Well the last Cloverfield made 90% of its box office in the first two weeks, so they probably consider BvS to be a nonissue, heh.OUTTA FUCKIN NOWHERE
CLOVERFIELD FANS REPRESENT
Releasing so close to BvS tho? Yikes...
https://twitter.com/CharlesLandy/status/687873761203208192If it's 'Valencia' with a new title, then it's not Cloverfield 2. Saw a preview a few months ago, and it's big twisty fun.
The monster sounds? I love them. It sounds sort of like a sad whale cry, which fits the idea that it's just a terrified deep sea creature, not some malicious nuclear demon dinosaur hellbent on destruction.
I never found the monster itself to be very scary, but it sure was a fascinating creature.
This will make me a little less excited if true, but I'm sure it'll still be great.
I don't get Film Twitter's insistence on trying to delineate whether this is a Cloverfield sequel or not when it's got the word CLOVERFIELD in the fucking title.
Saw Lussier and now McWeeny like "It's not Cloverfield 2! Calm down!"
Like, why? Is it that disturbing that something got by all of us and it wasn't filtered through the blogosphere first?
"It's not Cloverfield, it's Valencia"
Seems way more obvious to me, considering the title on the trailer, that Valencia was never Valencia, and was always Cloverfield.
The way the trailer ends with the word CLOVERFIELD lingering for a few seconds before the rest of the title appears says otherwise unless they're using the Cloverfield title as a sort of anthology title or something.
I've thought this too though. The way Cloverfield pops up before "10 - Lane"... unless there's a good explanation we aren't thinking of, there's no way it's not at least in the same universe as the original.Then why the secrecy?
Ha! People are already posting again at the old Cloverfield unforum.
The madness never left. It just went dormant for a while.
Renaming it 10 Cloverfield Lane, with major emphasis on Cloverfield in the trailer, and then NOT having it be related? That would be some next level fuckery.
I don't get Film Twitter's insistence on trying to delineate whether this is a Cloverfield sequel or not when it's got the word CLOVERFIELD in the fucking title.
Saw Lussier and now McWeeny like "It's not Cloverfield 2! Calm down!"
Like, why? Is it that disturbing that something got by all of us and it wasn't filtered through the blogosphere first?
I get the feeling they like knowing things.
I don't get Film Twitter's insistence on trying to delineate whether this is a Cloverfield sequel or not when it's got the word CLOVERFIELD in the fucking title.
Saw Lussier and now McWeeny like "It's not Cloverfield 2! Calm down!"
Like, why? Is it that disturbing that something got by all of us and it wasn't filtered through the blogosphere first?
This will make me a little less excited if true, but I'm sure it'll still be great.
Yeah, I'm definitely seeing it a lot more than I expected. You're probably on the money with the reasoning.I don't get Film Twitter's insistence on trying to delineate whether this is a Cloverfield sequel or not when it's got the word CLOVERFIELD in the fucking title.
Saw Lussier and now McWeeny like "It's not Cloverfield 2! Calm down!"
Like, why? Is it that disturbing that something got by all of us and it wasn't filtered through the blogosphere first?
Renaming it 10 Cloverfield Lane, with major emphasis on Cloverfield in the trailer, and then NOT having it be related? That would be some next level fuckery.
I'm gonna say it makes no sense to sabotage your film like that.
Yeah, it really makes no sense. Can you imagine the word of mouth if this was the case? Even if the movie was great, you'd be literally lying to people to get them to buy tickets. The backlash would be fucking outrageous.I don't get Film Twitter's insistence on trying to delineate whether this is a Cloverfield sequel or not when it's got the word CLOVERFIELD in the fucking title.
Saw Lussier and now McWeeny like "It's not Cloverfield 2! Calm down!"
Like, why? Is it that disturbing that something got by all of us and it wasn't filtered through the blogosphere first?
"It's not Cloverfield, it's Valencia"
Seems way more obvious to me, considering the title on the trailer, that Valencia was never Valencia, and was always Cloverfield.
I don't get Film Twitter's insistence on trying to delineate whether this is a Cloverfield sequel or not when it's got the word CLOVERFIELD in the fucking title.
Saw Lussier and now McWeeny like "It's not Cloverfield 2! Calm down!"
Like, why? Is it that disturbing that something got by all of us and it wasn't filtered through the blogosphere first?
"It's not Cloverfield, it's Valencia"
Seems way more obvious to me, considering the title on the trailer, that Valencia was never Valencia, and was always Cloverfield.
The way the trailer ends with the word CLOVERFIELD lingering for a few seconds before the rest of the title appears says otherwise unless they're using the Cloverfield title as a sort of anthology title or something.
That seems likely actuallyIs it possible that there are two versions of the film? Valencia and Cloverfield? If principle filming has been done for over a year, what if they saw a preview of Valencia, before the Cloverfield parts got added? JJ giving the critics something to throw them off the trail sort of?
Both?
The only found footage movie I've ever liked was Europa Report because it had a sensible explanation for the footage existing. It didn't rely on people stupidly and constantly endangering themselves further by focusing on filming their life or death experiences. Makes complete sense for a huge space mission in the future to be littered with cameras recording everything.
This, although to be perfectly fair I could see "Cloverfield" just becoming a sort of anthology style title for Bad Robot-helmed sci-fi horror, and this film not really having anything to do with the original directly.
That would be fucking insane if true. Like Lucasfilm and Disney held back JJ's mystery box tendencies so much that he had to go double time on the little movie by someone else lolIs it possible that there are two versions of the film? Valencia and Cloverfield? If principle filming has been done for over a year, what if they saw a preview of Valencia, before the Cloverfield parts got added? JJ giving the critics something to throw them off the trail sort of?
Is it possible that there are two versions of the film? Valencia and Cloverfield? If principle filming has been done for over a year, what if they saw a preview of Valencia, before the Cloverfield parts got added? JJ giving the critics something to throw them off the trail sort of?
That seems likely actually
Is it possible that there are two versions of the film? Valencia and Cloverfield? If principle filming has been done for over a year, what if they saw a preview of Valencia, before the Cloverfield parts got added? JJ giving the critics something to throw them off the trail sort of?
After a car accident, a young woman comes to in an underground cellar, where most of the action takes place. She fears she has been abducted by a survivalist, who tells her he saved her life and that a chemical attack has left the outside world uninhabitable. Uncertain what to believe, she decides she must escape, whatever dangers she may face outside.[3] “As it goes on, it gets progressively darker and darker, and less and less funny, and weirder,” Winstead told the 'Collider' movie news website.
I don't get Film Twitter's insistence on trying to delineate whether this is a Cloverfield sequel or not when it's got the word CLOVERFIELD in the fucking title.
Saw Lussier and now McWeeny like "It's not Cloverfield 2! Calm down!"
Like, why? Is it that disturbing that something got by all of us and it wasn't filtered through the blogosphere first?
"It's not Cloverfield, it's Valencia"
Seems way more obvious to me, considering the title on the trailer, that Valencia was never Valencia, and was always Cloverfield.
That would be absurdly strenuous on a low budget.
Precautionary Spoiler Warning: Collider had a story up with some plot details from a cast member
First a JJ Abrams quote:
Some plot details from Mary Elizabeth Winstead:
She told us the story revolves around a woman who wakes up in a cellar where shes being kept by a stranger, played by Goodman. The actress elaborated a bit on the plot by saying the following:
He tells me that basically the world is over outside because theres been a nuclear fall-out. It does have similarity to Faults, in some ways, because you dont know whos telling the truth or who to believe. Theres a lot of, whos manipulating who, and all of that. Tonally, its very different, but it has some of those same themes.
That info is literally in the first post. Haha
Yeah, people in this thread who are literally mad at the suggestion that this might not be in the same universe as the original movie are more than a little crazy, and I have to wonder if they'd go insane if they ever watched, like, The Twilight Zone.