added_time
Member
Toronto photo of the day:
Toronto photo of the day:
Toronto photo of the day:
I am going to switch over to wind super soon - I hit the 2 year mark on my 3 year contract in a month, it will cost me 200 and a bit to buy out.
I'll save money, TONS of money, especially considering the fact that 2 out of my last 4 phone bills were 100+ bucks.
Switching to 50 with unlimited will be awesome.
When I worked at an agency years ago, our client was in that building. I want to say it was Sears but can't remember.. We used to call it the upside down pyramid. Not sure if this is true or not but apparently it has no elevators, only escalators.
Are you sure? I thought the Sears building was on Jarvis, and much taller.
I think we are both right. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/222_Jarvis_Street Although they have since relocated to the eaton centre.
I think we are both right. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/222_Jarvis_Street Although they have since relocated to the eaton centre.
Well played! For that I will let your pigeon drive the bus then. Just this once.
Toronto photo of the day:
Pretty interesting building.. at least it's better than this..
New condo planned at Adelaide and Brant. Eww. Not sure we need to give a nod to this sort of throw back design.
Now that One City is dead..... what the heck? lol
Hey guys. Our asshat deputy mayor thinks the downtown area isnt suitable for raising children.
Cause the Fords clearly did such a good job out in suburbia.
Councillor Adam Vaughan has always required developers looking to build in his Trinity-Spadina ward to set aside 10 per cent of their buildings for three-bedroom units.
“Where will these children play — on King St.?” Holyday asked skeptically.
The city’s acting chief planner, Gregg Lintern, told Holyday that the area in question is “a neighbourhood, an emerging neighbourhood.” Lintern added that “it just makes for a healthier city” to have families living downtown.
Holyday, dubious, said, “It makes for a healthier city to have children out on a street like King St. where it’s bumper-to-bumper traffic and people galore at all times of night and day? I just think of raising my own family there. That’s not the place I’d choose.”
Holyday then tabled a motion to eliminate the 10 per cent requirement. “As far as raising your children downtown, maybe some people wish to do that. I think most people wouldn’t,” he said to jeers from other councillors. “I mean, I could just see now: ‘Where’s little Ginny?’ ‘Well, she’s downstairs playing in the traffic on her way to the park!’”
It was dead on arrival. The idea itself was cool and we could use that sort of long term planning, but there was no way it was going to receive funding.. and even if it do somehow get approved, it would be changed / cancelled two hundred times by 2030.
Sure, but
Rob Ford "we need subways"
Stintz "here are subways. here's how you would pay for them"
Rob Ford "lol what plan"
should've raised SOME flags somewhere.
Why do you always use such small avatars?I think a lot of things Ford said before he was elected should have raised flags.. but we still voted him in.
I think a lot of things Ford said before he was elected should have raised flags.. but we still voted him in.
Why do you always use such small avatars?
Doug seems to not understand that the suburbs are a very new phenomenon. Children have been raised in cities for centuries.
of course, he was actually pushing a condo developer's demand, not an actual considered point, because he is a lickspittle lackey, so I don't know why I'm bothering.
I already have it.
Well, I do agree with him that raising a family downtown isn't ideal. That's why we moved to the suburbs.Hey guys. Our asshat deputy mayor thinks the downtown area isnt suitable for raising children.
Cause the Fords clearly did such a good job out in suburbia.
Well, I do agree with him that raising a family downtown isn't ideal. That's why we moved to the suburbs.
I agree that condo developers should have family-sized units as well, but I still don't believe it is an ideal living situation for families with younger children.The only reason it isn't ideal is because of the cost of the housing downtown. I don't see any other drawbacks.
The city absolutely should be forcing condo developers to have family-sized units.
I agree that condo developers should have family-sized units as well, but I still don't believe it is an ideal living situation for families with younger children.
How many city parks are there downtown which are close walking distances away from the condos? Would you want your 5-10 year old child riding their bike downtown?
For school, I'm assuming most downtown children would need to take the bus (TTC or school funded). I took the TTC to school from kindergarten through grade 8, but I don't want my son(s) to need to do the same. Does the Toronto School Board offer before/after school programs at the schools? If not, are there local day cares which will do drop-off/pick-up?
These are the kinds of drawbacks I see to downtown living as a family. All of these can be handled, but they still drawbacks which are easier to deal with outside of the downtown core.
I agree that condo developers should have family-sized units as well, but I still don't believe it is an ideal living situation for families with younger children.
How many city parks are there downtown which are close walking distances away from the condos? Would you want your 5-10 year old child riding their bike downtown?
For school, I'm assuming most downtown children would need to take the bus (TTC or school funded). I took the TTC to school from kindergarten through grade 8, but I don't want my son(s) to need to do the same. Does the Toronto School Board offer before/after school programs at the schools? If not, are there local day cares which will do drop-off/pick-up?
These are the kinds of drawbacks I see to downtown living as a family. All of these can be handled, but they still drawbacks which are easier to deal with outside of the downtown core.
In this context, I am only speaking of those living in a condo in the downtown core, which I believe is what the Deputy Mayor was speaking of as well.Depends what you consider downtown I guess. If you're only looking at the core (Bathurst west, DVP east, Bloor to the north), then you might not enjoy the very concrete city feeling of it all. But if you expand your field of vision out more in the Old City of Toronto, you'll find a lot of good neighborhoods with quality schools, parks everywhere, decent transit, and a safe feeling in general. I personally choose to live just a bit outside of the core for the parks and the dog, but I'm still 'the city'.
