ProfessorMoran said:Most of them don't just chop off the fin
Yeah? Where's your source on that?
ProfessorMoran said:Most of them don't just chop off the fin
Stet said:Yeah? Where's your source on that?
ProfessorMoran said:They sell shark steaks, if they just chop off the fin then where would they get the shark steaks?
Ya, when I started taking the subway to the east end, I used to notice how long those stops took. Now I'm used to it.added_time said:What a cool map. I always have to go to Scarborough to visit family so I'm well aware of the Vic Park - Warden - Kennedy subway stops taking a lot longer than most other stops.
Holy shitThe Interrobanger said:
The Interrobanger said:
Sloth love Chunk!The Interrobanger said:
ProfessorMoran said:Most of them don't just chop off the fin and toss them back, they sell the meat and use the skeleton because of the high level of cartilage. That said, when you get sharks out of the water, they don't live very long, and they're fish, they're not mammals, cows are killed by driving a large spike through their heads (imagine if you're a cow and someone is holding you in a device and you're waiting for the machine to blow your brains out), yeah steaks are fucking delicious, next thing you know we might have to find more humane way of harvesting seaweed.
Not sure how you can raise sharks like cattle.
Human existence grossly affects every single ecosystem, we might as well all off ourselves.
Shark finning is a cost-cutting gimmick, to get more fins, without wasting precious time and boat space. It takes place solely at sea, so only the fins need to be transported to mainland, without the bulky shark bodies.
→ Shark meat is not as valuable or costly, as fins. Shark fins are a billion dollar industry. A pound of shark fin can cost up to $300.
→ Sharks are selective reproducers. Unlike other fish, they produce few, well-developed young, rather than a bulk of under-developed babies. They also sexually mature slowly, so their reproductive cycles take place later in life. This contributes to their population growth and features.
→ It is extremely wasteful, in terms of hunting. 99 per cent of the shark is thrown away, leading to a loss of other products. For people dependent on sharks for food, this practice destroys their diet.
→ Shark fin soup is the main use of the fins. It is a must-have status delicacy, in China and other Asian countries, at weddings and banquets. Here's the joke, the fin itself is tasteless, but it adds a chewy and gelatinous feel to the soup. The actual flavor comes from chicken or other stock.
→ The high mercury content in shark, flesh and fin, can make it hazardous for human consumption. Pregnant women and children are more susceptible to its effects. So eating these sort of parts can be harmful to one's health in the long run.
Stet said:From a much smaller number of sharks? You can get several steaks from a single shark. You can get one fin.
Fins are much more expensive than steaks due to the "tradition" of Chinese Wedding soup, which makes it a much more lucrative market. Fishermen in China have the option of: taking whole sharks and using a large amount of storage space for a small profit or finning the shark and throwing the still living body in the water to die and packing hundreds of fins in their hold for a huge profit.
Divvy said:Unfortunately, that is not frequently true. It is more lucrative for them to just harvest the fins as they're easier to smuggle than whole sharks.
You can not care about the ecosystem, but eventually you're just going to overhunt them until they go extinct, then what are you going to eat? Regardless, the removal of a top predator from an ecosystem can have catastrophic effects on the biodiversity.
Holy shit, way to completely miss the point.ProfessorMoran said:You take the shark out of the water, it's going to die no matter what. Would it be more humane to cut the head off and then dump the body and the head back into the water?
It's not specifically a wedding soup, it's basically a banquet soup.
ProfessorMoranRoto13 said:Holy shit, way to completely miss the point.
Roto13 said:Holy shit, way to completely miss the point.
ProfessorMoran said:You take the shark out of the water, it's going to die no matter what. Would it be more humane to cut the head off and then dump the body and the head back into the water?
It's not specifically a wedding soup, it's basically a banquet soup.
The ban is now, extinction isn't a certainty and it's not going to be for a while as there are many species of sharks.
In these waters, several shark species have all but vanished since 1972, including 99% of the bull, dusky and smooth hammerhead populations.
Divvy said:
a176 said:no ... just ... no
Amazing. A boatful of fins kills a lot more sharks than a boatful of sharks. It's not about returning their souls to Ewah or whatever the hell weird idea is rattling around in your head.ProfessorMoran said:Why store the bodies when you can return it to nature for recycling? What are you going to do? Bury them?
They can obviously sell the meat too, and they should, maybe governments should require the whole shark to be used, that would be more of a policing problem.
I can't tell if you're trolling or just really dumb.ProfessorMoran said:So we should hunt the cownose ray, bring it back to balance.
Roto13 said:Amazing. A boatful of fins kills a lot more sharks than a boatful of sharks. It's not about returning their souls to Ewah or whatever the hell weird idea is rattling around in your head.
I can't tell if you're trolling or just really dumb.
ProfessorMoran said:What does this have to do with a wampus cat?
Basically mostly only chinese people eat shark fin soup and you're telling chinese people in Toronto to give a shit about biodiversity and not eat shark fin soup which they like and give a shit about, unlike biodiversity which probably isn't a great concern to the majority of chinese community in Toronto, and it's not going to make a difference because you're not banning it in China, depriving chinese torontonians the chance to enjoy a nice bowl or many nice bowls of delicious shark fin soup is not going to make a dent in the problem.
Divvy said:Well shit, we should just ignore all problems in the world as long as they make us feel better! And hey, as long as China is doing it, it's okay! Free human rights violations for all!
Besides, they can just eat their swallow's nest soup instead.
ProfessorMoran said:You're not solving the problem at all by banning shark fin in Toronto, so why even do it? All you do is piss people off, it just means sharks will continue to be hunted for their fins and other chinese people get to eat the fins.
Sharks being overhunted is not equivalent to human rights being violated.
Why can't we have shark fin soup AND swallow's puke soup? They're both awesome.
who posted the goddamn article?!EvilMario said:Congratulations, your Toronto-Age has evolved into Shark-Fin age.
Divvy said:Well all movements have to have a beginning. The motivation is that this will spark other regions to ban them as well. I guess ultimately it's goal is to put enough public pressure so that countries will actually actively enforce the ban. Right now we have illegal fishing boats all over the place unrestricted.
Because shark fin hunting is just not sustainable? If you keep hunting at the current rate, they'll be gone. Forever. No more shark fin soup one way or another, but also massive damage to the world's oceans.
crazy monkey said:it is okey some times we can discuss some other things can't we?
This whole thing is along the lines of "My neighbour's car spews thick black smoke and he doesn't care, so why should I bother fixing mine?"ProfessorMoran said:The country in question is China and they don't fucking care if sharks go extinct as long as they can have their soup now, pandas would have been completely extinct had China not figured out they could rent them out for millions a year to sucka zoos all over the world and somehow manage to retain ownership of all the offsprings that other countries manage to breed.
A lot of things are not sustainable, the human race is not sustainable, we're going to suck the planet dry eventually regardless, it's nice to believe we can do something about it but with so many countries under different juridictions, the shark fin ban is nothing but an inconvenience that manages to accomplish absolutely nothing.
lunarworks said:This whole thing is along the lines of "My neighbour's car spews thick black smoke and he doesn't care, so why should I bother fixing mine?"
ProfessorMoran said:The country in question is China and they don't fucking care if sharks go extinct as long as they can have their soup now, pandas would have been completely extinct had China not figured out they could rent them out for millions a year to sucka zoos all over the world and somehow manage to retain ownership of all the offsprings that other countries manage to breed.
A lot of things are not sustainable, the human race is not sustainable, we're going to suck the planet dry eventually regardless, it's nice to believe we can do something about it but with so many countries under different juridictions, the shark fin ban is nothing but an inconvenience that manages to accomplish absolutely nothing.
