Peter Deming.
Bruh...
Twin Peaks S1 is cubism. It's emotionally evocative and instantly captivating, while also being surreal in a manner that both excites and unsettles.
S3 still has some good moments, but overall, it's more akin to the painter who shows off a blank canvas and says "This is art. I'm making a statement."
Listen to the most recent Idle Thumbs podcast for a pretty solid take on why patience is wearing thin (these guys ardently defended the previous episodes, but are starting to get tired of the BS): https://www.idlethumbs.net/twinpeaks/episodes/the-return-part-6
Listen to the most recent Idle Thumbs podcast for a pretty solid take on why patience is wearing thin (these guys ardently defended the previous episodes, but are starting to get tired of the BS): https://www.idlethumbs.net/twinpeaks/episodes/the-return-part-6
I was actually going to make a post about the owl ring and Mike but I never got around to it. That ring seems to be very important and is tied to Mike. He may ahve created it. Anyone who wears it arm goes numb. Teresa, Laura, and Dougie. Chet Desmond disappears when he touches it or so it seems.
The ring protects you from Bob. Laura is given the ring in a dream. It saved Laura from possession by Bob that is why he kills her.
The last person to have it was the real Dougie and Mike took it from him when Dougie was turned into a gold ball. I assume Dougie had it to protect himself from Bob. I suspect the next person to own the ring will be Rain Coop to protect him from DoppelCoop and Bob.
What I was trying to say was that this isn't the type of production that always allows for that kind of spontaneous creativity, that you can't use that to explain bad special effects when they might have been made by the VFX company.
I'm not the one suggesting that technical expertise is the enemy of creativity. I'm also not saying that the creators can't view the work as personal, it's just not the kind of work where of them could claim full ownership. The more conspiratorial the plot gets, the more it feels like Lynch is making a concession to his co-creator. There are scenes in this show that look like the kind of stuff Lynch would HATE to film, especially since the realities of TV production forced him to back down on his stance on product placement. The goofy hacking sequence brought to you by Microsoft® Surface might have been the most painfully unLynchian thing I've ever seen.
I will straight up admit to not being as hardcore or learned as many fans, but I've never understood this interpretation of the ring being for protection. I've always taken it to mean you're marked. Marked for death, or worse, in most known cases. Banks wears the ring and dies. Laura sees the ring in a dream and Cooper specifically tells her not to take it. Desmond touches it and vanishes, never to be heard from again. Now we know Dougie had it- but we don't even know the full scoop behind Dougie. I mean, yes it seems obvious Bob (or the evil Arm, or who knows) created him to prevent Mr. C from being taken back into the lodge. Which is fine, but how does that tie in to protecting Dougie from Bob? All we know for sure, all we see- is that Dougie ceases to exist. As does, in one form or another, everyone who comes in contact with that ring.
Am I missing a big piece of the puzzle here?
As for product placement. Lynch has clearly had to change his mind on it. Whatever. I get it. I don't like it, but it's not too out of the norm. It's products where they should be.
I feel like we're talking about different things. The originally quoted part of my post was referring to the idea that everything in this show looks the way it does due to Lynch's singular vision and his own style, which simply can't be the case due to the nature of collaborations (parts of it, sure, but it can't be used to deflect all criticism).Collaborations are collaborations for a reason. Frost and Lynch share the Twin Peaks universe. It is personal to both of them. They both bring different things to the table and understand to get TP you have to have both of those POVs. That doesn't make it any less personal. Compromise doesn't make art any less personal. A suggestion from somewhere outside yourself doesn't make it less personal.
We know Lynch thinks of getting ideas as catching fish.
Which is to say they come from out there somewhere and it's up to you to find them and use them. No one is without influence and people have these hard to explain connections to one another. That's a lot of words to say collaboration can be personal and shared. It's weird how art can do that.
As for product placement. Lynch has clearly had to change his mind on it. Whatever. I get it. I don't like it, but it's not too out of the norm. It's products where they should be.
By the way a thread on the Twin Peaks Reddit goes into product placement and someone captured a shot of a close-up of an Apple Macintosh portable in the original series. Season 2 episode 11, btw. Not too different from that Microsoft surface close-up.
We've only had recovering Coop for 3 1/2 episodes.
Patience.
It's weird to me that this episode was the breaking point for so many people. It had some awful scenes, like randomly throwing a dead kid at the audience, but Cooper made a ton of progress, Hawk most likely just found pages from Laura's diary, and we're heading to a major collision between Cooper and a psychotic hitman. It was probably one of the most grounded and plot-advancing episodes yet.
The kid dying was the highlight of the episode. It was a powerful scene, made Horne an instant super heel and laid down all sorts of potential plots
It's weird to me that this episode was the breaking point for so many people. It had some awful scenes, like randomly throwing a dead kid at the audience, but Cooper made a ton of progress, Hawk most likely just found pages from Laura's diary, and we're heading to a major collision between Cooper and a psychotic hitman. It was probably one of the most grounded and plot-advancing episodes yet.
It was tasteless, like so much else in the new Twin Peaks. Lynch is a weird old man with violence and bubble butts on his mind. Living proof that decades of meditation don't necessarily amount to anything.
I've watched the first three episodes a second time now. Probably gonna watch more tonight. It's a lot of fun, and clearer, on rewatch. Really happy with how the show is turning out.
It was tasteless, like so much else in the new Twin Peaks. Lynch is a weird old man with violence and bubble butts on his mind. Living proof that decades of meditation don't necessarily amount to anything.
So who was the magic drug dealer guy with the coin?