It's not that I'm scared to death of the public transit system, I take the train and bus almost everyday myself, but I also wouldn't want my kids to need to take a 45 minute TTC bus ride to and from school everyday like I did. I have few issues with the TTC itself in this regard, it's more of my trust (or lack there of) of it's riders. I don't know, maybe I'm getting soft in my old age. ;-)Of course, I'm not adverse to public transit for myself, or family. My wife and I will never own a car (even though I love driving); It's a sink hole of cash for us and as much as people complain about the TTC, it's a decent transit system. Kids having to take a bus to school bus doesn't bother me, and if they had to eventually take the TTC themselves, it doesn't bother me. I grew up in barren northern California and took the bus for a long time, and then started walking the three mile trek home. It could be considered a lot more dangerous that my friends, or myself would have been picked up by a strange back then, but thankfully my parents were not scared to death of everything that moves like some.
You are right on this actually, we did a lot of research on day cares downtown and they didn't seem any worse than what we have found in the suburbs (just more expensive). The waiting list to get in is far more annoying however.There's no shortage of day-cares with pickup / drop off programs downtown either, or parents that take turns / form groups for walking children to school. I don't know how this is different than living in a suburb of a large city, given that it all still requires research for schools, programs and setting them up. So lack of park space, or too much noise being one thing, but amenities, not so much.
In this context, I am only speaking of those living in a condo in the downtown core, which I believe is what the Deputy Mayor was speaking of as well.
I lived at High Park for a few years and I would have no issues raising my family in that area (along with several others).
It's not that I'm scared to death of the public transit system, I take the train and bus almost everyday myself, but I also wouldn't want my kids to need to take a 45 minute TTC bus ride to and from school everyday like I did. I have few issues with the TTC itself in this regard, it's more of my trust (or lack there of) of it's riders. I don't know, maybe I'm getting soft in my old age. ;-)
You are right on this actually, we did a lot of research on day cares downtown and they didn't seem any worse than what we have found in the suburbs (just more expensive). The waiting list to get in is far more annoying however.
Mayor Rob Ford has continued his annual tradition of voting against every one of the city’s community development grants programs.
The six programs would have sailed through council unanimously on Friday, without a vote, had Ford not placed a “hold” on the items in order to vote against them. He lost the votes 34-1, 34-1, 33-1, 34-1, 35-1, and 35-1.
Ford did not offer an explanation. He was also silent when he voted in June against accepting federal money for a gang prevention project that would not have cost the city anything. He lost that vote 33-1.
Ford, ever the lone wolf, is an ardent advocate of small government. As a councillor, he railed against grants on the council floor and on talk radio, characterizing them as “free money” given by taxpayers to community groups running ineffective or odd programs that don’t deserve city support.
The grants approved on Friday, totaling about $16 million, will go to 306 projects. Nineteen of the funded projects are explicitly intended to make communities safer; 25 provide recreation programming; 24 are intended to improve race relations and promote community participation among minority groups, 13 are local festivals or events.
The biggest chunk of funding, $13.5 million, goes to 214 groups running programs “that advance council’s strategic goals and priorities by working to improve social outcomes for vulnerable, marginalized and high-risk communities.”
Extend-A-Family, for example, will get $21,230 for its Safe and Secure Futures program, which aims to help families better support relatives with disabilities. Newcomer Women’s Services Toronto, which provides counselling, employment training, anti-violence workshops and other services for immigrant and refugee women, will get $38,210.
The 19 community safety projects include a Jane-Finch program to improve relations between young people and the police, a Scarborough program to help female Caribbean immigrants age 16 to 18 develop better conflict resolution skills, and a Scarborough project to reduce violence and substance abuse among Tamil young people.
Ford voted the same way on the grants programs last July, also in silence. He lost 43-1 in votes on four programs, 42-2 on the fifth, and 41-3 on the sixth. He also lost 37-1 last July in a vote on anti-HIV/AIDS grants. He supported an HIV prevention grant this week.
I would agree with that, I did live in the city until I was 15 and then again for 5 years after I got married. If not for the cost of housing and travel distance to family, we would probably be living in the city still.Yeah, I don't disagree with you on whole about living in 'the core', but I just wanted to defend the city as a whole a bit. There's lots of livable neighborhoods, with highly rated schools that can be reached by far less than a half hour bus trip, and for the most part.. this city is pretty safe. I wouldn't want to raise kids across from Moss Park, or the Club District either, but a lot of people like to throw the entire city into some stereotype of unlivable hell. It's especially irritating when it's a city councillor from Etobicoke.
He lost the votes 34-1, 34-1, 33-1, 34-1, 35-1, and 35-1.
The libertarians in the US should be looking to recruit him. His voting recored speaks for itself. He's a hero for every person aiming to achieve liberty and freedom in the world. Standing up against social liberalism isnt easy in this day and age, take real character, determination and beliefs in one's values.
TORONTO Microsoft Corp. plans to open its first international standalone store in Toronto as part of a large-scale retail ramp-up as the software giant becomes the latest hi-tech gadget maker to take its wares straight to consumers.
The stores are intended to create a more direct relationship with buyers, borrowing a page from the playbooks of other technology giants that have been successful with their own branded retail locations most notably the slick and ultra-cool outlets of Sony Corp. and Apple Inc.
Microsoft chief operating officer Kevin Turner confirmed Wednesday at the companys annual Worldwide Partners Conference here that its first standalone retail outlet outside the United States is slated to open in Torontos upscale Yorkdale Shopping Centre before year end.
Microsoft Store coming to Yorkdale this year:
http://business.financialpost.com/2012/07/11/microsoft-store-to-open-in-toronto-later-this-year/
I don't understand how Microsoft thinks it can get people excited about a Microsoft store...
Not everyone likes apple shit. Plus, xbox's n junk I guess and windows 8 is pretty awesome.
Took some pics with my iPhone during my lunch break at work, I was working on the 34th floor of the market wharf condos today. Really good view.
Aghhhhh!!! I never understand how to post pics on GAF. FFS!!!!!!