Barkley's Justice
Member
The GAF eating crow trail is long and vast. See for example many examples including paying for online multiplayer (PSN) and other future crow-eating endeavors such as digital library ownership, VR, PSNow...
Few laypeople knew Thor was a superhero before the Thor movie and the Avengers came out.
The name Thor is kinda well known outside simply being a superhero
I knew about Rocket Raccoon from MvC3. Didn't know about the other team members though.Those make sense, most are ingrained in American popculture,
Who the fuck besides an extreme niche of even comic fans knew of GotG?
Marvel knows what they are doing.
I think the most surprising thing about this is learning that GotG cost 170mil to make. For some reason I thought it would be even more than that.
Comic books or not it looked like a super fun sci-fi movie and a lot more interesting than yet another Captain America or Iron Man. I really love the poster for it too, it kinda reminds me of Star Wars in a way.
All this conflict...
Oh boy...Where is that from ?
Where is that from ?
Oh boy...
How do I say this:The movie this thread is about.
Hey Dalek, I might as well eat crow too. The latest Uncanny Avengers was really good.
Wouldn't work. Rogue, Wolverine, Daken, Havok and Sunfire are essential to the story. And we get a planet full of mutants. The movie is a dream away.Now THAT would make a great movie.
Oh boy...
How do I say this:The movie this thread is about.
They're coming.
Yeah I was thinking they must have payed the other actors a relatively small amount because damn that movie was filled to the brim with (good) CG.
Marvel is notoriously cheap with their actors. Chris Hemsworth was only paid 200,000 dollars for The Avengers.
I see we're still pretending TWS is some sort of smart political/spy thriller.
All this conflict...
I see we're still pretending TWS is some sort of smart political/spy thriller.
Marvel is notoriously cheap with their actors. Chris Hemsworth was only paid 200,000 dollars for The Avengers.
That's some pretty big reaching for crow in that OP. I'll happily send mine back.
Some of the effects in that released trailer that I commented about DO still look like shit.
There are some pretty nice establishing shots, but by and large it looked really cheap.
Yeah you can totally get a crow refund. Have you seen the movie yet? Lots of the effects in the actual film look like shit too! I love the art direction, but the visual effects and cinematography totally doesn't do it justice. There are some pretty nice establishing shots, but by and large it looked really cheap.
I thought it had some of the best cinematography and visuals in a Marvel Studios picture, so I really disagree there. Film was pure visual bonbon. Even outside of the setpieces, it was a gorgeous movie.
Giant alien-cat hybrids starred in the biggest box office success of all time
Talking trees were in another huge blockbuster event film
A raccoon with a gun is digestable too
Now an advanced African civilization? Hahahhaaaa
It's a real good one though.
It's just a fun movie to me. People will read from it what they want.
Yeah you can totally get a crow refund. Have you seen the movie yet? Lots of the effects in the actual film look like shit too! I love the art direction, but the visual effects and cinematography totally doesn't do it justice. There are some pretty nice establishing shots, but by and large it looked really cheap.
Marvel is notoriously cheap with their actors. Chris Hemsworth was only paid 200,000 dollars for The Avengers.
I thought it had some of the best cinematography and visuals in a Marvel Studios picture, so I really disagree there. Film was pure visual bonbon. Even outside of the setpieces, it was a gorgeous movie.
Still haven't seen GotG, but the best photography in any Marvel film thus far is Winter Soldier - shaky action scenes notwithstanding. A DP who was allowed to light a set properly actually worked on the film! I was shocked.
Yeah you can totally get a crow refund. Have you seen the movie yet? Lots of the effects in the actual film look like shit too! I love the art direction, but the visual effects and cinematography totally doesn't do it justice. There are some pretty nice establishing shots, but by and large it looked really cheap.
Hearing everybody talk about Guardians at work is crazy.
Think the sci if adventure angle is making it more interesting to the general public, I don't think another normal superhero movie from Marvel would have done as well (this year).
I thought it had some of the best cinematography and visuals in a Marvel Studios picture, so I really disagree there. Film was pure visual bonbon. Even outside of the setpieces, it was a gorgeous movie.
I think they're still a bit concerned with certain origins and taking risks. That's why Asgard is not magic, but an advanced technology. I have a feeling Dr. Strange will be similar. It won't be magic, but some kind of 'cosmic force', maybe related to the Cube/Tesseract. In fact, isn't Juggernaut's helmet magical or something anyways?I was thinking about how far we have come.
I remember wayyy back, when X-Men: Last Stand came out, thinking they could never do a character like Juggernaut faithfully, since his power comes from a gem that originates from outer space. The mainstream audience would never tolerate that "corny nerd sci-fi crap" or however you'd describe it.
It is now 2014 and we have GOTG. Amazing.
Does TMNT have the potential to be good, yes. Will it outgross GotG Week 2, not likely unless TMNT is amazing. Like I said before, it's tracking pretty low. Even GotG had great projections for a new franchise.
Also, initial Twitter reactions aren't a good way to see if a movie is gonna be good. TASM2 was being praised by early viewers on Twitter, & we all know how it turned out. The best way to know is to wait for full reviews to come out.