The referendum was divisive and got ugly at times but I think we need to wait and see what has actually happened, reported hate crimes have gone up but that's not necessarily the same as an actual rise in incidents, could be down to increased awareness of reporting for example. Not trying to bury my head in the sand or deny a problem here, and obviously any example of a hate crime is deplorable, but I'm not ready to write off a chuck of the population as bigots.
All in all I just don't think there is a massive appetite out there to re-run more referendums and go over all the arguments again.
Even if you
don't want Scotland to have another referendum you should at least be able to admit two things in support of it
1) In 2014 Better Together heavily leaned on Scotland voting NO to stay in the UK and stay in the EU. Blame Cameron for arsing this up a mere 2 years later, but we are where we are now.
2) 62% of Scotland did vote remain, and yes while we are in the UK that doesn't mean much as we have to go along with the UK result. However as independence is a potential chance to allow that 62% to be honored over a decision this large why is it unimaginable to put it (indyref2) forward as a potential? Unlike silly arguments about London becoming independent due to Brexit Scotland does actually have a possibility to do it.
I mean to elaborate on point 2, it's not as if the UK has voted to change the traffic light colours and Scotland is saying right, time for indyref2. The EU vote is probably one of the largest votes to have hit the UK in most of our lifetimes. There is a lot of principals behind this vote as well, not just cold hard numbers and what the analysts are saying. Many don't want to follow the rhetoric of the Leave campaign with their anti-immigrant stances and attack on doctors in the NHS for being "brown".
Sometimes it's hard to blame people for wanting to vote with their heart over their head. Sure in 95% of the cases you need to vote with your head as to be sensible about the economy and so forth, but there are times where you want to stick up for humane principals even if it means more hard work and uncertainty in the short term. Brexit is not that, the EU was painted as a bogeyman it really is not. As were immigrants. Taking back control in this campaign suggested the EU and immigrants do something horrendous to the UK. They don't. The Conservatives are the ones refusing to finance public services and the NHS. They are the ones also choosing inhumane private companies to handle benefits.
Not only does the UK face Brexit, but it faces a short to mid term future of constant Tory reign. To not give some Scots leeway to voting with their heart to try and avoid both of those things is to either be sadistic and want to drag us along because damn anyone escaping that isn't yourself! Or to not think it a big deal we face Brexit and Tory reign. Which is fine if you support both, but many don't want to and will urge our (Scottish) government to support
all options. All means all.
This really isn't a case of holding constant referendums to get your way, even if it's a nice parcel to tie criticism up in to aim at the SNP. There are genuine reasons of concern to consider cutting ties, and as I sarcastically hinted at above this is not potentially holding a referendum over a change of light bulb colours in traffic lights. There are pathetic reasons to suggest a country holding an independence referendum, that may well be fine to criticize as going at it to try and force a result, this is not one of those cases no matter how badly Unionists want to dismiss the SNP for drafting up a bill as an option. I'll finish with it again, aim your ire at Cameron and the Conservatives for a mere 2 years ago harping on about how important the EU was and that Scotland should vote for EU certainty, then leading the country to leaving the EU and Cameron having to step down. Scotland showed that a good portion of those that voted NO in 2014 came out to vote REMAIN with Brexit. As in they believed in what the UK government told them in 2014.