Toonami |Aug15| You know, Luffy, we really are One Piece
- Thread starter Grexeno
- Start date
- Status
Imperial Bishop
Banned
Damn. My computer died on me back there.
the_sun_king
Member
I take her more seriously than either Ryuko or Satsuki.
It is.
Emperor_EL
Member
They should make a Kill la Kill/Kamen Rider Gaim crossover & call it "Fruit of the Loom".
Imperial Bishop
Banned
Even kid Mitchiko was a badass.
Quite the bar she had to clear there!
Doctor Decimate
Member
This is my thing. I like plenty of dumb, over-the-top stuff, and KLK still has a ton of issues.
Schadenfreude
Member
Well she's selling little kids. Can't exactly be on her side either.
That's the entirety of bullfighting.
grandjedi6
Master of the Google Search
Michiko trusts the lady who sells children. Michiko continues to be a bad judge of people.
Michiko and Satsuki > Ryuko.
Damn, child Michiko is the Monica voice I'm accustomed to.
Ow. Ow ow ow ow ow.
UltraGunner
Banned
You sell children. How can anyone trust you?
Gucci Messiah
Banned
This may be an unpopular opinion but I think SAO is funnier than KLK; the humor falls flat most of the time for me. Mako is your stereotypical hyperactive idiot and the interactions between Ryuuko and pervy sensei/senketsu rarely made me laugh. Best character in the show was that dude from the gold mecha crab bump, he was incredible.
I wouldn't know, I've never bothered to watch bull fighting.
Imperial Bishop
Banned
"Pop, pop, pop."
After crippling the bull to a point it has no choice but to charge.
BassForever
Member
Yes, even during its serious or expositions scenes there's still a sense that the tongue is drilled far into the cheek
SAO has boring exposition, multiple fetish rape scenes to help make kirito look awesome, and sexualized underage girls
Its no comparison
mightynine
Member
It's all in the execution. KLK never really took itself seriously (which is where I can get where people come from when they feel the show is asking you to take things seriously), whereas SAO has tried to pass off its story as super-serious, and it's not good.
It's kinda like the new Mission: Impossible and Mission: Impossible 2. There are both popcorn flicks, but the former just kinda nods and winks and understands what it is, whereas M:I 2 is a bit too full of itself (Woo almost goes self-parody at times).
If you don't think KLK's technique works, then I don't think you're going to like the show. I liked the characters, didn't take anything too seriously (even the alleged serious parts) and just went along for the ride.
SparksterMeta0
Member
Smile and say sorry!
Well that kind of matters a whole lot LOL.When you try to be taken seriously, things like the plot making no sense or characters doing things that make no sense hurt the show more. Also SAO has no interesting/endearing characters (Kirito is a self insert Gary Stu and everybody else sucks), is often boring as fuck (KLK is pretty much never boring even at its worst), is actually more rapey that KLK, makes no sense even as a series of video games, etc. Like it seems so obvious to me why SAO get more hate around here.
Schadenfreude
Member
Why is Glenn Close there?
Gucci Messiah
Banned
This dub is really good so far; great voice acting
Imperial Bishop
Banned
Don't eat that food, Hatchin.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked