planned departure from the European Union is expected to get under way at Belfast High Court today.
Lawyers representing the politicians and campaigners will argue that triggering Article 50 would be illegal if done without securing parliamentary and Northern Ireland Assembly consent.
The Divided KingdomUnunited Britain or Britains saviours?
The unintentioned result of the EU referendum is that it has provided an actual quantity of people against EU and all that jazz. Now we see the tories going full hog to appeal to this base.
Like, has the been any real witch hunt against the troops using Human rights? Seems like a fake narrative to get rid of it under favourable pretended.
There is a Doctor Who joke or reference to be made somewhere!
NHS announces new series called 'Doctor, Where?'
Then those newly trained Doctors move to Australia for better wages away from the slow gutting of the NHS.
yeah about that
Are there that many physicians leaving the UK soon or immediately after completing training? Shouldn't the causes of that be addressed? Even four years is not that long compared to that training cost.
yeah about that
Yeah that won't backfire at all. But hey it might push more gps into scotland. Works for me.yeah about that
yeah about that
Are there that many physicians leaving the UK soon or immediately after completing training? Shouldn't the causes of that be addressed? Even four years is not that long compared to that training cost.
If you receive training subsidized by the company you work for, and you leave soon after, it's entirely common that they would expect you to pay that money back. Happens a LOT in the IT industry where I work.
I don't know but I imagine they wouldn't be short on job offers so moving is unlikely to be a problem and if the NHS is crap to work for, they shouldn't be surprised if people leave promptly and should be looking to make it more appealing to stay, not a threat.
If you receive training subsidized by the company you work for, and you leave soon after, it's entirely common that they would expect you to pay that money back. Happens a LOT in the IT industry where I work.
If you receive training subsidized by the company you work for, and you leave soon after, it's entirely common that they would expect you to pay that money back. Happens a LOT in the IT industry where I work.
They're a bit busy trying to destroy it :/Yeah, I get that moving isn't a problem in terms of their job, but most people are generally hesitant to move especially if they have a family. So if circumstances are solid comparatively speaking, I wouldn't expect people to move en masse. However if working for the NHS is either crap or the pay is, then I would expect many to choose to leave. So if the NHS is crap to work for, that should probably be the main focus of the government in addressing this.
We both know this is all according to the plan to starve the English nhs.The Doctors are already paying though. They pay fees for medical school which they have to pay back like any other student. The other training is on the job, literally on the job, and they'll typically pay themselves for any additional exams or qualifications.
It's like getting a job in Asda, leaving and Asda charging you for till training.
Interesting approach. Make the job less appealing (both domestically and internationally) while simultaneously trying to get more people into the profession.
The Doctors are already paying though. They pay fees for medical school which they have to pay back like any other student. The other training is on the job, literally on the job, and they'll typically pay themselves for any additional exams or qualifications.
It's like getting a job in Asda, leaving and Asda charging you for till training.
Interesting approach. Make the job less appealing (both domestically and internationally) while simultaneously trying to get more people into the profession.
British financial-services companies will get no special favors in Brexit negotiations from Prime Minister Theresa May, who wants to change the relationship between the government and the City of London.
According to three senior figures in Mays administration, the government will refuse to prioritize the protection of the sector after the U.K. has left the European Union. Her team has also dismissed the key business demand for an interim deal with the EU to help ease the transition out of the bloc, one of the people said. All asked not to be named because the information is sensitive.
Downgrading the concerns of the City, as the capitals financial district is called, signals a clear break from Mays predecessor, David Cameron, who put the risk to financial services at the heart of his failed referendum campaign to keep the U.K in the EU. Cameron argued that Brexit would be a high-stakes gamble for the U.K. and its financial-services sector, which accounts for almost 12 percent of economic output and 1.1 million jobs.
The shift also risks adding to investor concerns about a so-called hard Brexit. The pound resumed its decline on Tuesday amid growing speculation Mays government is prepared to surrender membership of the European single market for trade in return for more power over immigration, law-making and the budget. Sterling was down more than 0.5 percent at 10.09 a.m. in London, dropping to the lowest level since 1985.
Mays office had no immediate comment on the shift in attitude when contacted on Monday.
More at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ade-city-in-brexit-shock-for-financial-sector
Interesting approach.
I can't unpick the thinking here. I mean... I just can't. And surely if you're part of that team or an advisor you'd have to say "hey, twelve per cent is a pretty big deal..."
I can't unpick the thinking here. I mean... I just can't. And surely if you're part of that team or an advisor you'd have to say "hey, twelve per cent is a pretty big deal..."
We don't need the city, we don't need Japanese firms, we are Albion.
Albion Jams and Marmalades. An untapped multibillion dollar industry.
Have you guys considered that it might just be a practical approach to the problem?
There is no way to protect both the financial industry as it stands and have Brexit in the terms that have been asked.
Rather than try to fix it, just admit the problem and move towards a new paradigm, whatever that might be, no point trying to achieve the impossible?
They're betting that it'll only be a proportion of that 12% which it will be. I've seen estimates of up to 25% of the financial services sector activity 'leaving' which would 'only' be 3%. Of course that's just one sector, and it'll probably be a bit less in practice of financial services activity leaving, but other activities in other sectors will move as well.
There's no doubt we're going to take a pretty big hit. The current approach seems to be to ignore any major issue (like Northern Ireland, Gibraltar etc), and other trade issue needs to be filtered through the Brexit means Brexit means immigration filter which rules out everything short of full hard brexit and some sort of trade deal down the line.
I can't unpick the thinking here. I mean... I just can't. And surely if you're part of that team or an advisor you'd have to say "hey, twelve per cent is a pretty big deal..."
Have you guys considered that it might just be a practical approach to the problem?
There is no way to protect both the financial industry as it stands and have Brexit in the terms that have been asked.
Rather than try to fix it, just admit the problem and move towards a new paradigm, whatever that might be, no point trying to achieve the impossible?