It's not about the pictures.
There's an entire debate to be had here about art, who owns it, if creators have the right to go back and alter their works after they've been embraced by the broader culture. All works are a reflection on the period of their release, and I don't want even the most minimal of alterations to any art to bring it up to "modern" standards or sensibilities, because it infringes upon the integrity of that work in the period it represents and was released in. I want this shit in old works of art…..I want racism, I want sexism, I want sexual objectification, I want imperfections….not because I value these things individually, but because I want to be able to peer back to a period and witness works that spoke to it.
Not to be too pretentious (yeah, too late) but I do think it's a valid and important argument to be had. IMO, companies and creators have absolutely no right to go back and deprive their works, and by extension, the broader culture, of that statement in time that endures through time, imperfect and offensive it may be. It needs to be valued, and it needs to be preserved.
Frankly I'm amazed that there aren't laws to ensure this, but it is what it is.