The Wii U Speculation Thread V: The Final Frontier

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rösti
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if it was just a R700 chip (and we know that in fact, it will be a highly customised chip), that's enough to blow current gen. It could offer a range performance from 3 to 6 times the current gen.

I'm talking about the architecture of the traditional part.

Also, we've already narrowed it down to <3x, and antoz is even implying <2x.
 
While searching for Wii U news, I came over a small piece from MMO-Champion. Now, it's most likely just jargon but if I'm not mistaken 5850 has been suggested before. It's from the poster Rennadrel in reply to poster DeltrusDisc:

DeltrusDisc said:
Honestly... the chances the next gen consoles will compare to anything you listed, is next to "it won't." Considering they will likely put mobile pieces or lower end pieces into the consoles (think i3s, and GTX 460s) they will not compare at all. They have to if they want to keep the consoles small anyways, they don't give them much room to breath/cool. =/

Rennadrel said:
No, it's more evident that console manufacturers are going the way of the quad core CPU, as it seems to be the most ideal without being overkill. Console performance now is not a lack of CPU power, the Xbox 360 has more then enough juice to run any desktop game at max settings, however it is hindered by an ancient graphics card. I know Nintendo is using a modified AMD 5850 GPU in the upcoming Wii U console, along with a quad core IBM processor with a shit ton of memory. At this point with Sony shares at a 31 year low, I am not even sure if they will release a new console.

Source: http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...U-last-until-next-generation-of-console/page2

As I said, it's most likely nothing and just a paraphrase of speculated things. But it shows example of what people on forums other than NeoGAF and Beyond3D believe. If they are setting themselves up for disappointment or if they actually know some insider details is anyone's guess.

The specs for ATI Radeon HD 5850 (I assume that is what is meant, if else ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 is clocked at 500-625 MHz with processing power of 0.8-1.0 TFLOPS):

2.15 billion 40nm transistors
TeraScale 2 Unified Processing Architecture
1440 Stream Processing Units
72 Texture Units
128 Z/Stencil ROP Units
32 Color ROP Units
GDDR5 interface with 128.0 GB/sec of memory bandwidth
PCI Express 2.1 x16 bus interface
DirectX® 11 support
Shader Model 5.0
DirectCompute 11
Programmable hardware tessellation unitAccelerated multi-threading
HDR texture compression
Order-independent transparency
OpenGL 3.2 support15
Image quality enhancement technology
Up to 24x multi-sample and super-sample anti-aliasing modes
Adaptive anti-aliasing
16x angle independent anisotropic texture filtering
128-bit floating point HDR rendering

Engine clock speed: 725 MHz
Processing power (single precision): 2.09 TeraFLOPS
Processing power (double precision): 418 GigaFLOPS
Polygon throughput: 725M polygons/sec
Data fetch rate (32-bit): 209 billion fetches/sec
Texel fill rate (bilinear filtered): 52.2 Gigatexels/sec
Pixel fill rate: 23.2 Gigapixels/sec
Anti-aliased pixel fill rate: 92.8 Gigasamples/sec
Memory clock speed: 1 GHz
Memory data rate: 4.0 Gbps
Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/sec
Maximum board power: 151 Watts

Source: http://www.amd.com/us/products/desk...5850/pages/ati-radeon-hd-5850-overview.aspx#2

I guess we won't know for sure until a developer comments or if someone opens up the console.
 
It's not "displaying" anything. A dev said it's current-gen tech, so there's nothing more to argue here.

From everything we know of the console's dev kits, that statement is wrong just from the facts I listed.

And it is displaying those demos last year, which do show advances to tech. You need to take what he said into context instead of dismissing everything you hear that doesn't agree with your assumed "facts" about the console.
 
Rösti;37889209 said:
While searching for Wii U news, I came over a small piece from MMO-Champion. Now, it's most likely just jargon but if I'm not mistaken 5850 has been suggested before. It's from the poster Rennadrel in reply to poster DeltrusDisc:





Source: http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...U-last-until-next-generation-of-console/page2

As I said, it's most likely nothing and just a paraphrase of speculated things. But it shows example of what people on forums other than NeoGAF and Beyond3D believe. If they are setting themselves up for disappointment or if they actually know some insider details is anyone's guess.

The specs for ATI Radeon HD 5850 (I assume that is what is meant, if else ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 is clocked at 500-625 MHz with processing power of 0.8-1.0 TFLOPS):



Source: http://www.amd.com/us/products/desk...5850/pages/ati-radeon-hd-5850-overview.aspx#2

I guess we won't know for sure until a developer comments or if someone opens up the console.

If it has a 5850, I'll post a video of me making out with a hobo on YouTube. Don't even humor this BS.

From everything we know of the console's dev kits, that statement is wrong just from the facts I listed.

And it is displaying those demos last year, which do show advances to tech. You need to take what he said into context instead of dismissing everything you hear that doesn't agree with your assumed "facts" about the console.

direct dev comment > everything
 
Antonz said that Wii U's a current-gen machine tech-wise, so we can safe throw that possibility out of the window.

You are simplify stuff far too much. I commented that if you look at the technology it is indeed much closer to current gen than it is some 10-15X mega beast. While there will be 2011/2012 bells and whistles the entire machine is very much not.

You can have a GPU made in 2012 still be little more than a tweaked part from 2009. Hell Half of what AMD and Nvidia like to do is tweak older gpus be it die size etc and then relabel it a modern gpu.

I will admit I am probably a tad harsh to some degree on the machine but its out of love and what could have been
 
antonz's comments about the Wii U Pad makes my heart smile. Words I agree with, and money better spent elsewhere.
 
You are simplify stuff far too much. I commented that if you look at the technology it is indeed much closer to current gen than it is some 10-15X mega beast. While there will be 2011/2012 bells and whistles the entire machine is very much not.

You can have a GPU made in 2012 still be little more than a tweaked part from 2009. Hell Half of what AMD and Nvidia like to do is tweak older gpus be it die size etc and then relabel it a modern gpu

That is perfectly fine with me, 2011/2012 bells and whistles with 2x-4x the power of 360 and 2GB of ram... Yeah, I'm perfectly happy with this.
 
It's not "displaying" anything. A dev said it's current-gen tech, so there's nothing more to argue here.
By "current" do you mean as in "this year/2012"?
Rösti;37889209 said:
While searching for Wii U news, I came over a small piece from MMO-Champion. Now, it's most likely just jargon but if I'm not mistaken 5850 has been suggested before. It's from the poster Rennadrel in reply to poster DeltrusDisc:





Source: http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...U-last-until-next-generation-of-console/page2

.....
His profile says he is a "Pit Lord" so he appears to have a fairly senior position. I trust him.
 
What he say about the pad?

That the technology in it detracts from the overall system budget quite significantly, relative to where they money could be spent. This makes it a gamble, as in order for the Wii U to be unique and justify the budget spent on the pad versus processing hardware developers need to use the pad in interesting, game enhancing and sellable ways. As he (and I) feels most developers, specifically third parties, will reserve pad use for gimmicks like maps, alternate cams, and other junk that isn't integral to the game design, the pad's value decreases. What we're left with is a system with a core controller that is largely missused outside of anybody who isn't Nintendo, and if the pad didn't exist at all additional budget could have been put towards further modernising the Wii U's hardware.

I feel quite similar because I'm not interested in the pad at all. I'd rather the pad be gone, and instead have the HD Wii with waggle wands that I've wanted for some time.
 
Isn't that post likely wrong because it says quad core, but we have credible evidence that it's only got three cores?

Yeah, it's wrong, also a 5850 @ 625MHz isn't .8-1TFLOPs, it's 1.8TFLOPs... Which is closer to PS4's Expected power level. Wii U won't have a lot of ALUs, it will have somewhere between 400-800, BG currently expects 480@600MHz, roughly 2.4X 360's GFLOPing power... I feel like we need Terry Crews to promote next gen.
 
A dual Wiimote set-up in which both controllers contain a circle pad, a shoulder button and a trigger, the left hand controller has a D-pad and the right hand controller has a multiple face buttons (rather than just the one A button) would be both achievable and godly. I would prefer it to the Wii U pad.
 
You are simplify stuff far too much. I commented that if you look at the technology it is indeed much closer to current gen than it is some 10-15X mega beast. While there will be 2011/2012 bells and whistles the entire machine is very much not.

You can have a GPU made in 2012 still be little more than a tweaked part from 2009. Hell Half of what AMD and Nvidia like to do is tweak older gpus be it die size etc and then relabel it a modern gpu.

I will admit I am probably a tad harsh to some degree on the machine but its out of love and what could have been

Oh wow, that actually worked.

Also, both you and EC are still crazy for thinking Nintendo would chose better tech over a lower price.
 
Also, both you and EC are still crazy for thinking Nintendo would chose better tech over a lower price.

No, I mean, same price as it's going to be, but budget normally reserved for the Wii U pad instead put towards the hardware. I agree with antonz that the Wii U pad likely has enough tech in it (especially the touch screen and battery power) to warrant enough dosh that could have been used to beef up the hardware instead. However much the Wii U costs, remember you're not just buying a processor and GPU, you're buying a Wii U pad too.