I feel I am loosing track of all these characters.
So who was the magic drug dealer guy with the coin?
I feel I am loosing track of all these characters.
That's three and a half hours dude.
These aren't short episodes.
id totally agree if this season was 10 episodes.
as it stands im willing to see where it goes
So much THIS. I'd argue that all of Lynch's works are more coherent a second time around...hell, the first Lynch film I saw was Blue Velvet and I hated it with a passion...little by little, I'd watch pieces of it and over time "learned" how to watch it. It's now an all-time favorite as is most of Lynch's works. Present day TP is no different....Although I've been enjoying them from the start, I do find rewatches much more enjoyable and, with Lynch, there is always more to dig into.
I love Dougie's ridiculous one liners haha
How does Kyle do it
Well so am I. I am just a bit worried.
Problem is it's hard to get excited for something like that with the pace of the show. For example, when Albert told Cole he "knew where she drinks" people were like "oh shit, do we finally get to see Diane!?!"... and the next episode rolls around and there's no sign of Cole, Albert or Diane.
Different strokes, I guess. I really liked the episode too, but I thought that scene was one of the worst yet. It was as openly and artificially manipulative as a laugh track.The kid dying was the highlight of the episode. It was a powerful scene, made Horne an instant super heel and laid down all sorts of potential plots
I really liked the episode.
Fair point, but at least the show is moving forward.Problem is it's hard to get excited for something like that with the pace of the show. For example, when Albert told Cole he "knew where she drinks" people were like "oh shit, do we finally get to see Diane!?!"... and the next episode rolls around and there's no sign of Cole, Albert or Diane.
imo the entire season is an 18 hour episode called "The Return".
Pretty much. I interpret it as "the return" of Dale Cooper, not "the return" of the show itself.
Dale's not breaking free of his current state until Part 17 or Part 18, y'all. Just you wait.
Dougie's ex-boxer boss is going to throw down with the assassin.But how will he survive? There's a killer.....I'm pretty sure braindead Coop transforms to normal Coop very soon.he needs a new weapon though
"the return" can also mean "return to Twin Peaks"
But how will he survive? There's a killer.....I'm pretty sure braindead Coop transforms to normal Coop very soon.he needs a new weapon though
"the return" can also mean "return to Twin Peaks"
One of the reasons I appreciate Mulholland Dr so much is it taught me to enjoy everyone scene for what it was. Don't worry so much about how it all adds up. Stay in the moment so when it's all done you can properly reflect on what you just saw. If you focus your mind on trying to connect the dots of what you are currently watching you are going to miss things.
That's not to say turn your brain off, just relax, stay focused on what's in front of you and take it in. Your mind will do a much better job of connecting things that way.
Dougie's ex-boxer boss is going to throw down with the assassin.
There's a third doppelganger, duh
Mainly you should interpret it as a marketing tagline, only slightly more "official" than the nonsensical German episode titles. According to the creators, it's just "Twin Peaks."Pretty much. I interpret it as "the return" of Dale Cooper, not "the return" of the show itself.
And then what? Is the stupid mutt going to kill itself because it couldn't take being a puppy?Besides, Rich was already established as the lowest of the low with his cartoonishly evil "I'm going to laugh while I fuck you!" introduction. It's like Lynch is going down a checklist of amateur insta-villain cliches. Maybe he'll kick a puppy next episode.
Basically. I think some of the frustration simply stems from this show not having neatly snipped episode arcs. It's a vignette style of storytelling (not new for Lynch) that's building towards something, maybe multiple things, but not always using traditionally satisfying story beats every 60 minutes. Sometimes things occur 20/30/40 minutes into episodes that would close the ep on another show. Hell, we've already seen the Diane build and reveal be strewn across multiple episodes without the typical "DUN DUN DUNNNNNN" dramatic payoff that it would've gotten from literally any other show on TV. These are pieces of a whole that are slowly coming together, but scene to scene atmosphere takes priority over a clear procedural and dramatic throughline.
And then what? Is the stupid mutt going to kill itself because it couldn't take being a puppy?
(Chad is wayyy worse than Little Dicky)
I think a Diane reveal is justified on the basis that even non-superfans who watched the show would be somewhat shocked to finally see the woman Cooper was referring to whenever he recorded his tapes.The Diane scene puzzles me. What was the point in the way that was done?
First they told they need to find someone and they know where she drinks. So, there's some sort of a mystery, but not really in any other way than that maybe superfans want to discuss if the woman is Diane. No other viewers really care.
Then nothing about that happens in the next episode.
In the next episode Albert goes to a bar where he ominously reveals he's looking for Diane, which, again, is not interesting to anyone else than the superfans.
We see the back of her head. The superfans anticipate who plays Diane. THe actress likely doesn't interest anyone else.
Then she slowly turns her head.
We see Laura Dern and that gets the superfans so excited. But there isn't anything more to it. She just says "hi, Albert" and that's it. And that it's Laura Dern.
It's as if the whole mystery about Diane was made for the superfans of both Twin Peaks and David Lynch. The Twin Peaks fans could be interested in seeing Diane but only Lynch superfans are interested that it's Laura Dern.
So, what's the point?
Personally for me that reveal was an anti-climax. Dern was expected and I was hoping for more surprising casting like Watts being Dougie's wife and Chrysta Bell being Tamara Preston. Everyone thought Bell would be a minor character somewhere and everyone was expecting Watts to be... well... something else than a normal housewife
Oh well, I'm not a Dern fan anyway so that could be one of the reasons I wasn't so excited about that reveal.