Trump will ask for investigation into alleged voter fraud

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is going to find a decent number of people who are registered in multiple states, dead or have paperwork anomalies that lead to duplication on voter rolls, but no accounts of people actually VOTING. He'll point to it as "proof"

Yup.

The problem is what is he going to do with that "proof". I don't like where this is going.
 
I love how none of the headlines repeating this mention he's just repeating what Republicans have been saying for years.

They should read;

"Trump joins the Republican Party's long time claims of mass minority voter fraud."

Amazing how they got the Voting Rights Act thrown out, then multiple red states immediately went to work targeting minority voters, which led to 5 of those states having there redistricting or voting systems thrown out as racist by their own Republican courts. (including texas!), and they're not held responsible for any of it and will continue to claim massive fraud anyway.

And they know they can. If I recall correctly, not a single damn question was asked about this at any of the three debates.
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?
 
The worst part about this is even Paul Fucking Ryan disagrees with Trump. And he's one of the most partisan people in the senate.

As per The Hill

Ryan and the rest of the republican party, shouldn't be smiling and smirking at this as if it's some sort of silly grandpa moment. This is fucking dangerous and they'd be worried if they actually took this seriously and didn't have their own agenda for manipulating Trump's insecurities.

Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?

Because the studies HAVE ALREADY BEEN DONE. Voter fraud at a noticeable level let alone Trump's national conspiracy level is a dream and the only reason republicans want to do it, just like with redistricting, is to reduce the voter rights of the people they know will not overwhelmingly vote for them AKA racial, gender, sexual or religious minorities because of their backward policies. This is not about fraud, it's about restriction.
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?

There are costs and hurdles associated with having an ID. I'm sure others can go into this at greater detail, but in general voter ID laws target and discriminate against low income and minority voters as they are less likely to have ID, live further away from places like the DMV so travel and paying for travel is an issue, time is an issue as a lot of DMV's get closed so they have to travel further take more time off work etc.

Its not like "EVERYONE HAS ID"

And certain forms of ID are not allowed and are restricted.


Ask yourself why along with this voter ID bullshit there never seems to be a push to make sure every person has an ID and its easy to get?

Voter ID is an effort to get less people to vote and thats all it is. Has nothing to do with voter fraud which is statistically non-existent and nearly non-existent in reality.
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?

Photo IDs cost money. Can pretty much guarantee you a welfare ID / public access card wouldn't "count".
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

Because the amount of voter fraud is extremely low and such measures disproportionately target those who cannot easily pay for or access the system/mechanisms needed for voter ID and similar laws (i.e. the poor, minorities and younger voters). There's a reason Voter ID laws are so popular among Republicans - they artificially suppress Democratic turnout.

If the ID was free and money/effort was spent to make sure everyone got theirs, maybe there would be a case for it, though it'd still be an expensive solution for a largely nonexistent problem. As it is, it's a purely political move designed to attack the most vulnerable of voters.
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?

because the costs associated with IDs can make getting them infeasible for low-income individuals
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?

The only way this will work is if you introduce mandatory ID laws, comparable to Germany.

That means everyone over the age of 16 has to have a ID as required by law, and it's easy to get and relatively cheap. Basically another social security card.
 
Are us taxpayers footing the bill for this ridiculous investigation?

Operation Fragile Ego

You better believe we are. We always do.

What better way to stroke an old mad mans ego, disenfranchise voters and over all make our country worse, than by using tax payer dollars.


Hell remember those 10+ benghazi investigations you paid for? Money well spent, as always.


But look out! somewhere poor black people are voting, priorities!
 
The only way this will work is if you introduce mandatory ID laws, comparable to Germany.

That means everyone over the age of 16 has to have a ID as required by law, and it's easy to get and relatively cheap. Basically another social security card.

Yup. And Republicans will never allow that.

Again, it's amazing how *Republican* courts in *Republican* states including Texas have thrown these things out becuase of how racist they are and the reaction from people is, "Why don't the Democrats want this? They must have something to hide."
 
For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?

You do not need a government-issued photo ID for welfare, taking a plane or a train. You don't need one to buy the vast majority of medication either. Putting aside the practical reality that most adults do not need ID to buy cigarettes or booze, it's irrelevant anyway as smoking and drinking are privileges that many people do not partake in.

You think everything requires a government issued photo ID because you have one and it is generally the easiest option when something requires identification. In fact, some strict photo ID voting laws even have no problem with alternatives -- as long as they are options predominately held by Republican voters.
 
Remember:

After requiring voter ID, Alabama closed 31 DMV locations, most in predominantly black counties. http://www.governing.com/topics/pol...rivers-license-offices-In-clack-counties.html

Yeah. Voter of laws themselves are not the problem, which is why people openly can praise them without seeming like jerks. Who wouldn't want some extra effort to make sure votes are valid

It's what happens as a result of the laws that no one talks about: making it a pain in the ass to get an ID if you are poor. And since poor people usually are liberal, and racially segregated in cities that can cherry pick ways to make it harder to gain ID, there is a reason only republicans push this concept. Sadly, I don't even know if liberals fight to make IDs easier to get, because that's the real solution. Fighting for the right to vote without checks and ID is a losing concept that intuitively makes no sense
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?

You need an ID for controlled substances. Why do you have controlled substances prescribed to you?

I've frequently dropped off and picked up prescriptions for family members without any type of ID whatsoever.
 
Press really should not have been asking about an investigation.

He called the bluff, will find some fake stuff, and implement voter suppression.

He honestly does feel like a Russian plant.

US criticizes Russian elections? Putin tells Donnie to cast doubt on US elections.
 
Hilarious how the first one they found who committed voter fraud according to Trump's own words is Steve Bannon lol.
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?


If you look back to the motor voter bill in the 90's it's the same thing. Democrats wanted to make it easier for people to register to vote when getting a licence because doing so would have skewed much younger and young people overwhelmingly vote Democrat.

Republicans want strict ID laws because it will skew the votes in their favor. They don't care about voter fraud.

...and what "shady shit" do you think people could possibly do? It's a 5 year prison sentence and a felony. Do you really think people are risking their lives to cast one extra vote for any candidate?

It's just not happening.
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?

Elderly people who don't drive and don't work are fairly unlikely to have a valid Driver's license. They may have an expired license, but for states implemented these strict ID laws that isn't going to cut it.

Also, there are large chunks of people who use public transit in larger cities and may also have expired IDs.

Why should these people not be allowed to vote?
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Drumpf investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Drumpf investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?

That idea that "ID is good, what's the harm?" is EXACTLY what the GOP are counting on, that on paper, it sounds reasonable to the uninformed. It conceals their true motive, suppressing minority votes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...0c1087f7583_story.html?utm_term=.6ac984e2bc8d

“The new provisions target African Americans with almost surgical precision” and “impose cures for problems that did not exist,” Judge Diana Gribbon Motz wrote for the panel. “Thus the asserted justifications cannot and do not conceal the State’s true motivation.”

Election law experts are skeptical there is evidence of widespread cheating at the polls in this country. In particular, they find that voting fraud is most often associated with absentee balloting, rather than the kind of impersonation voting that ID laws are meant to combat.

“Before enacting that law, the legislature requested data on the use, by race, of a number of voting practices,” Motz wrote. “Upon receipt of the race data, the General Assembly enacted legislation that restricted voting and registration in five different ways, all of which disproportionately affected African Americans.”

The panel found the law was passed with racially discriminatory intent, violating the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. It said that “intentionally targeting a particular race’s access to the franchise because its members vote for a particular party, in a predictable manner, constitutes discriminatory purpose.”
 
Sadly, I don't even know if liberals fight to make IDs easier to get, because that's the real solution. Fighting for the right to vote without checks and ID is a losing concept that intuitively makes no sense

Every state already requires voters to provide identification either when registering or when voting for the same time. The fight against strict photo ID laws is a fight against making it harder to get the appropriate ID. There are broader issues with making the specific IDs the GOP wants to accept easier to get
 
Press really should not have been asking about an investigation.