I don't want the pad :P.
 
Oh wow, that actually worked.

Also, both you and EC are still crazy for thinking Nintendo would chose better tech over a lower price.

Im not as anti-tablet because I think the potential could be nice and probably will be on Nintendos end but knowing the other side of the coin its gonna get wasted by 3rd parties.

Thats just where my disappointment comes from. Its like buying lobster for everyone on gaf except to find out only 5 people on gaf will eat it so the rest rots and goes to waste.

edit: Im on to your game now too burnt. trying to provoke me to post and slip stuff :p
 
That the technology in it detracts from the overall system budget quite significantly, relative to where they money could be spent. This makes it a gamble, as in order for the Wii U to be unique and justify the budget spent on the pad versus processing hardware developers need to use the pad in interesting, game enhancing and sellable ways. As he (and I) feels most developers, specifically third parties, will reserve pad use for gimmicks like maps, alternate cams, and other junk that isn't integral to the game design, the pad's value decreases. What we're left with is a system with a core controller that is largely missused outside of anybody who isn't Nintendo, and if the pad didn't exist at all additional budget could have been put towards further modernising the Wii U's hardware.

I feel quite similar because I'm not interested in the pad at all. I'd rather the pad be gone, and instead have the HD Wii with waggle wands that I've wanted for some time.

I know you are talking about beefing up the console hardware instead of controller hardware, which is better, but if a developer barely uses the uPad, doesn't that save some horsepower for the game?
 
That the technology in it detracts from the overall system budget quite significantly, relative to where they money could be spent. This makes it a gamble, as in order for the Wii U to be unique and justify the budget spent on the pad versus processing hardware developers need to use the pad in interesting, game enhancing and sellable ways. As he (and I) feels most developers, specifically third parties, will reserve pad use for gimmicks like maps, alternate cams, and other junk that isn't integral to the game design, the pad's value decreases. What we're left with is a system with a core controller that is largely missused outside of anybody who isn't Nintendo, and if the pad didn't exist at all additional budget could have been put towards further modernising the Wii U's hardware.

I feel quite similar because I'm not interested in the pad at all. I'd rather the pad be gone, and instead have the HD Wii with waggle wands that I've wanted for some time.

Shouldn't having a faster CPU and the possibility of a Nunchuk+ be a nice enough upgrade of the Wiimote+ controller without dividing the consumer?

I just want Wiimote+ in the box, give me a Nunchuk+ (has IR & wiimote+'s motion sensing)
 
You guys are going to change your tune on the tablet when you have it and experience all the cool stuff you can play and do with it while away from the TV set. The tablet only experience will be Nintendo's third pillar.
 
Im not as anti-tablet because I think the potential could be nice and probably will be on Nintendos end but knowing the other side of the coin its gonna get wasted by 3rd parties.

Thats just where my disappointment comes from. Its like buying lobster for everyone on gaf except to find out only 5 people on gaf will eat it so the rest rots and goes to waste.

Well at least the lobster has a nice standard control layot this time including clicky sticks. Hell, the screen in the middle also means it's going to be more comfortable thanks to hand separation, not as good as remote + chuck but still nice.
 
I know you are talking about beefing up the console hardware instead of controller hardware, which is better, but if a developer barely uses the uPad, doesn't that save some horsepower for the game?

Yes, unless Nintendo's APIs reserve processing specifically for the pad.

Shouldn't having a faster CPU and the possibility of a Nunchuk+ be a nice enough upgrade of the Wiimote+ controller without dividing the consumer?

I just want Wiimote+ in the box, give me a Nunchuk+ (has IR & wiimote+'s motion sensing)

My ideal Wii U would be pretty much that. WiiRemote+, better nunchuck, Wii U pad scrapped and manufacturing budget instead going towards the console hardware itself.

But I love my waggle and IR games. That's the future I hoped Nintendo would explore first and foremost.

I do, though ;p

Unless you plan to buy me a Wii U, I don't care what you pad lovers want.
 
Releasing a Wii with more modern hardware would have been a pretty bad move on Nintendo's part, I think.

All the console manufacturers are going to have a hard time justifying the upgrade to the next generation, more so than with previous generations, so the best thing they can do is provide distinguishing services or controllers that make it distinct from what's currently on offer.

With Microsoft I think it's going to be a better Kinect plus multimedia stuff, not sure what Sony's angle is going to be.
 
You guys are going to change your tune on the tablet when you have it and experience all the cool stuff you can play and do with it while away from the TV set. The tablet only experience will be Nintendo's third pillar.