What about those rising real estate prices in Toronto? You can even get a decent semi in Toronto for less than $500k in a good area.
Scythe27 said:So just because nothing is sustainable it's pointless to try preserving what we have since inevitably it'll be gone at some point? It's not a matter of being nice to believe we can do something. The point is, something can be done if people pull their heads out of the sand and think about the repurcussions of overcomsumption. Changes have been made, species have been reintroduced, and ecosystems have been balanced out. It's not impossible. If everyone thought like you we'd have absolutely nothing left.
ProfessorMoran said:You can't put out a fire when the fire is on another continent.
There's a reason why places don't do it, people can tell it's not the same. Restaurants who try to pass it off as such (and there are places that do that) usually get ratted out fairly quickly.Kinitari said:it can easily be replaced with imitation shark fin.
Kinitari said:But why start one on yours too? Why contribute to the problem? Shark Fin is tasteless, and it can easily be replaced with imitation shark fin. What's the difference?
AlphaTwo00 said:There's a reason why places don't do it, people can tell it's not the same. Restaurants who try to pass it off as such (and there are places that do that) usually get ratted out fairly quickly.
Personally, my understanding of the topic, and the typical chinese (through the phone-in radio talkshows) argument that has failed to carry through to the english side of the news is that people feel that this "ban" is an attack on the chinese culture than an actual environmental agenda. While people claim that it is an environmental issue, the ban is just a ban, as it does no more in saying that "the city of Toronto will push this as an agenda forward to make it a bigger issue to other places". They feel that this ban is in no way targeted at the issue that's presented.
ProfessorMoran said:Because shark fin soup is goddamn delicious.
Shark fin is not tasteless and its texture cannot be easily replicated with imitation shark fin, just like a veggie burger doesn't taste like a real burger.
A lot of Chinese banquets in Toronto are actually substituting shark fin soup with an abalone dish, we're probably going to eat them into extinction too.
Again, as I pointed out: people feel that this ban doesn't actually do anything when it comes to "hey, let's make this a city agenda that we can pull other places to do the same", rather just "hey, we're going to stop ourselves and hope everything gets better".Kinitari said:It's not attacking Chinese culture as a whole, it's attacking one facet of Chinese culture. If any other culture did anything similar, it would be the same. Because something is part of someone's culture, doesn't make it immune to scrutiny. It's not like Toronto is saying "Fuck dem chinamen! Lets mess with something that is dear to them!". No, people find the practice abhorrent.
AlphaTwo00 said:Again, as I pointed out: people feel that this ban doesn't actually do anything when it comes to "hey, let's make this a city agenda that we can pull other places to do the same", rather just "hey, we're going to stop ourselves and hope everything gets better".
I think if you were to ask people individually on their thoughts on how the gather the shark fins, they would agree that it is a problem. But this issue isn't just here, and basically saying "we're not going to do it anymore" isn't an actual solution to the real problem.
Edit: And this is why I didn't want to bother posting. I can't be fair and balanced, and tell people to look at the bigger picture without dragging all the shit that comes with any argument. I'm going to eject myself from this whole shark fin thing.
It's so sad. The city will "save" $78 million over 7 years which we all know is bullshit if they go with the bid they're favouring. This is going to cost the city the same amount of money (in a best case scenario) or more. All this will end up doing is reducing the money going to workers and bring all of our standards of living down.AlphaTwo00 said:Can we talk about the whole privatization of garbage collection yet? I wonder why no one has brought up the York Region transit strike as an argument that privitization != no strikes...
Many municipalities in Canada have privatized their garbage collection without issue.AlphaTwo00 said:Can we talk about the whole privatization of garbage collection yet? I wonder why no one has brought up the York Region transit strike as an argument that privitization != no strikes...
ussjme said:i wanna start reading about new and politics in the realm of toronto while at work, besides this thread, which new sites/blogs are most informative? where do you guys get most of your info?