m_shortpants
Member
I'll pretty much paraphrase that other reply but basically:
- killing him was meaningless. Sure, the guy killed Foltest. So what? Foltest was a gigantic cunt with a lot of blood on his hands. It's not like he was my best friend. The only good reason to kill him would have been to clear Geralt's name but that was already done by that point. Also, I didn't feel very judgmental of Kingslayers after letting Roche have his way with that other cunt king.
- he helped Yennefer.
- he was a Witcher bro and insisted we weren't enemies.
- his particular School knows a lot about the Wild Hunt. I'd rather have them as allies. All three of them.
- I'm done caring about politics. I'm a very short sighted guy: I help bros and kids because it sounds right but at the end of the day, every kingdom will fuck people. I can't say I'll miss these Northern Kingdoms and then aggressively segregationist policies.
- rule of thumb: as long as someone isn't a particularly annoying cunt like Loredo or that king, I don't go out of my way to kill them. I'd rather they owe me.
Same reasons I saved Sile.
Edit: that other king I mention is Henselt.
Damn, you guys are tempting me to reload and change my mind.
I feel like what he did was terrible, but at the end of the day everyone in the Northern Kingdoms are also reprehensible pieces of shit. I guess I'm just trying to reconcile between him not being that bad, but helping Nilfgaard plan am invasion.
AAAAAAHHHHH SUCH A DIFFICULT CHOICE.
Do I go back and let him go, or just go into the game having to live with my decisions?
AAAAAAHHHHH SUCH A DIFFICULT CHOICE.
Do I go back and let him go, or just go into the game having to live with my decisions?