Thing is, the talk of "the deal must be complete by October 2018" kind of makes me worry that Article 50 may already have been triggered in some people's eyes.
Yeah but you seem there will be less immigrants on the roads, meaning you will be able to commute to work faster. And time is money.Poll suggests public will not accept a Brexit that leaves them worse off
Brexit means Brexit you colossal bellends.
I thought it was interesting just how London centric the media is....when the Libdems took the pro remain by election in London the press were all over it as a 'brexit voter rejection' for a couple of days, even though they voted to remain by a large percentage in the referendum
Yet the Sleaford seat which was largely pro leave, barely got a mention as it went exactly to type by voting Tories back in comfortably.... no story here
Poll suggests public will not accept a Brexit that leaves them worse off
Brexit means Brexit you colossal bellends.
Poll suggests public will not accept a Brexit that leaves them worse off
Brexit means Brexit you colossal bellends.
Poll suggests public will not accept a Brexit that leaves them worse off
Brexit means Brexit you colossal bellends.
Poll suggests public will not accept a Brexit that leaves them worse off
Brexit means Brexit you colossal bellends.
I appreciate the gesture, but it being part of Brexit negotiations is really a way to cause a lot of argument and division. It's a smart strategy.
But I'm not going to hold my breath, and instead just thankful I qualify for an Irish passport.
We TOLD you that you absolute fucking tossers. You called it 'project fear'. I don't give a flying fuck at a donut that you're going to be worse off from this. I kind of relish it, to be honest. Enjoy your just desserts, and maybe consider not listening to the lies from the scumbags and shitrags that 'informed' your decision.
This. It's a way for EU negotiators to sow dissent in the British ranks and undermine May's position.
May and the Brexiteers keep taliking about their record-breaking 17 million vote mandate, so if lots of Brits are talking about wanting associate membership it shows the mandate to hard brexit is a lie.
Unlike our Department of Faceplanting out of the EU, I think the EU negotiators have a clue about the n-dimensional chess of international treaty negotiations.
TBF it is a loaded question...I mean cmon, who would really ever answer they were happy to lose money
We TOLD you that you absolute fucking tossers. You called it 'project fear'. I don't give a flying fuck at a donut that you're going to be worse off from this. I kind of relish it, to be honest. Enjoy your just desserts, and maybe consider not listening to the lies from the scumbags and shitrags that 'informed' your decision.
Presumably the 5% who said they'd give £100pcm for muh sovrunty, and not to hear foreign accents on the bus.
it is a daft question...now if they had asked " If you knew that Brexit would make you at least £100 a month worst off, would you still of voted to leave" then you could learn something...
all they have done is ask an obvious question....
No. You would have a point if they were asked "would you be HAPPY to forego £100 a month after Brexit?" (the obvious answer being "no"), but they were asked "would you ACCEPT a Brexit that cost you £100 a month?" - suggesting they would give May the middle finger if Brexit meant they were worse off.
The way the question is phrased kind of suggests that there is a way to exit the EU without it doing lasting damage to the economy though. After all, people hear this question and think "Oh, May should just get a good deal instead of a shit one. I won't accept a shit one." instead of thinking "Oh, I need to ask myself if money or leaving the EU is more important to me"
Nigel "anti-establishment" Farage moaning about how poor he is compared to his banker chums.
[Paywall]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...lusive-interview-special-relationship-donald/
Cribbing quotes from around the net:
The EU pays him £85,000 a year.
On UKIP members:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/dec/09/nigel-farage-scathing-attack-ukip-low-grade-people
On Trump:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ar-taxpayer-funded-nigel-farage-a7466401.html
Has abominable views on women and minorities = represents the right things
Nigel "anti-establishment" Farage moaning about how poor he is compared to his banker chums.
[Paywall]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...lusive-interview-special-relationship-donald/
Cribbing quotes from around the net:
The EU pays him £85,000 a year.
On UKIP members:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/dec/09/nigel-farage-scathing-attack-ukip-low-grade-people
On Trump:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ar-taxpayer-funded-nigel-farage-a7466401.html
Has abominable views on women and minorities = represents the right things
Poll suggests public will not accept a Brexit that leaves them worse off
Brexit means Brexit you colossal bellends.
If only somebody would have warned them this would happen before the Referendum took place
Countries with which the UK has territorial disputes such as Argentina and Spain could use the opportunity to force compromise on other issues, the Institute of Export has warned
Brexit: Britain's WTO status 'could be blocked over territorial disputes'
More scaremongering. The WTO needs us more than we need them. etc. etc.
...Oh shit, they could, couldn't they?
So we may potentially leave the European Union with nothing going for us?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38324146 - a new Trade deal with the EU might take up to 10 years to make and still fail.
But I guess the media would rather focus on a few seconds of May looking a bit out of sorts at a meeting.
GET ON WITH IT, JUST LEAVE, THE EU WON'T EXIST IN 10 YEARS, etc
It's clear both stories, May continuing to be an awkward and rubbish PM, and probably taking 10 years to reach an EU trade deal are both masking the real story:
A popular brand of pink wafer is under threat after a company went into administration following a "sharp fall" in the value of sterling after Brexit.
This'll clearly be a game changer and shock awakening to many brexit voters who are partial to a good ol' british pink wafer and cup of tea, finally realising that leaving the EU doesn't mean they're getting their country back. I look forward to the impassioned discussion on this pressing issue in tonight's question time.
Pink Wafers are only the start. Wait till Chocolate Digestives double in price.
Pink Wafers are only the start. Wait till Chocolate Digestives double in price.
Pink Wafers are only the start. Wait till Chocolate Digestives double in price.
I hate this kind of stuff to be fair. She isn't exactly a social butterfly, but we shouldn't mock her for that.
She's clearly a really awkward, kind of nerdy person, but that's cool. To laugh and highlight this stuff just doesn't feel right, especially when there's actual issues to be had with her governance.
Um, nothing about her so far suggests she's awkward or nerdy.
She was literally given the cold shoulder, she wasn't invited to the dinner which is something that's kinda of a big deal apparently. What we see here is the other EU members ignoring her while she thought she'd get some kind of back patting or handshaking as is standard at these kinds of meetings.
Sucks for her, but I guess all that rhetoric about using people as bargaining chips has upset a few people...
I hate this kind of stuff to be fair. She isn't exactly a social butterfly, but we shouldn't mock her for that.
She's clearly a really awkward, kind of nerdy person, but that's cool. To laugh and highlight this stuff just doesn't feel right, especially when there's actual issues to be had with her governance.