Autodidact
Banned
I don't want Mike Rogers in that position. He voted in favor of AHCA. I don't trust him to not rubber stamp Trump request to suspend the investigation.
He left Congress in 2015.
I don't want Mike Rogers in that position. He voted in favor of AHCA. I don't trust him to not rubber stamp Trump request to suspend the investigation.
He left Congress in 2015.
Very encouraged that @POTUS is considering @TGowdySC & @JohnCornyn to lead @FBI either would be an excellent choice
Does the new FBI chief need 60 or 50 votes in the senate?
If its Cornyn, won't there only be 51 republicans in the senate for the vote?
Given our control over the US financial system and accordingly its assets, given all the intelligence tools at our disposal...do you believe Donald Trump has access to the nuclear codes, is giving commencement speeches, is throwing out executive orders, signing legislation, and talking to foreign leaders while guilty of treasonous collusion? If he's been POTUS for nearly 4 months and that's the case then think through the implications.
Technically, it needs 51. Politically, it needs 90+.
What the hell does a senator know about being an FBI director??
I mean, there's no way that happens for either of those choices
Got an honorary Ph.D. At Liberty University for giving a commencement speech.
Yes.Politco said:Will Trump Be the First to Politicize the FBI?
Why do you believe the investigation is effectively stalled? The investigation is too large to be killed by any high ranking Trump appointed FBI stooge.It doesn't really matter whether it's a politician or not at this point. Trump was always going to appoint someone he feels is loyal and will kill the investigation. With Comey gone, we just have to make peace with the fact that the investigation is effectively stalled until at least after the next presidential election.
No shit it shouldn't be a politician. FBI director is not a political office. Why the fuck do you think Obama (stupidly) appointed a Republican?
Yes.
Why do you believe the investigation is effectively stalled? The investigation is too large to be killed by any high ranking Trump appointed FBI stooge.
If it's Gawdy than there should be a riot.
If not stalled, then irreperably compromised. I can't envision a situation where Trump's stooge doesn't use their authority to damage and hinder the investigation in every way possible, and there's nothing anyone can do about that until Trump is out of office.
And what's Trump and his FBI crony gonna do when the FBI takes Comey's side and refuses to stop investigating? They can't fire the entire FBI and it's looking like pretty much the entire FBI (minus the NY Criminal Field Office) is more loyal to Comey than Trump.
Maybe I don't understand how the FBI is structured. Does the Director not have the authority to move employees around, hire even more stooges, restructure departments, close investigations, etc.? Everything else Trump has done has been blatant and brazen. Why are we so confident the FBI is safe from that, even if a significant segment of it is loyal to Comey?
If they think he's fucking with the investigation, then other governments and the media will just get a massive anonymous infodump
Who do you think keeps backhanding him every time something positive comes out from his camp
And what's Trump and his FBI crony gonna do when the FBI takes Comey's side and refuses to stop investigating? They can't fire the entire FBI and it's looking like pretty much the entire FBI (minus the NY Criminal Field Office) is more loyal to Comey than Trump.
It's the same reason Trump can't do jack shit about all the leaks of his administration.
Look, do you really believe Donald Trump himself colluded with Russian officials to torpedeo the career of Hillary Clinton and has been POTUS for nearly 4 months? Despite all the flags you see...do you really believe he wouldn't be arrested right on the spot at any true red flag? That Pres. Obama's administration would hand over the keys to the US presidency to a Russian operative...
Hypocritical Dems know I didn't "collude" with Russians because Obama (sick guy) would have me arrested on the spot!
Does Trump have any legal power to simply shut down the FBI, or dismiss people and then not hire replacements? If we safely assume Trump doesn't actually care about the FBI stopping domestic problems, and is more concerned with shutting down the investigation, could he actually take steps to simply empty it out and leave it that way?
No shit it shouldn't be a politician. FBI director is not a political office. Why the fuck do you think Obama (stupidly) appointed a Republican?
There wasn't a riot when Comey was fired. Have there even been any significant mass protests since the Women's March and Muslim ban?
No but Obama kept him as an outreach to the half of the country who didn't vote for him. Those were the days.Comey was never an elected politician
FBI Agents Association urges POTUS to nominate former House Intelligence Committee Chair Mike Rogers as FBI director
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/863474925046296576
* They nominated him last time as wellThis is good. If Trump does not follow their endorsement, then it makes him look more guilty, and pisses off the IC even more.
So was the FBI raids at the GOP fundraising firm a shot across the bow telling the GOP to stop covering for Trump no matter what to free the path for impeachment hearings?
Or was it really evidence gathering for a RICO case against the GOP as a body?
The suggested power struggle in the background feels immense.
Mensch's suggestion that the first three in the line of succession are already out is absolutely nuts. I can't believe that at all even though she was right on some things in the past. Maybe she is taken for a ride by forces that want to put more fuel to the fire?
Think about what would happen if Trump literally tried to strangle the FBI in such a way.
If Trump actually tried that shit, all he would be doing is guaranteeing that the FBI treats Trump as their #1 enemy. As in the FBI would start treating Trump as a bigger threat than domestic terrorists.
Making your own staff into enemies is one of the biggest reasons that Nixon went down.
So was the FBI raids at the GOP fundraising firm a shot across the bow telling the GOP to stop covering for Trump no matter what to free the path for impeachment hearings?
Or was it really evidence gathering for a RICO case against the GOP as a body?
The suggested power struggle in the background feels immense.
Mensch's suggestion that the first three in the line of succession are already out is absolutely nuts. I can't believe that at all even though she was right on some things in the past. Maybe she is taken for a ride by forces that want to put more fuel to the fire?
Source? I haven't seen anyone confirm this other than that firm itself.It was unrelated to Trump. Has to do with a lawsuit against that firm by the Ken Cuccinelli campaign.
It was unrelated to Trump. Has to do with a lawsuit against that firm by the Ken Cuccinelli campaign.
Along with Giulianis other connections to New York FBI agents, his former law firm, then called Bracewell Giuliani, has long been general counsel to the FBI Agents Association (FBIAA), which represents 13,000 former and current agents.
That's just the story from the company's president, not the FBI. The firm has ties to Roger Stone and Paul Manafort, which is quite a coincidence.