This is true, if some pad features take very little dev budget and are simply a matter of flipping a switch (remote play, hopefully), it'll be well worth it.
 
You guys are going to change your tune on the tablet when you have it and experience all the cool stuff you can play and do with it while away from the TV set. The tablet only experience will be Nintendo's third pillar.
The tablet has to be in the same room as the console. So it is unlikely that you can take the tablet upstairs/downstairs and contunie playing in bed for example. Unless Nintendo has changed something about this since last E3.
 
Courtney-Stodden.gif
WiiU-10-580-90.jpg
 
Things you can do with the pad is promising, just steamlining the transition with inventory, like Re revelations on 3ds will be a little things that will become essential for comfort.
Also it can does everything like the wiimote .
I reserve judgement for fps if gyro aiming is nice, but by my experience with revelations again, it can be satisfying.
Really, there are just games like Skyward sword or trauma center that remain better for wiimote, due to its shape.
 
Yes, unless Nintendo's APIs reserve processing specifically for the pad.

Kind of reminds me of the 3DS, looking at Revelations the map runs at a much lower framerate (like 5 fps) than the game which seems like a obvious attempt to use as much power for the 3D graphics.

Unless I am mistaken about 3DS, IDK if Nintendo reserved API for the touch screen on it.
 
Yes, unless Nintendo's APIs reserve processing specifically for the pad.



My ideal Wii U would be pretty much that. WiiRemote+, better nunchuck, Wii U pad scrapped and manufacturing budget instead going towards the console hardware itself.

But I love my waggle and IR games. That's the future I hoped Nintendo would explore first and foremost.



Unless you plan to buy me a Wii U, I don't care what you pad lovers want.

Well, I'd like my cake and eat it too, to me asymmetric gaming, is actually hugely exciting, and we already have Ubisoft exploring that, plus I'd love to see some more PC only genres making it over to Wii U (like Diablo 3, that I guess is rumored or confirmed to be coming to PS360... I got lost in Wii U threads and can't find my way over to the D3 thread to be updated)

Pretty much my biggest problem with what you are saying though is that even if they pushed for that extra $50 to go towards hardware, they would still be far behind PS4/XB3, in which case, I don't have a tablet to cry on, so Wiimote+ in box with Nunchuk+, and an asymmetric game bundled in.
 
The tablet has to be in the same room as the console. So it is unlikely that you can take the tablet upstairs/downstairs and contunie playing in bed for example. Unless Nintendo has changed something about this since last E3.

Then I'll have the console in my bedroom and just always play it in bed.

I'm hoping we don't even need it hooked up to TV out.
 
The stylus is just so terrible for that controller design. It's awkward enough devoting one hand to stylus use with the small DS that could mostly sit on one palm; I can't imagine trying to play a game with it while using the circle pad.
 
The tablet has to be in the same room as the console. So it is unlikely that you can take the tablet upstairs/downstairs and contunie playing in bed for example. Unless Nintendo has changed something about this since last E3.

Actually, if it's using Ni-Fi, it pretty much should be a bit more range than a Wireless N router in even the worst cases.
 
Are we in gloom mode again?

And has antonz's comments made you think about not getting a Wii U, EatChildren?

I'll probably put down money for a Wii U before half the people in this thread. Nintendo consoles are always, and will always be (pending heinously dumb Nintendo shit, like selling all their franchises!), must own day one purchases for me. Nintendo's IPs are some of my favourite, and the company still makes some of the best games in the industry. Simple as that.

But I don't feel any need to wave the Nintendo banner in the console wars, defend them in areas they don't deserve defending, try and put a positive spin on everything they do, or look out for their financial/business interest versus my enjoyment as a consumer. When Nintendo does dumb shit I don't agree with, I will bitch about it, and there hasn't been a generation of Nintendo where I haven't been frustrated with something they've done, either on a hardware or software level (or both).
 
The stylus is just so terrible for that controller design. It's awkward enough devoting one hand to stylus use with the small DS that could mostly sit on one palm; I can't imagine trying to play a game with it while using the circle pad.

Yeah I'm wondering how many people use a stylus on their DS or 3DS? I mostly use the side of my finger and it works fine, stylus was only used for touchscreen heavy games.
 
Yeah just dump the stylus.

Why would you dump precision?

The stylus is just so terrible for that controller design. It's awkward enough devoting one hand to stylus use with the small DS that could mostly sit on one palm; I can't imagine trying to play a game with it while using the circle pad.

Well, unlike the 3DS you could rest it on your lap like you would an ipad.

a7-600x400.jpg
 
I'll probably put down money for a Wii U before half the people in this thread. Nintendo consoles are always, and will always be (pending heinously dumb Nintendo shit, like selling all their franchises!), must own day one purchases for me. Nintendo's IPs are some of my favourite, and the company still makes some of the best games in the industry. Simple as that.

But I don't feel any need to wave the Nintendo banner in the console wars, defend them in areas they don't deserve defending, try and put a positive spin on everything they do, or look out for their financial/business interest versus my enjoyment as a consumer. When Nintendo does dumb shit I don't agree with, I will bitch about it, and there hasn't been a generation of Nintendo where I haven't been frustrated with something they've done, either on a hardware or software level (or both).

While I try to be somewhat neutral when it comes to MS, I do prefer Nintendo, and would rather just have a SNES type of generation with MS as Sega, I am pretty much the same... I still think the tablet is a great idea, and hopefully it can be my only next gen console, along with my PC, but I'm not afraid to buy a XB3 if the third parties don't come, I mean I've already brought 3 XB360s, thanks to RRoD.
 
Are we in gloom mode again?

And has antonz's comments made you think about not getting a Wii U, EatChildren?

I dont want to scare any Nintendo fans off from buying the Wii U. I will be there day one console in hand like everyone else. It will be a fantastic upgrade as far as Nintendo hardware goes going from the Wii to it.

That said I think they could have done better and thats just where my frustration is and I think Ideamans friends echo my sentiments. They aren't angry and gonna throw the machine off a cliff in disgust but they aren't gonna dance in the street in celebration either
 
Well, unlike the 3DS you could rest it on your lap like you would an ipad.
Good point.
I can only see it getting much use in drawing apps. I think the general public will find touchscreen interaction primarily through the stylus to be enormously outdated.
That said, I'm sure Nintendo will release a neat stylus-based game or two that put its precision to good use.
 
I dont want to scare any Nintendo fans off from buying the Wii U. I will be there day one console in hand like everyone else. It will be a fantastic upgrade as far as Nintendo hardware goes going from the Wii to it.

That said I think they could have done better and thats just where my frustration is.

Yeah, that is understandable, I speculated that they could of put a GPU 640sp @ 800MHz in the box + fixed function shaders, but I know that Nintendo would rather "Just make it work" then push the form factor they have chosen.

Still 2011/2012 B/Ws, I'll be pleased with ~3X gpu power, I just really hope it's there.

Also what fustrates me is being punched in the genitals by Thunder Monkey
 
I think the stylus could be larger. No reason to keep it so thin as its not a mobile device. I predict some people will just make their own "giant pencil" versions and attach it to the w.u.c. using Velcro tape.


Good point.
I can only see it getting much use in drawing apps. I think the general public will find touchscreen interaction primarily through the stylus to be enormously outdated.
That said, I'm sure Nintendo will release a neat stylus-based game or two that put its precision to good use.
Don't overlook games and apps where you need to sign a check.
 
Wait... Atonz is a dev? Who has worked or has info on WiiU?

I always thought he was just some schmuck.


PS: how likely would it be to have games that have the uPad on your lap or a stand, and actually play with the Wiimote? So basically playing with 2 controllers at once, one as main controller, the other as quick menu hopper and second screen.
 
I'll probably put down money for a Wii U before half the people in this thread. Nintendo consoles are always, and will always be (pending heinously dumb Nintendo shit, like selling all their franchises!), must own day one purchases for me. Nintendo's IPs are some of my favourite, and the company still makes some of the best games in the industry. Simple as that.

But I don't feel any need to wave the Nintendo banner in the console wars, defend them in areas they don't deserve defending, try and put a positive spin on everything they do, or look out for their financial/business interest versus my enjoyment as a consumer. When Nintendo does dumb shit I don't agree with, I will bitch about it, and there hasn't been a generation of Nintendo where I haven't been frustrated with something they've done, either on a hardware or software level (or both).

I dont want to scare any Nintendo fans off from buying the Wii U. I will be there day one console in hand like everyone else. It will be a fantastic upgrade as far as Nintendo hardware goes going from the Wii to it.

That said I think they could have done better and thats just where my frustration is and I think Ideamans friends echo my sentiments. They aren't angry and gonna throw the machine off a cliff in disgust but they aren't gonna dance in the street in celebration either

Ah ok, thanks guys.

I know the console won't be left behind when the HD Twin successors arrive, but I just want this console to strike a chord with everyone. I've had enough of the allegiances and hardware flaunting this gen brought about.

Here's to an E3 without bullshit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom