Turns Out PS5 Leak Showing Available SSD Storage Was Real

Well, at least you can add a third-party fourth-generation PCIe NVME SSD. I'm getting a 2TB Samsung 980 Pro for my PS5 when it becomes available.
 
This is just a "MS knows always knows what's best" type of argument. You don't know how much RAM the competition is reserving, therefore your point of reference doesn't say much. Your second argument doesn't work, because if indeed it's 4K because of RAM, then it will never be 4K because MS can't just take that back. It's the opposite that is possible, as shown by previous gens, more resources can be made available as the generation goes by.

It's also just a rumor, the "because more ram for devs", which is used as a defense but will shape shift into "MS found a way for a 4K ui and more RAM for devs" if it's 4K by release. Basically you're just covering all bases.... "MS always does the right thing"
Microsoft did same thing with one x. They made UI 1080p to allocate more resources to developers.

.
 
OPs video looks like FUD, plus those shots look like it came from the dev kit and not the retail unit. I'd be extremely shocked to see the SSD being in the 600GB range, especially since Sony opted for an 825GB instead of a 1TB
 
Microsoft did same thing with one x. They made UI 1080p to allocate more resources to developers.

.
That's not a sound argument though, it just shows that XBox's UI is way too bloated (which is a problem with Windows 10 as well). A UI that doesn't have to run on older hardware could look better, have more features, without needing as much space, which is what PS5 has.
 
Question about the expansion drive. If you add a drive does it recognize it as part of the many storage (assuming it meets specs), or as another drive? I ask as swapping between 3 drives (internal, internal expansion, and external SSD) would kind of suck.

I assume it sees it as a different drive.
Two likely options:
1) The system tests drive speed, then classifies it as either "storage-only" or "game viable" for PS5 games
2) All internal drives need to meet the speed test for playability or are rejected
 
I have a fiber connection so disk space is not a consideration at all for me.

Besides that's still plenty of space. God of War isn't even a full 50GB. You could fully install 13 AAA games before you start running low on space.
 
Last edited:
I have a fiber connection so disk space is not a consideration at all for me.

Besides that's still plenty of space. God of War isn't even a full 50GB. You could fully install 13 AAA games before you start running low on space.
Well no, you can't. The PS4 frequently complains about no having no space to install when you still have 40+GBs left to use.
I expect the PS5 will still have the same problem. So you really have even less space then you think.
 
Well no, you can't. The PS4 frequently complains about no having no space to install when you still have 40+GBs left to use.
I expect the PS5 will still have the same problem. So you really have even less space then you think.

the PS5 will not have this problem.
hell even the PS4 didn't have it untill Sony changed the way PS4 games update.
the whole "copying" shit after downloading Updates is something patched in like 3 years ago. older games don't have that.

what happens there is the system downloads the whole patch first and then installs it, and after that THE ENTIRE GAME gets copied and pasted basically (in order to defragment the data... which in theory makes loading faster but in reality this makes almost no real difference)
this is why even if you only download a 50MB update for a game, you still need free space of the size of the entire game in order to update it.
so 200GB Call of Duty needs 200GB of empty space to update each time.

on an SSD this will be completely useless and therefore removed.

BUT maybe PS4 games will still operate this way regardless since they are not designed for SSDs and might still need to go through this update process.

as for fresh game installs, I mean, I hope they change that as well, hell the Xbox 360 even had on the fly installation of games and so does the Xbox One, so you always only need marginally more space on the drive than the final game install ends up to be, vs. on PS4 where you need about twice the space of the final game install size.
 
Last edited:
Well no, you can't. The PS4 frequently complains about no having no space to install when you still have 40+GBs left to use.
I expect the PS5 will still have the same problem. So you really have even less space then you think.
Cerny specifically talks about this in his presentation and explains why it was bad on the PS4 and why it won't be on the PS5.
 
Well no, you can't. The PS4 frequently complains about no having no space to install when you still have 40+GBs left to use.
I expect the PS5 will still have the same problem. So you really have even less space then you think.
I hate this! Drives me nuts. Destiny is the worst for this too. You need 100+ gigs to install a 3 gig patch.

Also, games won't be smaller next generation, they will be larger.
 
Last edited:
i mean even if it turns out PS5 is pretty much identical to Series X in 3rd party games visually, this might push me to buying most games on Series X
 
Last edited:
Both the Series X and PS5 have "1TB" written on the box.

Isn't that technically false advertising?

are there official retail boxes of the PS5?
if so, yes and they should get sued if true... I kinda doubt they would do that tho, since that would be beyond stupid of them.

in the Series X it's not false advertising since it has a 1TB SSD.

SSD sizes never get listed with usable space but with total size
 
Last edited:
Both the Series X and PS5 have "1TB" written on the box.

Isn't that technically false advertising?

Technically true on series x, really really really misleading however manufacturers have gotten away with it for so long, not going to be an issue except for some stupid idiot looking for a payday.
Definitely false on PS5 so unlikely to happen.
 
Both the Series X and PS5 have "1TB" written on the box.

Since when for the PS5 exactly?
The images released of the box make no mention of storage capacity.
And given they have been upfront and specifically said it is a 825GB SSD (rather than trying to spin it as a "custom 1TB" or similar), I'd be very surprised if they had 1TB written on the box.
 
Last edited:
I have a fiber connection so disk space is not a consideration at all for me.

Besides that's still plenty of space. God of War isn't even a full 50GB. You could fully install 13 AAA games before you start running low on space.

Not to mention the option to deselect online mode when installing or downloading games. Big plus for me.
 
Ok so what do you want them to do? Increase it to 2TB so that the console can be $699? Come on people. Get an external drive and swap out the games. You people whining should really think about the benefits of having an SSD in the first place. Maybe that will calm you down a bit (who am I kidding?)
 
Last edited:
Ok so what do you want them to do? Increase it to 2TB so that the console can be $699? Come one people. Get an external drive and swap out the games. You people whining should really think about the benefits of having an SSD in the first place. Maybe that will calm you down a bit (who am I kidding?)

And not just any SSD. The best and fastest available, anywhere.
 
Who cares? Just use a USB 3.0 Extended Harddrive to swap games to and from the console as you use them, problem solved.
Yea but what about those fast load times, not very fast if you have to keep moving games around before you play. Also having to get a slow external hdd is just wasted money imo that could've gone to a bigger internal. its also more cumbersome for a console that's already massive.
 
Last edited:
there are faster drives available? Which one? The980 pro I thought couldn't becauseof its architecture?

there are some that already claim PS5 compatibility, which means they have to be faster, fast enough in fact to overcome the missing access levels the internal one has.
 
This is actually disappointing but super easy to get over. I will just have to prioritize and finish games. Not really a big deal.
 
there are some that already claim PS5 compatibility, which means they have to be faster, fast enough in fact to overcome the missing access levels the internal one has.
I'm not sure if that is true. Maybe someone else could chime in. I'm pretty sure there aren't drives that are faster yet.
 
Forgive me if it's been covered somewhere in the last 330 posts, but if the capacity is so low, and the possibility of games running from an external HDD is so high, what happens when you load a multiplayer game and one sod is playing from HDD? Everyone waits for that person to load in? Or does the console enforce something to not ruin the experience?
 
Forgive me if it's been covered somewhere in the last 330 posts, but if the capacity is so low, and the possibility of games running from an external HDD is so high, what happens when you load a multiplayer game and one sod is playing from HDD? Everyone waits for that person to load in? Or does the console enforce something to not ruin the experience?
The console simply won't allow next-gen games from anything external, as in hooked up to USB.

For internal we don't know what restrictions are actually in place; but at worst someone could put in a slower NVME drive, since that's all that would fit... but Sony might have put real restrictions in place like the OS does a quick speed test or something, we don't know yet. If they didn't, then the worst someone could do is still a pretty fast drive all things considered.
 
Last edited:
The console simply won't allow next-gen games from anything external, as in hooked up to USB.

For internal we don't know what restrictions are actually in place; but at worst someone could put in a slower NVME drive, since that's all that would fit... but Sony might have put real restrictions in place like the OS does a quick speed test or something, we don't know yet. If they didn't, then the worst someone could do is still a pretty fast drive all things considered.
That's good. I wonder if they will only allow certain NVME models to maintain a certain speed level for all. Can't allow the speed to be undermined within a year because no one can fit a game on.
 
That's good. I wonder if they will only allow certain NVME models to maintain a certain speed level for all. Can't allow the speed to be undermined within a year because no one can fit a game on.

Yeah I'm curious what will happen myself; Sony just hasn't said anything about it since the initial Cerny presentation where he indicated they will release a compatibility list but they don't expect to have that list ready until next year.

If it becomes a problem Sony can always patch into the firmware better "SSD testing" stuff. If I was a betting man, I'd bet the system isn't going to restrict the internal but leave it up to the users to use a drive that is fast enough to not expect problems. At least at launch.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone need more then 1 year of CoD installed anyways...
 
Last edited:
So what you guys don't talk about is the extra amount of space just isn't because of multi resume. It's to store paged memory. That's really the magic sauce behind both these new consoles. With the faster io you can quickly move data in and out of ram from the ssd. So of course to be able to do this you are going to need to allocate more space for the os than last gen. And since no one knows the sweet spot of how much.. I bet Sony is holding on to a big chunk of the ssd just for this.
 
With the faster io you can quickly move data in and out of ram from the ssd. So of course to be able to do this you are going to need to allocate more space for the os than last gen.

uhm, the Series X uses up significantly less space for its OS compared to the Xbox One tho, and that's with reserved space for quick resume. so the OS itself is a fuck ton smaller.

on Xbox One/One X you have 781GB of free space and on Series X you habe 802GB of free space.
21GB smaller on Series X

again, there's also space reserved on Series X for quick resume, which will be anywhere from 60 to 70 GB.

so the OS itself was shrunken down significantly
 
Last edited:
No...you're not.... the consumer could be buying the SSD for a PC... It is a card for use anywhere. IT IS NOT PROPRIETARY!!!

The most that anyone will see on the packaging is maybe something that indicates the drive is compatible with the PS5. Doesn't mean that Sony is going to make money off those drives though.
 
I don't think this will be a problem for me as there will be only one game on my PS5.










Demon's Souls baby!
 
The most that anyone will see on the packaging is maybe something that indicates the drive is compatible with the PS5. Doesn't mean that Sony is going to make money off those drives though.

what do you think about Oodle? When do you think we'll see it in games? Sounds pretty amazing.
 
It's disappointing but I can live on 660 GBs if file sizes aren't absolutely massive this gen. I had a 1TB ps4 pro and 1tb extra storage external hard drive and I had way more space than I ever needed.
 
What? The specs literally say 825gb


Since when have console ever listed the usable space on the spec sheet? Sounds like nonsense

Exactly. Every drive I've bought has never had the full storage space available. Hell, I literally just bought an 8TB external USB drive and after formatting it, PS had it at 7.23TB. I formatted a 10TB using NTFS in Windows and it's something like 9.35TB or something like that.

If the drive is 825GB, the total available capacity would be smaller off the bat and then there's the OS and whatever else it has on it (including Astro's Playroom in the retail box).
 
What? The specs literally say 825gb


Since when have console ever listed the usable space on the spec sheet? Sounds like nonsense

Just wanted to show you these people exisit on this very forum.
Customers smell bs if you list your console as 1tb you should get 1tb

64gb iPhone you get 64gb

boom

stop tricking and confusing your customers
 
Top Bottom