He called the bluff, will find some fake stuff, and implement voter suppression.

He honestly does feel like a Russian plant.

US criticizes Russian elections? Putin tells Donnie to cast doubt on US elections.

The wider the net, the thinner it becomes. This sort of deceit really starts to get put under the microscope the more you try to work it, and the media is doing its job in pressing the question.

If they try to fake 3-4 million votes, that'd be utterly devastating to the US but also to the Presidency because there's no way any state would accept that result and the whole thing would be flung into chaos.
 
This has nothing to do with his ego and is instead part of the plan to create fertile ground for voter suppression. This is a clear signal to GOP governors around the US to start hashing out ways to restrict civil rights and the right to vote.

Trump has a huge ego and when things don't go well for him he lashes out. I guarantee if he won the popular vote he would not even look twice at the voting system.
 
Jake Tapper ‏@jaketapper 24m24 minutes ago

.@seanspicer suggests the Trump investigation into voter fraud will focus on "bigger states" such as CA and NY

Caroline O. @RVAwonk

WOW. Spicer just admitted Trump's 'voter fraud' investigation will focus on states where Trump lost; "urban areas" mentioned specifically.

.
 
Gaf - how is needing identification and valid voter registration bad again? I seriously am asking... So Trump investigates and finds voter fraud and puts measures in place to stop it...that seems good, no? Trump investigates and finds no voter fraud and we have mandatory voter ID needed from here on?..that seems reasonable.

I live in a state that needs ID and it is no big deal. I can do it online with my DL#. I need ID for almost literally everything else important..and voting is a big deal so...I guess I am pretty confused at the negative reaction... I mean if we could fingerprint or put the voting machine data into a blockchain...I would be for it. For poor people..you need ID for welfare..so they have it. I need it for smokes booze to get on a plane or a train...get medicine at the pharmacy but not to vote?


The only reason I WOULDN'T want voter id is if I wanted to do shady stuff. Is this just because the democrat strongholds (IL,NY, CA) don't have voter ID laws currently and this is perceived as an attack on dems?

Have you seen this?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHFOwlMCdto
 
OJAGWJC.png

https://twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/824327508476751874
 
Guess you have to hand it to Trump on this one. He turned a debate about crowd size into pushing Voter ID laws.


Do you think he plans this... I think we elected Cpt Jack Sparrow..
 
Can't wait for the made-up bullshit to show massive amounts of voter fraud.

Sorry people of color, you may never vote again.
 
“Just to be clear, not just in 2016,” Spicer told reporters. “I think in terms of registration, where you’ve got folks on rolls that have been deceased or moved or registered in two counties. This isn’t just about the 2016 election. This is about the integrity of our voting system.”

Yeah, it's gonna be voter suppression.
 
Trump's 'Voter-Fraud' Investigation Targets States That Opposed Him

During Wednesday’s White House briefing, Press Secretary Sean Spicer was asked about Trump’s false claim that millions of fraudulent votes cost him a victory in the popular vote. After that lie was ridiculed Tuesday, Trump tweeted early Wednesday morning that he would order a “major investigation” into voter fraud. But the claim is not just unsupported by any evidence—it was contradicted by his own campaign lawyers, who argued there was no evidence of fraud when Green Party nominee Jill Stein sued for a recount in some states. Why should anyone believe him now?

Spicer’s answer was stunning.

“There’s a lot of states that we didn’t compete in where that’s not necessarily the case,” he said.
You look at California and New York, I’m not sure that those statements were—we didn’t look at those two states in particular … I think when you look at where a lot of places where a lot of these issues could have occurred in bigger states, that’s where I think we’re going to look

Here’s a shorter way to put that: Spicer is saying that Trump will target only states that voted Democratic for his investigation of fraud.
Full article: https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...ps-punitive-voter-fraud-investigation/514424/
 
So surely he's going to introduce a free national ID to go with the national voter ID laws he's clearly trying to justify, right? Right? Lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom